You Have the Power to Change the World


This is a great website for exploring Higher Consciousness and learning how to affect change in the world through thought, emotion and meditation. If only a portion of humanity united in consciousness and actively participated in daily, even weekly visualization techniques and meditation focused at dismantling the darker forces that have control over humanity. We have the power to bring this powerfully complex web of Darkness to it’s end.

Ya see, what people don’t understand, or don’t want to believe is that we have to power inside of us to change the world without violence, protesting, voting or even leaving the home! It’s all inside us, our minds have that power we just haven’t learned how to tap into it and use it for the good of humanity – we’re taught from childhood not to believe in powers of the mind, that our power is out side of ourselves in some God and anything else was hoodoo-voodoo, or wackodoodle.

Well, listen to the Svali interview to learn how they teach these children how to use the power of the mind to manipulate reality as well as their environment.

What we need to do is reclaim our power then rise up to vaporize the Dark Cabal in a conscious sea of Love & Divine Light, then everything they attempt will fail, accidents start happening and chaos ensues within the ranks of the DC, better known as the Illuminati.  And it’s already begun to happen…the swine flu HOAX was exposed and apparently in Europe the WHO is in trouble; massive shipment of vaccines vanished in Nov; the Detroit underwear bomber event failed to blow-up plane, although they succeeded in violating more rights with airport scanners; it appears Codex Alimentarius has hit snags as more people voice legal opposition to this draconian, predatory legislation

Apparently as more and more people wake up to what’s going on, their chances of succeeding are diminishing and they know it. And in the end the people will win against PTB…

UNIVERSAL
CONSCIOUSNESS
AND THE POWER TO CHANGE OUR WORLD

The
Network of Light Visualization Project

 

So much
we are bombarded daily with all the manipulation, destruction and diseases that
are continuously growing in our planet that lots of people and specially our
youngsters are losing hope and wondering what is the purpose of life, why should
they keep on the struggle.

Anybody
interested can find thousands of references of what is actually going on in
this website as well as many others that you will find in our links.

Well,
we think the time has actually come to join our energies, put our light and
love together, set aside our differences and let us all put an extra effort
to change our planet.

HOW?

The first
and most important basic requirement is let us each set aside our ego and personal
importance. Lets forget about this while we join on Fridays to do our recommended
Cosmic Visualization.

What we
need to do is study and understand (12 chapters on this information follows)
what is Universal Consciousness or Cosmic Awareness. Once we do this let us
dissolve with it and then let it manifest Divine love, peace, and higher vibrations
for the planet through using our beings. It is as simple as this.

It sounds
more difficult than it actually is. Imagine an artist, musician, or sculptor
doing a work of art some kind of creation. He is so deeply engrossed in it that
he forgets during this time his personal ego, his self importance.

So that
is what we are asking from all of us that desire to let go and lets join to
bring in light, a tremendous gigantic wave, network of light and lets cover
our whole planet with it, so that no space for any darkness is left.

Simple
as that. We highly suggest that you take a look at our Cosmic Law of Co-creation,
which informs us that: two have the power of four, three of nine, and 144 entities
joining together have the power to CHANGE THE WORLD!

Enjoy
and welcome to a New World and a New Beginning for Everyone!!

Change Starts With You, Tag You’re It!!  

Enter website here:

http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/start.htm

Svali: How the Illuminati Infiltrated and Controls Society


Eye-opening interview with Svali describes a child sacrifice she was forced to witness as her indoctrination into the Illuminati as a 12 year old, how the children are "programmed" and why the occult doesn’t get caught at child pornography, prostitution, drug running, ritual and satanic abuse. This is a fascinating interview and one that needs more mass exposure to wake people up to the truth of the great evil that humanity is up against.

"The sheep have no idea they’re being led by the nose"…The Illuminati

Svali Interview on Illuminati Practices

Illuminati and Ritual Abuse


After reading this material, sadly most of you will chose not to believe it
because that’s much easier than having to accept that we are facing a
great evil, a cancer that is eating away at the very morality and
virtuousness of this once great nation. Today American’s are completely
desensitized to violence, rape, murder and corruption until it touches
their own lives.

We also
want to believe the best in people and that evil in it’s true form
hides in far away places. As an empath, it’s very difficult for me to
understand the dark side of human nature and how people who seem
perfectly normal on the surface, are hiding a great evil that only the unlucky few ever witness. Or those who partner in their crimes of pedophilia, torture and ritual abuse.

As a
victim of violent crime, I can personally tell you that evil does not
discriminate and has a special thirst for those who shine a brighter
light.And it always disguises itself behind a smiling face….

The
following are confessions of a woman brought up in the ranks of the
Illuminati, the ruling elite that controls the leadership and economy’s
of the Western world. Her story has been vetted and she’s well-known for her courage and bravery in coming forward to expose this dark, sinister world. She’s also a victim
of horrible abuse, as most children in the Illuminati allegedly
experience for their "own good". She goes by the name of Svali and in
her own words, this is why she believes people continue to chose to
stay in denial:

Svali:
"The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does NOT want
to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way.

The
Franklin case is a point. How much evidence has come out? Or the
MK-Ultra documents that have been declassified, shown as real, and
people ignore it.

Okay,
I’ll get off my soapbox. But I believe that the media that downplays
ritual abuse is feeding into a deep need in the average person to NOT
know the reality. In fact, how can a person face the fact of great evil
in mankind, unless they have either a strong faith in God, or are faced
with insurmountable evidence? We as human beings want to believe the
BEST of our race, not the worst, IMHO.

I
really don’t believe people will do anything about the Illuminati even
if they know. Sorry for the cynicism, but it is based on a lifetime of
experience.

The Illuminists don’t
care who prints this stuff, or if they are "exposed" because
they are counting on the majority not believing it, having done a pretty
good job with a media blitz campaign (seen any articles in Newsweek or
Time lately that addresses this other than as a laughable conspiracy theory?
Guess who owns Time-Warner?).

I have heard them laughing
about this very thing in leadership meetings five years ago, and I doubt
their attitude has changed much since then. If people DID believe this,
if action could be taken, then I would be very surprised and quite happy."

Svali

The only
way we can fight is by uniting and never surrendering to fear. More and
more people are waking up to the fact that we’ve been living a lie, a
myth about who we are. Waking to the knowledge that we are all powerful
spiritual beings, living a human experience and will win this battle
against our spirit and help to save the children who continue to be
tortured and killed through ritual abuse.  The following link contains
material exposes the dark inner lives of the Illuminati, who they are
and how they’ve managed to stay in control for thousands of years.

Advisory:
This page contains disturbing testimony about the inner workings of the
Illuminati that may not be suitable for sensitive readers and children.

http://projectcamelot.org/svali.html


Take Action Against Bill Banning Vitamin and Nutritional Supplements


A bill has been introduced to the Senate that would drive up the cost of dietary supplements and restrict your access to them. This bill seeks to give the FDA arbitrary control over what supplements you are allowed to have.

This bill proposes to squander tax revenue, while burdening the private sector with oppressive laws that will hinder scientific advances and increase costs. The net effect will be to take away your free access to dietary supplements.

Pharmaceutical interests are obviously behind this latest effort to legislatively force more Americans towards expensive prescription drugs and away from natural ways of preventing degenerative disease. Along with millions of other people, if this law passes it will have an extremely detrimental effect on my health and bigpharma is well aware of that. Hence the reason for the bill….this is pure evil at work.

Profiting from health care should be entirely outlawed, we have an entire industry we entrusted with our best interests and now every thing they do is aimed at making us sick. Then bankrupting us and taking our homes, when we can’t pay the hospital bill.

Now that’s the American way, predatory capitalism at it’s finest! Please take action and pass this on to your friends – we must rise up en masse against this murderous bill, and that’s exactly what this is.

http://www.lef.org/featured-articles…ct-of-2010.htm

Glenn Beck exposed


Alex Jones exposes Glenn Becks trick to his fake tears and much more…the tape shows that Glenn works very hard to please his corporate masters that pay him $18 million a year to jump through hoops to keep you uninformed.

You be the judge, but you must watch to the end to get the whole picture

Personally, I’m sickened…as the daughter of a phd psychologist and one who has had direct experience with sociopaths, Beck is a textbook case. They can take a tidbit of the truth, then spin an elaborate lie around it and no one knows the difference until they get exposed. And if crying gets them what they want, they have no problem pulling out the crocodile tears. This is surely the sign of a criminal mind…

 I also have a degree in broadcasting and worked in radio for 3 years, you can’t believe a thing you hear or see on TV. Its ALL and illusion based on what sells.

Conversation with Andrew Basiago about Life on Mars


Alrighty my friends, put on a pot of coffee or tea for an enlightening
conversation with Andrew D. Basiago about the Hidden History of His
Discovery of Life on Mars. In this fascinating, six-hour interview, American lawyer Andrew
D. Basiago, 47, narrates the hidden history of his discovery of life on
Mars in 2008 and reveals the fact that by 1968 the US intelligence
community was already aware of aspects of his later Mars work.

Andy
relates his experiences in DARPAs Project Pegasus during the period
1969 to 1972, and describes probes to past and future events that he
took via teleportation and chronovision during the early days of
time-space exploration by the US government.

He confirms that
the United States has been teleporting individuals to Mars for decades,
and recounts the awe-inspiring and terrifying trips that he took to
Mars in 1981 after he was tapped to go there because he had teleported
as a child participant in Project Pegasus.
I first met Andy in July
2009 at ECETIs Science, Spirit and World Transformation Conference near
Mt. Adams, Washington, where we were both featured speakers.
During
his lecture, Andy shared numerous photographic images evidencing his
discovery of life on Mars, including many photos of humanoid beings,
different animal species, carved statues and built structures on Mars
that put him at the forefront of Mars research.
Throughout the
weekend, Andy lectured at his table to small groups of
conference-goers, who came and sat in rapt attention as he shared
stories about his experiences as a child in Project Pegasus, the secret
US research program in which time travel was the focus.
I know that,
like me, everybody who took part in those impromptu seminars was
certain that Andy is, as Bill Ryan of Project Camelot stated recently,
the real deal  a truth-teller with significant new information to
share about the real Philadelphia Experiment.
In this interview,
Andy tells the phenomenal story of seven briefings over 40 years in
which he was shown evidence of his destiny involving the discovery of
life on Mars, and explains how the emergence of time travel and this
epochal future event were interlinked.
According to Andy, by 1968,
the CIA was already teleporting individuals to the past and future to
retrieve artifacts there and bring them back while propagating
holograms of past and future events with devices called chronovisors to
also gather intelligence.
Incredibly, as a result of this quantum
access, in 1971 Andy was given a copy of his landmark paper The
Discovery of Life on Mars and asked to read and remember it, so that
when he wrote it, in 2008, it would contain as much data about Mars as
possible!
A book and film about Andys experiences in Project Pegasus
are in development and he will soon be featured by Project Camelot.
This must hear interview is an introduction to a major figure in the
Disclosure Movement and an emerging 21st century visionary, who is
fighting the good fight to bring his important story to light.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwE8m50sbWk

“The Tilting of the Earth Changes Everything


"The tilting of the earth changes everything"

Submitted by Ian Mauro on Wed, 11/25/2009

Arguably, the most bizarre, fascinating and perhaps groundbreaking of
all observations we’ve heard from Inuit is that they believe our world
has tilted on its axis and this contributes to climate change. When
Zacharias and I first heard this, we thought it was very strange, yet
elders in all the communities we’ve worked in – Pangnirtung, Iqaluit,
Resolute Bay and Igloolik – all believe this phenomenon to be true. In
today’s blog, we post a video from Igloolik elder Japiti Palluq talking
about the impacts of a tilted earth, and unpack the traditional
knowledge and science on this issue.

It’s been very interesting to see elders and hunters across Nunavut
make the same observation about the world having shifted on its axis.
In most cases, research participants were not prompted on the issue,
yet they began talking about it. Just today, we heard from another
interviewee that "the earth has tilted", and Zach looked and me and
jokingly said "did you tell him?". As a trained scientist, I know that
a key test for "truth" is the repeated replicability of a research
finding, independent of who is doing the test. Hearing Inuit across
Nunavut make the same observation, using their traditional ecological
knowledge, seems to pass this credo for scientific truth. So what data
are elders collecting and analyzing to draw this conclusion?

Elders across Nunavut have noticed that the sun and stars have changed
their position in the sky. The sun is now rising higher and staying
longer than it used to. Importantly, in the far north, you must
remember that the sun goes below the horizon for a large part of the
year, and therefore Inuit are very familiar with its celestial pattern.
Indeed, Inuit we’re talking with are telling us stories about how in
the old days, during the dark months, they would travel the land by dog
team using stars as their navigational tools. So, when Inuit talk about
the sun and stars, they do so with an intimate knowledge of these
systems.

We’ve heard that the earth has tilted in the direction of the sun.
Elders explain that this is why the sun is higher in the sky and there
is increased and more direct heat entering the Arctic ecosystem. As
Japiti explains, this has subsequently altered migratory routes of
animals, warmed the ocean water, and thinned the ice cover. While this
almost sounds like a fringe theory to obfuscate that fossil fuel use
increases greenhouse gases, it is actually something has just recently
been acknowledged by scientists.

When we began this project, I scanned the academic literature to see if
there was any scientific evidence to support Inuit claims that the
"earth has tilted" and thus causing climate change, but nothing
existed. Now that we’re in Igloolik, editing the film, and hearing this
observation repeatedly, I hit the literature again. And, to my surprise
and delight, two research studies have recently been published that
relate to the Inuit knowledge we are collecting with video.

Drysdale et al (2009) published a study in the prestigious journal
Science this past August that argues the Late Pleistocene
(approximately 141,000 years ago) glacial period came to an end because
of changes to the obliquity, or tilt, of the earth. Like Inuit, the
study states that this is a possible climate change hypothesis "because
of the relatively large and persistent increases in summer energy
reaching the high latitudes of both hemispheres during times of maximum
Earth tilt". Although Drysdale et al (2009) are discussing past climate
change, their findings seem to support present claims by Inuit that a
tilting earth may warm climate. In another study, published this past
September in Geophysical Research Letters, Landerer et al (2009)
indicate that the warming of oceans, exacerbated by melting glaciers
that flow into them, is causing "horizontal mass redistribution" of the
world’s seas. Essentially, the weight and position of the world’s
oceans have shifted, and this has literally caused the earth to shift
its position on its axis! In both the Drysdale (2009) and Landerer
(2009) studies, the authors argue that these phenomena have not been
previously reported, and that their findings offer new insights into
how scientists and society should think about climate
change and its causes and associated impacts.

Indeed, Inuit observations seem tied to the technical science of
long-term climate change, specifically the theory of the Milankovitch
Cycles, which seem to predict natural planetary warming and cooling
periods based on the position of the earth and its axis in relationship
to the sun. See Wikipedia for more details:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

In many ways, Inuit elders speak with the knowledge of astrophysicists
and environmental scientists all in one, and so I’m just trying to
catch up. I find it fascinating that for many years, elders and hunters
living on the land have been observing and talking about environmental
change that is now only being published by scholars working at the
cutting edge of science. Indeed, Inuit are climate change experts, and
their knowledge complements and in some ways surpasses scientific
understanding on this topic. We certainly hope that our work shows how
these two "ways of knowing" can work together to better understand
climate change, arguably the paramount issue of our time.

References:

Drysdale (2009). Evidence of obliquity forcing of glacial termination II. Science, 325, 1527-1528.

Landerer et al. (2009). Long-term polar motion excited by ocean thermal expansion. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, 1-5.
"
Video at:
http://www.isuma.tv/hi/en/inuit-know…ged-everything

Get Healthy A “Thank-You” a Day can keep sickness away!


The health benefits of gratitude, which is really the same thing as
love, are an amazing example of just how sturdy the bridge is between
the mind, body, and emotions. Research shows that heart-centered
feelings associated with gratitude, appreciation, and caring are health
enhancing. When you find one thing, however small, to be thankful for
and you hold that feeling for as little as 15–20 seconds, many subtle
and beneficial physiologic changes take place in your body:

* Stress hormone levels of cortisol and norepinephrine decrease,
creating a cascade of beneficial metabolic changes such as an enhanced
immune system.
* Coronary arteries relax, thus increasing the blood supply to your heart.
* Heart rhythm becomes more harmonious, which positively affects your mood and all other bodily organs.
* Breathing becomes deeper, thus increasing the oxygen level of your tissues.

Other scientific evidence that gratitude improves health comes from
research accumulated by Robert A. Emmons, professor of psychology at
the University of California, Davis. Emmons found that gratitude makes
you healthier, smarter, and more energetic. He also showed that people
practicing gratitude daily, such as writing in a gratitude journal,
reported higher levels of alertness, enthusiasm, determination,
attentiveness, and energy than those who didn’t.

If all of this happens when you focus for just 15–20 seconds on
something that brings you pleasure, joy, or a feeling of gratitude,
imagine what would happen to your health if you were able to cultivate
thoughts of appreciation on a consistent and regular basis.

Practice Makes Perfect

Cultivating gratitude, like maintaining strong muscles and bones, takes
discipline and will. That’s right. It takes practice to feel gratitude
and reap its physical and emotional benefits. There are valid
physiologic reasons why focusing on gratitude isn’t easy. Physically,
we humans evolved along with a nervous system wired to ensure our
survival by keeping us alerted to possible danger from the occasional
wild animal or violent storm—events that were relatively infrequent
within a life span. Now fast-forward that same nervous system to our
current era of mass media, when all of the possible dangerous events
from the entire planet are beamed into our living rooms day and night.
You can see why holding thoughts of appreciation is hard.

Get a piece of paper and list your blessings. Pay special attention to
the people who enhance your life on all levels, for example, the
checkout person at your favorite grocery store, the FedEx driver, or a
sunny, optimistic coworker. This exercise can literally change your
life. The more you notice the people and things you are grateful for,
the more of them you’ll attract. And thanking those who bestow these
blessings enriches your life in ways you never thought possible. And
also uplifts them.

In my book Women’s Bodies, Women’s Wisdom I wrote, “Thinking with your
heart takes practice, but if you faithfully learn to start thinking
with your heart and pay attention to areas of your life that bring you
joy and fulfillment, over time you will evoke biochemical changes in
your body that will recharge your batteries.” In addition to enhancing
your energy levels and reducing stress, recognizing and appreciating
life’s many blessings is one of the most powerful ways I know of to
enhance the immune system, balance your hormones, and promote heart
health.

Christiane Northrup, M.D., a board-certified ob/gyn, is a visionary
pioneer; beloved authority in women’s health and wellness. Dr. Northrup
now devotes her time to helping women truly flourish on all levels
through tapping into their inner wisdom. Website: www.DrNorthrup.com

source

http://www.healyourlife.com/author-dr-christiane-northrup/2009/12/l…

Mother Earth is not happy…


 

  This
is the beginning of a series I’m starting to log earth changes that are
taking place, there are many things happening that most people are
totally unaware of. The climate change scandal doesn’t mean that we
aren’t facing serious problems…I also encourage people to add your
own articles and input if you know of changes taking placae in your
area.

Here’s an article about islands off the coast of India that have lost over 10 square miles in land to the sea and area losing more by the day.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123733017

Chile, Chaiten Volcano activity causes Chile to raise Red Alert status.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/am…ano/index.html

2/18 6.9 Earthquake at China/North Korean Border

6.8 Quake in Eastern Indonesia (6.2 recorded by US Geological Survey) on 2/16/10.

Sure enough there was a 2.2 last week near Ramapo county NJ. Never
experienced any form of earthquake in my 22 years and we are definitely
not in an area that has them very frequently.

2nd week of February 3.0+ earthquake in Chicago area

Earthquake swarms in Yellowstone have been reported the last few months

Undersea Volcano Erupts, May Form New Island

National Geographic

Erupting from an undersea volcano some 745 miles south of Tokyo, smoke
and ash rise roughly 30 stories into the air in this image captured by
a Japan Coast Guard helicopter on February 3, 2010.

The helicopter’s mother ship, Yashima, was on a routine patrol when the
***utoku-Okanoba volcano exploded. There had been no warning that an
eruption was imminent, according to Keiji Doi, senior coordinator for
seismic information at the Japan Meteorological Agency.

"Coast Guard vessels and aircraft are now collecting data in the area,"
Doi said, adding that other ships have been warned to keep their
distance. "It is very dangerous to approach the area as it is
impossible to predict further eruptions."

Couple of nice photos on the story link.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n…47_600x450.jpg

On one of the farms in the south of
Poland,
water in one of the wells has the temperature of 50 degrees
Celsius. This phenomenon has not been explained as of yet. They checked
all the parameters and the water is suitable for drinking. it is not an
area of hot springs….

__________________


Cold wave in Florida

Iguanas, pythons and other non-native species are freezing to death as
temperatures plummet in the Sunshine State. Comatose iguanas have been
dropping from the trees and pythons have frozen to death in their
tracks in Florida’s unusually harsh winter, wildlife officials said
today. Parts of the Sunshine State saw their second snowfall of the
season this weekend, with the extended cold spells killing off a host
of tropical intruders, including iguanas, Burmese and African pythons
and invasive fish. State wildlife officials said more than half of the
green iguanas, which are native to South America, could have been
killed off. "The iguanas up in the trees just got so cold, they kind of
went very, very sluggish, and just fell down," said Jenny Tinnell, a
biologist with Florida’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Residents of south Florida, who have discovered the animals on their
patios, have tried to warm them back to life. Local newspapers,
meanwhile, have been warning homeowners not to let their dogs gnaw on
iguana corpses, which may be poisonous. In the Everglades, trackers
licensed by the state have discovered the decaying corpses of three
African rock pythons, which can reach over 20ft and can kill people.
State officials believe up to half of the Burmese pythons have also
died, along with large numbers of invasive fish. The python die-off
could be helpful to wildlife officials. The alien constrictors, many of
them abandoned pets, have been taking over portions of the Everglades,
threatening native species. Last month, the Obama administration said
it was considering a ban on nine species of giant snake. "The fish and
wildlife commission has no problem with nature naturally knocking back
those populations," said Tinnell. But the harsh winter is also harming
natives such as the manatee, which is an endangered species. Long
periods of cold weaken their immune systems. Officials said about 200
manatee carcasses have washed up on shore since the beginning of the
year. Dozens of crocodiles have also died. The extreme temperatures
also prompted a rescue effort last month for endangered sea turtles.
Officials plucked more than 4,000 from chilly waters, bathing them in
warm salt water to revive them.

http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/woalert_read.php?cid=24946

Surveillance Drones To Zap Protesters Into Submission By Paul Joseph Watson


Global Research, February 14, 2010
Prison Planet – 2010-02-12

Illustrating
once again that the prison planet being built around us far outstrips
anything Aldous Huxley or George Orwell ever imagined, a Wired News
report details how police forces worldwide are preparing to unveil
drone aircraft that can not only conduct surveillance of protesters,
but also zap them into submission with non-lethal weapons.

As part of their ongoing mission to “protect and
serve” the new world order, cops across the world are getting access to
military drones which allow them to “carry out surveillance on everyone
from protesters and antisocial motorists to fly-tippers,” reports Wired News.

The report details how the future of policing will resemble something approaching a combination of They Live and The Running Man, with unmanned drones replacing police helicopters whizzing around everywhere torturing and knocking out anyone who misbehaves.

According
to the report, this is a natural progression from CCTV cameras that
shout at passers-by, currently deployed in several UK cities, only now
drones will be fitted with LRAD acoustic devices, torture sound weapons
that were indiscriminately used and abused during the G20 summit in Pittsburgh
on innocent members of the public who were just walking down the street
and had not even dared to engage in the criminal activity of expressing
their First Amendment right to assemble.

“The LRAD has been tested on the Austrian S-100
unmanned helicopter, and the technology is ready if there is a police
requirement,” states the article.

Also available to police will
be a drone that can fire tear gas as well as rubber pellets to disperse
anyone still living under the delusion that they were born in a
democratic country.

“French company Tecknisolar Seni has demonstrated a
portable drone armed with a double-barrelled 44mm Flash-Ball gun,”
states the report. “Used by French special police units, the one-kilo
Flash-Ball resembles a large calibre handgun and fires non-lethal
rounds, including tear gas and rubber impact rounds to bring down a
suspect without permanent damage — “the same effect as the punch of a
champion boxer,” claim makers Verney-Carron.”

Of course the fact that the Flash-Ball devices have caused “permanent damage” in the form of head injuries is glossed over.

Another option will be a mini-flying saucer drone
fitted with a Taser gun, primed to shoot 50,000-volts into anyone who
refuses to bow down at the feet of global government.

“Taser stun guns are now so light (about 150 grams)
that they could be mounted on the smaller drones. Antoine di Zazzo,
head of SMP Technologies, which distributes tasers in France, says the
company is fitting one to a small quad-rotor iDrone (another quad-rotor
toy helicopter), which some have called a “flying saucer”.

Since police routinely use Tasers as a method of
“pain compliance,” ie torture, and not in genuinely threatening
situations, abuse of the devices is widespread in every country that
has introduced them. Since June 2001, over 350 people have died in the United States
after being hit with these “non-lethal weapons”. Imagine how incidents
of abuse would skyrocket once the personal element of using a Taser is
removed and they are strapped to marauding surveillance drones,
eliminating any responsibility for deaths and injuries that occur.

Why not just equip the drones with hellfire missiles
and have done with it? Now it’s admitted that the authorities treat any
dissenter, any protester, anyone who questions the system, even anyone
who takes a photograph in public as a terrorist, why not just blow us
all away like they do to “insurgents” in Afghanistan?

The fact that every one of these fascistic and
futuristic tools of enslavement is being primed to be used mainly
against protesters only confirms that the police state is not coming,
it’s not some future threat, it’s here in 2010 – we’re living in a
world that does not tolerate dissent against its overlords, we’re truly
living on a prison planet.


URL: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17609

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation


Aside from the corporate, institutionalized mass media being reduced to
just another tool for propaganda and controlled information, the reason
the majority of Americans stay misinformed and ignorant of the facts is
that those who are newsmakers… the politicians, Wall Street moguls
and corporate CEO’s and their PR machines all are masters at
disseminating misinformation that purposely keep the masses confused
and ignorant of the facts. People no longer have the time, nor the
attention span to research at an investigative level the endless bits
of data coming at us to be able connect the dots. So instead they
listen to sound bites designed to stir emotions and lead people away
from the facts.

Well next time your listening to a news report or an interview, there
are tricks of the trade used to lead people off the track and here’s
how they do it…here’s a fascinating and eye opening look at 25 ways
to Suppress the Truth, it’s like they worked on getting this down to a
science! You can clearly see how people are manipulated to believe lies
unless they’re very perceptive and work hard to dig for the truth….

Here’s a link to the story if the email gets difficult to read.

http://prernalal.com/banned%20books/25%20Ways%20To%20Suppress%20Truth%20-%20The%20Rules%20of%20Disinformation%20-%20Michael%20Sweeney.pdf

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

by H. Michael Sweeney
copyright © 1997 All rights reserved
Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial
use provided information reproduced in its entirety and with author
information in tact.

For more related info, visit the Light vs. Shadow home page: http://www.teleport.com/~sweenfam/lightshadow.html

Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin,
the following may be useful to the initiate in the world of dealing
with truth, lies, and suppression of truth when serious crimes are
studied in public forums. Where the crime involves a conspiracy, or a
conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be a
disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and
expose the conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists
tend to apply, as revealed here. Also included with this material are
seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also prove useful
in identifying players and motives. The more a particular party fits
the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they
are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive.

Understand that when the those seeking resolution of such crimes
proceed in attempting to uncover truth, they try their best to present
factual information constructed as an argument for a particular chain
of evidence towards a particular solution to the crime. This can be a
largely experimental process via trial and error, with a theory
developed over time to perfection or defeated by the process. This is
their most vulnerable time, the time when a good disinfo artist can do
the greatest harm to the process.

A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will
evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are
solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further
development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more
links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if
parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a particular link
was merely supportive, but not in itself key) the argument. The game is
played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably
to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo
artist to at least make people think the links are weak or broken when,
in truth, they are not.
It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break
the chain of evidence, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is
broken either a new link must be forged, or a whole new chain
developed, or the basis is lost, but truth still wins out. There is no
shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed chain if done with
honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it
is understandable that a person
can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given
issue, it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But
the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize and chastise any failure
(real or false claims thereof), and will seek to prevent new links from
being forged by a kind of intimidation.
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull his strings who stand
to suffer should the crime be solved, and therefore, who stand to
benefit should it be the opposite outcome. In ANY such case, they MUST
seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of
evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on
their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are
professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence
community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at
least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and
observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not
well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by
these time-proven tactics.
The overall aim is to avoid discussing links in the chain of evidence
which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever
deceptions or lies to make the links seem weaker than they are, or
better still, cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted
in any number of ways, including the method of questioning the
credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact,
regardless of the source. Truth is truth, regardless of the source.
This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals.
Where a motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the
testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely invalid. Were a known
"liar’s" testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it
might certainly be of questionable value, but if the testimony
(argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it
matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are, or if
they have lied in the past or even if motivated to lie in this instance
— the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit
and their part in the matter will merely be supportive.
Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper
letters to the editor, and Internet chat and news groups, the disinfo
type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics
of discussion are generally attempts by individuals to cause other
persons to become interested in their own particular problem, position,
or idea — usually ideas, postulations, or theories which are in
development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding
board and in hopes of pollenization to better form their ideas. Where
such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested groups
(especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has
yet another role — the role of nipping it in the bud. They also seek
to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than
credible should any possible future confrontation in more public forums
result due to successes in seeking a final truth. You can often spot
the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher
standards" of discussion than necessarily warranted. They will demand
that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the
same level of expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative
writer. Anything less renders any discussion meaningless and unworthy
in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid.
So, as you read here in the NGs the various discussions on various
matters, decide for yourself when a rational argument is being applied
and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or
trickery is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the later freely. They
(both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray, and those who are
simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus
illuminated, or — put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a
perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal). Here
are the twenty-five methods and six traits, some of which don’t apply
directly to NG application. Each contains a simple example in the form
of actual paraphrases form NG comments or commonly known historical
events, and a proper response. Accusations should not be overused –
reserve for repeat offenders and those who use multiple tactics.
Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational
sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily
dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the complete rule rather
than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to
provide a complete copy of the rule set upon request (see permissions
statement at end):
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation)
rules are generally not directly within the ability of the traditional
disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly
by those at the leadership, key players, or planning level of the
criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you
know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news
anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have
to deal with the issues.
Example: Media was present in the courtroom when in Hunt vs. Liberty
Lobby when CIA agent Marita Lorenz "confession" testimony regarding CIA
direct participation in the planning and assassination of John Kennedy
was revealed. All media reported is that E. Howard Hunt lost his liable
case against Liberty Lobby (Spotlight had reported he was in Dallas
that day and were sued for the story). See Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial
for the full confessional transcript.
Proper response: There is no possible response unless you are aware of
the material and can make it public yourself.. In any such attempt, be
certain to target any known silent party as likely complicit in a cover
up.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and
instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being
critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also
known as the "How dare you!" gambit.
Example: "How dare you suggest that the Branch Davidians were murdered!
the FBI and BATF are made up of America’s finest and best trained law
enforcement, operate under the strictest of legal requirements, and are
under the finest leadership the President could want to appoint."
Proper response: You are avoiding the Waco issue with disinformation
tactics. Your high opinion of FBI is not founded in fact. All you need
do is examine Ruby Ridge and any number of other examples, and you will
see a pattern that demands attention to charges against FBI/BATF at
Waco. Why do you refuse to address the issues with disinformation
tactics (rule 2 – become incredulous and indignant)?
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all
charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild
accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may
work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent
press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are
through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with
the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have
no basis in fact.
"You can’t prove his material was legitimately from French
Intelligence. Pierre Salinger had a chance to show his ‘proof’ that
flight 800 was brought down by friendly fire, and he didn’t. All he
really had was the same old baseless rumor that’s been floating around
the Internet for months."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. The Internet charge reported widely is based on a single FBI
interview statement to media and a supportive statement by a
Congressman who has not actually seen Pierre’s document. As the FBI is
being accused in participating in a cover up of this matter and Pierre
claims his material is not Internet sourced, it is natural that FBI
would have reason to paint his material in a negative light. For you to
assume the FBI to have no bias in the face of Salinger’s credentials
and unchanged stance suggests you are biased. At the best you can say
the matter is in question. Further, to imply that material found on
Internet is worthless is not founded. At best you may say it must be
considered carefully before accepting it, which will require addressing
the actual issues. Why do you refuse to address these issues with
disinformation tactics (rule 3 – create rumor mongers)?
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s
argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and
the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply
exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent
arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest
charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which
appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while
actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Example: When trying to defeat reports by the Times of London that
spy-sat images reveal an object racing towards and striking flight 800,
a straw man is used. "If these exist, the public has not seen them."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. You imply deceit and deliberately establish an impossible and
unwarranted test. It is perfectly natural that the public has not seen
them, nor will they for some considerable time, if ever. To produce
them would violate national security with respect to intelligence
gathering capabilities and limitations, and you should know this. Why
do you refuse to address the issues with such disinformation tactics
(rule 4 – use a straw man)?
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also
known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods
qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with
unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-
wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia",
"racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This
makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label,
and you avoid dealing with issues.
Example: "You believe what you read in the Spotlight? The Publisher,
Willis DeCarto, is a well-known right-wing racist. I guess we know your
politics — does your Bible have a swastika on it? That certainly
explains why you support this wild-eyed, right- wing conspiracy theory."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your imply guilt by association and attack truth on the basis
of the messenger. The Spotlight is well known Populist media source
responsible for releasing facts and stories well before mainstream
media will discuss the issues through their veil of silence. Why do you
refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics
(rule 5 – sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule)?
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your
opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer
can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well
in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady
stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain
criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never
discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for
that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
Example: "This stuff is garbage. Where do you conspiracy lunatics come
up with this crap? I hope you all get run over by black helicopters."
Notice it even has a farewell sound to it, so it won’t seem curious if
the author is never heard from again.
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your comments or opinions fail to offer any meaningful dialog
or information, and are worthless except to pander to emotionalism, and
in fact, reveal you to be emotionally insecure with these matters. Why
do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation
tactics (rule 6 – hit and run)?
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to
imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or
other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the
defensive.
Example: "With the talk-show circuit and the book deal, it looks like you can make a pretty good living spreading lies."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your imply guilt as a means of attacking the messenger or his
credentials, but cowardly fail to offer any concrete evidence that this
is so. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such
disinformation tactics (rule 6 – question motives)?
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with
authority and present your argument with enough "jargon" and "minutia"
to illustrate you are "one who knows", and simply say it isn’t so
without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing
sources.
"You obviously know nothing about either the politics or strategic
considerations, much less the technicals of the SR-71. Incidentally,
for those who might care, that sleek plane is started with a pair of
souped up big-block V-8’s (originally, Buick 454 C.I.D. with dual 450
CFM Holly Carbs and a full-race Isky cams — for 850 combined BHP @
6,500 RPM) using a dragster-style clutch with direct-drive shaft.
Anyway, I can tell you with confidence that no Blackbird has ever been
flown by Korean nationals have ever been trained to fly it, and have
certainly never overflown the Republic of China in a SR or even
launched a drone from it that flew over China. I’m not authorized to
discuss if there have been overflights by American pilots."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your imply your own authority and expertise but fail to
provide credentials, and you also fail to address issues and cite
sources. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such
disinformation tactics (rule 8 – invoke authority)?
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered,
avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any
sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or
support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
Example: "Nothing you say makes any sense. Your logic is idiotic. Your
facts nonexistent. Better go back to the drawing board and try again."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your evade the issues with your own form of nonsense while
others, perhaps more intelligent than you pretend to be, have no
trouble with the material. Why do you refuse to address the issues by
use of such disinformation tactics (rule 9 – play dumb)?
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw
man — usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone
will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt
with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man
issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial
contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new
ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original
charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address
current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was
involved with the original source.
Example: "Flight 553’s crash was pilot error, according to the NTSB
findings. Digging up new witnesses who say the CIA brought it down at a
selected spot and were waiting for it with 50 agents won’t revive that
old dead horse buried by NTSB more than twenty years ago."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your ignore the issues and imply they are old charges as if
new information is irrelevant. Why do you refuse to address the issues
by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 10 – associate charges with
old news)?
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter
or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" with candor
that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that
opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of
proportion and imply greater criminalities which, "just isn’t so."
Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this
can garner sympathy and respect for "coming clean" and "owning up" to
your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
Example: "Reno admitted in hindsight she should have taken more time to
question the data provided by subordinates on the deadliness of CS-4
and the likely Davidian response to its use, but she was so concerned
about the children that she elected, in what she now believes was a sad
and terrible mistake, to order the tear gas be used."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your evade the true issue by focusing on a side issue in an
attempt to evoke sympathy. Perhaps you did not know that CIA Public
Relations expert Mark Richards was called in to help Janet Reno with
the Waco aftermath response? How warm and fuzzy feeling it makes us, so
much so that we are to ignore more important matters? Why do you refuse
to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 11 -
establish and rely upon fall-back positions)?
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of
events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events,
paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those
otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly
without having to address the actual issues.
Example: "I don’t see how you can claim Vince Foster was murdered since
you can’t prove a motive. Before you could do that, you would have to
completely solve the whole controversy over everything that went on in
the White House and Arkansas, and even then, you would have to know a
heck of a lot more about what went on within the NSA, the Travel
Office, and on, and on, and on. It’s hopeless. Give it up."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your completely evade issues and attempt others from daring to
attempt it by making it a much bigger mountain than necessary. Why do
you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics
(rule 12 – enigmas have no solution)?
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by
reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that
forbears any actual material fact.
Example: "The news media operates in a fiercely competitive market
where stories are gold. This means they dig, dig, dig for the story –
often doing a better job than law enforcement. If there was any
evidence that BATF had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing,
they would surely have uncovered it and reported it. They haven’t
reported it, so there can’t have been any prior knowledge. Put up or
shut up."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your backwards logic does not work here. Has media reported
CIA killed Kennedy when they knew it? No, despite their presence at a
courtroom testimony "confession" by CIA operative Marita Lornez in a
liable trial between E. Howard Hunt and Liberty Lobby, they only told
us the trial verdict. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of
such disinformation tactics (rule 13 – Alice in Wonderland logic)?
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents
to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best items
qualifying for rule 10.
Example: "Since you know so much, if James Earl Ray is innocent as you
claim, who really killed Martin Luther King, how was it planned and
executed, how did they frame Ray and fool the FBI, and why?"
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. It is not necessary to completely resolve any full matter in
order to examine any relative attached issue. Why do you refuse to
address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 14 -
demand complete solutions)?
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative
thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in
place.
Example: The best definitive example of avoiding issues by this
technique is, perhaps, Arlan Specter’s Magic Bullet from the Warren
Report.
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your imaginative twisting of facts rivals that of Arlan
Specter’s Magic Bullet in the Warren Report. We all know why the magic
bullet was invented. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of
such disinformation tactics (rule 15 – invoke authority)?
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
Example: "You can’t say Paisley is still alive… that his death was
faked and the list of CIA agents found on his boat deliberately placed
there to support a purge at CIA. You have no proof. Why can’t you
accept the Police reports?" True, since the dental records and autopsy
report showing his body was two inches two long and the teeth weren’t
his
were lost right after his wife demanded inquiry, and since his body was
cremated before she could view it – – all that remains are the Police
Reports. Handy.
Proper response: There is no suitable response to actual vanished
materials or persons, unless you can shed light on the matter,
particularly if you can tie the event to a cover up or other
criminality. However, with respect to dialog where it is used against
the discussion, you can respond… You are avoiding the issue with
disinformation tactics. The best you can say is that the matter is in
contention based on highly suspicious matters which themselves tend to
support the primary allegation. Why do you refuse to address the
remaining issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 16 -
vanish evidence and witnesses)?
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other
ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with
abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a
new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions
who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion
arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
Example: "There were no CIA drugs and was no drug money laundering
through Mena, Arkansas, and certainly, there was no Bill Clinton
knowledge of it because it simply didn’t happen. This is merely an
attempt by his opponents to put Clinton off balance and at a
disadvantage in the election because Dole is such a weak candidate with
nothing to offer that they are desperate to come up with something to
swing the polls. Dole simply has no real platform." Response. "You
idiot! Dole has the clearest vision of what’s wrong with Government
since McGovern. Clinton is only interested in raping the economy, the
environment, and every woman he can get his hands on…" One naturally
feels compelled, regardless of party of choice, to jump in defensively
on that one…
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your evade discussion of the issues by attempting to sidetrack
us with an emotional response — a trap which we will not fall into
willingly. If you truly believe such political rhetoric, please drop
out of this discussion, as it is not germane unless you can provide
concrete facts to support your contentions of relevance. Why do you
refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics
(rule 17- change the subject)?
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do
anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into
emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and
overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less
coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first
instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you
can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how "sensitive they
are to criticism".
Example: "You are such an idiot to think that possible — or are you
such a paranoid conspiracy buff that you think the ‘gubment’ is cooking
your pea-brained skull with microwaves, which is the only justification
you might have for dreaming up this drivel." After a drawing an
emotional response: "Ohhh… I do seemed to have touched a sensitive
nerve. Tsk, tsk. What’s the matter? The truth too hot for you to
handle? Perhaps you should stop relying on the Psychic Friends Network
and see a psychiatrist for some real professional help…"
Proper response: "You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. You attempt to draw me into emotional response without
discussion of the issues. If you have something useful to contribute
which defeats my argument, let’s here it — preferably without snide
and unwarranted personal attacks, if you can manage to avoid sinking so
low. Your useless rhetoric serves no purpose here if that is all you
can manage. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such
disinformation tactics (rule 18 – emotionalize, antagonize, and goad
opponents)?
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a
variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be
presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material
irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come
by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something
which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder
weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you
to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid
sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that
statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or
relevance.
Example: "All he’s done is to quote the liberal media and a bunch of
witnesses who aren’t qualified. Where’s his proof? Show me wreckage
from flight 800 that shows a missile hit it!"
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. You presume for us not to accept Don Phillips, reporter for
the Washington Post, Al Baker, Craig Gordon or Liam Pleven, reporters
for Newsday, Matthew Purdy or Matthew L. Wald, Don Van Natta Jr.,
reporters for the New York Times, or Pat Milton, wire reporter for the
Associated Press — as being able to tell us anything useful about the
facts in this matter. Neither would you allow us to accept Robert E.
Francis, Vice Chairman of the NTSB, Joseph Cantamessa Jr., Special
Agent In Charge of the New York Office of the F.B.I., Dr. Charles
Wetli, Suffolk County Medical Examiner, the Pathologist examining the
bodies, nor unnamed Navy divers, crash investigators, or other cited
officials, including Boeing Aircraft representatives a part of the
crash investigative team — as a qualified party in this matter, and
thus, dismisses this material out of hand. Good logic, — about as good
as saying 150 eye witnesses aren’t qualified. Only YOUR are qualified
to tell us what to believe? Witnesses be damned? Radar tracks be
damned? Satellite tracks be damned? Reporters be damned? Photographs be
damned? Government statements be damned? Is there a pattern here?. Why
do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation
tactics (rule 19 – ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs)?
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues
designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as
useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This
works best when the crime was designed with
contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
Example: Jack Ruby warned the Warren Commission that the white Russian
separatists, the Solidarists, were involved in the assassination. This
was a handy "confession", since Jack and Earl were both on the same
team in terms of the cover up, and since it is now known that Jack
worked directly with CIA in the assassination.
Proper response: This one can be difficult to respond to unless you see
it clearly, such as in the following example, where more is known today
than earlier in time… You are avoiding the issue with disinformation
tactics. Your information is known to have designed to side track this
issue. As revealed by CIA operative Marita Lorenz under oath offered in
court in E. Howard Hunt vs. Liberty Lobby, CIA operatives met with Jack
Ruby in Dallas the night before the assassination of JFK to distribute
guns and money. Clearly, Ruby was a coconspirator whose "Solidarist
confession" was meant to sidetrack any serious investigation of the
murder. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such
disinformation tactics (rule 20 – false evidence)?
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered
investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and
effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion.
Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret
when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting
attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that
the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once
a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the
guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking
to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially
closed.
Example: According to one OK bombing Grand Juror who violated the law
to speak the truth, jurors were, contrary to law, denied the power of
subpoena of witness of their choosing, denied the power of asking
witnesses questions of their choosing, and relegated to hearing only
evidence prosecution wished them to hear, evidence which clearly seemed
fraudulent and intended to paint conclusions other than facts actually
suggested.
Proper response: There is usually no adequate response to this tactic
except to complain loudly at any sign of its application, particularly
with respect to any possible cover up.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s),
author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new
ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony
which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address
issues, you can do so authoritatively.
Example: The False Memory Syndrome Foundation and American Family
Foundation and American and Canadian Psychiatric Associations fall into
this category, as their founding members and/or leadership include key
persons associated with CIA Mind Control research. Not so curious,
then, that (in a perhaps oversimplified explanation here)
these organizations focus on, by means of their own "research findings", that there is no such thing as Mind Control.
Proper response: Unless you are in a position to be well versed in the
topic and know of the background and relationships involved in the
opponent organization, you are well equipped to fight this tactic.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be
working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media
coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news
stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
Example: To distract the public over the progress of a WTC bombing
trial that seems to be uncovering nasty ties to the intelligence
community, have an endless discussion of skaters whacking other skaters
on the knee. To distract the public over the progress of the Waco
trials that have the potential to reveal government sponsored murder,
have an O.J. summer. To distract the public over an ever disintegrating
McVeigh trial situation and the danger of exposing government
involvements, come up with something else (any day now) to talk about
— keeping in the sports theme, how about sports fans shooting referees
and players during a game and the whole gun control thing?
Proper response: The best you can do is attempt to keep public debate
and interest in the true issues alive and point out that the "news
flap" or other evasive tactic serves the interests of your opponents.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider
removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that
the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their
death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their
character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper
intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
Example: As experienced by certain proponents of friendly fire theories
with respect to flight 800 — send in FBI agents to intimidate and
threaten that if they persisted further they would be subject to
charges of aiding and abetting Iranian terrorists, of failing to
register as a foreign agents, or any other trumped up charges. If this
doesn’t work, you can always plant drugs and bust them.
Proper response: You have three defensive alternatives if you think
yourself potential victim of this ploy. One is to stand and fight
regardless. Another is to create for yourself an insurance policy which
will point to your opponents in the event of any unpleasantness, a
matter which requires superior intelligence information on your
opponents and great care in execution to avoid dangerous pitfalls (see
The Professional Paranoid by this author for suggestions on how this
might be done). The last alternative is to cave in or run (same thing).
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly
illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the
issues, vacate the kitchen.
Example: Do a Robert Vesco and retire to the Caribbean. If you don’t,
somebody in your organization may choose to vanish you the way of Vince
Foster or Ron Brown.
Proper response: You will likely not have a means to attack this
method, except to focus on the vanishing in hopes of uncovering it was
by foul play as part of a deliberate cover up.
Note: There are other ways to attack truth, but these listed are the
most common, and others are likely derivatives of these. In the end,
you can usually spot the professional disinfo players by one or more of
seven distinct traits:
1) They never actually discuss issues head on or provide constructive
input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials.
Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually
everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert
knowledge in the matter without any further justification for
credibility.
2) They tend to pick and choose their opponents carefully, either
applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive
of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are
known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become
argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the
commentator as well.
3) They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a
controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in
general discussion in the particular public arena. They likewise tend
to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were
likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with
the reason.
4) They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs
or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but
there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this
sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players
will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or
other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
5) Their disdain for "conspiracy theorists" and, usually, for those who
in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they
hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending
a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might
think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every
topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one
might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their
actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
6) An odd kind of "artificial" emotionalism and an unusually thick skin
— an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming
criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence
community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny
everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net
result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most
people, if responding
in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their
presentation. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the
"image" and are hot and cold with respect to emotions they pretend to
have and the more calm or normal communications which are not
emotional. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to "act their
role in type" as well in a communications medium as they might be able
in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have
outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more
anger later — an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned,
no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they
will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any
adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game
— where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think
might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so
forth.
7) There is also a tendacy to make mistakes which betray their true
self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it
may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really
root for the side of truth deep within. I have noted that often, they
will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and
the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot,
but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent
style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too
many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no
knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand
knowledge of it.
I close with the first paragraph of the introduction to my book, Fatal Rebirth:
Truth cannot live on a diet of secrets, withering within entangled
lies. Freedom cannot live on a diet of lies, surrendering to the veil
of oppression. The human spirit cannot live on a diet of oppression,
becoming subservient in the end to the will of evil. God, as truth
incarnate, will not long let stand a world devoted to such evil.
Therefore, let us have the truth and freedom our spirits require… or
let us die seeking these things, for without them, we shall surely and
justly perish in an evil world.

http://prernalal.com/banned%20books/25%20Ways%20To%20Suppress%20Truth%20-%20The%20Rules%20of%20Disinformation%20-%20Michael%20Sweeney.pdf

Whistleblower Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, Ike’s Great-Granddaughter, outs secret Mars Colony Project


This is an amazing account from the Great Grand Daughter of President
Eisenhower, Laura Magdalene Eisenhower exposes secret Mars colony.
Those of us who have investigated whistleblower testimony have heard
repeated accounts of a colony on Mars inhabited with humans from Earth,
as well as humanoid and other extraterrestrial races from the star
systems of Sirius, Orion and Zeta Reticula among others. Laura’s
grandfather Ike signed a treaty for technology in 1954 with an alien
faction and lived to regret it.

She discusses is teleportation devices which transport an object or
individual from one location to another almost instantaneously, like Star
Trek "Beam me up Scotty". Yep we have an operational "Jumproom to
Mars", they’re real and the technology WILL revolutionize
transportation once free energy technologies are no longer being
suppressed by the energy company’s who have a stranglehold on us with
oil, coal and gas. We’ve had teleportation technology since the
1960’s…it took me some time to process much of this information when
I first began learning about it last summer. The most shocking to learn
was that there’s life on Venus, a highly advanced technological
civilization that’s been visiting Earth for thousands, if not millions
of years.

It seems that bloodlines are a very important factor with the ruling
elite and the bloodlines of the world leaders can be traced back
thousands of years, and much of what Laura says is shrouded in
symbolism and Egyptian mythology. Which is one of the keys to
understanding what’s going on today, is tied into a long history of
power that’s stayed in the same family’s throughout the ages. This
material needs to be approached with an open mind and without judgment,
I have a feeling in the not too distant future more will be revealed
that will help all of this make more sense.

http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2010m2d10-Whistleblower-Laura-Magdalene-Eisenhower-Ikes-greatgranddaughter-outs-secret-Mars-colony-project

Whistleblower Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, Ike’s great-granddaughter, outs secret Mars colony project

February 10, 3:48 PM Seattle Exopolitics

read the rest of this article, please click on the link below:

http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seatt…itics-Examiner

or

http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seatt…examiner-email

In a public statement great-granddaughter of former
President Dwight David Eisenhower (1890-1969), has exposed her
attempted recruitment from April 2006 through January 2007 by a secret
Mars colony project.

Ms. Eisenhower’s account of her targeting by time travel surveillance
and attempted manipulation by trained intelligence agents attached to a
Mars colony project was revealed during an ExopoliticsRadio.org interview,
and in an extensive written statement at Ms. Eisenhower’s website.

Ki’ Lia, a Stanford-educated artist, futurist and colleague of Ms.
Eisenhower, has provided a corroborating first hand witness account of
her and Ms. Eisenhower’s attempted recruitment into a secret human
survival colony on Mars, available at Ki’ Lia’s website.

The alleged purpose of the secret Mars colony was to provide a survival
civilization for the Earthling human race in the event of planned (such
as HAARP or bio-weapon induced) or natural cataclysm (such as by solar
flares) which would depopulate the Earth. Both Ms. Eisenhower and Ki’
Lia identify Dr. Harold E. (Hal) Puthoff, a former researcher at
Stanford Research Institute, as a behind the scenes coordinator of the
secret Mars colony project.

In revealing these secret Mars colony plans, Ms. Eisenhower and Ki’ Lia
have emerged to join a growing cadre of independent whistleblowers
disclosing secret technologies and extraterrestrial-related covert
operations of U.S. military-intelligence agencies and corporate
entities.

The revelations of Ms. Eisenhower and Ki’ Lia corroborate independent
whistleblower revelations made by lawyer Andrew D. Basiago of covert
U.S. government surveillance of political persons of interest using
secret time travel technology. Their allegations are also consistent
with disclosures made by Mr. Basiago that twice in 1981 he teleported
from a CIA facility in El Segundo, CA to a secret U.S. base on Mars,
first by himself, and then a second time in the company of CIA agent
Courtney M. Hunt.

White House: Former U.S. Pres. Dwight D. EisenhowerLaura Magdalene, extraterrestrials and the Eisenhower legacy

Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, who has resided and traveled independently
in over 20 cities in the U.S. and abroad, has developed a wide
knowledge base in frontier health, natural systems, alchemy,
metaphysics and ancient history, and also has degrees and
certifications in science, wilderness expedition leadership, natural
healing and building. She is a mythic cosmologist, global strategist,
clairvoyant healer, Earth advocate, and artist.

In introducing her Mars colony revelations at Exopolitics.com, Ms.
Eisenhower writes, “My great-grandfather President Ike, who was also
the Army general who led the Allied Forces to victory over Hitler,
battled evil corrupt powers on Earth and took on some of the most
challenging scenarios in history. As I grew up, I could sense that I
was completing this battle that has ancient roots. When Hitler died and
the Nazis lost power- the entities including those that were
ET/Extraterrestrial did not. They continued to find hosts and create
agreements with people who were a part of the races of the patriarch
and Global Elite – who want to run things through fear tactics, control
and the suppression of Sophia or the essence of the Divine Feminine.”

ExopoliticsRadio.org interview with Laura Magdalene Eisenhower

Listen to the full, in-depth 2-hour radio interview with Laura
Magdalene Eisenhower by Alfred Lambremont Webre by clicking here. The
first 10-15 mins area little slow, but the material gets at the essence
of many things I’ve been trying to say for some time now:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/er_laura_magdalene_eisenhower_full_interview.mp3

Time travel: How Laura Magdalene Eisenhower was targeted by the secret Mars colony project

In her statement, Ms. Eisenhower details how Agent X, her principal
“handler” from the secret Mars project, eventually confessed to her
that “He knew a lot about me from numerous sources that overlapped with
one another – from Freemasons, Knights Templar, to this hidden branch
of the government that was behind creating this Mars mission. They
understood me based on remote viewing and time travel devices and they
also seemed to recruit people from the Freemasons and Knights Templar
who were well aware of the Magdalene path. They seemed to all be
connected, but someone was taking advantage of it all and trying to
stay one step ahead of how nature may have unfolded as far as us coming
together into Union. I did not know he was an agent until months into
the relationship and I later found out that it was them who sent him to
find me and it was all a set-up.”

Ki’ Lia, who has worked as an accomplished innovative and
multidisciplinary design consultant with many renowned pioneers,
corroborates the background of how Ms. Eisenhower was targeted as a
subject by a shadowy group behind the secret Mars colony, using time
travel and exotic targeting techniques.

Ki’ Lia states, “After years of friendship, in the spring of 2006 in
Washington DC, I met her and her new romantic partner, who I will call
Agent X. He claimed to know himself archetypally as Joseph of
Arimathea/Osiris/Orion and affiliated with different, interlinked
secret societies, e.g, Knights Templar and Freemasons. He and Laura
quickly formed an intimate relationship, and I helped conduct a ‘Divine
Union’ rites of passage for them."

She continues, “Agent X revealed that his group had identified her
through her bloodline, as the matrilineal great-granddaughter of 34th
U.S. President Eisenhower (and the Allied Commander who defeated
Hitler). As well, they knew her as a unique reincarnation of
Magdalene/Sophia/Isis (ever since she was young, many psychics have
recognized her). He also said his group was interested in her twin
sons, who they knew as Romulus and Remus (founders of Rome) and the
hero twin archetypes in the Mayan prophecy."

Ki’ Lia writes, “They had a list of male partners, who she could be
with in possible timelines, and he was one of them. They targeted her
(especially her heart) and these men through electromagnetic or psychic
weaponry, and indeed many men tried to destroy her throughout her life.
Agent X admitted that he (as well as his parents) was implanted with a
chip and had a multiple personality disorder, which involves very
sudden robotic and abusive behaviors. This is the typical profile of
someone who was subjected to well-documented MK-ULTRA experiments and
multi-generational occult ritual abuse.”

Ki’ Lia concludes, “Their data about Laura and her partners were
seemingly gathered through a time viewing device (which they had called
‘Looking Glass’ or ‘Orion’s Cube’ or possibly through remote viewing or
even time travel – all part of their cadre of top classified
technologies (already disclosed in increasing black projects
literature).”

Timeline of the secret Mars project

Ms. Eisenhower, who is the mother of twin boys, writes about her the
evolution of her relationship with “Agent X” during this period of
attempted recruitment into the secret Mars project. She states,
“August, 2006. The plan was that I would move to Raleigh, NC, and we
would live together and figure this entire thing out, as [Agent X] kept
convincing me that my vision and mission would not go unnoticed. So we
made the move happen. Upon arrival things drastically shifted. Mars
would always come up again, and I was not feeling like it was safe. I
felt that it was a mission being created from a hidden agenda that
wished to disrupt our union and have control over it – to be used for
their plots in the grander scheme of things, to assist in re-seeding a
civilization there. I could just sense it because his behavior often
changed and fluctuated greatly from connection with me, to panic and
intensity about these missions.”

Ki’ Lia documents Agent X’s organizing of the secret Mars project. She
writes, “My science and business background wasn’t extensive, but as a
quick multidimensional learner, I could immediately spot key alliances
and best of breed technologies. I had made links to significantly
wealthy people for my various ventures, but I continuously questioned
why the heck with all their connections would they want me involved.
Well, Agent X recognized my leadership and visionary skills, and wanted
funds coming through his intimate allies, in order for him to achieve
some equal footing with his senior advisors."

Dreams and the secret Mars colony project

Ms. Eisenhower explains the role of her dreams in breaking away from
the attempted recruitment to the secret Mars colony project.

She writes, “Over time the Mars issue became louder and louder. Ki’ Lia
and [Agent X] were working on plans to make this mission happen, but
she realized his plans were dubious based on my observations and she
could only try investigate more. She and I would talk more and more and
I would fill her in on what I was seeing. It was clear he was being
mind-controlled. I even had dreams and premonitions that something was
way off and in one dream I got taken up by chains into a ship and a
voice told me I had to make a choice about being with them or staying
on Earth – and that they wouldn’t harm me but they would certainly
control me.”

In the dream, Ms. Eisenhower states, “I chose Earth and fell out of the
ship and fell into the ocean and was all alone in darkness. I tried to
reconnect with the ship and flew up into the air to just communicate to
them and understand things more, but thunder and lightning obscured my
ability to see the ship and I fell back into the water. Then some crazy
alignment happened and all these planets were surrounding me: this
organic light filled my being and I knew I made the choice for Gaia
which connected with my deep awareness of what I am here to create.
Plus, I naturally have adverse reactions to being controlled in any
way, so I knew it was my only choice.”

Ms. Eisenhower continues, “I told [Agent X] the dream and he was
nervous, but we stayed together and I continued to observe him while
feeling a broken heart deep inside. I knew I was losing him to them."

Ms. Eisenhower writes, “I said I did not want to go to Mars even if
there were Earth catastrophes, and I felt confident especially after
that dream, but he said I had to and if I didn’t they would kidnap me.
His behavior got worse and worse and he was dealing with all kinds of
death threats and there was no way he was able to pull out of their
grips or stay on Earth with me.”

Ki’ LiaThe secret Mars project and the Divine Feminine

In the aftermath of breaking away from the secret Mars colony project
after January 2007, Ms Eisenhower writes, “Ki’ Lia and I discovered
that in order for [the secret Mars colony] to have their matrix of
control, they wanted the Magdalene-Isis and Osiris seeding of Mars, or
the power of the Holy Grail, which means ‘royal blood.’ After so many
readings throughout my life confirmed this as my identity, not just
essence – it all started to make sense but in a way that was hard for
me to want to communicate or own up to, except for within. I knew my
energy field, heart and intention was strong enough as a
personification of the Venus calendrical path (which everyone can
access) to help regenerate Gaia and Mars and shift us into the positive
2012 Awakening of consciousness."

Ms. Eisenhower states, “I knew this would lead to the liberation from the controls that have kept us imprisoned for so long."

Time travel political surveillance of U.S. presidential persons of interest

A lawyer in Washington State and president of the Mars Anomaly Research
Society, Andrew D. Basiago has revealed the existence of a secret DARPA
time travel program in which he was a childhood participant, that
included the identification of future persons of interest utilizing
different forms of quantum access beginning in the early 1970s. ??

On a November 11, 2009 Coast to Coast AM radio program, Mr. Basiago
publicly stated that this DARPA program involving time travel was
identifying future persons of interest, including those who would serve
as U.S. president, and then informing such persons of their destinies.
Mr. Basiago stated that in the early 1970s, in the company of his late
father, Raymond F. Basiago, an engineer for The Ralph M. Parsons
Company who worked on classified aerospace projects, he was present at
a lunch in Albuquerque, New Mexico at which future U.S. Presidents
George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush were guests shortly after they were
informed that both would one day serve as president.??

He also stated that in the early 1970s, the DARPA program, Project
Pegasus, had identified future Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton
utilizing time travel technology and that when Mr. Basiago met future
President Barack Obama in Los Angeles, CA in 1982 when Mr. Basiago was
attending UCLA and Mr. Obama, then a student at Columbia University,
was visiting former classmates at Occidental College in Los Angeles, a
statement made by the ally of Mr. Obama’s in the anti-apartheid
movement that had introduced them revealed that Mr. Obama, then age 20,
already knew that he would one day be President.??

Mr. Basiago revealed that the reason Project Pegasus was able to
identify Mr. Carter, who was then Governor of George, in 1971, as a
future U.S. President, is that the program was in possession of a copy
of the Universe Books edition of Exopolitics: Politics, Government and
Law in the Universe by Alfred Lambremont Webre, a book that this
reporter would not write until 2005, but which bears a quote on its
front pages of a statement made by President Jimmy Carter.

According to Mr. Basiago, Mr. Webre’s book Exopolitics was, among other
written works, physically retrieved from the future by Project Pegasus
and brought back in time to 1971 or a prior time. At that time, 1971,
Mr. Webre was General Counsel of the New York City Environmental
Protection Administration and had been placed under time travel
surveillance by the U.S. government.??

Thus, there is historical precedent for the covert political
surveillance, via remote sensing in time, of a person of interest like
Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, great-granddaughter of U.S. President
Dwight D. Eisenhower.

U.S. secret bases on Mars and intelligent life on Mars

Ms. Eisenhower’s and Ki’ Lia’s account of a secret Mars colony designed
as a survival civilization for the human race is plausible within the
context of independent whistleblower evidence regarding a secret U.S.
presence on Mars.

There is now independent whistleblower evidence of secret U.S. bases on
Mars. Andrew D. Basiago, formerly involved in secret research and
development projects undertaken by a US defense agency, has verified
his secret teleportation to US bases on Mars, and to meeting
intelligent Martian extraterrestrial life.

Mr. Basiago confirms that "the United States has been teleporting
individuals to Mars for decades and recounts the awe-inspiring and
terrifying trips that he took to Mars in 1981 after he was tapped to go
there because he had teleported as a child participant in Project
Pegasus.” Mr. Basiago has also publicly confirmed that in 1970, in the
company of his late father, Raymond F. Basiago, he met three Martian
astronauts at the Curtiss-Wright Aeronautical Company facility in Wood
Ridge, New Jersey while the Martians were there on a liaison mission to
Earth and meeting with US defense-technical personnel.

Ms. Eisenhower and Ki’ Lia appear to be following a trend of
whistleblowers predicted by the Web Bot technology. A September 15,
2009 report using Asymmetric Language Trend Analysis (ALTA) of data
collected by the Web Bot predicts that “It is very likely that the
‘whistleblower’ who had been described in previous ALTA reports (see
1309) as emerging out of the period of the [coagulation] of the
[government/officialdom of the USofA due to financial structure
collapse] is a person by the name of [Andrew D. Basiago].” The ALTA
report predicted that a trend of whistleblowers would follow Mr.
Basiago’s initial revelations.

Public investigation and a return to the Divine Feminine

As whistleblowers of a secret Mars colony project, Laura Magdalene
Eisenhower and Ki’ Lia ask for a further, public investigation.

Ms. Eisenhower writes, “All I ask is that this be further investigated.
There is still much to uncover and piece together. It is crucial that
the truth is revealed and that world leaders disclose their files
related to any cover-ups of ET and UFO relations, and have the ethics
and integrity to look deeper into the use of technologies such as ELF
and HAARP. I hope that citizens of this planet embrace with an open
mind, their true origins and relationship with Universal Society and
share this information with others.”

Ki’ Lia asks that “serious investigations be made into the real agenda
and cover-up –– of the currently existing Mars colony as a survival
plan for a planned or foreseen disastrous 2012 Earth timeline.”

In her in-depth ExopoliticsRadio.org interview, Laura Magdalene Eisenhower calls for a return of the Divine Feminine.

She writes in her public statement, “The archonic patriarchal energies
have had a manipulative hold on the life-force and creativity of Gaia
for thousands of years, personified as Sophia the Goddess. Our Mother
Earth is more powerful than these lower energies though, but to
instantly break free of the dysfunction would mean a mass apocalypse
and the re-establishment of a new creation. To let go and lose
awareness would result in being taken away on an agenda that has been
in the works, with the intention of re-seeding a new civilization on
Mars under the selfish control of the Global Elite- therefore leaving
the Earth to atrophy and self-destruct.”

Ms. Eisenhower states, “The Mother energy loves us though beyond our
comprehension and is patient and determined to create global
transformation, regenerate and re-unite with Heaven, through the cycles
of nature and the path of Venus.”

Ki’ Lia states, “I/We call every single person of every age, race,
faith and background to stand up for the Truth… of our loving and
laughing eternal soul nature. Our collective and internal reunion with
the Divine Feminine and Masculine. Our power of consciousness to heal,
travel and manifest instantaneously. And our magnificent galactic
heritage and destiny. We must rebuild our civilization and restore our
lost Paradise, Atlantis, Shambhala, Eden or Heaven on Earth.”

Laura Magdalene Eisenhower can be contacted through The Return of the
Divine Feminine (Facebook). Ki’ Lia can be contacted through 2012
Paradise on Earth (Facebook). Ms. Eisenhower and Ki’ Lia have a joint
online group at Ascending Earth 2012 (Facebook).

Lucus at Brave New Books: The Destroyer Star & The Future of Mankind


According
to some our planet is about to change and become something unfamiliar
to us all. Some say that a massive star may be coming our way and it
may have a profound effect on our planet. Has this happened before?
Some say it has and is going to happen again. At this presentation at
Brave New Books in Austin, Texas, Lucus presents indications of this
coming destroyer star and connects it to the Denver New World Airport.

http://www.youtube.com/user/FloydAnderson#p/u/12/q_GeAy2MCzc

Dick Cheney and Cathy O’Brien’s Disturbing Testimony Alleging Rape and Torture


Warning – all of this material is very graphic. If anyone has more
information or any opinions, please add freely. I read some detailed
accounts (excerpts of her book, Trance-Formation of America).

WIKI: Cathleen Ann O’Brien (born 4 December 1957, Muskegon,
Michigan[1]) is an American who claims to be a victim of Project
MKULTRA, a program funded by the Central Intelligence Agency to
research the use of drugs for intelligence purposes.

Website: http://www.trance-formation.com/

BIO:
My name is Cathleen (Cathy) Ann O’Brien, born 12/4/57 in Muskegon, Michigan.
http://www.trance-formation.com/aboutcathy.htm

*DISTURBING CHENEY HUNT*

Cheney’s Most Dangerous Game hunting nekked women and little girls then raping them then…
www.archive.org/details/tmdg_trailer
www.archive.org/details/tmdg_broll
www.gnn.tv/videos/3/The_Most_Dangerous_Game

Tuesday, January 31, 2006 05:05 TIMES READ: 18308
Boy sex ring/ties to Bush administration& Gunderson report Pt 2
PIRATEJENNY
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=17305
__________________________________________________ ___

X-ref re Iraq

Cheney Impeachment delayed by convenient school shooting
Wednesday, April 18, 2007 02:24 TIMES READ: 7861
John Lee, executive producer Pirate News TV, PirateNews.org

Articles of Impeachment To Be Filed On Cheney
Washington Post – Looks like he’s reached his boiling point.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), the most liberal of the Democratic
presidential candidates in the primary field, declared in a letter sent
to his Democratic House colleagues this morning that he plans to file
articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=15&t=28239

US to Launch Fallujah-style Attack in Afghanistan


This is a must read, then please
go to callcongress.org to demand a halt to this upcoming massacre
planned for the town of Marjah in Afghanistan.  We must stop this
horrific war crime from taking place in our name, this is a revenge
attack for the loss of corrupt CIA agents who deserved to die for their
war crimes anyway. We are creating terrorists with acts like this, now
we’re going to blow up  and may murder over 100,000 civilians, we will
never know the numbers until it comes out in an international war
tribunal when our leader are put on trial for all of this. WAKE UP
PEOPLE, THIS IS CRIMINAL WE HAVE GOT TO GET OUR LEADERSHIP UNDER
CONTROL!! If you’re not familiar with the horror of Fallujah then
you’re just as guilty. Do your homework, our military is acting like
Nazi’s, this is proof. Over one million people were murdered in Iraq
and the same thing is happening in Afghanistan, I’m sick of being
associated with such evil – aren’t you?

Please call your reps in congress and send this to your friends to help
make this article go viral – we have a chance to stop this massacre
before it happens…thanks!

US to Launch Fallujah-style Attack in Afghanistan


By Bill Van Auken


Global Research, February 8, 2010

As
US and British troops prepare to attack the town of Marjah in
Afghanistan’s Helmand Province, military commanders and the media are
openly comparing the operation to the November 2004 siege of Fallujah,
one of the bloodiest war crimes of the Iraq war.

 

The
operation in central Helmand province, long an area of intense
resistance to the US-led occupation, will constitute the largest
military offensive since Washington invaded the country in October
2001. At least 15,000 troops are expected to lay siege to the Helmand
river valley town, which has 80,000 inhabitants and is said by the US
military to be a stronghold of the Taliban.

 

A
total of 125,000 people live in the district around Marjah, which is an
agricultural center 350 miles west of Kabul. The population has been
swelled by Afghans fleeing villages occupied by US Marines last summer,
following President Barack Obama’s order shortly after he took office
to send 21,000 more troops into Afghanistan.

 

US
Marines, frustrated and enraged over casualties suffered at the hands
of an unseen enemy who is able to attack and then blend back into the
local population, will be unleashed against the town in a violent
military assault, with predictable results.

 

Brigadier
General Larry Nicholson, commander of the US Marines in southern
Afghanistan, spelled out the character of the upcoming offensive. Those
found in Marjah would have three options. “One is to stay and fight and
probably die,” he said. “The second one is to make peace with his
government and reintegrate.” The third would be to attempt to escape,
“In which case we’ll probably have some people out there waiting on
them as well.”

 

“We’re
going to go in big,” said Nicholson, commander of the 2nd Marine
Expeditionary Brigade. “I’m not looking for a fair fight,” he added.

 

In
a highly unusual move, the US command has publicly announced plans for
the offensive. “It’s a little unconventional to do it this way, but it
gives everybody a chance to think through what they’re going to do
before suddenly in the dark of night they’re hit with an offensive,”
said General Stanley McChrystal, the senior US commander in Afghanistan.

 

The
stated intention of revealing the target of the upcoming offensive is
to allow civilians to flee before the Marines move in. It also provides
a preemptive alibi for the US offensive by painting those who fail to
heed the warning as die-hard Taliban who deserve to be killed.

 

Stratfor,
a military-intelligence web site with close ties to the US state
apparatus, reported Thursday that “the assault is likely to include the
cordoning off of the area, so many of the fighters dedicated to its
defense will probably be forced to fight to the death or surrender.”

 

The
article continued: “With assaults on Fallujah and Ramadi in Iraq under
their belts, the Marines are experienced with this sort of urban
assault.”

 

What is the record of urban assaults of “this sort”?

 

The
Marine assault on Fallujah in November 2004 reduced most of the city of
300,000 people to rubble, as warplanes dropped thousands of tons of
explosives and helicopter gunships and battle tanks fired missiles into
buildings and strafed the area with cannon fire.

 

The
US military command claimed to have killed 2,000 “insurgents,” but the
real death toll remains unknown. Civilians who remained in the town
were subjected to the same bombardment. Some were shot to death during
the door-to-door raids that followed, and others were killed while
fleeing. Wounded fighters were summarily executed, and medical
facilities were targeted for military attack. All those in the city
were denied food, water and electricity for more than 10 days.

 

The
operation was a vicious exercise in collective punishment against the
population of Fallujah for the killing there of four Blackwater
mercenaries and the city’s protracted resistance to foreign occupation.
It embodied the criminality of the entire war and was characterized by
multiple and gross violations of the laws of war.

 

If
American military commanders are to be believed, a similar operation is
being prepared in Afghanistan, and for similar reasons. The town of
Marjah is to be turned into a killing field.

 

As
in Fallujah, vengeance plays a role. US military forces have seen a
steady escalation in casualties over the past year, while the CIA
suffered a humiliating attack at the end of December that left seven of
its operatives dead on the Afghan border.

 

In
Afghanistan, as in Iraq, the US military command sees value in making
an example of a population center known as a center of resistance to
occupation, sending a message to the entire country that such
resistance is futile and will be met with slaughter and destruction.

 

This
bloodletting is officially justified in the name of a never-ending
struggle against terrorism. Behind the propaganda, the driving force of
the war in Afghanistan, like the war in Iraq, is the attempt by
America’s ruling elite to counter the crisis of US capitalism through
the use of force and the seizure of strategic positions in the Persian
Gulf and Central Asia, both centers of vast energy reserves.

 

A
year ago, when Barack Obama entered the White House, there existed hope
among broad layers of the American people that his inauguration would
turn such words as Fallujah, Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo, Blackwater,
torture and rendition into the lexicon of a dark and shameful, but
closed, chapter in US history.

 

The
preparation of the Marjah offensive only underscores that, far from
being ended, the crimes of the Bush administration are continuing and
escalating under the Democratic president.

 

Today
there are more US troops deployed abroad in colonial-style wars and
occupations than under Bush, and the killing has spread from Iraq and
Afghanistan to Pakistan and Yemen. The Obama administration is seeking
$322 billion for the two ongoing wars and occupations, a figure that
will doubtless be swelled by further demands for “supplemental” funding.

 

The
supposed candidate of “hope” and “change” has emerged ever more clearly
as the hand-picked agent of sections of the political establishment and
military-intelligence complex that wanted to effect certain tactical
changes in policy, while continuing to employ militarism abroad and
wage a relentless assault on the working class at home.

 

American
working people cannot accept a new round of war crimes carried out in
their name. The demand for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal
of all US and other foreign troops from Afghanistan must be joined with
a political offensive against the Obama administration and the
financial oligarchy that it defends.


URL: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17479

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007

The 29 Signs You are Awakening


28 Signs You are Awakening

1) Moving into a better job that supports the expression of who you
are, your passion or your mission, which are basically the same.

2) Greater financial abundance as you’ve never quite experienced before.

3) Most of your dreams come true and easily

4) You attract a new mate/partner or you and your current partner have
a relationship revolving around companionship with no issue related
"hooks". You love, admire and adore each other for who you are with no
dependencies.

5) As you further evolve, you re-unite with your "twin" who is a total
reflection of you. Being together is like being with yourself and you
feel a unity to Source as never before.

6) You don’t seem to care much about anything and nothing seems to
matter anymore. You have evolved out of the Old way of being of drama
and emotions.

7) You have lost your interest in the "New Age" arena.

8) You KNOW that all your needs are met and will always be.

9) You no longer have the desire or need to make things happen, "to
try" or "to fix" anything. You understand "allowing", "acceptance",
"being" and "intent".

10) You can no longer relate to mental and analytical processes. You now relate to "feeling".

11) You no longer care what anyone thinks about you or anything else.

12) You understand that there is no right or wrong, good or bad, or black or white. Everything just IS.

13) You finally realize that there is no dark or light. The appearance
of lack of light is simply to provide a contrast to spur us on to
creating what really feels good. All energy is always going in the same
direction, supporting the light.

14) You have lost your desire to read books or gather any more new
information as you are now much more connected to Source and can gather
it "directly" by being, feeling and "knowing."

15) Your health improves and/or you experience a miracle-like healing of a long standing physical ailment.

16) You crave a simplicity in all things and require and thrive on
simple processes, simple desires and a very simple lifestyle.

17) You begin to experience a flow to life at a slow leisurely pace,
where you need not do anything you do not really wish to. Everything
falls into your lap. You experience much basking, savoring and
gratitude for the simple things in life.

18) You only desire to do what is yours to do and no longer have a life
full of mundane "responsibilities". When much releasing has been
completed you are then left with a purified you…a gold nugget of your
divine expression. This is your contribution to the New World.

19) You easily pick up the thoughts, feelings, desires and needs of others, as you are becoming telepathic.

20) You can control your emotions, your experiences and create your
world with your mind and intent without doubt or fear.

21) Your surrounding environment has little effect on you. You don’t
take things personally. Nothing is really worth getting that upset
about.

22) You have an unquenchable thirst for creativity. The enormous amount
of energy running through you demands an outlet. You feel most as home
and in alignment with Source when you are in your passion and creating.

23) You laugh a lot and find many things amusing and funny.

24) You have a heightened love and compassion for all living things.
You are also experiencing higher states and more frequent state of love
and joy.

25) You live in the moment without a "day planner". Things just
naturally unfold day-by-day and moment-……by-moment. All stress is
gone.

26) You feel incredible peace. There is a distinct absence of fear and you feel safe.

27) Your inner child seems to have disappeared (relating to issues and
wounds), although you love to play and frolic. Much of the time you
just want to play, play and play!

28) You begin to have an understanding about how everything is connected. You understand that there are no mistakes.

http://www.in5d.com/28-signs-you-are-awakening.html

PETITION: War is Illegal


Please take a moment from your day to sign the following petition demanding the Bush and Cheney
be held accountable by theInternational Courts and that Obama pulls
the troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq, we also need to get out of
Yemen and Iran
. With
all the fear mongering about an upcoming terrorist attack, it’s obvious
that another invasion is being planned for Yemen because the
CIA/Moussad is planning another false flag terrorist attack on the US
to scare Americans into agreeing to more loss of rights and freedom.
And you can bet they’re going to blame the attack on terrorist in
Yemen…more lies.                                                    

When will Americans wake
up to the fact that global corporations have hijacked the US and the
only thing that matters is profits, not human life or the suffering of
billions of people. Corporations are not people, they don’t care about
us and now they are running this war because war is profitable and a
handful of people are making billions of dollars while America goes
down the toilet.

War is Illegal

http://www.war-is-illegal.org/index.php

Against a background of escalating
ecological crises, and the fact that large parts of the world´s
population are being exposed to extreme poverty, inhuman working
conditions and increasing social tensions, the annual global military
expenditure has risen to more than 1000 billion dollars.
The
military-industrial complex of just a few G8 countries is responsible
for the overwhelming part of this spending, causing incalculable social
and ecological consequences.

Unequal distribution of global
resources, increasingly controlled by large multinational companies,
global debt policy and unfair international trading practices
ultimately could not be maintained without military security. In many
countries the military is used to repress critical opposition.

The terror attacks of September 11, 2001 are increasingly used to
justify systematic surveillance and the dismantling of constitutional
rights.
Even European countries have helped to establish Guantanamo-like secret
prisons, where torture in all probability takes place.

Iraq was attacked based on falsified evidence causing the death of
hundreds of thousands of people, widespread destruction,
destabilization and contamination with cancer-causing depleted uranium
munitions.
Now plans to attack Iran and the possibility of a new World War have
been made public, meeting resistance even from moderate elements within
the military due to the unforeseeable consequences.

Faced with the choice between a war, that according to some western
leaders, will last for many years or a possible peaceful transformation
we support the following demands:

1) Prosecution by the International Court of Justice of G. W.
Bush, R. Cheney and other officials from various countries for waging
wars of aggression contrary to international law and committing crimes
against humanity.

2) International investigation of the September 11, 2001 terror
attacks. They are used as the central justification for the "War on
Terror", but well documented evidence shows that the official
explanation of 9/11 cannot be correct. International personalities in
science, politics, and culture, including high-ranking military
veterans, have called for a new investigation.

3) Immediate military withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq, and no
attack against Iran. International prohibition of war as a means of
conflict resolution. Military intervention and export of weapons should
be criminalized.
In a civilized society torture must be prohibited in any form.

4) Conversion of military industries to civilian purposes and the
development of ecological and sustainable energy resources. According
to the UN environmental agency, a fraction of the annual global defense
expenditure could ensure that all humans have access to clean water and
a basic supply of food and healthcare.

This
statement is based on a commitment to non-violence and tolerance of all
ethnic groups and religions. Two devastating World Wars and historical
catastrophes like the Nazi Holocaust must always remind us of the worst
consequences of nationalism, racism and incitement to war.

Sign this statement, pass it on, whatever we can do. It is up to us.

(After US-President Obama took office the demand for impeachment in #1
has been placed in parentheses. The text of the declaration remains
unchanged.)

to sign please use the form at the top right of this page or send e-mail to:support@war-is-illegal.org
or warisillegal@fastmail.fm

More than 3000 signatures since November 2007, and more than 300 new signatures since December 2009

http://www.war-is-illegal.org/index.php