*2 Years Later* Professor: Microbes in Gulf attacking things other than oil? Very large increase in crab and lobster with appendages falling off — High incidence of eyeless shrimp… More (VIDEO)

Published: April 23rd, 2012 By ENENews

Crustacean biologist Darryl Felder, Department of Biology with the University of Louisiana at Lafayette: “My fear is that these prior incidents of lesions might be traceable to microbes, and my questions are, did we alter microbial populations in the vicinity of the well by introducing this massive amount of petroleum and in so doing cause microbes to attack things other than oil?” -April 19, 2012

Title: Gulf Oil Spill: BP Execs Escape Punishment as Fallout from Disaster Continues to Impact Sea Life
Source: Democracy Now
Date: Apr. 23, 2012
Emphasis Added

AMY GOODMAN: [...] The impact of the disaster continues to unfold for the area’s residents and wildlife. Scientists say shrimp, fish and crabs in the Gulf of Mexico have been deformed by chemicals released during the spill. One commercial fisherperson told Al Jazeera that half of shrimp caught during the last white shrimp season were eyeless.

SCOTT EUSTIS: We have some evidence of deformed shrimp, which is another developmental impact, so that shrimp’s grandmother was exposed to oil while the mother was developing, but it’s the grandchild of the shrimp that was exposed grows up with no eyes.

[...]

DAHR JAMAIL: We have recently come across very, very disturbing information from Gulf region scientists. You know, the first person I came across was Dr. Jim Cowan with Louisiana State University, and he’s been working on a project, getting his funding from the state of Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. And he’s been, actually, for many decades, sampling red snapper, which is a very popular fish in the industry. And he’s been finding that before the BP disaster in April 2010, that of all the red snapper he was sampling, he was finding point-one-tenth [0.1] of 1 percent snapper coming up with lesions and other types of problems. Post-spill, that has gone to between 2 and 5 percent of all samples. That means an increase of between 2,000 and 5,000 percent, and in some areas as much as 20 percent [a 20,000% increase], he said, in other areas who have extreme impact, where the oil and dispersants came in nearby the shore, of as many as 50 percent [a 50,000% increase] of fish sampled. Very, very disturbing information there.

And then, another doctor that I spoke with, Dr. Darryl Felder with University of Louisiana-Lafayette, he also has before-and-after samples. He was working out around the Macondo wellhead area on the sea floor with a grant from the National Science Foundation, that they wanted him to investigate just overall drilling impact on species in the area. And so, he had deep sea crab, deep sea lobster, deep sea shrimp, from before the spill, and then many, many sampling trips after the spill. And what he found was obviously a very, very large increase of finding crab and lobster, etc., that had black gills, that had appendages falling off, again similar stains on their shells, and again similar to findings not too different from Dr. Jim Cowan’s, in that when the oil, that much unnatural oil introduced into the environment, coupled with the dispersants, that it’s causing these lesions that are burrowing into the carapace and the shells and eating into the wax of the shells, causing an increase in the microbes that do eat oil. Not only are they not eating just oil, but eating into the shells, and then parasites and diseases and other illnesses are being formed.

And then, lastly and I think most disturbingly, as you already touched upon, the eyeless shrimp. We’re seeing very, very large incidence of eyeless shrimp now popping up not just in Louisiana, but in Alabama and Mississippi, not just inshore, but further far ashore—offshore. And some of the shrimp that we’re seeing, they came from a shrimper in Louisiana that was caught—caught 400 pounds of white shrimp in one catch in last September, just off the outskirts of Barataria Bay. And that was—of the 400 pounds of shrimp, the shrimpers told us that all of them were eyeless. So, very, very disturbing findings. And unfortunately, we’re expecting more to continue.

[...]

[BP claims administrator Ken] Feinberg is on his way out, because so many people across the region are incensed at the way he’s handled most of the claims. [...]

I talked to Ryan Lambert, who heads one of the largest charter fishing businesses in the entire Southeast, and he said, “Hey, we’re going to court. They have destroyed my business. It’s not coming back. I haven’t seen one single speckled trout in three months. It’s the first time I’ve ever experienced that in my life. That’s 90 percent of the fish that we catch. So of course I’m going to go to court, because what they offered me, frankly, was insulting.”

http://enenews.com/2-years-later-concern-in-gulf-that-microbes-are-attacking-things-other-than-oil-very-large-increase-in-crab-and-lobster-with-appendages-falling-off-high-incidence-of-eyeless-shrimp-more

Billions in Fines Don’t Matter — Here’s How BP Should Be Punished for the Gulf Disaster

What is missing is a criminal prosecution that holds responsible the individuals who gambled with the lives of BP’s contractors and the ecosystem of the Gulf of Mexico.

April 20, 2012  |

LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?

Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Environment headlines via email.

This story was published as an op-ed in The New York Times.

Two years after a series of gambles and ill-advised decisions on a BP drilling project led to the largest accidental oil spill in United States history and the death of 11 workers on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, no one has been held accountable.

Sure, there have been about $8 billion in payouts and, in early March, the outlines of a civil agreement that will cost BP, the company ultimately responsible, another $7.8 billion in restitution to businesses and residents along the Gulf of Mexico. It’s also true the company has paid at least $14 billion more in cleanup and other costs since the accident began on April 20, 2010, bringing the expense of this fiasco to about $30 billion for BP. These are huge numbers. But this is a huge and profitable corporation.

What is missing is the accountability that comes from real consequences: a criminal prosecution that holds responsible the individuals who gambled with the lives of BP’s contractors and the ecosystem of the Gulf of Mexico. Only such an outcome can rebuild trust in an oil industry that asks for the public’s faith so that it can drill more along the nation’s coastlines. And perhaps only such an outcome can keep BP in line and can keep an accident like the Deepwater Horizon disaster from happening again.

BP has already tested the effectiveness of lesser consequences, and its track record proves that the most severe punishments the courts and the United States government have been willing to mete out amount to a slap on the wrist.

Prior to the gulf blowout, which spilled 200 million gallons of oil, BP was convicted of two felony environmental crimes and a misdemeanor: after it failed to report that its contractors were dumping toxic waste in Alaska in 1995; after its refinery in Texas City, Texas, exploded, killing 15, in 2005; and after it spilled more than 200,000 gallons of crude oil from a corroded pipeline onto the Alaskan tundra in 2006. In all, more than 30 people employed directly or indirectly by BP have died in connection with these and other recent accidents.

In at least two of those cases, the company had been warned of human and environmental dangers, deliberated the consequences and then ignored them, according to my reporting.

None of the upper-tier executives who managed BP — John Browne and Tony Hayward among them — were malicious. Their decisions, however, were driven by money. Neither their own sympathies nor the stark risks in their operations — corroding pipelines, dysfunctional safety valves, disarmed fire alarms and so on — could compete with the financial necessities of profit making.

Before the accident in Texas City, BP had declined to spend $150,000 to fix a part of the system that allowed gasoline to spew into the air and blow up. Documents show that the company had calculated the cost of a human life to be $10 million. Shortly before that disaster, a senior plant manager warned BP’s London headquarters that the plant was unsafe and a disaster was imminent. A report from early 2005 predicted that BP’s refinery would kill someone “within the next 12 to 18 months” unless it changed its practices.

Such explicit flirtation with deadly risk was undertaken as part of Mr. Browne’s effort while chief executive to expand BP as quickly as possible. Mr. Browne relentlessly cut costs, including on maintenance and safety. Then he hastily assembled a series of acquisitions and mergers between 1998 and 2001 that added tens of thousands of employees, blurred chains of command and wrought chaos on his operations. His methods — and the demands of Wall Street — became overly dependent on quantitative measures of success at the expense of environmental and human risk.

After each disaster, Mr. Browne pledged to refresh his focus on safety, investment in maintenance and commitment to the environment. His successor, Mr. Hayward, followed suit, saying that BP’s culture had to change. But the Deepwater Horizon tragedy — which bears many of the same traits as the company’s past accidents — shows how difficult it has been for the company’s leaders to shift BP’s corporate values and live up to their promises.

The question becomes: did they try hard enough, and did the mechanisms of oversight, regulation and law enforcement work sufficiently to provide a recidivist organization the deterrent that could guarantee its compliance?

After its previous convictions, BP paid unprecedented fines — more than $70 million — and committed to spend at least another $800 million on maintenance to improve safety. The point was to demonstrate that the cost of doing business wrong far outweighs the cost of doing business right. But without personal accountability, the fines become just another cost of doing business, William Miller, a former investigator for the Environmental Protection Agency who was involved in the Texas City case, told me.

The problem then (and perhaps now) is that it is the slow pileup of factors that cause an industrial disaster. Poor decisions are usually made incrementally by a range of people with differing levels of responsibility, and almost always behind a shield of plausible deniability. It makes it almost impossible to pin one clear-cut bad call on a single manager, which is partly why no BP official has ever been held criminally accountable.

Instead, the corporation is held accountable. It isn’t clear that charging the company repeatedly with misdemeanors and felonies has accomplished anything.

At more than $30 billion and climbing, the amount BP has paid out so far for reparations, lawsuits and cleanup dwarfs the roughly $8 billion that Exxon had to pay after its 1989 spill in Prince William Sound in Alaska. And BP will likely still pay billions more before this is finished.

And yet it is not enough. Two years after analysts questioned whether the extraordinary cost and loss of confidence might drive BP out of business, it has come roaring back. It collected more than $375 billion in 2011, pocketing $26 billion in profits.

What the gulf spill has taught us is that no matter how bad the disaster (and the environmental impact), the potential consequences have never been large enough to dissuade BP from placing profits ahead of prudence. That might change if a real person was forced to take responsibility — or if the government brought down one of the biggest hammers in its arsenal and banned the company from future federal oil leases and permits altogether. Fines just don’t matter.

Abrahm Lustgarten is a former staff writer and contributor for Fortune, and has written for Salon, Esquire, the Washington Post and the New York Times.

http://www.alternet.org/environment/155088/billions_in_fines_don%27t_matter_–_here%27s_how_bp_should_be_punished_for_the_gulf_disaster?page=entire

Eyeless Shrimp and Mutant Fish: Gulf Seafood Deformities Alarm

Many of you have heard me say this before so I’m repeating this FACT for new readers, while flying home from a family vacation last month I personally witnessed large areas of oil sheen on contaminating the surface water in the Gulf of Mexico. Which means if oil can still be seen on the surface, for over 24 months BP has been spraying highly toxic dispersant’s {Corexit} to hide the oil coming from the fractured ocean floor. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to calculate the toxicity that’s accumulate, ultimately contaminating everything living the Gulf of Mexico’s eco-system.

After seeing the contaminated seafood in this video can you imagine what marine life coming out of the Pacific will look like after a couple of years of living in a variety radioactive elements in high concentrations from Fukushima? Thanks for bring this story to our attention DP!

Published on Apr 19, 2012 by Sheilaaliens

http://sheilaaliens.net/?p=543 I’m re-posting this because Al-Jazeera is one of – if not THE only media network to be giving this any real attention. The U.S. mainstream media has picked up the story but only after Al-Jazeera’s report/investigation and the U.S. MSM is only posting it on their “blogs”/articles sections… no news videos (yet, that I have seen) addressing this issue.
This is what should be on the evening news. It concerns our food supply. So, leave it to a foreign news agency to tell us the most vital things we need to know about whats really going on with our country. :/ Share the info.
——————————————————————————–­——————————

“NEW ORLEANS — Eyeless shrimp, fish with oozing sores and other mutant creatures found in the Gulf of Mexico are raising concerns over lingering effects of the BP oil spill.
On April 20, 2010, an explosion aboard the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 people and spewed an estimated 4.9 million barrels into the Gulf, in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.
Two years later, scientists and commercial fishers alike are finding shrimp, crab and fish that they believe have been deformed by the chemicals unleashed in the spill, according to an extensive report by Al Jazeera English.
“At the height of the last white shrimp season, in September, one of our friends caught 400 pounds of these,” Tracy Kuhns, a commercial fisher from Barataria, La., told Al Jazeera, showing a sample of the eyeless shrimp.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/18/eyeless-shrimp-and-mutant-fish-rais…

video source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VVyPiV5xdY
http://www.youtube.com/AlJazeeraEnglish

Major Oil Leak in the Gulf of Mexico

Here’s confirmation that oil is still leaking in the Gulf, a fact which I personally reported last month after returning from vacation when I flew over the GoM and witnessed several large patches of oil from my viewpoint on the airplane. I couldn’t see what was on the other side of the plane. What is seen here in this video doesn’t look as bad as what I saw, the oil patch’s were thicker and darker.

Uploaded by MrCometwatch on Apr 9, 2012

PLEASE SHARE THIS VIDEO
BP/Destroy the Planet/Destroy Humanity/Before the Return of Christ.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/healthygulf/6816316376/in/set-72157629534913885/…

Thousands of Dolphins Dying in Gulf Waters

Dolphins are also dying off the coast of Peru in large numbers, what appears to be happening is a combination of factors are creating an environment where life is no longer sustainable in increasingly larger regions the worlds oceans. With oil still leaking into the Gulf of Mexico – I personally witnessed large areas of oil sheen on the water March 24, 2012 while flying over the GoM – combined with continuous radioactive contamination of the Pacific over the last two year and now another massive leak in the North Seas; the oceans are facing a disaster of unimaginable proportions.

One in which mankind in it’s current capacity, is proving does not have the moral, ethical or technological capabilities to handle in a responsible or competent manner. Which should be of major concern, especially when Rosalind Peterson recently reported that the web of life is in a state of collapse on land due to effects of chemtrail geo-engineering.

The people of Earth are facing a serious problem here…not to mention every “innocent” creature that depends on the web of life for sustenance. They didn’t ask for this…

Tim Wall
Discovery News
Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:01 CDT

© NASA, Wikimedia Commons
Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) A dolphin surfs the wake of a research boat on the Banana River near the Kennedy Space Center.

The dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico are in the midst of a massive die-off. The reasons why remain a complicated and mysterious mix of oil, bacteria, and the unknown.

Normally an average of 74 dolphins are stranded on the northern shore of the Gulf of Mexico each year, especially during the spring birthing season. But between February 2010 and April 1, 2012, 714 dolphins and other cetaceans have been reported as washed up on the coast from the Louisiana/Texas border through Franklin County, Florida, reported the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 95 percent of the mammals were dead.

Since many of the dead dolphins sink, decompose or are eaten by scavengers before washing up, NOAA biologists believe that 714 represents only a fraction of the actual death count. NOAA declared the die-off an “Unusual Mortality Event” as per the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972.

Although the timing of die-off largely coincides with BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill and its aftermath, the deaths actually started increasing about two months before the April 20, 2010 explosion which started the months long oil spill.

Before the spill, 112 dolphins had already been reported stranded on the shore.

In the summer of 2011, NOAA tested 32 live dolphins in Barataria Bay, an area heavily impacted by the oil spill. The dolphins were underweight, anemic, had low blood sugar and/or some symptoms of liver and lung disease. Nearly half had abnormally low levels of hormones that help with stress response, metabolism and immune function.

The symptoms are consistent with those seen in animals exposed to oil.

But the mystery remains as to why the dolphins started dying before the spill. One possible culprit is Brucella bacteria. Since an initial find of 5 infected dolphins, NOAA has found an additional 11 infected dolphins washed up on the Gulf Coast. But dozens more showed no signs of infection.

NOAA’s investigation into the dolphin tragedy continues.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/243700-Thousands-of-Dolphins-Dying-in-Gulf-Waters

NibiruMagick 2012′s Climate Change Update ~ Tornado Wrecked Dallas, Fukushima Nightmare, Heavy Snows in Scotland, Japan Typhoon and Dolphin die-off (04 April 2012)

Anyone who says the oil leak in the Gulf has been capped is a bald faced liar! Last week when flying from Miami to Oklahoma City I personally saw oil sheen on the water in the Gulf of Mexico, which means they’ve never stopped spraying Corexit to keep as much oil at the bottom as possible. No wonder dolphins are dying!

Anyone still eating seafood is at high risk of toxic or radioactive contamination now that the Atlantic and Pacific oceans have been heavily contaminated over the last two years. Forget the mercury that gives you the shakes gotmercury.org

 

 

Uploaded by NibiruMagick2012 on Apr 4, 2012

A destructive reminder of a young tornado season Wednesday left thousands without power and hundreds of homes pummeled or worse Wednesday, after the National Weather Service said as many as a dozen twisters touched down in a wrecking-ball swath of violent weather that stretched across Dallas and Fort Worth.
http://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/4-The-Living-Planet?page=1

http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php

Kyodo: Storm may have halted nitrogen injections at three Fukushima reactors for hours — Tepco says no fears of hydrogen explosion
http://enenews.com/

Marine contamination reached Philippines last April
http://fukushima-diary.com/category/dnews/

Not even TEPCO is willing to accept radiation-contaminated wood chips, because of the concern for radioactive ashes from burning the chips.
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/

Total Petro Co. Readies Military Air Spraying to Cover Their Mess.

When I was flying from Miami to Oklahoma City last week, we flew over the Gulf of Mexico where I can personally attest to the fact that the BP Macondo well is still leaking. There are still large areas of oil sheen on the water, so anyone who says that disaster is over is a LIAR. Which means over two years later they must still be spraying dispersants to keep as much oil at the bottom as possible, obviously the sea floor is irreparable. Meaning, the contamination of the oceans will continue for the foreseeable future or until Mother Nature steps in – at that point it might get rough for those living near the Gulf.

Uploaded by MrCometwatch on Apr 3, 2012

Total Prepare to destroy the North Sea to Hide The Damage.
I Had BP on the Brain, I meant to say French Taxpayers,Please Excuse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corexit
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/oily-substance-…

Oily substance at North Sea gas leak rig

An oily sheen has spread around a stricken gas rig, Greenpeace activists said Monday, but Total insisted it was formed by gas condensate.

By Jonathan Nackstrand, AFPMon, Apr 02 2012 at 11:19 AM EST

GAS LEAK: The French energy giant insists there has been little environmental impact since the gas began leaking from the platform on March 25. (Photo: Hommedal Marit/AFP)

An oily sheen has spread around a stricken North Sea gas rig, Greenpeace activists on a ship nearby said Monday, but Total insisted it was formed by gas condensate.

Greenpeace’s Koenigin Juliana research ship arrived on Monday at the edge of an exclusion zone around the abandoned Elgin platform owned by Total, 150 miles off Aberdeen in eastern Scotland.

The French energy giant insists there has been little environmental impact since the gas began leaking from the platform on March 25.

But Christian Bussau, a marine expert from Greenpeace who is on board the ship, said a multi-coloured sheen around the platform was spreading and the group was taking air and water samples.

He said he believed the substance to be oil, though he admitted Greenpeace would not be able to analyse its samples until the ship returned to its base in Germany.

“This is a really big accident,” Bussau said from the Koenigin Juliana, which is about three nautical miles from the platform. “Total must immediately start to close the leak, or the pollution won’t stop.”

Total has readied a Hercules military transport plane carrying dispersant that could be sprayed on the sheen, but said it did not expect it would be necessary to deploy it.

It says the sheen is caused by gas condensate, or gas that has turned to vapor.

“The light condensate poses no significant threat to seabirds or other wildlife,” a Total spokeswoman told AFP.

Greenpeace dispatched the Koenigin Juliana from Germany on Saturday.

“Oil companies often withhold information when there are accidents,” Bussau said. “We want to get our own picture of the environmental damage from the scene.”

Total, which has seen an estimated eight billion euros ($10 billion) wiped off its stock value since the leak was discovered, is awaiting British regulators’ advice on whether it is safe to approach the rig.

The Health and Safety Executive told AFP its officials would meet with Total in Aberdeen on Monday, while the energy giant said it was assembling a crew to go on to the platform “in the next couple of days.”

Total said the crew would include outside experts from Texas-based firm Wild Well Control. They were among the experts who worked to stem the massive oil spill following an explosion at BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

Total is preparing to drill two relief wells to stop the gas leak, in parallel with an operation to pump so-called “heavy mud” at high pressure into the stricken well.

The last of Elgin’s 238 crew were evacuated on March 25, while Total’s Anglo-Dutch rival Shell has also been forced to halt output at its Shearwater platform and Noble Hans Deul rig, four miles away, because of safety concerns.

The last major accident in the North Sea was in 1988, when the Piper Alpha oil platform operated by the US-based Occidental Petroleum exploded, killing 167 people.

Total’s British rival BP is still recovering from damage to its reputation and finances caused by the Deepwater Horizon spill.

Copyright 2012  AFP Global Edition

Massive Methane Gas Leak Could Be the North Sea’s Deepwater Horizon

These disasters are completely avoidable when free energy technology is being utilized in black ops projects and has been available since Tesla’s discoveries in the early 1900′s. Tme for the veil’s to fall…

Julia Whitty
Mother Jones
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:31 CDT

© tjodolv via Flickr
North Sea platforms

A natural gas well in the North Sea 150 miles off Aberdeen, Scotland, sprung a massive methane leak on March 25. The 238 workers were all safely evacuated. But the situation is so explosive that an exclusion zone for ships and aircraft has been set up around the rig, reports the Mail Online. And nearby rigs have been evacuated, reports the New York Times:

Royal Dutch Shell said it closed its Shearwater field, about four miles away, withdrawing 52 of the 90 workers there; it also suspended work and evacuated 68 workers from a drilling rig working nearby, the Hans Deul.

But that’s not the worst of it. The platform lies less than 100 yards/meters from a flare that workers left burning as crew evacuated. The French super-major oil company owner of the rig, Total, dismissed the risk, while the British government claimed the flame needs to burn to prevent gas pressure from building up. But Reuters reports:

[O]ne energy industry consultant said Elgin could become “an explosion waiting to happen” if the oil major did not rapidly stop the leak which is above the water at the wellhead.

lgin Field: Adapted from map by NordNordWest via Wikimedia Commons.

And that may not be the worst of it either. The leak is not in the well apparently but in the chalky seabed around it. No one really knows how reparable that will be – especially with the risk of explosion so high for any workers on site.

Plus, the field produces sour gas: a potent mix of natural gas, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon dioxide. Twenty years ago the cost of extracting energy from such messy stuff would have been prohibitively expensive. Now, not so much. But the true cost could be brutal, reports the BBC :

The major threat to the local ecosystem is the hydrogen sulphide, which is toxic to virtually all animal life. “You might as well put Agent Orange in the ocean,” says [Simon Boxall of the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton, UK]. Because the leak is below the water’s surface, the hydrogen sulphide is bubbling through the sea water. This is the worst-case scenario, says Boxall, because it could lead to mass animal and plant deaths. Boxall says Total needs to monitor the water quality to see if this is happening.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/243554-Massive-Methane-Gas-Leak-Could-Be-the-North-Sea-s-Deepwater-Horizon

NibiruMagick 2012′s Climate Change Update: Gulf Dead Zone Much Larger Than thought, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station CA. (2 February 2012)

Uploaded by NibiruMagick2012 on Feb 1, 2012

The leak occurred in equipment that was installed in the plant in the fall of 2010. The leak occurred in one of thousands of tubes that carry radioactive water from the Unit 3 reactor.
However, the company has found damage to other tubes, Dricks said.
“The damage that they have found to many other tubes is unusual, and they are attempting to identify the reason,”
http://enenews.com/ap-radiation-could-have-escaped-nuke-plant-on-san-diego-co…

US: Researchers Discover Gulf Dead Zone Much Larger Than Previously Thought
http://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/4-The-Living-Planet?page=1

Powerful energy release emanating from the Earth’s core recorded?
http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/

Tropical Cyclone Iggy weakens before making landfall
http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/

http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php

Report: ‘Empty’ Reactor No. 4 was actually filled with nuclear fuel — Only a matter of time before melt-out
http://enenews.com/

DON”T forget Zippcast (Uploaded fast tonight)
http://www.zippcast.com/user/NibiruMagick2012

NibiruMagick’s Climate Change Update: Freak Foam Storm UK, Fukushima Hospitals forced to limit services, Diseased Seals in Alaska tested for radiation (30 December 2011)

From: NibiruMagick2012  | Dec 29, 2011

Drivers and walkers heading along the promenade at a popular Lancashire tourist spot were swamped by thick, dirty foam yesterday.
The oily bubbles were blown ashore after 90mph winds battered the resort of Cleveleys, near Blackpool. In places the freak foam was almost 3ft deep, trapping residents in their homes and stranding drivers.
Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-world/2011/12/30/seasi…

Unusual Amount Of Gray Whales Spotted Off California Coast
http://www.sott.net/signs/list_by_category/4-The-Living-P…

Diseased seals washing ashore in Alaska being tested for possible Fukushima radiation exposure
http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/

Solar wind weakens Mercury’s magnetic field
http://iceagenow.info/

Fukushima hospitals forced to limit services and reduce number of patients due to Tepco — Official: “We don’t know how long we’ll be able to continue operating under the current circumstances”
http://enenews.com/