Excellent, a most worthy read, submitted by DP 5/16/13!!
American Kabuki published thisDetailed explanation of the Montauk chair, time lines, ascension, the reason for chemtrails, global warming, global cooling, changing earth albedo, D.U.M.B.S, cabal plan to continue domination at the expense of the people.
PDF: Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP, World Orders, Time Lines and Ascension
May 2, 2013
Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in Patristics from the University of Oxford and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science and “strange stuff.” He is the author of many books in the field of alternative research. In the first hour we begin on the Boston Marathon bombings and what appears to an internal Gladio Operation with a huge geopolitical agenda, which could be spun in a variety of ways. Then, we’ll discuss Putin’s clash with the world government agenda. Later, Joseph talks about hidden conflicts and the creation of a breakaway civilization by the Nazis. He discusses the advanced technology that they took with them at the end of the war and psychological war that they waged for decades on America and NATO. He’ll talk about how our system is based on stolen gold. Farrell explains why he thinks technology has moved into an entirely new ball game. In the second hour, we’ll speak more on the economic events in the Eurozone and we’ll discuss the BRIC nation’s grievances against the financial oligarchs of the west. Joseph talks about the importance of the political center as there is no real party of opposition. He tells why he thinks the internet will be playing a bigger role in the future. The hour ends on the military assessment of the ET threat. Joseph explains why he believes they may be right.
Note: The timing on this sudden grab for gold that coincided with the Boston bombings is quite interesting when you factor in the SwissIndo offer (based on gold) to restore the wealth to the One People of the world, made on behalf of the Indonesia-Javanese Royal family. The offer also came out at the same time in mid-April as the release of the Sirius documentary, which was quickly followed by the Citizens Hearings on Disclosure.
All of it happened in the same time period, when the bombings were subsequently followed by Martial Law in Boston. To a very large degree both events effectively served to overshadow and distract the public and the media, while the foundations of the elites systems of power, wealth and of secrecy began the process of disintegrating.
It just goes to show nothing is ever as it seems in the game of Smoke and Mirrors, in the interview Henrick states it brilliantly when he says “When happening over here, I always look in the other direction to see what’s really happening over there” (paraphrased)…
The elites have long been aware that the eye is distracted by shiny objects, that way they can pick your pocket while you’re looking the other way. Fortunately we’re catching on, for myself the moment I read the headline for the bombings I knew without a doubt it was a false flag…
In reading the flood of bad economic data and the hick ups of the old powers I say all is just fine! Yes, it is fine. We are needing to get a total halt and disintegration of the old systems and power structures that have leaned on their versions of power over and distribution of wealth around the world for a few. Whatever way I look I still see the PTW playing their duality role as if nothing happened. But behind the scenes the pressure is cooking all the old strongholds and tactics cook to pulp. No more ….cy,…. ies or … ism’s. All those words, and what they stand for, say only I rule you in whatever sort of way it is arranged. It does not matter if it is a monarch, an aristocrat, a president, an oligarch, an meritocratic ruler group, a socialist, a communist, a ceo, or a leader of a non-elected governing body or whatever. Those who think belief systems and religions are the rulers of the people will be proven also wrong.
What I see is still groups presenting us with the old power structures. Still selling us the idea we can not handle things and need to be treated like children, infants, followers or even inferior people or slaves. Given them a prosperity package or relief and they will easily go with us again. A growing day by day group of humans has awakened and is already busy building in all this disintegrating old paradigm a new paradigm. You may have missed it or maybe you are still part of the old paradigm thinking illusion or you are having your hidden agendas or legions still pledged to the old system and powers and the possible profit or gain that is in it for you.
The slander, dishonesty and also the sheer lies are repeated over and over to make those that do have doubts go for the misinformation. A lie is not becoming true by repeating. People are exposing themselves and are showing their real faces. Just discern and also research yourselves and know and feel what is true. The crap out there on the net, tv and media is multiple. I see the stories of the gold. I see the manipulations. I see the overstatement of the importance of the collateral accounts and the lawsuits. I see the plots around who gets what and when or not. It is just a fight amongst those losing the grip on the reality that has moved on. Our new paradigm is forming already and it is putting the old that can not be sustained anymore to the side.
Do you see the humans already en masse declare they need no more power structures and beliefs and rulers to lead them astray. More and more humans know they are their our own power structures and all that power is found within. They already stopped to give their powers away. The energy you gave and the work you have done for the PTW was the real value. They made you belief it was the money or its representation and even that was an illusion. The gold or silver in what amount stocked, hidden or by mining extracted will not make any difference if humans say we give your illusion no more power or energy. If humans only will exchange with their own divine energy between themselves and do this in equality without having to value something before exchanging you will see the implications this has on the old powers and systems. It is though that what will be in the near future our way of exchange.
The old system and its representatives fears this and wants to push one way or the other with promises and betterment in their behaviour or even by brute force and totallitarian control towards a new old system. This system they stand for is nothing more than a system that will rule humans and again will be used for control and enslavement. In the new paradigm of 5D we are not able to maintain structures that are not built on equality and freedom for the divine individuals you all are. Even those that seem now to oppose us are divine individual beings. See there is ample time left for them to reconcile with their own extreme polarities and duality. They will come to a change in perception of the world and humanity. They will have to come to that place of neutrality for all of us where we can resolve and build again together. We will unite again.
All thought of so-called stalemates are just fictions. There is only a fast forward into unity and this is inevitable. It is also time to ensure if they come to the table to reconcile, that we as awakened humans will respectfully see the roles they have played in the play that ended already 21st December 2012. We will hold no grouch nor will harm them as we need to become whole again as one people that are divine individual humans. We all are just part of the one. The polarities like the electric and magnetic, the dark and the light and so on are all coming into balance. Let us reconcile. Stop the nonsense of playing the old game. We will not play anymore with you. Come and build with us the new paradigm in a totally new and never before done way, not as rulers but as co-creators in eqality and in freedom.
Love and Light,
Lucas
(c) 2013 – Copyright of Lucas, all writings of Lucas maybe published, re-blogged and posted only in full without altering anything with the http://www.lucas2012Infos.wordpress.com link mentioned in the article with name of the author Lucas.
Dozens of journalists sifted through millions of leaked records and thousands of names to produce ICIJ’s investigation into offshore secrecy
A cache of 2.5 million files has cracked open the secrets of more than 120,000 offshore companies and trusts, exposing hidden dealings of politicians, con men and the mega-rich the world over.
The secret records obtained by the lay bare the names behind covert companies and private trusts in the British Virgin Islands, the Cook Islands and other offshore hideaways.
They include American doctors and dentists and middle-class Greek villagers as well as families and associates of long-time despots, Wall Street swindlers, Eastern European and Indonesian billionaires, Russian corporate executives, international arms dealers and a sham-director-fronted company that the European Union has labeled as a cog in Iran’s nuclear-development program.
The leaked files provide facts and figures — cash transfers, incorporation dates, links between companies and individuals — that illustrate how offshore financial secrecy has spread aggressively around the globe, allowing the wealthy and the well-connected to dodge taxes and fueling corruption and economic woes in rich and poor nations alike.
The records detail the offshore holdings of people and companies in more than 170 countries and territories.
The hoard of documents represents the biggest stockpile of inside information about the offshore system ever obtained by a media organization. The total size of the files, measured in gigabytes, is more than 160 times larger than the leak of U.S. State Department documents by Wikileaks in 2010.
To analyze the documents, ICIJ collaborated with reporters from The Guardian and the BBC in the U.K., Le Monde in France, Süddeutsche Zeitung and Norddeutscher Rundfunk in Germany, The Washington Post, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and 31 other media partners around the world.
Eighty-six journalists from 46 countries used high-tech data crunching and shoe-leather reporting to sift through emails, account ledgers and other files covering nearly 30 years.
“I’ve never seen anything like this. This secret world has finally been revealed,” said Arthur Cockfield, a law professor and tax expert at Queen’s University in Canada, who reviewed some of the documents during an interview with the CBC. He said the documents remind him of the scene in the movie classic The Wizard of Oz in which “they pull back the curtain and you see the wizard operating this secret machine.”
The vast flow of offshore money — legal and illegal, personal and corporate — can roil economies and pit nations against each other. Europe’s continuing financial crisis has been fueled by a Greek fiscal disaster exacerbated by offshore tax cheating and by a banking meltdown in the tiny tax haven of Cyprus, where local banks’ assets have been inflated by waves of cash from Russia.
Henry Kissinger’s quote recently released [3] by Wikileaks,”the illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer“, likely brought a smile to his legions of elite media, government, corporate and high society admirers. Oh that Henry! That rapier wit! That trademark insouciance! That naughtiness! It is unlikely, however, that the descendants of his more than 6 million victims in Indochina, and Americans of conscience appalled by his murder of non-Americans, will share in the amusement. For his illegal and unconstitutional actions had real-world consequences: the ruined lives of millions of Indochinese innocents in a new form of secret, automated, amoral U.S. Executive warfare which haunts the world until today.
And his conduct raises even more fundamental questions: to what extent can leaders who act secretly ,illegally and unconstitutionally, lying to their citizenry and legislature as a matter of course, legitimately claim to represent their people? How much allegiance do citizens owe such leaders? And what does it say about America’s elites that they have honored a man with so much innocent blood on his hands for the past 40 years?
Mr. Kissinger’s most significant historical act was executing Richard Nixon’s orders to conduct the most massive bombing campaign, largely of civilian targets, in world history. He dropped 3.7 million tons of bombs** between January 1969 and January 1973 – nearly twice the two million dropped on all of Europe and the Pacific in World War II. He secretly and illegally devastated villages throughout areas of Cambodia inhabited by a U.S. Embassy-estimated two million people; quadrupled the bombing of Laos and laid waste to the 700-year old civilization on the Plain of Jars; and struck civilian targets throughout North Vietnam – Haiphong harbor, dikes, cities, Bach Mai Hospital – which even Lyndon Johnson had avoided. His aerial slaughter helped kill, wound or make homeless an officially-estimated six million human beings**, mostly civilians who posed no threat whatsoever to U.S. national security and had committed no offense against it.
There is a word for the aerial mass murder that Henry Kissinger committed in Indochina, and that word is “evil”. The figure most identified with this word today is Adolph Hitler, and his evil was so unspeakable that the term is by now identified with him. But that is precisely why it is important to understand the new face of evil and moral depravity that Henry Kissinger represents. For evil not only comes in the form of madmen dreaming of 1000 year Reichs. In fact, in our day, it is more likely to be committed by sane, genial and ordinary careerists waging invisible automated war in far-off lands against people whose screams we never hear, whose faces we never see, and whose deaths go unrecorded and unnoticed. It is critical to understand this new face of evil, for it threatens not only countless foreigners but Americans in coming years. And no one has embodied it more than Henry Kissinger.
The planes he dispatched came by day. They came by night. Remorseless. Pitiless. Relentless. Day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year. Most of the people below had no idea where the bombers came from, why their lives had been turned into a living hell. The movie ”War of the Worlds”, in which Americans are incomprehensibly slaughtered by machines is the closest depiction of what the innocent rice-farmers of Indochina experienced.
Hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam were forced to live in holes and caves, like animals. Many tens of thousands were burned alive by the bombs, slowly dying in agony. Others were buried alive, as they gradually suffocated to death when a 500 pound bomb exploded nearby. Most were victims of antipersonnel bombs designed primarily to maim not kill, many of the survivors carrying the metal, jagged or plastic pellets in their bodies for the rest of their lives.
Fathers like 38-year old Thao Vong were suddenly blinded or crippled for life as they lost an arm or leg, made helpless, unable to support their families, becoming dependent on others just to stay alive. Children were struck, lying out in the open, screaming, villagers unable to come to their aid for fear of being killed themselves. No one was spared – neither sweet, loving grandmothers nor lovely young women, neither laughing, innocent children nor nursing or pregnant mothers, not water buffalo needed to farm not the shrines where people had for centuries honored their ancestors and hoped one day to be honored themselves.
A farmer on the Plain of Jars in northern Laos wrote of being bombed by the U.S. in 1969 that ”every day and every night the planes came to drop bombs on us. We lived in holes to protect our lives. I saw my cousin die in the field of death. My heart was most disturbed and my voice called out loudly as I ran to the houses. Thus, I saw life and death for the people on account of the war of many airplanes in the region of the Plain of Jars. Until there were no houses at all. And the cows and buffalo were dead. Until everything was leveled and you could see only the red, red ground.”
A 30-year old mother wrote that ”at that time, our lives became like those of animals desperately trying to escape their hunters. Our lives were confided to the Lord Buddha. No matter when, all we did was to pray to the Lord to save our lives.”
A 39 year old rice-farmer wrote of the aftermath of a bombing raid: “The other villagers and I got together to consider this thing. We hadn’t done anything, nor harmed anyone. We had raised our crops, celebrated the festivals and maintained our homes for many years. Why did the planes drop bombs on us, impoverishing us this way?”
Mr. Kissinger exulted to President Nixon over this bombing, telling [4] him that ”it’s wave after wave of planes. You see, they can’t see the B-52 and they dropped a million pounds of bombs … I bet you we will have had more planes over there in one day than Johnson had in a month … each plane can carry about 10 times the load of World War II plane could carry.”
Although Mr. Kissinger claimed he was only bombing enemy troops, guerrilla soldiers were largely undetectable from the air. Investigating the bombing of northern Laos, the U.S. Senate Refugee Subcommittee concluded that ”the United States has undertaken a large-scale air war over Laos to destroy the physical and social infrastructure in Pathet Lao (i.e., guerrilla) areas. Throughout all this there has been a policy of secrecy. The bombing has taken and is taking a heavy toll among civilians.” These words apply to Mr. Kissinger’s bombing throughout Indochina. The villagers of Indochina were not “collateral damage”. They were the target.
Those who praise Mr. Kissinger for the opening to China but ignore his mass murder in Indochina shame human decency itself. By honoring Mr. Kissinger they dishonor themselves. And they are also blind to the careerist “Executive Branch mentality” he embodied, which poses a clear and present a danger to foreigners and Americans alike today. Adolph Hitler dreamed of conquering and Stalin of communizing the world. Mr. Kissinger destroyed millions of lives primarily to further his career by preventing a communist takeover while he held office. And it is this kind of institutional, bureaucratic mentality, combined with new machines of secret war, which threatens the humanity today far more than the crazed ideologies of the past.
In the end Mr. Kissinger failed, as the communists took over Indochina in the spring of 1975. The Thieu, Lon Nol and Royal Lao government regimes, which Mr. Kissinger propped up with so many tens of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars, evaporated. The genocidal Khmer Rouge took over in Cambodia, which would not have occurred had Mr. Kissinger supported the neutralist Sihanouk and not illegally invaded Cambodia. But though Mr. Kissinger failed miserably in Indochina, he did in the end succeed in his principal goal. He emerged from the wreckage of Indochina with his reputation intact.
Even critics of Mr. Kissinger tend to use euphemisms about his actions for fear of losing their “credibility.” But facts are facts. The truth is the truth, and euphemisms obscure it. It is a matter of fact not rhetoric that Mr. Kissinger bears a major responsibility for murdering masses of people in Indochina. He is a mass murderer.
What is most important about his mass murder, however, was not only that his order to Alexander Haig to undertake [5] ”a massive bombing campaign in Cambodia. Anything that flies on anything that moves” was clear evidence of criminal intent to avoid the laws of war protecting civilians, and that he would have been executed had the Nuremberg Judgment been applied to his blanket bombing of civilian targets.
It was that he conducted a new form of automated, secret and amoral warfare previously only imagined by George Orwell in 1984 when he described war as fought by machines waged by ”very small numbers of people, mostly highly-trained specialists (waging war) on the vague frontiers whose whereabouts the average man can only guess at.” When Richard Nixon decided, and Henry Kissinger executed, a plan to withdraw U.S. ground troops but seek to win by escalating war from the air, they brought into being a new age of automated war that inevitably, and cold-bloodedly, wound up killing large numbers of civilians.
Previous war-makers fomented hatred against the “Jewish scum”, “gooks”, or “Huns” they massacred. But neither Mr. Kissinger nor his subordinates had anything against the countless Lao, Cambodian and Vietnamese civilians they slaughtered. They simply did not regard them as human beings. They had no more significance for them than cockroaches or ants. It was not immorality but amorality, the murder of countless “non-people” whose existence as human beings was simply ignored. Though the people of the Plain of Jars wanted nothing from America except to be left alone, even this simple wish was denied them, as they were extinguished like flies out of indifference not malice.
An August, 1945 editorial in the London Observer eerily foreshadowed what Mr. Kissinger represented, and what such successors as David Petraeus and John Brennan embody today: ”Albert Speer symbolizes a type which is becoming increasingly important in all belligerent countries: the pure technician, the classless, bright young man, without background, with no other original aim than to make his way in the world, and no other means than his technical and managerial ability. It is the lack of psychological and spiritual ballast and the ease with which he handles the terrifying technical and organizational machinery of our age which makes this slight type go extremely far nowadays. This is their age. The Hitlers and Himmlers we may get rid of, but the Speers, whatever happens to this particular special man, will long be with us.”
Although Mr. Kissinger failed so miserably in Indochina, he did indeed display great ability in handling the “organizational machinery” of the U.S. Executive Branch — so much ability in fact that his actions have become the template for most U.S. war-making today. This war-making is:
– Undemocratic: Mr. Kissinger not only failed to obtain permission from Congress to bomb Laos and Cambodia, he did not even inform it he was doing so. The incredible fact is that a handful of U.S. leaders unilaterally dropped 3.7 million tons of bombs on Indochina entirely on their own initiative – as have U.S. officials today assassinated thousands of unarmed suspects throughout the Muslim world.
– Unconstitutional: The very foundation of the Constitution is the principle that leaders may only legitimately rule with the “informed consent” of the people. But Mr. Kissinger not only failed to inform the American people or Congress about his bombing of Indochina. He has lied about it from the day he took office until today. Between January 1969 and March 1970, as he leveled the Plain of Jars, Mr. Kissinger’s State Department denied it was even bombing Laos. And when reports from refugees made it impossible to deny the bombing, Mr. Kissinger’s and his representatives continued to lie, denying that they bombed civilian targets. William Sullivan, close Kissinger ally and the former U.S. Ambassador to Laos, testified to Senator Edward Kennedy on April 22, 1971 “the policy of the U.S. is deliberately to avoid hitting inhabited villages.”
– Illegal: By failing to even notify Congress of his massive bombing, Mr. Kissinger broke domestic law. By systematically bombing civilian targets and refusing to observe laws seeking to protect civilians during wartime, he violated international law. Both conditions are true for U.S. drone and ground assassinations today.
– Secret: The bombing of Laos and Cambodia, like that in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia today, was conducted in secret. Even as U.S. officials first denied they were doing any bombing at all, and then that they were only bombing legitimate military targets, they refused to allow journalists to go out on bombing runs. The information about the bombing of civilian targets was classified and kept out of the hands of Congress, the media, and the American people.
– Amoral: Like Mr. Kissinger, President Obama lied when he recently described his drone assassination program as “a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists who are trying to go in and harm Americans, hit American facilities, American bases, and so on “. In fact, U.S. officials have admitted that most of their victims are unarmed suspects killed in “signature strikes” against people who names are not known. And the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has documented that hundreds of those killed by U.S. drone strikes are civilians. The victims of drone strikes are simply labeled “militants”, denied their humanity as well as their lives.
What is most troubling to anyone with a conscience about Mr. Kissinger’s new form of warfare is that, from a bureaucratic perspective, it worked. By keeping the human consequences of their war-making secret from Congress and the American people, the Kissingers, Petraeuses and Brennans have had a free hand to kill, torture, imprison and maim anyone they wish. They not only need not fear punishment for their illegal acts. Like Mr. Kissinger, who has grown wealthy on the blood of the innocents of Indochina, they can even look forward to being rewarded for them. We are taught as children that crime does not pay. Mr. Kissinger, who has earned tens of millions since the war ended on the blood of innocent Indochinese, is living proof that this is untrue.
The big question for Americans today is the degree to which this “Executive Mentality” will be directed against American citizens in the future. The prospects are not promising.
The U.S. Executive today has not only obtained permission from Congress to kill or imprison any American citizens they wish without due process. They have done so – murdering not only Anwar al-Awlaki but his 16 year son, also a U.S. citizen, while sitting in a café. The Executive under President Obama has undertaken unprecedented prosecution of U.S. whistle-blowers and journalists alike for revealing information officials have arbitrarily classified. Never before has the U.S. had an Executive Branch ”Department of Homeland Security”, which routinely spies on millions of Americans, and is working to paramilitarize police departments around the nation.
On a human level it is possible, even appropriate, to sympathize with Henry Kissinger. German Jew Heinz Alfred Kissinger was only 9 when Hitler took office, and only escaped at age 16 shortly before Kristallnacht, One can only guess at the multiple traumas and psychological damage he suffered. It is entirely understandable that he would develop a cynical view of the world and devote himself solely to gaining and holding power devoid of moral or ethical concerns.
But Mr. Kissinger is more than an individual. He is also a political and historical figure.
Future historians, public intellectuals and journalists who have nothing to gain by flattering Mr. Kissinger and ignoring his crimes against humanity will likely have a very different view of his legacy than today’s opinion-makers.
They will likely see the U.S. opening to China as inevitable and pay relatively little attention to Mr. Kissinger’s role in it. As the historian Gareth Porter has documented [6] in detail, they will also see clearly that the terms of the Paris Peace Agreement he signed in 1973 were no different than what he could have obtained in 1969 – thus saving tens of thousands of American, and countless Indochinese, lives. And his winning the Nobel Peace Prize will be seen less as an honor he deserved than an indelible stain on those who awarded it to him.
No, what Mr. Kissinger will be most remembered for is cold-bloodedly ushering in a new age of undemocratic, unconstitutional, secret, criminal and amoral automated warfare, by a U.S. Executive Branch constrained neither by law nor elemental human decency.
After the war ended, former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara made a good-faith effort to understand what he did in Vietnam, issuing a mea culpa of sorts in his book [7] In Retrospect. By contrast PBS Journalist Steve Talbot reported [8] the following when he interviewed Mr. Kissinger: “I told him I had just interviewed Robert McNamara in Washington. That got his attention. He stopped badgering me, and then he did an extraordinary thing. He began to cry. But no, not real tears. Before my eyes, Henry Kissinger was acting. ‘Boohoo, boohoo,’ Kissinger said, pretending to cry and rub his eyes. ‘He’s still beating his breast, right? Still feeling guilty.’ He spoke in a mocking, singsong voice and patted his heart for emphasis.” As the Khmer Rouge were conducting genocide in Cambodia, Mr. Kissinger told [9] the Thai Foreign Minister on November 26, 1975 that “how many people did (Khmer Rouge Foreign Minister Ieng Sary) kill? Tens of thousands … you should tell the Cambodians that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in the way. We are prepared to improve relations with them. Tell them the latter part, but don’t tell them what I said before.”
Future historians will not only marvel at the depth of his pathology, but ask a basic question: what does it say about America and its elites that they honor such a man?
They will likely not have much interest in the man himself who was indeed, after all, little more than the man foresaw by the London Observer, a ”classless, bright young man … with no other original aim than to make his way in the world”characterized both by a ”lack of psychological and spiritual ballast” and a skill in handling ”the terrifying technical and organizational machinery of our age.”
Kissinger the man will likely be remembered, if he is remembered at all, as the fellow best described by the novelist Joseph Heller in Good As Gold:
“It was disgraceful and so discouraging … that this base figure charged with infamies too horrendous to measure and too numerous for listing should be gadding about gaily in chauffeured cars, instead of walking at Spandau with Rudolf Hess … Asked about his role in the Cambodian war, in which an estimated five hundred thousand people died, he’d said: ‘I may have a lack of imagination, but I fail to see the moral issue involved.’ Whereas another State Department official, William C. Sullivan, had testified: ‘The justification for the war is the reelection of the President.’ Not once … had Kissinger raised a voice in protest against the fascistic use of police power to quell public opposition to the war in Southeast Asia.
“In Gold’s conservative opinion, Kissinger would not be recalled in history as a Bismarck, Metternich, or Castlereagh but as an odious shlumpf who made war gladly.”
But what this insignificant man symbolized for future war-making will be of great significance to future historians. For, as the London Observer also correctly predicted Mr. Kissinger did indeed go far – taking America on a dark journey of war-making characterized by mass murder by machine, secrecy, lying, manipulation, betrayal of democracy and the U.S. Constitution, international criminality, overthrowing democratically elected governments and support for some of the world’s most brutal and savage dictators. Yes, as he joked, he was skilled at engaging in ”illegal” and ”unconstitutional” activities. But the rest of humanity, and this nation, will be paying the price for this skill for generations to come.
** “Dollars and Deaths,” The Congressional Record, May 14, 1975, p. 14262.
1. Soviet Jews:“The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern.” (link [10])
2. Bombing Cambodia: “[Nixon] wants a massive bombing campaign in Cambodia. He doesn’t want to hear anything about it. It’s an order, to be done. Anything that flies on anything that moves.” (link [11]) (Emphasis added)
3. Bombing Vietnam: ”It’s wave after wave of planes. You see, they can’t see the B-52 and they dropped a million pounds of bombs … I bet you we will have had more planes over there in one day than Johnson had in a month … each plane can carry about 10 times the load of World War II plane could carry.” (link [4])
4. Khmer Rouge:“How many people did (Khmer Rouge Foreign Minister Ieng Sary) kill? Tens of thousands? You should tell the Cambodians (i.e., Khmer Rouge) that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in the way. We are prepared to improve relations with them. Tell them the latter part, but don’t tell them what I said before.” (from November 26, 1975 Meeting [9] With Thai Foreign Minister.)
5. Dan Ellsberg: “Because that son-of-a-bitch—First of all, I would expect—I know him well—I am sure he has some more information—I would bet that he has more information that he’s saving for the trial. Examples of American war crimes that triggered him into it…It’s the way he’d operate….Because he is a despicable bastard.” (Oval Office tape, July 27, 1971)
6. Robert McNamara: “Boohoo, boohoo … He’s still beating his breast, right? Still feeling guilty. ” (Pretending [8] to cry, rubbing his eyes.)
7. Assassination: “It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.” (Statement [12] at a National Security Council meeting , 1975)
8. Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” (link [13])
9. Illegality-Unconstitutionality: “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” (from March 10, 1975 Meeting With Turkish Foreign Minister Melih Esenbel in Ankara, Turkey)
10. Himself: “Americans like the cowboy … who rides all alone into the town, the village, with his horse and nothing else … This amazing, romantic character suits me precisely because to be alone has always been part of my style or, if you like, my technique.” (November 1972 Interview with Oriana Fallaci)
Added by GM on March 3, 2013
Here is the text of an email I received recently from Paula Humfrey detailing the OPPT foreclosure, the “Trust” accounts set up for all of us on the planet, and top secret documents we were never supposed to see.
Sam Davis
Hi All,
Let me take you through two items that appeared in my email inbox over the course of the past week. Both of these items, one video and one .pdf file, are publicly available online. Check it out for yourself.
It’s just amazing what hides in plain sight. It’s also amazing to see what happens when we use our mind’s eye.
Here’s what we’ve learned so far:
On behalf of us, the One People, OPPT has foreclosed on all of the global ‘trust’ accounts. These accounts properly belong to all of us in trust, simply because we’re all citizens of this planet, equally. Each global trust account (and these go by many and various names) represents vast sums of money, all of it backed by gold, silver, and treasure.
That’s a pretty chewy statement but let’s go with it, just as a thought experiment.
OPPT proposes that Ten Billion Dollars ($10,000,000,000) USD is held in trust for each individual on this planet. Well then! What kind of evidence exists that I might use to verify for myself that this story isn’t completely nutbar? Let’s return to the above-mentioned pair of items, which turn out to be very helpful in this regard.
The video, titled ‘Joint Release 3-36.3’, was produced at some point after Dec. 24th, 2012 by UN-SWISSINDO TELEVISION NEWS: GLOBAL WORLD, which seems to be the PR vehicle for announcements from the Soekarno Trust. So in this moment of NOW I’m transcribing the first part of an hour-long video announcing disbursements from the Trust. The payments, one after the other, are literally astronomical (see partial transcript below). There seems little question that this money is in fact available and is being sent out to its named recipients.
And now here comes this missive, just in today (Jan. 22) from Drake via Jean Haines, which directly concerns the subject at hand:
“HUGE assets and MONEY from the imperial families are in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Specifically, China, Japan, Indonesia.”
“Financial Intel – From Drake…”
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/financial-intel-from-drake/
I also offer for your consideration the attached ‘Top Secret’ 2012 World Bank audit of its black-screen off-ledger accounts. Some impressive signatures are attached to the end of the document. As you’re reading through the audit doc, you might want to keep these three things in mind:
1. It’s important to squint hard at the names of the accounts and the identities of the account holders; this info appears in the first several pages of the doc.
2. The ‘infinity’ symbol looks like a sideways numeral 8. That symbol replaces dollar values in each of the accounts because they are in fact infinite (the accounts are grown and partially harvested when mature, in perpetuity).
3. Really: check out those signatures at the end.
Cheers.
• • •
As an added bonus, here’s my partial and slightly challenged transcript of the first 15 mins. of the video, which is all I was able to handle in one go. If someone would like to improve on it, that would be swell:
Joint Release 3-36.3
UN – SWISSINDO TELEVISION NEWS: GLOBAL WORLD
Good day.
I am Director of Joint Communications [unclear]. This is Publication 3-36, authorized release unlimited. ID 452106/66/2012, Trustee, Processee, Dynasty… Swissindo Agreement Joint Release 3-36, Joint Doctrine for Multinational Operations, ID 452106/66/2012.
For keeping information on Transactions and Treaties, International Agreements.
Treaty Event: UN Swissindo Multinational, Special Extra, Thirty Trillion US Dollars, Federal Reserve Bank, to pay to Deposit Control Settlement Investment Deposit, Freedom Forever 111, in official name, ownership [unclear], authority mandate, Personal International Trustee, plus Trustee Dynasty RMSPTD, Beneficial name, Global Development
1. Payment 1: To Committee of Treaty of UN Swissindo Multinational.
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD.
Date: November 20, 2012.
2. Payment 1: U.N. date 24 [unclear] in the House of Representatives HR 1249, Internal Protocol Number 301 of the Great President of the Kingdom of the United Nations Organization
Amount: Five Hundred Million ($500,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.
3. Payment 1: Independent Consultant and Contractor Exhibit AB
Amount: Nine Billion and Seven Hundred Million ($9,700,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012
4. Payment 1: For [unclear], Public Property
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.
5. Payment 1: For UMD UN Swissindo, Treaty Event of Paris
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.
6. Payment 1: Official Extra to U.N. Members of 193 Nations
Amount: Five Hundred Billion ($500,000,000,000) USD
Total: Forty-Six Trillion and Five Hundred Billion ($46,500,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.
7. Payment 1: U.N. Swissindo Multinational
Date: December 24, 2012
Number 1: N.A.T.O.: One Hundred and Fifty Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($158,990,000,000,000) USD
Number 2: S.A.T.O.[?]: One Hundred and Thirty Trillion and Nine Hundred Ninety Billion ($130,990,000,000,000) USD
Number 3: NON-BLOC: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
8. Payment 1: Neo Mercusuar Dunia
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
9. Payment 1: Contract Project
1. Master Key Plan; Date: December 24, 2012
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
1. Master Plan; Date: December 24, 2012
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
10. Payment 1: Global Immunity, The World [unclear] Date: December 24, 2012
Big Top: One Hundred Twenty Person World [unclear] Most Powerful Families
Amount: Ten Billion in [unclear] Currency
Amount: Two Trillion and Two Hundred Fifteen Billion ($2,215,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
11. Payment 1: [unclear]; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 1: UN Members of 190 Nations
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and One Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,119,000,000) USD
Number 2: Top Three Hundred Organizations IPO
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD
Total: Four Hundred and Sixteen Trillion and Nine Hundred and Seventy Billion ($416,970,000,000) USD
Number 3: World and Indonesia [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion USD
Total: Three Quadrillion…
[This is really funny! At the 7:30 point in the video, the number is so big that the Communications Director, who now has terrible cotton mouth from reciting non-stop, can't get his tongue around saying it successfully.]
Total: Three Quadrillion and Six Hundred and Thirty Trillion and Seven Hundred and Forty Billion ($3,630,740,000,000,000) USD
3.1. [unclear] Foundation
3.2. [unclear] Foundation
3.3. U.N. Foundation
3.4. [unclear] Republic Indonesia
3.5. USO USA
3.6. MUN [?]
3.7. OMD
3.8. [unclear]
3.9. [unclear] Indonesia
3.10. Billion Big Bang [unclear] A1 1A
3.11. UBS AG
3.12: Bank of America
3.13: Wells Fargo
3.14: Citibank N.A.
3.15. Federal Reserve
3.16. World Bank
3.17. Bank of International Settlements or BIS
3.18. International Monetary Fund
3.19. All Central Banks for 193 and 115 Top World Prime Banks
3.20. International Chamber of Commerce or ICC
3.21 Financial [?] FITFGFI
3.22. Tantara [?] National International TNI [?]
3.23. United Nations Organization
3.24. [unclear] Hospital
3.25. Thirty-Three Provinces
3.26. 29 BUMN
3.27. [unclear] Global Government
Number 4: World Mining or [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 5: World [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 6: World Agricultural or Brittania
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 7: Communication or [unclear] Land, Ocean, and Air
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Total: Seventeen Billion and Three Hundred and Ninety-One Million and Three Hundred and Four Thousand and Three Hundred and Forty-Eight ($17,391,304,348) USD
Total: Three Quadrillion and Eight Hundred and Ninety-One Trillion and Seven Hundred and Twenty Million ($3,891,000,720,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 10: Global Development Human Obligation of the Big Five Continents and Requirement Employer of the Consultant on site of the Big Five Continents AAAA2, Asia, Africa, Europe, America, Australia
10.1. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Asia
Amount: Twenty-Six Quadrillion and Two Hundred Trillion ($26,200,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
For and on behalf of Continent of Asia, Pilot Project; Date: December 24, 2012
Club 1: Indonesia, 33 Provinces
Amount: One Quadrillion and One Hundred and Sixty-One Trillion ($1,161,000,000,000) USD
Club 2: [unclear]
Six Trillion and Eight Hundred and Sixty-Two Billion ($6,862,000,000,000) USD
Singleton[?] of one or part country, Continent of Africa
Amount: Three Hundred and Thirty Trillion ($330,000,000,000) USD
10.2. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Africa
Amount: Six Quadrillion, Seven Hundred and Twenty Trillion ($6,720,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Africa, the Nation of Africa
10.3. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Europe
Amount: Five Quadrillion and Nine Hundred and Twenty Trillion ($5,920,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
Singletonl[?] of one or part country, Continent of Africa, Bosnia-Herzegovina
Amount: Thirty-Six Trillion ($36,000,000,000) USD
For and on behalf of Continent of Europe, Nation of Africa
10.4. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of America
Amount: Three Quadrillion and Four Hundred Trillion ($3,400,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Continent of Africa,
Nation of Africa
10.5. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Australia
Amount: One Hundred and Forty-Five Trillion ($145,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Continent of Australia,
Nation of Australia
Number 11: Requirement, Consultant, and Contractor, Swissindo, JO[?], Representing the Big Five Continents
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion (138,919,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
Number 12: OMB [unclear] USA Indonesia
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
This stuff is pretty amazing, isn’t it?
Sam Davis
Published on Dec 18, 2012
Join Release 3-36
Join Doctrine For MULTINASIONAL OPERATIONS
AD452106/66/2012
For Keeps International Transaction And Treaties International Agreement
TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO MULTINASIONAL
http://guardianlv.com/2013/03/jd-oppt-when-will-the-other-shoe-drop/
Adam Yates March 26, 2013
UniversalPeaceNowNo CommentsOne Voice
Lawyers are so expensive that Governments win their Court cases by your poverty (Unlawful).
New Statutes and precedents are set in this way for the benefit of those claiming ownership of you by a design copyrighted berth certificate. You are a vessel of funding to the design owners (Courts) therefore under Jurisdiction or Administration of all three forms of statute legislation, they being the designers…the paper statutes are not designers (which pre supposes a proponent with power of voice) and cannot own anything. Statutes are written words (statutes of any law systems have no power in Court unless consented to).
Baptized (under Ecclesiastical), registered (under Crown/Federal) and owned by NI/SSN (under Copyright)
Courts create Laws by voice. Governments create Legislative Statutes to control Law. You hold Authority in Court as Sovereign.
Lawyers are so expensive that Governments win Court cases by your unrebuttal out of poverty (Unlawful). New Statutes and precedents are set in this way.
Not to have money or ‘ownership’ ‘of ‘property’ is the ‘state of insanity, incompetence, absence’ in Statute Legislation (this is not the same as Law).
Written word is Statute by the Author. Voiced word is Law by Being. Do not condemn yourself by silence, always object or ‘notify’.
Ecclesiastical Law by ‘authority of power of god’ is Slavery Law. AUTHORITY IS TAKEN by CONSENT: NOT GIVEN WITHOUT CONSENT .
Authority over you in Court is offered/requested/required/stipulated/endorsed/billed/summonsed/licensed/notified/noticed/presented/asked ‘for’ by the Judge in the form of:
1 commerce (the vessel hull), 2 religion (to be a slave on ship), or 3 claim to own the physical ship or vessel (your body that holds water) by copyright ownership (berth certificate).
You are nothing but a ‘drawing’. You are a ‘drawing’ in a ‘design’ of a Law Vessel copyrighted by the Vatican. The US Copyright laws enable the US to do business for the Vatican as a partner by enforcing Canon Law with a global agenda under the guise of copyright law. Now look up ‘drawing’ in Ballentines Law Dictionary.
The lie is that their Law Systems, Government and Court are NOT ‘vessel’s (defined as a seaworthy craft). They literally hold no water by definition and therefore have no power/authority: only a voice is deemed Authority in a fair Court (fair: without such religious, business and ownership conflicts of interest).
Government and Court cannot float on water; neither can the Vatican even if Jesus did.
They are ideas we either accept (consent) or reject (rebut).
We are not in a ‘vessel’ or ‘ship’ though metaphorically we are if you want to be as a ‘content’ of an ‘employer’ in a ‘workplace’ registered under religious copyrighted ideas.
Step away from the metaphor…be precise.
You can’t copyright something that cannot float in water least of all an idea. Neither can paper contracts survive water.
Water is their ‘value’. Voice is the proven power of Being a vessel, sovereign, freeman, spiritual person who holds ‘value’ by a voice or ’flag’.
Laws are ‘established’ by ‘trials’ and is taught over years of continual changes to Law over time.
Never get to Court: Corporations go to Court. If you are not yet sovereign and have a summons to Court this is for you.
You are owned as a registered entity/company/thing by another copyrighted entity/company/thing.
The CHARGE you get is giving commission to Court on your Court appearance should the prosecutor think they will win and get money, the Court always get a commission, hire charge, paid by the State or Nation. Conflicts of Interest. The Court is proponent ‘giving offer of commerce’.
Courts are paid by governments whose legislation is there to support the occupancy of the system by ‘sadism’, (see dictionary) as if their Terms & Conditions, so governments are supporting the Court system & vice versa. Conflicts of Interest.
Positive Law: Attention is drawn to apostrophe words where meanings stray into ‘legal fiction’.
Above all you are registered: by birth certificate, as owned by the crown under canon law, that appoints trustees to administer your company name registered by the certificate. The trust is a cestui que vie trust. This declares you incompetent/missing/lost at sea shortly after birth. You then become berthed in citizen’ship’. If unrebutted for 7 years you are owned by the crown or government then enslaved by an NI or SSN registration number . See Cestui Que Vie 1666, just after the Plague and Great Fire of London. This Act was amended about a hundred years later to include the incompetent or insane and the creation of mental health statutes ensued thereof as another ‘instrument’ of ‘offers of commerce’.
A ‘person’ or ‘thing’ that can be ’owned’ may be a Vessel or ’ship’ and all the contents which will include ‘people’ to ‘work’ in the ‘ship’, as designed & registered by the US Copyright ‘holder’ as defined by the ‘US Copyright Law’, the US being under Canon Law. Copyright is an instrument for treason.
The Crown Monarch or Nation are copyrighted.
Vatican, governments, departments, all copyrighted….
The three vessels of Law that ‘govern’ the ‘people’ in ‘benefit’ ‘for’ the ‘hull design’ of the ‘Laws’ are Uniform Commercial Code (Trading: by consent), Canon Law (Slave Law: imprisonment, seizure of goods) & Copyright Law to which you consent all the time you do not ‘claim Sovereignty’.
That law is denied the right to reversal of form in court.
Taxpayers or ‘section’ (denoted by the symbol ‘§’) defined as a ‘region contained within a larger area’ i.e a ‘berth’ within a citizen‘ship’ (crown or state). A statute authored & denoted ‘§’ holds no more water than one without if written by a Sovereign.
IN COURT: Show Respect. Make it known you are competent and you have Authority.
Declare Common Law Jurisdiction as Sovereign Being to the Clerk of Court or Justice of Peace by paper witnessed notice and as many friends as will come.
Respondent & Proponent
Never be the proponent unless invoicing as a response.
“…he who attacks first makes himself look the prick…” three full stops before & after phrases denote an action/response/notice/receipt for the ‘invoice’ to a respondent or ‘offer of commerce’ under UCC Law.
Denotes ‘duress’ as you did not ask for the offer.
Recess & Adjournment
When judge calls to recess he is abandoning the ship of Uniform Commercial Code itself (1st Form of Law a court ‘hears’).
You say, “Let the record show Judge has abandoned ship, I claim authority over the Court, and I move to dismiss the charges: Motion carried”
You have declined the Judges ‘offer’ to fight under Canon Law which ‘holds’ religious ‘conviction’ in the Vessel of Roman Law or Slave Law. (Vatican City).
When Judge calls an Adjournment he is returning to Court under the same Jurisdiction of UCC, 1st Form of Law.
Without objecting to the recess you will be under Canon Law on his return and therefore have consented to Ecclesiastical Slavery Systems where you are now considered a ‘thing’ in the eyes of the now Canon Law Court.
“Are you trying to deny me Justice, Your Honour”, is a useful phrase.
Being Competent
A competent is a property owner (Vatican notably) or one who knows the law (Bankers notably)
Mortgage, license, registration, leasehold, is not owner’ship’ or ‘valid competencies’ (by Copyright Law of vessels and Hull Design).
In court you must ‘prove’ ‘competency’ as ‘sovereign’ by ‘copyright’. In court you must ‘prove’ ‘competency’ as ‘sovereign’ by ‘copyright’ or ’property owner’ of a ‘private individual’ and not ‘holder of a deed’ (berth certificate by baptism).
You must write your own letters, and terms & conditions (your opinions that are immovable by water carried in another vessel i.e. the Judge) legal terms are not important since OPPT and this is all OPPT have done…removed the legal need for lawyers altogether at Courts. It is legal to present your case by simply saying no, having the letter witnessed and sent by recorded delivery to a real name in a department of the bullyboy company.
Silence is ‘incompetency’
In Court we have been subjected to ‘rule of consent or imprisonment’ by Canon Law, Fraud Law, and Copyright infringement simply by contesting our ‘innocence, ignorance, incompetence’ of the ‘Straw Man’.
Terms &Conditions/Statutes/Obligation/Bill/Endorsement/Request/Offer/Receipt/Summons/Doctrine.
As Sovereign you may ‘hold’ Court Authority and ‘claim notice served for terms and conditions of witnessed documents’ i.e. the notice of terms and conditions that this Court is under Common Law as well as UCC Law by authority of your ‘paper witnessed notice’. Common Law is abused in favour of UCC Law, ‘gain’, ‘profit’, ‘money’ all the time. This is a commercial court and not applicable to people, only vessels of design. You were not designed you were created!
‘For’ & ‘Of’.
For is used to mean towards or for your own benefit.
Of means you are giving of free will.
When asked in court if you are Mr. Yourname and you reply yes you ‘claim the debt to crown Canon Law by ignorance, incompetence of Law and Vessels of design and Ecclesiastical Canon Law. Therefore ownership of the legal fiction ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Vessel designed ‘by’ (of fabrication or giving, for) ‘Law’ and then your address ‘of’ and you also reply yes or you understand, you have in fact just consented to the Court to take your house and liberty with prison to confine you to ‘quarters’ as a legal fiction or ‘story’. You are returned to the warehouse; prison, hospital.
When you reply no to ownership of the legal fiction Mr. Yourname, by Common Law right, you are able as Registered Sovereign, to be Administrator for the Straw Man with no personal liability to you in your common name, or body. You then become a Court Official and cannot be removed from Court by the Judge lawfully.
Do not consent to becoming owner, agent, deed holder, surety, tax, levy, tythe, toll, licensee, mortgagee, etc
There is no legal definition for: Claim to ‘Free Thought’
‘of’ (you become respondent/debtor/MR/MRS/MS/Taxpayer/Citizen) or ’for’ (you become proponent/creditor/Sovereign Trust)
The Vatican is the biggest owner of property
Taken using Canon Law
Mind your OFS and FORS if you end up in Court
Salvific Law is the ‘Will of God’. i.e. You owe me for the design of the vessel that saves you, rather than pays (govt.) or protects you (crown/state), a ridiculous ‘claim’ without reference to gender.
Having the intention or power to bring about salvation or redemption: “the doctrine that only a perfect male form can incarnate God fully and be salvific” (Rita N. Brock).
[Late Latin salvificus : Latin salvus, safe; see safe + Latin -ficus, -fic.]
Vatican Indoctrination of Male above Female.
That only men can ‘author’, ‘design’ and ‘own’. Women are not deemed good authors and not invited into authorship of Laws or administration of Church trusts. From authorship comes ‘Authority’.
As women they are the creator of the vessel and men the designer though this is not acknowledged in Law as Law refers to Knowing which has no gender whilst statute refers to things as ‘he’. Designer is perceived as more important than creator or worker or labourer although without either male or female the ‘thing’ or ‘article’ would not exist since physical reality needs a male and female to create the creator in retrospect. It is a conflict of interest to claim ‘ownership’, ‘right’ or ‘decree’ to a single company/person since their life exists of the fact of bi-lateral nature, unrebuttable from outset and known.
In order to keep women out of power they are made as vessels that can be designed and owned by marriage certification. These laws favour men.
All law maybe interpreted as ‘advice’.
Created by Copyright (GOD?)
Ecclisiastically Licensed
Commercially Trading
Legally, lawfully, factually and as a matter of public policy OPPT have released us from having to know all of the above. Life is excellent!
http://www.yellowbrickroadtour.net/probate-and-other-law.html
‘Marathon Monday’ will never be the same for Bostonians. The 117th Boston Marathon ended abruptly when two bombs went off in quick succession at 2.50 pm EST near the finish line on Boylston Street in downtown Boston. As we go to press, 3 people have been confirmed dead, 17 are critically wounded and another 176 have been treated for injuries. The bombs – spaced some 500 yards and 10 seconds apart – went off on the same side of the street, where many spectators had gathered to cheer runners on to the finish line.
Flying limbs and streets awash in blood from what were effectively anti-personnel bombs, designed to maximise trauma, are daily occurrences in countries occupied by the U.S. military, but such gruesome scenes aren’t usually seen on the streets of the ‘homeland’. Until now.
As the initial shock subsides to make way for an official narrative that will no doubt squeeze every ounce of political capital from this heinous deed, we want to point out some of the inconsistencies we’ve noticed thus far.
A marathon spectator, Fred Milgram, speaking to Irish ‘NewsTalk’ Radio, said that he was talking to Boston Marathon runner Tim Hare, who saw a trashcan explode. Milgram stated that the other bomb was in the Marathon Sports store close to the finish line. This contradicts ‘anonymous sources close to the investigation’ (remember them?) who claim that the explosives were contained in “6-liter pressure cookers and hidden in black duffel bags” left on the sidewalk. Milgram also stated that marathon runner Tim Hare claimed that there was a young man who had been wandering around warning people for hours that “something was going to happen”.
Another Boston marathon runner, Mike Heiliger, told the Squamish Chief newspaper that a woman holding several bags had been telling runners who were picking up their pre-race packages in downtown Boston on Saturday (April 13th) that they were going to die if they participated in the event.
“I was downtown on Saturday and you know, you see these people on the street and think it’s just some nutbar,” he told The Chief from his Boston hotel on Monday. “It was a little creepy because you can identify who the runners are and I heard her say to this runner two feet away from me that, ‘If you run tomorrow you’re going to die.’“
But the strange synchronicities don’t stop there. In an April 12th story, Firehouse.com reported that Boston EMS would deploy a new, off-the-shelf, lightweight mobile device for the first time at the Boston Marathon on April 15th. The device is “intended for use in mass-casualty situations and gives EMS personnel the ability to carry into crowds and assess a patient upon arrival, document in real-time, transmit data to transport units before they arrive, and other features.”
‘Don’t worry, it’s just a training exercise’
As we’ve seen time and time again, ‘drills’ coinciding with ‘terror attacks’ are a constant theme in the major attacks that have been used to justify the ‘War on Terror’. From September 11th to the London bombings to the active shooter drills in schools near Sandy Hook last December, drills conducted by emergency services that switch from ‘passive exercise’ to ‘real-time active’ mode have proven to be tell-tale signs that leave enormous question marks over the official narratives of events.
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, who was near the finish line of the marathon when the explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb-sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines, as well as law enforcement spotters on the roofs of buildings.
“They kept making announcements to the participants – ‘Do not worry, it’s just a training exercise’,” he told CBS Local TV 15 News.
“Evidently, I don’t believe they were just having a training exercise,” Stevenson said. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill… I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in.” Stevenson has participated in many marathons in major metropolitan areas, but stated that he had never seen such heightened security presence at a race.
That is one possibility: that local police were tipped off about a security threat on the day of the race, combed the scene before and during the race as a precaution, and announced to participants that “it’s just a training exercise” to prevent panic and reassure people. But investigators have since emphatically stated that there was no intel or warning prior to the attack, suggesting that the drill really was planned in advance.
How DID he know that?!
Observing the stream of spurious and misleading claims disseminated by anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ in the immediate aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre – claims the real investigators later retracted – we have speculated that drills timed with such attacks provide ideal cover for ensuring that people working for the perpetrators can be placed on the scene to ensure that the ‘right information’ reaches the press (and therefore the nation) in the immediate aftermath of an attack. Most drill participants unwittingly respond to open invitations for emergency personnel from all sectors, and even from neighbouring jurisdictions, to participate in ‘improving emergency preparedness’, etc. All it takes is one or two (maybe more?) intel operatives to blend in with the emergency response effort in the chaotic aftermath; provided they have appropriate attire, I.D. indicating membership of one alphabet agency or another, and security clearance, just about anyone can justify their presence on the scene – if later questioned – on the basis that they were there to take part in the drill.
Remember the second armed man wearing black cammo gear and caught in the woods next to the Sandy Hook school? He was apprehended, taken into custody then later quietly released with the explanation that he was “an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town.”
And do you remember this guy from 9/11? His name is Mark Walsh. Mark was pulled aside by a Fox News reporter to give a statement immediately after the second plane crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. How did he manage to describe in succinct detail a scenario the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) would take four years to make up?
NIST got it wrong of course, but that’s a whole other story. The point is that it’s common practice for intel operatives to be placed on the scene of a false flag attack to quickly establish the official narrative for the media.
Sure enough, we’ve come across a couple of instances of this at the Boston Marathon bombing. This was reported in the UK’s Daily Mail within an hour of the bombs going off:
A source who was speaking with authorities told MailOnline that there were shotgun shells in two explosions, which sprayed onlookers and runners with massive amounts of shrapnel, though the statement has not been confirmed by authorities.
Today, April 16th, investigators have been able to determine that the bombs were packed with ball bearings to maximise the extent of devastating injuries, but how could someone have determined that fact so soon after the explosions?
Here’s another hot contender for deliberate disinfo, taken from the same article:
Police told the Boston Globe that they are still finding ‘secondary devices,’ and pleading with anyone still in the area to leave at once.
In fact, a later report ‘confirmed’ that 7 other bombs were found and that a ‘controlled explosion’ had taken place outside the JFK Library around 4.30pm. And yet today Reuters cites officials stating that no additional explosives were found in the area, leaving just the two fatal explosions. But yesterday, Boston police said during a press conference 2 hours after the explosions that there was a third explosion, the one at Boston’s JFK Library. Throwing more confusion in to the mix was the earlier report of a fire, “possibly caused by an incendiary device”, at the library just ten minutes after the 2 Boylston Street bombs went off.
No wonder Reuters today described the official revision from ‘multiple secondary bombs’ to just two bombs as “a development that could complicate the case”! ‘Complicating the case’, it would appear, is exactly what the stream of false reports is intended to do following a mass traumatic event.
The following ‘eyewitness’ – interviewed within an hour of the explosions – also appears a little too confident and knowledgeable about the nature of the bombs, to the extent that even the news anchor feels obliged to state that no one really knew, at that point, what had happened.
The 2013 Boston Marathon was themed in remembrance of the victims of the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14th 2012. 26 seconds of silence were observed before the race began. The race being 26.2 miles long, one mile was dedicated to each of the victims. Survivors and their families watched on from the VIP area in the spectator stand at the finish line where the first bomb went off yesterday, cheering on a group called ‘Newtown Strong’ – Newtown parents taking part to raise money for local charities. Below you see that the banner marking the final mile carries a dedication to Newtown.
While several people have been taken in for questioning, as yet no charges have been pressed and no group has claimed responsibility. There is no autistic, reclusive 20-year-old to blame. What we have instead is this powerfully symbolic connection to – and reminder of – the Sandy Hook atrocity. The timing of this attack – on Patriots’ Day, a civic holiday commemorating the anniversary of the first battles of the American Revolutionary War, and traditionally observed on the third Monday each April – is intended to remind the people why they need strong leaders to protect them from ‘random’ acts of terror. There is also the fact today, Tuesday 16th April, is Israeli national independence day.
Disgust is often the first reaction to the mere suggestion that authority figures alone stand to benefit from terror attacks. And yet, in the midst of their trauma, they ask: “WHO COULD DO SUCH A THING?” While we can’t name names, history tells us that the source always lies within “ramified networks of mutual pathological conspiracies poorly connected to the main social structure”, as described by Lobaczewski in Political Ponerology.
Many older Europeans ought to be familiar with the ‘Strategy of Tension in Europe in the ‘Cold War’ years. The strategy of tension, employed by US and European government agents, was a tactic that aimed to divide, manipulate and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, and false flag terrorist attacks.
The theory began with allegations that the United States government and the Greek military junta of 1967-1974 supported far-right terrorist groups in Italy and Turkey, where communism was growing in popularity, to spread panic among the population who would in turn demand stronger and more dictatorial governments. There is no reason to assume, or believe, that governments today are any less interested in controlling the people through fear and terror.
An established web-based essayist and print author, Joe has been writing hard-hitting editorials for Sott.net for 8 years and is the author of Sott.net’s The Sott Report Videos. His articles have appeared on many alternative news sites and he has been interviewed on several internet radio shows. His articles can also be found on his personal blog JoeQuinn.net
Niall Bradley has been an editor and investigative journalist for SOTT.net since 2009. He is also an editor of SOTT.net’s print publication, the Dot Connector Magazine, and has appeared as a guest commentator on Press TV and internet radio shows. Niall’s articles are reposted on other alt.news sites and his personal blog NiallBradley.net
http://www.sott.net/article/260940-Strategy-of-tension-Boston-Marathon-bombing
