Root of “Shaken Baby” Scam Revealed

“I was in the Queensland Police Service for 20 years and I saw first hand how the vaccines caused death and the police would investigate, and while supported by the medical system would prosecute the parents for the injuries and death caused by the vaccines.”

Chris Savage, Queensland Police officer
Jim Stone, Editor
5/2/2012

I joined the Queensland Police Service in Queensland Australia in 1989 at the age of 27. In my work as a State Police officer I would be called to sudden deaths to investigate the circumstances. This included babies and young children.

I attended several where the baby was found dead by one of the parents in the morning, in Australia the term “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” is used to describe this outcome. Notice how the “syndrome” is frequently used – I believe this serves the purpose of mystifying the problem and therefore the cause. Another is “gulf war syndrome” which is clearly caused by the Anthrax vaccine.

I began to dig deeper whenever I had the opportunity to conduct investigations into the infant deaths. In 1993 I was the first response to a 6 month old baby death. I went to the hospital because the baby had been taken there by ambulance, and at the hospital I obtained the testimony of the mother. In her statement she told me that her baby was eating and sleeping normally but when the baby was vaccinated at the age of 2 months (which was the vaccine policy in Australia) the baby then would not sleep and would not eat properly and suffered frequent convulsions

She went to several doctors trying to find an answer. They gave her a common drug called “Panadol” which did not do anything. The convulsions continued so she went to another doctor who gave her another drug which also did not work. The baby continued to convulse and vomit frequently. The little girl would not sleep and the mother was sleep deprived also.

Because the situation was so desperate, the mother went doctor shopping. The other doctors simply gave her more drugs. At the age of about 5 months the baby died. The QPS then charged the mother for causing the death by using a forensic report which showed slightly elevated drug levels. Fortunately in this particular case the Director of Public Prosecutions did not want to proceed with a murder charge because the mother provided a statement which outlined normal sleep and eating prior to the vaccine.

Another incident occurred when I saw a father come through the Ipswitch District Watchhouse Q1D on the charges of Manslaughter (similar to 2nd degree murder) of a 5 year old that had suffered a severe reaction to the initial vaccines and was brain damaged. The QPS relied on the false medical premise titled “shaken baby syndrome” – there is that “Syndrome” word again.

The child succombed to the injuries from the vaccines and the QPS opted to blame the father on the basis of “Shaken Baby Syndrome” but there was no evidence other than the vaccine for the cause of the injuries when the “shaken baby” accusation was applied.

I have seen grieving parents charged with causing the deaths of their babies,

The highest risk period for death by vaccine was at two months when the babies are given all the vaccines;

When the detectives investigate the death of a baby they interview each parent separately. If there are any conflicting versions of the story they use the differences to attack the parents credibility and rely on the flawed “shaken baby syndrome” medical evidence. If there is no conflict, even a minor one in the parent testimony, the police then turn it over to a “medical doctor” who has “experience” with “shaken baby syndrome” and attempt to prosecute from that angle.

If the parents tell the investigator they picked up the lifeless baby and shook it to wake it, the police will prosecute even though the baby was already dead. Since “shaken baby syndrome” has no hard evidence, such as bruising or other injury, it’s the perfect way to blame parents for damage caused by vaccines.

In October of 2009, a baby died shortly after being vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine, and to everyone’s surprise the state coroner ruled that there was no link to the vaccine.

In my view, the QPS officers are sufficiently brainwashed to not realize the vaccines are causing the injuries and deaths; and when they investigate and prosecute they rely heavily on “medical evidence” which is significantly influenced by big Pharma, and appear to wish to divest responsibility.

Now they give the vaccinations at birth and I speculate that this is so that any damage can be blamed as having the problems since birth.

After giving a parent an article by Dr. Vera Schreibner, which outlined vaccine damage, the hierarchy of the QPS pursued me so I left on medical grounds. Upon my exit they tried to get me to take SSRI’s but I threw them all in the trash; they would have caused severe problems as you already know.

Chris Savage
Former Sergeant of Police, Queensland Police Service
Registered number 4007505
Amoor Qld 4570

http://jimstonefreelance.com/

Removing Heavy Metals Like Mercury from the Body Is “Dangerous”?

KERR-SPLAT!!

What’s that sound? This editors head exploding after reading the following report on the modern day witch hunt against physician’s using highly effective alternative forms of therapy to treat metal detoxification called chelating. Just one more example that lunatic Nazi’s are running the asylum more commonly referred to as Western medicine, this just boggles the mind!

These greed based decisions are blatant attempts to turn the clock back on advances taking humanity into a whole new realm of healing and away from antiquated, ineffective and often barbaric forms of treatment that only create more illness that generate continued profits for BigPharma.

April 24, 2012

Not only are doctors being advised to reject chelation therapy—they’re being asked to report on their colleagues who practice it.

The American College of Medical Toxicology held a conference at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) this past February about the “use and misuse” of chelation therapy—a misleading title suggesting some semblance of scientific objectivity, which was nowhere in evidence. The conference was more like a Salem witch hunt in which chelators played the role of the accused witches and warlocks.

Why is chelation so threatening to mainstream medicine? There is no disputing that heavy metals are extremely toxic. The human body is engineered to remove small amounts daily, but not the large amounts we often pick up from modern sources. One of those sources has of course been vaccines, which have used mercury as a preservative (it is still used in the US flu shot). Another source has been dental “silver” amalgam, which also contains mercury. This may be part of the reason for the hostility to chelation.

How does the therapy work? One method involves injecting into the patient’s bloodstream an organic chemical called EDTA, which can bind and remove the heavy metals mercury, lead, and cadmium in the bloodstream (metals which are toxic to humans and interfere with various physiological functions). A slightly different form of EDTA is used for heart-related chelation. There are also oral or suppository supplements for chelation, and some foods are natural chelators (e.g., cilantro and chlorella).

Chelation therapy has been used by many physicians and administered to thousands of patients since 1952. An informal survey of our readers revealed that body detoxification—whether through chelation, or through sauna or special dietary methods—is among their top ten most popular integrative therapies. The National Institutes of Health is currently studying chelation for cardiovascular disease in the TACT trial. Many people have doubted whether a US government agency could be expected to produce a fair evaluation. The jury is still out on that.

Doctors attending the conference received continuing education credits for attending and hearing all the chelation-bashing. Various topics seemed designed to highlight the dangers of chelation—while attempting to dismiss the benefits.

A look at the PowerPoint slides (available as PDFs downloadable from the conference’s website) reveal the following:

• No hard data was presented on the supposed public health dangers of chelation—only three anecdotal case studies. Hardly a “scientific” analysis.
• The speakers were biased—they made no attempt to represent or provide information from doctors who actually administer chelation therapy to their patients.
• Their main basis for dismissing chelation therapy is the way lab results are interpreted. This detail, however, does not address any of the effects of the therapy itself.
• The conference targets two “advocacy sites” for spreading “misinformation”: the American College for the Advancement of Medicine (ACAM), and the American Academy of Anti-aging Medicine (A4M)—both of which are respected organizations that represent integrative doctors. ACAM offers training and certification in chelation therapy.

Equally revealing is who else was represented at the conference, either as attendees or as panelists: the FDA and the Federation of State Medical Boards!

In the FDA’s session (“Unapproved Chelation Products Available Over the Internet”), the agency tried to conflate unapproved chelation products with the supposed dangers of dietary supplements. But “unapproved” chelation products are already illegal, and FDA is already empowered to enforce against them. Moreover, these products have nothing to do with the regulatory status of dietary supplements.

The FDA has the power to regulate interstate commerce of drugs and devices, and has used that power to clamp down on the sale of chelation products. In 2008 the agency released a Public Health Advisory on EDTA—simply because inattentive hospital personnel mixed up the medications being administered! In 2010, the FDA ordered eight companies to stop marketing over-the-counter chelation products. Our sources told us FDA was aware that many integrative doctors were doing heart-related chelation, and hoped that by blocking one particular form of EDTA, these doctors might be put out of business.

The presence of the Federation of State Medical Boards (a private organization largely controlled by the AMA) is especially troubling, as they could take this misinformation, adopt anti-chelation policies in each state, and target doctors who practice chelation therapy. In Kentucky, for example, doctors cannot discuss chelation therapy with their patients lest they face revocation of their license. Indeed, almost all Kentucky physicians who use alternative therapies have been either forced out of state or forced to desist from using alternative therapies, especially chelation therapy, because it “departs from prevailing practice in the State of Kentucky.” This is all too common, to one degree or another, in most states.

As the central federal agency for providing information on disease and public health issues, the CDC (which led a session as well as hosting the event) is in a key position to spread bias and misinformation on chelation.

We were also told that “Quackbuster” Stephen Barrett was a key participant. The Quackbusters are a group of self-proclaimed skeptics of any medical or health modality that avoids drugs, surgery, or radiation; they attack almost all nonconventional healthcare practices as quackery—regardless of the scientific research to the contrary. Two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling is on their quack hit list, along with many well-known and respected doctors and scientists, including Deepak Chopra, Andrew Weil, and dozens of others. The Quackbusters run over seventy websites, so millions of people are exposed to their propaganda.

Unfortunately, integrative physicians who practice chelation therapy fear being vocal about it lest they be targeted by their state medical boards. Let us be clear: chelation is in no way a “public health danger.” If you want a real public health danger, you need look no further than many parts of conventional medicine. Gary Null points out that mainstream medicine kills nearly 800,000 people every year through physician mistakes, hospital-related illnesses, and reactions to FDA-approved medications. That’s the equivalent of six jumbo jets falling out of the sky each day, and more than the number of American casualties in the Civil War and World War I combined.

http://www.anh-usa.org/removing-heavy-metals-like-mercury-from-the-body-is-dangerous/

You Have The Right To Know: 17 Chemicals To Avoid In Cosmetic And Personal Care Products

Elina April 10, 2012 3

For many, a commitment to health sounds more like a commitment to a life of paranoia and deprivation. The most common argument I hear is that it isn’t “healthy” to spend a life in fear of every product that is out there. For those with a busy lifestyle, it sure may seem overwhelming to think of adding more things to watch out for on top of our existing concerns. While I understand this perspective, I am writing this article to make it simpler for you. Remove the words paranoia, deprivation and concern from your vocabulary, and replace them with “Being Informed”.

Being informed will simply allow you to make more intelligent and conscious choices for yourself, your family, and the planet as a whole. You might lose a couple of seconds of your life while looking for detrimental chemicals on product labels, but is that any match for the healthier years you’ll add to your life, the illnesses you’ll avoid, and the example you will be in support of a more sustainable world?

The truth is, many of the ingredients in personal care and beauty products aren’t so pretty. U.S. researchers have found that one in eight of the 82,000 ingredients used in cosmetic and personal care products are hazardous industrial chemicals. This means that 10,500 industrial chemicals are used as cosmetic ingredients, many of which are carcinogens, pesticides, reproductive toxins, endocrine disruptors, plasticizers (chemicals that keep concrete soft), degreasers (used to get grime off auto parts) and surfactants (they reduce surface tension in water, like in paint and inks). And these go on our skin and into the environment…

Did you know that everyday chemical exposure is among the leading causes of the most common cases of chronic disease in America? (Click HERE to learn more)

Below is a brilliant video that examines the pervasive use of toxic chemicals in our everyday personal care products.

 

Below is a list of chemicals you will want to look out for to minimize your exposure to toxic chemicals.

HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS TO AVOID IN COSMETIC AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS:

1. Parabens

Used in makeup, moisturizers, shampoos etc. May interfere with hormone function. Associated with breast cancer. Look out for ingredients with “pararaben” in their name (methylparaben, butylparaben, propylparaben, isobutylparaben, ethylparaben). Widely used even though they are known to be toxic.

 

Learn More

2. DEA, cocamide DEA and lauramide DEA (Related chemicals: MEA and TEA)

In creamy and foaming products such as moisturizer, shampoo. Can react to form cancer-causing nitrosamines. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

3. Dibutyl Phthalate or DBP

In nail products and some hair sprays. Toxic to reproduction and may interfere with hormone function. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

4. BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene)

In moisturizer, makeup, etc. Can cause cancer and interfere with hormone function. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

5. Coal Tar Dyes

Look for P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE in hair dyes and colours identified as “C.I.” followed by five digits in other products. Potential to cause cancer and can be contaminated with heavy metals toxic to the brain.

 

Learn More

6. Formaldehyde-Releasing Preservatives

Look for DMDM HYDANTOIN, DIAZOLIDINYL UREA, IMIDAZOLIDINYL UREA, METHENAMINE, or QUARTERNIUM-15. Widely used in hair products, moisturizers, etc. Formaldehyde causes cancer.

 

Learn More

7. Synthetic  fragrances and Parfum

Widely used even in some products marketed as “unscented” (often the last ingredient). Mixture of chemicals that can trigger allergies and asthma. Some linked to cancer and neurotoxicity. Some harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

8. PEGs

Widely used in conditioners, moisturizers, deodorants, etc. Can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane, which can cause cancer.

 

Learn More

9. Petrolatum

In hair products, lip balm/lipstick, skin care products. Petroleum product that can be contaminated with
cancer-causing impurities.

 

Learn More

10. Mineral Oil (Most harmful when poorly refined)

In many other care products such as baby oil, body lotions, soap and makeup. Mineral oil is a petroleum by-product which cloggs the pores and interferes with the skin’s ability to eliminate toxins, promoting acne and other disorders. Slows down skin function and cell development, resulting in premature aging. May be contaminated with PAHs (carcinogens).

 

Learn More

11. Siloxanes (Cyclomethicone and ingredients ending in “siloxane” (e.g., cyclotetrasiloxane)

Widely used in moisturizer, makeup, hair products, etc. Can interfere with hormone function and damage the liver. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

12. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) and Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES)

In products that foam such as shampoo, cleansers, bubble bath. SLES can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane, which may cause cancer. SLS may damage liver. Irritates skin, eyes and respiratory tract. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

13. Triclosan

In “anti-bacterial” products such as toothpaste, soaps, hand sanitizers. May interfere with hormone function. Harmful to fish and other wildlife.

 

Learn More

14. Chemical Sunscreens (with Retinyl Palmitate, Oxybenzone and Octyl Methoxycinnamate)

When many of the chemicals used in popular sunscreens are exposed to sunlight, reactions occur between the sunscreen’s active and inactive ingredients and the epidermis. Toxic reactions include inflammation, dermalogical effects, allergic reactions and photogenotoxic (DNA altering) effects. Chemical sunscreens have ingredients that actually promote cancer.

Natural sunscreens with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide are safer alternatives.

P.S. Sunscreen does NOT allow the body to absorb any vitamin D from sunlight. So if you plan on being outside for a short period of time, skip the sunscreen and feed your body the vitamin D that will keep it healthy.

 

Learn More

15. Aluminum 

Aluminum is a common ingredient in deodorant and mostly antiperspirant. It is often linked to Alzheimer’s and brain disorders and is a possible risk factor in breast cancer. Aluminum-based compounds in antiperspirants form a temporary plug within the sweat duct that stops the flow of sweat to the skin’s surface, which forces toxins to flow back into the bloodstream.

 

Learn More

16. Heavy Metals: Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, Arsenic, Nickel and More

Heavy metals can build up in the body over time and are known to cause varied health problems, which can include: cancer, reproductive and developmental disorders, neurological problems; memory loss; mood swings; nerve, joint and muscle disorders; cardiovascular, skeletal, blood, immune system, kidney and renal problems; headaches; vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea; lung damage; contact dermatitis; and brittle hair and hair loss. Many are suspected hormone disruptors and respiratory toxins, and for some like lead, there is no known safe blood level.

Click HERE to learn how to test your lipstick or other cosmetic products for heavy metals.

 

Learn More

17. Talc

Commonly found in baby powders, face powders, body powders. Talc is a known carcinogen and is a major cause of ovarian cancer. It can be harmful if inhaled as it can lodge in the lungs, causing respiratory disorders. Since the early 1980s, records show that several thousand infants each year have died or become seriously ill following accidental inhalation of baby powder.

 

Learn More

SOURCES:

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/issues/health/science/toxics/dirty-dozen-cosmetic-chemicals/

http://www.primitivemakeup.com/Beauty%20Awards%20standards_web.pdf

http://www.handmadenaturals.co.uk/synthetic_cosmetic_ingredients_to_avoid.php

http://environmentaldefence.ca/sites/default/files/report_files/HeavyMetalHazard%20FINAL.pdf

http://lookyoungerfeelyounger.net/2011/02/thirty-cosmetic-ingredients-to-avoid/

http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/

http://safecosmetics.org

http://designerhealthcenters.com/blog/the-8-most-deadly-toxic-metals-effecting-you/

http://clinispot.blogspot.ca/2012/03/usfda-warns-on-mercury-containing.html

http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-156.shtml

http://www.fragrancefreeliving.com

http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/heavy-metals/dangers-of-aluminum

http://www.novamagazine.com.au/article_archive/2008/08_12_toxicsunscreen.htm

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/legislation/consultation/_cosmet/metal-metaux-consult-eng.php

http://www.preventcancer.com/consumers/cosmetics/talc.htm

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/AP-Deo

http://victoria-anisman-reiner.suite101.com/aluminum-in-deodorant-a45498

 

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2012/04/10/you-have-the-right-to-know-17-chemicals-to-avoid-in-cosmetic-and-personal-care-products/

New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death

A three-dimensional model of an HIV virus. Researchers are exploring the use of lasers and sound waves to attack viruses. Credit: 3DScience.com

By Michael Schirber (as reported on LiveScience.com)

posted: 05 February 2008 09:27 am ET

Scientists may one day be able to destroy viruses in the same way that opera singers presumably shatter wine glasses. New research mathematically determined the frequencies at which simple viruses could be shaken to death.

“The capsid of a virus is something like the shell of a turtle,” said physicist Otto Sankey of Arizona State University. “If the shell can be compromised [by mechanical vibrations], the virus can be inactivated.”

Recent experimental evidence has shown that laser pulses tuned to the right frequency can kill certain viruses. However, locating these so-called resonant frequencies is a bit of trial and error.

“Experiments must just try a wide variety of conditions and hope that conditions are found that can lead to success,” Sankey told LiveScience.

To expedite this search, Sankey and his student Eric Dykeman have developed a way to calculate the vibrational motion of every atom in a virus shell. From this, they can determine the lowest resonant frequencies.

As an example of their technique, the team modeled the satellite tobacco necrosis virus and found this small virus resonates strongly around 60 Gigahertz (where one Gigahertz is a billion cycles per second), as reported in the Jan. 14 issue of Physical Review Letters.

A virus’ death knell

All objects have resonant frequencies at which they naturally oscillate. Pluck a guitar string and it will vibrate at a resonant frequency.

But resonating can get out of control. A famous example is the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, which warped and finally collapsed in 1940 due to a wind that rocked the bridge back and forth at one of its resonant frequencies.

Viruses are susceptible to the same kind of mechanical excitation. An experimental group led by K. T. Tsen from Arizona State University have recently shown that pulses of laser light can induce destructive vibrations in virus shells.

“The idea is that the time that the pulse is on is about a quarter of a period of a vibration,” Sankey said. “Like pushing a child on a swing from rest, one impulsive push gets the virus shaking.”

It is difficult to calculate what sort of push will kill a virus, since there can be millions of atoms in its shell structure. A direct computation of each atom’s movements would take several hundred thousand Gigabytes of computer memory, Sankey explained.

He and Dykeman have found a method to calculate the resonant frequencies with much less memory.

In practice

The team plans to use their technique to study other, more complicated viruses. However, it is still a long way from using this to neutralize the viruses in infected people.

One challenge is that laser light cannot penetrate the skin very deeply. But Sankey imagines that a patient might be hooked up to a dialysis-like machine that cycles blood through a tube where it can be hit with a laser. Or perhaps, ultrasound can be used instead of lasers.

These treatments would presumably be safer for patients than many antiviral drugs that can have terrible side-effects. Normal cells should not be affected by the virus-killing lasers or sound waves because they have resonant frequencies much lower than those of viruses, Sankey said.

Moreover, it is unlikely that viruses will develop resistance to mechanical shaking, as they do to drugs.

“This is such a new field, and there are so few experiments, that the science has not yet had sufficient time to prove itself,” Sankey said. “We remain hopeful but remain skeptical at the same time.”

http://ascendedhealth.com/articles/NewWayToKillViruses.htm

Effective Cancer Therapies Suopressed

 
Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Oct, 2004 by Curt Maxwell

Editor:

Recently, some patients brought their son to see me for low back pain. I was concerned by his emaciated appearance and noticed on the intake form that he had cancer. Naturally I asked about treatment and was informed he was receiving IPT (insulin potentiation treatment). I asked about diet and he told me, “The Doctor didn’t say anything about that.” I asked about IV’s. Even a ‘Myers cocktail.’ What about IV vitamin C? No, nothing. OK, so it’s great that IPT, by dropping the blood sugar level way down with insulin and then zapping the cancer cells with low dose methotrexate or other chemotherapeutic drugs, works well in many cases. However, it still belongs in the ‘medical mindset’ of treating cancer, which is,“Kill the cancer cells.”

But what about the other half of the equation? Building Health. Everyone who has any type of cancer has a disturbed immune system. Was he taking any immune boosters? Oncolyn, thymic protein A, IP6, Beta 1,3-D Glucan, Lactoferrin, Mushroom combinations? No. Anything even minimal such as high dose antioxidants? No. Nothing. Even though he appeared to be dying of cachexia, he had never heard of Hydrazine Sulphate, the amazing substance developed by Joseph Gold M.D, which inhibits the loss of protein and body mass in cancer patients. It’s available but like everything else that’s too good, it’s officially banned by the FDA.

This is in no way a condemnation of IPT. Far from it. I have the utmost respect for the brilliant Mexican Dr. Donato Perez Garcia who developed IPT and his grandson who carries on the treatment in his Tijuana clinic, of course with no government interference.

Nevertheless, I wonder if practitioners understand that to give the patient the best chance of survival, all aspects should be considered in supporting the killing of cancer cells by IPT. Detox measures such as coffee enemas are a basic. Likewise the restoration of health could be considered a primary component. Diet, supplements and immune support must be addressed. Whether one chooses to use the Gerson system, Dr. Kelley’s approach or Dr. Manner’s or any other proven system or combination or common denominator of such is up to the individual practitioner.

There is somewhat of a misconception it seems in much of the Naturopathic community, because of a so-called study done several years ago. A Naturopathic physician visited cancer clinics in Mexico and followed patients for several years. The ‘study’ showed that the five-year survival rates weren’t that impressive. The problem was that almost all the patients going to the Mexican clinics are medical failures to start with and have all received chemotherapy, which greatly impairs the immune system. Patients who are smart enough to figure out the system and get legitimate treatment’ without chemo have a very high survival rate. I know of no clinic or hospital in Mexico or anywhere else that uses only one modality.

Even many ‘alternative’ doctors are misguided when it comes to cancer treatment. In the recent Townsend Letter focusing on cancer, the Editor states: “When cancer does respond to treatment, invariably it has been complicated requiring not only surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation, but usually numerous herbal and vitamin supports in addition to some form of positive mental thinking.” Because of damage done by chemo and radiation it’s difficult to understand any logic to this statement but let’s assume this is just politically correct rhetoric. The Editor also says, “We examine in this issue and in one issue each year the progress in alternative cancer treatments.” It would be wonderful to have real progress in alternative cancer treatments, although rather than alternative, the term should be ‘legitimate.’ It’s debatable whether we really need progress when all the wonderful treatments we already have are ignored and legitimate cancer-inhibiting substances are banned by the FDA. The letter from the National Cancer Institute is really pathetic. Notice that plenty of their ‘studies’ are combining CAM with conventional chemo and the rest of the proposed studies are mostly stupid and irrelevant. If the NCCAM is really committed to exploring legitimate approaches to treating cancer the first thing they need to do is get another Government agency, the FDA, to lift the ban on empirically proven cancer treatments such as Laetrile, Metbal and useful immune boosters like staphage lysate.

This will not happen. It’s easy to read between the lines. It’s a sham, merely a delaying tactic to try to appease. Their very heading, “NCCAM Seeks Scientific Answers on CAM for Cancer” is absurd. The key word here is supposed to be ‘scientific,’ and that usually implies ‘double blind’ studies. Chemo is a proven ‘scientific’ treatment. Proven to toxically poison several hundred thousand people to death every year. Where are the chemo double-blind studies? Just like many other drugs there are no double blind studies. What ridiculous hypocrisy! According to a report from the Harvard School of Public Health it’s calculated that 2% to 3% of those with cancer benefit from chemotherapy.

WARNING. The June 2004 issue of the Townsend Letter contains a letter from the National Cancer Institute. The writer is asking readers to forward (turn in) names and contact information of Doctors actively involved in treating cancer using ‘alternatives.’ Under no circumstances should anyone offer any information before clearing it with the individual practitioner. In many states Doctors treating cancer by legitimate means, which is other than chemo or radiation, can be subject to prosecution.

Even the use of CAM is misleading. Complementary and alternative medicine suggests using ‘alternatives’ to complement mainstream medicine. A better word is Integrative because a person’s health should be restored using an eclectic approach–utilizing the best for a particular manifestation from all branches of ‘Medicine’ including, but not limited to, Naturopathy, Oriental Medicine, (the various methods of acupuncture as well as Herbal formulas), Homeopathy in its various forms, Chiropractic and or Osteopathic manipulation, Western Herbal medicine, German Biological Medicine, Terrain Analysis, Natural Hormone Replacement therapy, Diet, Vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, Orthomolecular medicine as defined by Linus Pauling and all other non-toxic modalities. None of these modalities should be subject to any double-blind studies as empirical evidence is all the proof ever needed.

Most of the population are brainwashed into believing ‘mass media medicine.’ In his book, Answer Cancer: Miraculous Healings Explained Stephen C. Parkhill states. “If you want to identify the worst abuses of hypnotic power, without a doubt the two situations where abuse of hypnotic technique is causing the most illness or killing huge numbers of people are the corporate-driven news, as it uses electronic media to breed fear and emptiness, and the food and drug companies using the same electronic media to make people feel emptiness, cravings and symptoms of sickness.

This is not how any viewers would consciously choose to feel. But these feelings turn out to be the net result of too much time viewing the medium.” He goes on. “The thing that makes me mad is that wrapped in this sheep’s costume of harmless family entertainment, the real culprit of cultural decay doesn’t even have to offer its wares for inspection at the critical faculties’ guard shack. By recognizing the power of first impression, the consumer scientists knew to go after infant minds more than a generation ago. The materially-burdened, spiritually vacant images of their own self-serving America became what all too many people received as their earliest impressions once TV took hold. Consumer scientists learned to be there first when the eggs cracked open, and now the little ducks think the fox is mommy. By silencing all suspicion of power and intent, the real criminal slides straight into the subconscious mind of the viewer unannounced and takes powerful root. Quickly the critical faculty grows to protect the images installed by the consumer scientists. These are the same people who have been shaping the images that tell our subconscious minds what life should look like. Believe me when I tell you these people are experts at bypassing the critical faculty.”

Another interesting book, Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness by Jim Keith, in Chapter 1, opening paragraph, Keith says, “Agents of the world’s elite have long been engaged in a war on the populace of the earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, greed so pervasive that it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed. It is the philosophy of mass control that ultimately aims at dictating every aspect of human life-even remolding man’s perception of reality and himself.”

Several years ago Suzanne Somers developed breast cancer. Instead of chemo she opted for some alternatives and compromised (I think) by allowing radiation. Suzanne Somers knows more about health and building health than most ‘alternative’ doctors. Also she is right on the mark with diet and weight loss. She appeared on Larry King and I felt bad for her because she really had to ‘back peddle’ when it came to talking about her choice of therapy. Larry King again asked her about her treatment and what it was and she told him Iscador, the German anthroposophical treatment developed why Rudolph Steiner back in the twenties. He asked her why she chose that and she said it was because it was non-toxic and killed the cancer cells with no collateral damage. Larry King then gave away his ignorance by asking something like, “Well if it’s that good why don’t the oncologists use it?” She gave a big part of the answer by saying Iscador could not be patented. Actually, that is a major key to the whole problem. Natural products, for the most part cannot be patented. The cancer establishment does not want a cure for cancer unless it’s a patented, very expensive one.

Why would they? With over half a million people employed in the industry, billions of dollars of revenue coming in every year from several hundred thousand people being chemo’d to death, (average cost of around $200,000) what would be the incentive? Don’t be so naive to think anything noble. Won’t happen. That should be completely obvious to any clear thinking person. If the cancer industry really did want a “cure” then why would every viable treatment be condemned? Just look at the history of the industry. Everything from Harry Hoxsey’s herbal formula that has cured hundreds over decades and still is at the Bio Medical center in Tijuana, to William B. Coley’s toxins which have amazing ability to boost the immune system. Royal Raymond Rife and his incredible microscope and frequency machine, proven to cure cancer very quickly but just as quickly destroyed. Max Gerson, a rather complicated but absolutely proven treatment now under the direction of his very capable daughter Charlotte, in Tijuana. Dr. William Donald Kelley, who cured himself of Pancreatic cancer about three weeks before death and went on to cure many cancer patients with his system, utilizing the ignored work of John Beard and developing a system of Metabolic typing among other interesting modalities, before he got tired of government harassment and quit. Dr. Harold Manner, who was head of the biology department at Loyola University eventually left and opened a clinic in Tijuana. He states in the introduction of his book, The Death of Cancer “The administration of Loyola University of Chicago also deserves our sincere gratitude. Although they have been under continuous attack for allowing me to continue my work, they have steadfastly upheld my academic freedom, the right to conduct research and report my results.” They were under continuous attack because no proof was wanted that Laetrile had any anti-cancer properties at all. That was in 1978. Meanwhile in California Dr. John A Richardson, who had treated several hundred people with Laetrile and vitamin C with much success, was ridiculed and prosecuted as a Quack, his license revoked and his career destroyed, all by 1977.

Dr. Manner did absolutely legitimate university research with laetrile and proved this substance, especially when combined with certain vitamins, a powerful anticancer agent. It was banned and labeled ‘quackery.’ When Dr. Richardson was locked up, Dr. Douglas Brodie ran his practice for him. It wasn’t long before the authorities were after him too. After all, in the people’s state of California it was (is) illegal to treat cancer any other way except surgery, radiation and chemo. (Cut, burn, poison) Dr. Brodie moved to Nevada, where he practices to this day and now approaching 80, could be considered the ‘father’ of nontoxic US cancer treatment.

Dozens of patients have achieved ‘permanent remission’ from Dr. Brodie’s treatments.
In 1989, a patient and friend of mine, Jim Lawler of Kasilov, Alaska, was diagnosed with Leukemia. He was in rough shape with sores all over his legs, canker sores in his mouth and subject to colds and infections. He was also sleeping 18 hours a day. Oncologists said they could try and treat him but it was probably hopeless as no one ever survived. He heard about a Greek Doctor having great success with all types of cancer. Jim immediately contacted Dr. Hariton Alivazatos and left for Greece. He joined the line of about three to four hundred Americans, every morning, waiting to see the Doctor or his staff. All the patients were given a diet sheet and received daily injections. By the fifth day the sores on Jim’s legs were gone. By the 14th he was able to easily walk several miles around the Greek ruins and by the 21st day was in full remission. So far this remission has lasted more than twelve years! There were many other cures but also some failures, just as there is in other legitimate cancer clinics because most trusting, naive and ‘brain washed’ Americans seek the services of regular Oncologists. Only after they are told the situation is hopeless and they are almost dead do they seek so-called alternatives. Of course by this time most of their immune system is severely compromised by the toxic chemo.

Nevertheless, a good percentage survive. Those like Jim who didn’t have any toxic therapy have a very high survival rate. Dr. Alivazatos had such great success that survivors and supporters, all very naive people, wanted him to come to the United States and share his great cancer cure. Dr. Alivazatos, also apparently quite naive, came to the US but quickly found that the ‘authorities’ wanted to ‘steal’ his formula. He was right to be suspicious. He returned to Greece a very disillusioned man. The chances of his system being used with him getting credit had about as much chance as an inventor who designed a carburetor that would allow a big V8 engine to get 75 miles to the gallon, ever getting to market. Zero.

International Biologics Hospital in Tijuana offers the treatment under the direction of the very capable Roberto Tapia, MD with continued success. Dr. Alivazatos’ formula consists mostly of a few vitamins and an amino acid. It was marketed in the US under the name Metbal or Cellbal. It contained no drugs or synthetic ingredients. If there was nothing to it then why did it become illegal and join all the other cancer inhibitors on the FDA’s black list of supposedly “unproven” cancer treatments? Simple answer: Like Laetrile and all other threats to the Cancer Industry it worked too well and could not be allowed.

What about the empirically proven work of Drs. Virginia Livingston Wheeler, Kurt Donsbach, Geronimo Rubio, Ernesto Contreras, Harold Manner, Johanna Budwig, Gerhard Ohlenschlager, Heinrich Kremer, Franz Xavier Mayr, Abram Hoffer, Robert Bradford, Hulda Clark, Hans Neiper, Emanuel Revici, William B. Coley, Jesse Stoff, Hariton Alivazatos, Lawrence Burton, Stanislaw Burzynski, Joseph Issels, Keith Brewer, Jimmie Keller and others. For a fuller review of successful treatments see Definitive Guide to Cancer by Burton Goldberg.

Several months ago I referred a ‘terminal’ lung cancer patient to Dr. Rubio and Bill Frye’s American Metabolic Institute in Tijuana. The patient is now in remission and leading a normal life.
Jimmie Keller was not a doctor but had suffered from Cancer and after radical surgery failed, cured himself. He got remarkable remissions, especially with breast cancer at his Tijuana clinic. He was illegally kidnapped in Mexico and bought back to the US for a typical ‘kangaroo court’ trial. He was convicted and as far as I know he is still locked up for the crime of curing cancer.

In 1984 Dr. Brewer took Nobel prize winner Otto Warburg’s work and translated his theories into a practical treatment for cancer, expanding Warburg’s thesis using cesium to alkalize. He got remarkable results, treating 30 patients with various cancers. Results? All thirty survived. Why wasn’t his work hailed as a cancer breakthrough?

Look what a disgusting time Dr. Burzynski has had and his treatment is particularly successful with children’s brain tumors. All over the country poor little kids are tortured and killed by the thousands with chemo and radiation, every year. What a crime. Why can’t people see what’s going on? Maybe people cannot understand the depths that man can sink to, all for profit and greed. I really think that’s the key. Most people are honest and really believe we have a system that’s trying to do right. Even commentators like Bill O’Reilly don’t get it and seem to have no clue to the truth and he’s living in a state that has particularly nasty medical regulators. US a free country? Sure. Mass media brain washing has done a really excellent job because even intelligent people like King and O’Reilly don’t understand. Burton Goldberg, in his book, Alternative Medicine: Definitive guide to Cancer sums up the situation well. Talking about alternative treatments, he says “Many powerful economic forces–pharmaceutical drug companies, physicians’ trade groups, insurance companies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the latter two being taxpayer-funded organizations within the US government, want health care to stay exactly the way it is because they’re thriving under it. Successful alternative approaches to cancer are a direct financial threat to this system. They are also a serious intellectual threat to the belief systems of conventional medicine. If nutrition and the immune system are so crucial to health and healing and they have never addressed either, this means conventional doctors will have to “go back to school” to catch up.

It’s not just the treatment of cancer that could be considered criminally inadequate; it’s the treatment of all degenerative disease, including the number one killer, heart disease.

There are cures for almost every condition and disease. These cures are suppressed. Almost every disease or malady has a business built around it and these businesses actively suppress any solution that would destroy their income base. Drugs cannot cure. They suppress symptoms. All drugs have secondary effects, some life-threatening themselves. Iatrogenic disease is now considered the number 3 killer. There is no health care system in the US. It’s a farce. It has nothing to do with health.

The mainstream position on diet is wrong and is the main cause of illness and obesity. Recent studies have shown that saturated fat and dietary cholesterol do not necessarily raise serum cholesterol and serum cholesterol has little if anything to do with heart disease. Partially hydrogenated and hydrogenated fats, cis trans fatty acids, all sugars, processed grains and processed foods in excess are the problem. Dr. Robert Atkins was always right about carbohydrates and this will be totally proven over time. The Atkins diet is not a high protein, high fat diet. It is a low carbohydrate diet. That is, low intake of starches and ‘high glycemic’ foods.
The US Medical system has probably the finest emergency medical care in the world and also amazing technologies to diagnose disease but should be considered criminally negligent when it comes to treating degenerative disease.

The drug pharmaceutical companies control Medicine and direct research. There is no open research. If researchers go ‘off the path’ of researching pharmaceuticals, they are fired and blackballed. The FDA is bought and paid for by the Drug pharmaceutical companies. (See lef.com.)

The only time the system will change is when it’s forced to because people no longer seek the services of Medical Practitioners with no answers except drugs which only suppress symptoms, while no attempt is made to treat the cause(s). No one can ever be drugged or poisoned back to health.

Dr. Curt Maxwell
P.O. Box 1075
Winterhaven, California 92283 USA
phone number: 928-257-4873
email address: drcurtmaxwell@yahoo.com
COPYRIGHT 2004 The Townsend Letter Group
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group
http://drcurtmaxwell.com/published-l…ters-articles/

FDA Says Walnuts Are a “New Drug”

 

Dr. Mercola
Mercola.com
Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:53 CST

© karma-free-cooking.com

As unbelievable as it sounds, current law makes it illegal for food producers to share certain types of scientific information with you.

So when Diamond Food relayed health information about the omega-3 fats in walnuts on product packaging and also on their Web site, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attacked.

Even though the information was entirely true, and backed by peer-reviewed scientific research.

If a Food Can Prevent a Disease, it Must be a Drug

This is the backward thinking that goes on at the FDA, where regulations currently prohibit manufacturers of dietary supplements or producers of food from referring to any scientific study documenting the potential effect of the substance on a health condition, punishable by large fines and even jail.

Disclosure about the benefits of a dietary supplement or food, no matter how credible, places the food in the category of an “unapproved drug.”

In other words, if a product makes a medical claim, it’s automatically classified as a drug.

This is how the FDA got away with sending Diamond Food a warning letter^[1], stating:

“… we have determined that your walnut products are promoted for conditions that cause them to be drugs because these products are intended for use in the prevention, mitigation, and treatment of disease.

The following are examples of the claims made on your firm’s website under the heading of a web page stating “OMEGA-3s… Every time you munch a few walnuts, you’re doing your body a big favor … “

These claims are backed by science^[2], but it doesn’t matter under FDA rules, which are so counter to rationality and logic that it boggles the mind. The FDA letter goes on to list several health claims made by Diamond Foods regarding omega-3 fats, claims such as:

• “Studies indicate that the omega-3 fatty acids found in walnuts may help lower cholesterol; protect against heart disease, stroke and some cancers; ease arthritis and other inflammatory diseases; and even fight depression and other mental illnesses.”

 

• “[O]mega-3 fatty acids inhibit the tumor growth that is promoted by the acids found in other fats… “

 

• “[I]n treating major depression, for example, omega-3s seem to work by making it easier for brain cell receptors to process mood-related signals from neighboring neurons.”
  “The omega-3s found in fish oil are thought to be responsible for the significantly lower incidence of breast cancer in Japanese women as compared to women in the United States.”

Walnuts are “New Drugs”

Because Diamond Food dared to let consumers know that natural substances in a natural food may offer some health benefits and protections, the FDA views this as a new drug. In their eyes, only FDA-approved drugs are capable of offering such protections …

The FDA stated in the warning letter^[3]:

“Because of these intended uses, your walnut products are drugs… Your walnut products are also new drugs … because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced conditions. Therefore … they may not be legally marketed with the above claims in the United States without an approved new drug application.

Additionally, your walnut products are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes. Thus, your walnut products are also misbranded… in that the labeling for these drugs fails to bear adequate directions for use… “

The FDA’s current position is that foods such as walnuts, cherries, broccoli, turmeric, green tea and the like should be subjected to the full FDA approval process. But obtaining a new drug application, as the FDA suggested, can cost billions of dollars. And let’s face it – walnut growers cannot come close to affording that!

Is it Not a Constitutional Right to Share Truthful, Scientific Information?

This is so ridiculous, as censoring a food producer’s right to inform others about scientific research is in violation of the first amendment. The American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF) states:

“The FDA ignores first amendment protections and censors the communication of valid scientific information. The agency seems to have lost sight of its mandate to protect the public and has instead come to see itself as the guardian of corporate interests.”

Can you imagine the drug companies not being permitted to tell you what their products could do for you… do you think they would roll over for that? Not a chance, but they don’t have to simply because they are the ones who can afford the FDA’s approval process. With few exceptions, it’s impossible for food producers to assume such costs for natural and therefore non-patentable products.

It’s ludicrous for the FDA to require natural products to be “vetted” the same way as drugs. In nearly every case, natural products are safer and more effective than synthetic drugs, as science has shown, time and time again. Not to mention that natural agents are much less expensive than pharmaceuticals, and can even be grown in your backyard!

It’s unfortunate that the FDA is so beholden to the drug industry that it would waste it’s time to attack a walnut manufacturer for citing scientific research while allowing Frito Lay to claim that its Lay’s potato chips are “heart healthy.”

And walnut producers are not alone. Cherry growers have also been threatened by the FDA with jail time if their websites even contain links to scientific studies from Harvard and elsewhere, outlining the health benefits of cherries for gout or arthritis pain.^[4] Green tea growers have received similar threats. As I said, it truly boggles the mind…

What Should You Know About Walnuts?

The FDA was sure worried that you might get wind of the truth – that a food might confer health benefits that drugs currently lay exclusive claim to. Walnuts are good sources of plant-based omega-3 fats, natural phytosterols and antioxidants that are so powerful at free-radical scavenging that researchers called them “remarkable.”^[5] Plus, walnuts may help reduce not only the risk of prostate cancer, but breast cancer as well.

In one study, mice that ate the human equivalent of 2.4 ounces of whole walnuts for 18 weeks had significantly smaller and slower-growing prostate tumors compared to the control group that consumed the same amount of fat but from other sources. Overall the whole walnut diet reduced prostate cancer growth by 30 to 40 percent. According to another study on mice, the human equivalent of just two handfuls of walnuts a day cut breast cancer risk in half, and slowed tumor growth by 50 percent as well^[6]. Other research has shown walnuts may:

• Significantly reduce LDL cholesterol levels

 

• Reverse brain aging in rats

 

• Boost heart health in diabetics

Now this is the type of information that we need to hear more of as, no doubt, if people were made aware of these potential benefits, and similar ones in other whole foods, they may be tempted to snack on a handful of whole walnuts instead of a bag of potato chips or pretzels.

You Can Still Support HR 1364 for Free Speech About Science

Congressmen Jason Chaffetz (R – UT) and Jared Polis (D – CO) have introduced the Free Speech about Science Act (HR 1364), a landmark legislation that would allow the flow of legitimate scientific and educational information.7 The new bill provides a limited and carefully targeted change to FDA regulations so that manufacturers and producers may reference legitimate, peer-reviewed scientific studies without converting a natural food or dietary supplement into an “unapproved drug.” According to Rep. Chaffetz’s website, the provisions of HR 1364 do the following^[8]:

• Allow dietary supplements and healthy foods to cite legitimate scientific research

 

• Provide a clear definition of the types of research that may be referenced by growers and manufacturers

 

• Ensure that referencing such research does not convert a food or dietary supplement into an “unapproved (and therefore illegal) new drug”

 

• Retain the authority of FDA and FTC to pursue any fraudulent and misleading statements

According to Rep. Chaffetz^[9]:

“It is important for individuals and families to take charge of their personal health by making the right decisions to get and stay healthy. This includes accessing information so that individuals can adjust habits, eat healthfully, and take appropriate dietary supplements to prevent and even treat health conditions.

The Free Speech About Science Act helps insure their access to legitimate scientific research to make the necessary decisions to improve their personal health and the health of their families.”

Rep. Polis adds^[10]:

“Today’s science has shown that vitamins and nutritional supplements can offer successful, natural alternatives to drugs. As we begin to reform our nation’s healthcare system, supplements are an innovative way to help reduce costs.

The Free Speech About Science Act is a common sense act that will make it easier for doctors and consumers to learn about the cheaper, healthier alternatives to costly medicines that food and nutritional supplements provide.”

As of December 2011, HR 1364 is in the first step in the legislative process and has been referred to committee. The majority of bills never make it out of committee, so we need your help.

Please lend HR 1364 your support by signing on as a co-sponsor TODAY.

Use the Alliance for Natural Health’s HR 1364 page to send a letter to your representative in support of this bill.^[11] And forward or post this article to all of your friends and loved ones who care about their health and their right to informed consent. With your combined influence we can be a powerful force for much-needed change.

References

1. Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, February 22, 2010.

 

1. Omega-3 Fatty Acids, GreenMedInfo.com.

 

1. Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, February 22, 2010.

 

1. Tart Cherry, GreenMedInfo.com.

 

1. Antioxidative Polyphenols from Walnuts, Phytochemisty, August 2003: 63(7); 795-801, Toshiyuki Fukuda, et al.

 

1. Walnuts May Fight Breast Cancer, WebMD Health News, April 21, 2009: Charlene Laino.

 

1. H.R. 1364: Free Speech About Science Act of 2011, GovTrack.us, December 14, 2011.

 

1. Chaffetz and Polis Introduce the Free Speech About Science Act, Congressman Jason Chaffetz Website, April 5, 2011.

 

1. Chaffetz and Polis Introduce the Free Speech About Science Act, Congressman Jason Chaffetz Website, April 5, 2011.

 

1. Chaffetz and Polis Introduce the Free Speech About Science Act, Congressman Jason Chaffetz Website, April 5, 2011.

 

1. 11 Protect Your Right to Know about the Science Behind Supplements!, Alliance for Natural Health.

Source

The New American July 21, 2011

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242763-FDA-Says-Walnuts-Are-a-New-Drug-

Legacy of Treason – Depleted Uranium and the Poisoning of Humanity

treason n 1 betrayal of one’s sovereign or country.
2 any treachery or betrayal. treasonable adj treasonous adj

In recent years I have become aware of the issue of depleted uranium (DU) and its use by the US Military in Iraq in 1991 and again in the current Iraq war. The photos of birth deformities and stories of suffering resulting from DU shocked me, reminding me of the Agent Orange victims of America’s Vietnam war. Then I watched David Bradbury and Peter Scott’s film, Blowin’ in the Wind. Its content shocked and appalled me, and spurred me into researching and writing this article. It is undoubtedly one of the most significant issues on the planet today, and yet the mainstream media stays quiet.

Depleted uranium (DU) is what is left after raw uranium has been enriched to the highly radioactive isotope U-235 used for weapons and power generation. For every ton of U-235 produced, there are seven tons of DU. Estimates vary, but it seems that currently the US alone has in excess of five million tons of stockpiles of DU. This has no commercial use beyond its use as a radiation shield in medical devices, and for adding to concrete to form radiation containing bunkers. However, this requires an insignificant quantity of the DU produced each year.

The half-life of DU is 4.5 billion years, so storing it safely and indefinitely is cost prohibitive. To remedy the situation, the US Department of Energy has made it freely available to the Pentagon and US armaments and armour manufacturers, and it has been used in weapons exported to 29 countries. It is simply cheaper to make it into weapons than store it.

It is widely accepted that DU itself is fairly stable, as the dangerous alpha particles which it emits cannot pass through more than a couple of centimetres of air. The problems arise when DU is in contact with water or is used in weaponry and explodes. (Remember the footage of the Baghdad bombing, with all the big sparks flying into the air? — The sparks were DU that was on fire and exploding.) It then creates a vapourised, radioactive gas comprising of tiny nano-particles.

The microscopic particles in this vapour are then littered, depending upon prevailing winds, up to 100 kms around (estimates on this vary — with some sources citing up to 1000 kms), where they fall on crops, water, or just on the ground to be picked up by the next gust of wind or by car tyres. Later, when this gas enters the atmosphere, it can spread worldwide.

The nanoparticles of DU enter the body, from the air, from landing on clothing or skin and from food or water. These nanoparticles penetrate all protective clothing and masks (nothing can filter these particles out), and once it comes in contact with the body it immediately disperses and begins to alter DNA. As it is not soluble it cannot be excreted from the body. Uranium is a toxic chemical element, just like lead, mercury, cadmium and chromium.

According to the declassified Groves memo from the Manhattan Project in 1943, the properties of DU in weapons have been known and strategised with for 60 years. It is clear that the US has known for 60 years about the effects of DU on the battlefield, also the danger to its own soldiers.

Why is DU so useful as a weapon?

DU is very hard, the hardest and densest of metals, and so is used for armour piercing rounds, fired from tanks, ships, aircraft and snipers, and for the bunker buster bombs made famous in the 2003 attack on Baghdad. It is also in the Tomahawk Cruise missiles fired from ships. Being so hard, it is also used extensively in the armour plating of tanks and armoured cars.

DU is a pyroforic metal, meaning it burns. The bullets and large calibre shells are actually on fire when they come out of the gun barrel because they are ignited by the friction in the barrel and explode on contact — armour piercing incendiary ammunition. Most of the DU metal becomes a metal vapour, so it is really a radioactive gas weapon once the initial destruction has occurred. DU weaponry are nuclear weapons. No question.

The military use of DU violates current international law including the principle that there is no unlimited right to choose the means and methods of warfare. Instead governments, including the Australian Government in correspondence about this matter with the writer, state that because it is not a nuclear weapon it does not contravene nuclear agreements.

When speaking of the quantities of DU used in various wars it is worth understanding that the amount of uranium used in the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima was approximately 13kg, about the size of a two-litre milk container. A Japanese professor, Dr. K. Yagasaki, has calculated that in terms of the atomicity, (the amount of radiation produced), a ton of DU used on the battlefield releases the equivalent of 100 Hiroshima bombs worth of radiation released into the atmosphere.

Thus when experts refer to the 2000 tons of DU dropped on Iraq in the past three years, what is being released in the Iraqi atmosphere, and then spreading worldwide, is the equivalent of 200,000 Hiroshima bombs.

The total amount of DU the US has used since 1991 is approximately 4600 tons (1000 in the first Gulf War, 800 in Kosovo, 800 in Afghanistan and a further 2000 tons in the current Iraq war.) This amounts to approximately 460,000 Hiroshima bombs, ten times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from all previous nuclear testing worldwide.

Gulf War Syndrome

Over the past 18 months there has been an erupting scandal in the US in the Department of Veterans Affairs as DU is blamed by more and more respected scientists for Gulf War Syndrome (and also, Balkans War Syndrome).

Of the 580,000 US soldiers that served in Iraq in 1991, by mid 2004, 518,739 were on medical disability pensions. This figure is 150,000 higher than just one year earlier. There are no more recent statistics, but it would appear that by now the percentages of soldiers affected would be reaching 100%

According to Leuren Moret, in a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the first Gulf War, 67% of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects. They were born with missing legs, arms, organs or eyes or had immune system and blood diseases. In some veterans’ families now, the only normal or healthy members of the family are the children born before the war. This is the only group of soldiers who served in Iraq whose health has been studied over some years.

‘The use of depleted uranium weapons is a crime against humanity, a crime against all species, and a war against the earth,’ says Moret. ‘It is imperative that we demand a permanent international moratorium on the sale and the use of depleted uranium weaponry.’

DU: Coming to a country near you

A 20-year agreement was signed om 2005 between the United States and Australia, the specific terms of which are secret, but which allows the US military to train and test its latest weapons in Australia. This involves bombing ranges in the pristine Shoalwater Bay near Rockhampton in Queensland and at Lancelin, the lobster fishing village 150kms north of Perth where there would be ship-to-shore bombing from nuclear powered and capable US navy ships.

Also in the Northern Territory a ‘test’ bombing range has been designated where B52s and Stealth bombers will, as of January 06, and as you read this, be dumping their payloads on their flights from Guam. The US Navy uses DU in its shelling, and the B52s will be most likely (presumably they will be testing the weapons they actually use) carrying bunker buster bombs with their 2.2 tons of DU each. Retrospective legislation was passed to remove the need for any Environmental Impact Study (EIS) before or after the duration of this agreement.

When asked in the Australian Senate about whether or not the US would be using DU in its bombing of Australian sites, Defence Minister Senator Hill said, ‘In relation to Depleted Uranium used by our allies we have said that, if they believe it is the most appropriate element to use in their particular munitions in certain circumstances, we do not think it is appropriate for us to press a different view upon them.’ Senator Hill has since retired from Australian politics and has taken up residence as the Australian UN Ambassador in New York.

(The author has since been in contact with the Australian Department of Defence who vehemently refute that DU weaponry is being used within Australian waters on the basis of a 1960s law preventing the use of nuclear weapons in Australian waters or on Australian land. However, given that DU weapons are not officially classified as nuclear weapons they would not come under this law.
Given, however, the propensity of the Australian Government to avoid asking any uncomfortable questions of our US allies, and to adhere quite strongly to the doctrine of plausible deniability (‘I did not know’ seems to work as an excuse for Government’s systemic willful ignorance) it is more likely that the Australian Department of Defence does not in fact know what the US is using in its bombs, and does not want to know.)

Insert: The death economy

More and more it appears that the things which are most important are simply those that generate the biggest growth in profits, in the GDP. Sickness generates business, cancer rates generate research dollars, war accelerates growth, and we wonder why peace is so elusive when we worship the economy. The following is equally applicable to Australia now as it was to the US in the 1960s.
Too much and for too long we seem to have surrendered personal excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things. Our gross national product now is over $800 billion a year.
But that gross national product, if we judge the United States of America by that, counts air pollution, and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors, and the jails for people who break them. It counts the destruction of redwoods and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. It counts napalm and it counts nuclear warheads, and armoured cars for the police to fight the riots in our cities. It counts Whitman’s rifle and Speck’s knife, and the television program which glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children.
Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our passion nor our devotion to our country.
It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile. And it can tell us everything about America — except why we are proud that we are Americans.
— Robert Kennedy, 18/3/1968

Ultimately we do not know how much DU is being used in Shoalwater Bay, or Lancelin or dumped daily in the Northern Territory.

We do know that Japan, the Philippines and Puerto Rica no longer allow the US to bomb their lands with DU, and that there is no ship-to-shore bombing allowed anymore on the US mainland.

We know that there are hundreds of very vocal groups in opposition worldwide to the use of DU, who have devoted their lives to this issue.

We also know that the US government does not particularly care about the safety of their troops or anyone else’s, and is seemingly content to poison the world for eternity, and poison themselves in the process. We know that weapons usage is classified and that such information will never be freely supplied to the Australian people, while nuclear powered and armed ships are cruising the waters of the Great Barrier Reef. In January, the largest nuclear powered and capable aircraft carrier in the world, boasting 6000 marines on board, docked in Brisbane.

If the contamination of Shoalwater Bay and Lancelin is anything like Iraq, Kosovo, or Afghanistan, then the vicinity of these places should be avoided. But it would be a mistake to think that the troubles are confined to those areas. The beef and pineapples from Rockhampton, and the seafood from Lancelin, could be contaminated and end up on your bbq. After this article was first published a reader contacted the West Australian Government who assured them that the Federal Government had told them, in writing, that DU was not being used in WA.

The Federal Government may in fact believe what it is saying, but given the photo that appeared on the US Navy’s own website, of DU shells being loaded into a ship’s gun in Shoalwater Bay (scroll to near bottom of page), it beggars belief that they would not be using DU in WA. After all, according to the Defence Department, DU is perfectly safe. They test weapons that they use, and they certainly use DU weapons.

According to Leuren Moret, it is simply no longer possible to go to Afghanistan or the Middle East without being contaminated. How long before that is also true of Australia?

There are questions that need to be asked by everyone related to the integrity of our political leadership.

Does our government have our best interests in mind

• When they sign up for bombardments on Australian soil and in Australian waters by DU tipped weaponry?
• When they refuse to stipulate that no nuclear weapons are to be used on our shores, and will they guarantee that our children will not grow up breathing in DU nanoparticles? 
• when they sign up for Son of Star Wars , which will cost in excess of $50 billion? (To protect us from what? Who?)
• When they decide to sequester large tracts of land in the Northern Territory for eternity for a nuclear dump, so the US and UK can dump their ‘spent’ nuclear fuel and we can export more uranium?
• When they sign up for a de facto [unshielded] nuclear dump under the guise of a joint bombing facility in the Northern Territory?

Who is running the agenda that says that all of a sudden it is OK to talk about new nuclear power stations as if nuclear power is an answer to global warming? David Goodstein, professor of physics at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) said on ABC’s Lateline in October 2004 that if nuclear power were to provide all of the energy that fossil fuel currently provides there would be enough uranium for just 10 years!

Westinghouse and GE build most of the nuclear power stations in the world, and also happen to own significant stakes in most major media companies in the US, which is largely why no real discussion will arise from the US on this issue. Nuclear power becomes unviable if the cost of disposing of the DU is factored in, which is why it is given to the Pentagon. Now Australia wants to expand the number and size of its uranium mines to sell to India and China (Who knows how they will dispose of their DU!).

Now Australia, thanks to John Howard, is talking seriously about building nuclear power stations when our largest single electricity supplier, the Snowy Mountains company, is running at 13% capacity! (SMH, 24/5/06) (see an article by the same author, debunking much of the mythology surrounding nuclear power, such as it supposed green and economic credentials. A must read if you want to understand and be a part of the nuclear power debate.)

Together we need to do something. Research the internet, find out for yourself what the DU debate is about. Do the research before you speak to anyone so you know what you are talking about, as you will find that most people will not want to believe that this is happening. The list of websites supplied at the end of this article is by no means definitive, but is a good place to start.

Get in touch with any of the many groups that have mobilised over this issue all over the world. Start your own group. Do not let the size of the opposition and the scale of the ignorance and unwillingness to know the truth that you will be confronted with, convince you that you are helpless and cannot do anything about DU. This is what they depend on .

• Contact your local politician, and do not accept anything that smells like a brush-off. This may well be the most important thing you ever do.
• Buy a copy and arrange a showing of the film Blowin’ in the Wind at your local cinema, and get your local community radio station to broadcast talks, interviews and lectures like those available on alternativeradio.org or traprockpeace.org and many other websites.
• If you live or holiday near the affected areas, make lots of noise with the local councillors and media. Be disobedient. Be seditious. Get the use of DU weaponry stopped. It is nuclear weaponry.
• Find out who provides the Public Liability insurance for the army, and does that insurer know the risks associated with DU? Perhaps the way to stop this is through the public liability requirements that the Australian population is tied up with. Any insurance lawyers out there?

This is our home that is being poisoned. It is our country. Demand that it is respected and protected for our children and their children. History will not forgive us if we stand by idly.

This article was first published in Kindred/byronchild magazine, issue 17, March 06. Republished Living Now magazine, May 06. This article may be copied as long as correct acknowledgment is made of the author and this web page.

References:

• Depleted uranium: Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets, by Leuren Moret
www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml
• Depleted Uranium Shells, The Radioactive Weapons: Perpetuation of War Damage by Radiation (PDF) Prof. Katsuma Yagasaki Professor, University of the Ryukyus.
www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/speakers.htm
• Discussion on DU in Australian Senate, June 2003
www.traprockpeace.org/rokkeaustraliajune03.html
• US Nuclear policy and Depleted Uranium: Testimony at the 28/6/2003 International War Crimes Tribunal on Afghanistan, by Leuren Moret
www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/speakers/moret_text_uspolicy_en.pdf
Depleted Uranium101, by Glen Lawrence.
www.myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/lawrence/duproject/cwpaper.htm
Shoalwater Bay Photos, US Navy website,

http://www.c7f.navy.mil/ts05/index.htm

What you can do?

Activists websites

• Dusk: Depleted uranium, Silent Killer
  www.dusk-qld.info
• IDUST. International Depleted Uranium Study Team
  www.idust.net
• Campaign Against Depleted Uranium (UK)
  www.cadu.org.uk
• Sea Swap. Lancellin bombing, Western Australia, DU.
  www.seaswap.org
• Irati Want. Site related to proposed nuclear dump in South Australia.
  www.iratiwanti.org/home.php3
• Depleted Uranium Education Project
  www.iacenter.org/depleted/du.htm
• Depleted Uranium: Hysteria or health threat? Anti Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia website
  www.anawa.org.au/weapons/du.html
• WISE (World Information Service on Energy) Uranium Project.
  www.wise-uranium.org/index.html
• Map of Uranium mines and facilities in Australia:
  www.futureaus.net/map/index.html

DVDs, radio interviews, talks

• Blowin’ In The Wind, DVD by David Bradbury, Peter Scott.
  www.frontlinefilms.com.au
• The Doctor, the Depleted Uranium and the Dying Children. German documentary exposes current radioactive warfare in Iraq
  www.traprockpeace.org/depleted_uranium_children.html
• DU discussion with Leuren Moret and others, USA
  www.traprockpeace.org/WBAIDepletedUranium.mp3
• Dr. Doug Rokke, USA
  www.traprockpeace.org/Rokketalk03May03.mp3, www.traprockpeace.org/rokkemiller111302.mp3

Further reading

• What does the US government know about DU? By Leuren Moret
  www.traprockpeace.org/depleted_uranium.html
• Selected resources for Depleted Uranium information
  www.myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/lawrence/duproject/resourcef.htm
• Depleted Uranium: Origin, properties, and health consequences, One of many articles/studies by Glen Lawrence, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Long Island University, Brooklyn, NY 11201.
  www.myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/lawrence/duproject/duhandout.htm
• The Depleted Uranium Project
  www.myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/lawrence/duproject/duproject.htm
• Depleted uranium and health: Facts and helpful suggestions
  www.myweb.brooklyn.liu.edu/lawrence/duproject/duhealth.htm
• ‘The Trail of a Bullet,’ Christian Science Monitor.
www.csmonitor.com/atcsmonitor/specials/uranium/
• Heads roll at Veteran’s Admin: Mushrooming DU scandal blamed, Bob Nichols, San Francisco Bay View, December 14, 2005.
  www.sfbayview.com/012605/headsroll012605.shtml
• DU FAQ. What the Pentagon has to say
  www.gulflink.osd.mil/faq_17apr.htm
• Local troops victims of America’s high tech weapons. Juan Gonzalez, New York Daily News , April 2, 2004.
  www.nydailynews.com/front/story/180333p-156685c.html
• Radioactive Wounds of War. Dave Lindorff, In These Times, August 25, 2005
  www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2298/
• ‘Where and how much depleted uranium has been fired?’
  www.laka.org/teksten/Vu/where-how-much-01/main.html
• Depleted Uranium Weapons and Acute Post- War Health Effects: An IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) Assessment.
  www.converge.org.nz/pma/dupost.htm
• American Free Press four-part series on DU by Christopher Bollyn.
  1. - Part I: ‘Depleted Uranium: US commits war crime against Iraq, humanity,’
     www.americanfreepress.net/html/depleted_uranium.html
  2. - Part II: ‘Cancer epidemic caused by US WMD: MD says depleted uranium definitively implicated’
     www.americanfreepress.net/html/cancer_epidemic_.html
  3. - Part III: ‘DU Syndrome stricken Vets denied care: Pentagon hides DU dangers to deny medical care to Vets’,
     www.americanfreepress.net/html/du_syndrome.html
  4. - Part IV: Pentagon Brass suppresses truth about Toxic Weapons: poisonous uranium munitions threaten world,
     www.americanfreepress.net/html/pentagon_brass.html
• Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War. Leuren Moret: August 2004. World Affairs Journal.
  www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2004/DU-Trojan-Horse1jul04.htm
• ‘Marin Depleted Uranium resolution heats up – GI’s will come home to a slow death,’ Carol Sterrit: August 2004 Coastal Post Online.
  www.coastalpost.com/04/08/01.htm
• World Depleted Uranium Weapons Conference, Hamburg, Germany, October 16-19, 2004:
  www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/speakers.htm
• International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan. Written opinion of Judge Niloufer Baghwat:
  www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm
• Discounted Casualties: The human cost of Nuclear war. Series of articles. Akira Tashiro, foreword by Leuren Moret.
  www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/index_e.html
• Depleted uranium may stop kidneys ‘in days’, Rob Edwards, NewScientist.com , March 12, 2002
  www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2024
• The War Against Ourselves, Doug Rokke, YES! , Spring 2003.
  www.yesmagazine.com/article.asp?ID=594
• Science or Science Fiction? Facts, myths and propaganda in the debate over depleted uranium weapons, Dan Fahey, March 12, 2003.
  www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/pdf/dumyths.pdf
• US Army Training Video: Depleted Uranium Hazard Awareness
  www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3581.htm
• Extreme birth deformities of Iraqi children (Warning: these photos may distress viewers)
  www.xs4all.nl/~stgvisie/VISIE/extremedeformities.html

http://www.byronbodyandsoul.com/articles/depleted-uranium-a-legacy-of-treason/p/664

Scientists urge unis to axe alternative medicine courses

Kelly Burke

January 26, 2012

Holistic Nutrition School

www.IntegrativeNutrition.com

Our Nutrition Graduates Earn Up To $200/hr – 52 Week Program Online!

University reputations at stake … a new lobby group for doctors and scientists claims undeserved credibility is given to disciplines “better described as quackery”. Photo: Gabriele Charotte

MORE than 400 doctors, medical researchers and scientists have formed a powerful lobby group to pressure universities to close down alternative medicine degrees.

Almost one in three Australian universities now offer courses in some form of alternative therapy or complementary medicine, including traditional Chinese herbal medicine, chiropractics, homeopathy, naturopathy, reflexology and aromatherapy.

But the new group, Friends of Science in Medicine, wrote to vice-chancellors this week, warning that by giving “undeserved credibility to what in many cases would be better described as quackery” and by “failing to champion evidence-based science and medicine”, the universities are trashing their reputation as bastions of scientific rigour.

Advertisement: Story continues below

The group, which names world-renowned biologist Sir Gustav Nossal and the creator of the cervical cancer vaccine Professor Ian Frazer among its members, is also campaigning for private health insurance providers to stop providing rebates for alternative medical treatments.

A co-founder of the group, Emeritus Professor John Dwyer, of the University of NSW, who is also a government adviser on consumer health fraud, said it was distressing that 19 universities were now offering “degrees in pseudo science”.

“It’s deplorable, but we didn’t realise how much concern there was out there for universities’ reputations until we tapped into it,” Professor Dwyer said. “We’re saying enough is enough. Taxpayers’ money should not be wasted on funding [these courses] … nor should government health insurance rebates be wasted on this nonsense.”

Professor Dwyer said it was particularly galling that such courses were growing in popularity while, at the same time, the federal government was looking at ways to get the Therapeutic Goods Administration to enforce tougher proof-of-efficacy criteria for complementary medicines, following the release of a highly critical review by the Australian National Audit Office last September.

Of particular concern to the group is the increase in chiropractic courses, following the recent announcement of a new chiropractic science degree by Central Queensland University. More than 30 scientists, doctors and community advocates wrote to the vice-chancellor and health science deans at the university voicing their concern, which laid the foundations for Friends of Science in Medicine.

The groundswell of protest from medical professionals comes after a decision in Britain that means from this year it will no longer be possible to receive a degree from a publicly-funded university in areas of alternative medicine, including homeopathy and naturopathy.

German and British medical insurance providers are also in the process of removing alternative therapies from the list of treatments they will cover.

Australia’s vice-chancellors will meet in March and Professor Dwyer said his group was aiming to get a commitment from them to endorse health courses only with evidence-based science.

The spokesman for Universities Australia said tertiary institutions were self-accrediting. “[They have] the autonomy … to ensure the quality and relevance of the courses they offer,” he said.

The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, a government body set up to regulate higher education, refused to comment.

Most health funds pay rebates for alternative therapies under top cover polices. Private Healthcare Australia did not return the Herald’s calls.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/tertiary-education/scientists-urge-unis-to-axe-alternative-medicine-courses-20120125-1qhtm.html#ixzz1kYEumfYU

True World History – Documentary’s

 

TrueWorldHistory.infoliterally has 100′s of hours of high quality documentaries on just about every conceivable subject you can imagine, and is also where much of my time was spent mining for hidden knowledge during my awakening.  Right along with over three months in some kind of time warp, lost in the Project Camelot zone as my eyes began to open to a whole new whole new world of mystery and intrigue much more exciting than what we’ve ever been presented with in the so-called real world. 

On the “Must See” list are:

Ring of Power

Everything You Know is Wrong

Esoteric Agenda

Kymatica

2012 Enigma

Architects of Cotnrol

The Big Picture

Burzynski

Gasland

Who Killed the Electric Car

Century of the Self

Zeitgeist

Fiat Empire

America – Freedom to Fascism

And that’s just for starters, there’s so much more!  Now, if you’re just waking up to everything going on then this is a great website to really get your feet wet, and don’t forget to spend time with whistleblower interviews on the ProjectCamelot.org  site.  Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy have done a fantastic job compiling interviews on a variety of subjects that will open your eyes to “realities” we were made to believe only existed in the world of Science Fiction.  When in truth the reality we’ve been presented with was the real SciFi, accepting that fact is when the real paradigm shift takes place and you start becoming a “4th Dimensional” thinker which lies somewhere in the realm of Quantum Physics.

Be sure to visit the Expanded Video List where they have everything organized into categories.  Enjoy!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TrueWorldHistory.info presents a compelling series of video documentaries, lectures and interviews. These videos offer an uncensored and non-partisan perspective of today’s modern world, as well as where we are heading as a people, a nation and a global civilization with individual characteristics.

The information presented is sometimes controversial, and often hard to believe. This information is based upon documented facts and induced theories, based upon deductive reasoning and past historical occurences that project a possible vision of the future for our world. How we choose to interpret this information, and what we choose to do about it, will determine the future of the world in which we all live. The presenters request that you view these documentaries with an open mind, then decide for yourself what you believe, and what you will do to make it a better world for all people. Is everything in these documentaries true? Not likely, and not even possible as some even contradict each other on a few subjects. However, the overall picture they collectively paint is right on target.

The material presented focuses predominately on the USA, but it has future implications for the entire world. Tired of wondering why the US (among other countries) is so screwed up and just doesn’t seem to get any better, regardless of which major political party is in power? Do you believe that there is something terribly wrong with our nation(s) but you can’t quite put your finger on it? These documentaries contain very eye-opening information that you won’t ever see on TV, in public schools, or from any other institutionalized information gatekeeper.

We urge you to view these video documentaries in the order displayed so that you may better comprehend the information being presented. Each video expounds upon and supports the information presented in previous documentaries. In addition to this series of 24 videos, you will find a greater library available on the Expanded Video List.

http://www.trueworldhistory.info/

Fasten your seatbelt…

How to make Rick Simpson’s Cancer Curing Hemp( Cannabis) Oil

This video is intended for patients using medical marijuana

Uploaded by likeOMGitsUNLTD on Jan 12, 2011

PLEASE UPLOAD THIS TO YOUR CHANNEL. If you upload it, we can spread this info to those who need it! Be a part of the movement.

[How to download this video file]:

If you have the web browser FireFox download the add-on “Download Helper” (the one with a red, yellow, and blue icon). You can then download the file by going to this video page (for example) and hit the little downward facing arrow by the DownloadHelper icon. Click [480p] How to make Rick Simpson’s Cancer Curing Hemp(Cannabis) Oil and the video will download. The rest is as usual, upload the video to your channel and help spread this information.

——————————————————————————–­————————–
This video was downloaded from [StopTheRobbery2]‘s channel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKsq90jWFuA

Full movie (Run From The Cure) is available on youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI

Rick Simpson’s website: www.phoenixtears.ca

Rick Simpson’s Cancer Cure Hemp Oil (Cannabis extract full of Cannabinoids including THC)
-University of Bristol, UK

“THC induces apoptosis in colorectal Cancer cells.” PMID: 17583570
-University of Plymouth, UK

“Cannabinoids activate apoptosis in glioma cells.” PMID: 18615640
-University of Wolverhampton, UK

“Antitumour actions of Cannabinoids” PMID: 14640910
-St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, UK

“THC is a potent inducer of apoptosis” PMID: 15454482

THC (in cannabis/hemp oil) achieves this wizardry by binding to protein receptors on a cancerous cell’s surface. Once attached, the THC induces the cell to make a fatty substance called ceramide, which prompts the cell to start devouring itself. “We see programmed cell death,” Velasco says. What’s more, noncancerous cells don’t make ceramide when they come into contact with THC. The healthy cells don’t die.
Biochemists Guillermo Velasco & Manuel Guzmán
Complutense University, Madrid, Spain, Tel: 34-91394-4668

[courtesy of youtube user EssiacHempLaetrile]

Feel free to copy and paste this description into your own upload