It’s only by the grace of God that I got out of LA two years ago, if anyone in So Cali feels the need to bail the scene I have a room for rent here on the big island for only $450 a month. Let me know if you need more info below, much love to all…Annette
Uploaded by ActontheActor on Feb 4, 2012
Troops on the streets in Santa Monica ? Possible nuke dirty bomb soon for L.A. ?
Don’t know about you, but I love this guy! He’s a real hoot and has some really good suggestions for the preppers who are too busy being scared, building bunkers to store food and hoard guns and ammo to think about doing the important inner spiritual work that will be the creative key to manifesting solutions to problems you may be confronted with in a survival situation.
Uploaded by ActontheActor on Feb 4, 2012
Purify drinking water when the FEDS kick out your local Sheriff
Alright everyone, lighters in the air as David takes a bow!!
It’s enough to give ya the chill bumps…
11-11-11 doomsday non-event world saved predicted morningmayan 2012 believersunderground truthergirls barbarianrebellion postglacial
Uploaded by ActontheActor on Sep 15, 2011
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_denver02.htm
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=183442
Denver International Airport and Deep Underground Military Base (DUMB)
Uploaded by ActontheActor on Sep 10, 2011
EXPOSED! October 21 rapture a hoax and scam for YU55 terror buffs
http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/cathouse/darby.htm
The doctrine of a secret rapture was first conceived by John Nelson Darby of the Plymouth Brethren in 1827. Darby, known as the father of dispensationalism, invented the doctrine claiming there were not one, but two “second comings.” This teaching was immediately challenged as unbiblical by other members of the Brethren. Samuel P. Tregelles, a noted biblical scholar, rejected Darby’s new interpretation as the “height of speculative nonsense.” So tenuous was Darby’s rapture theory that he had lingering doubts about it as late as 1843, and possibly 1845. Another member of the Plymouth Brethren, B.W. Newton, disputed Darby’s new doctrine claiming such a conclusion was only possible if one declared certain passages to be “renounced as not properly ours.”
