Itccs Update from Kevin Annett


 

Posted on April 28, 2013 by itccs

 

In this Update:

 

- We the Jury broadcasts on May 4
- The Desperate Deception in Rome
- Domestic Terrorism and Treason by Roman Catholic Officials – An  Open Letter to Boston Cardinal Sean O’Malley

 

………………………

 

1. Our upcoming We the Jury blog radio program carries on the Common Law battle with front-line guests from Holland, America and Canada.

 

Catholic clergy are committing indictable treason by subverting child-protection laws in their own countries because of instructions from Rome. And family courts in Europe and the Americas are systematically trafficking children into the homes of known child rapists – an act of genocide under international law.

 

How are our newly-formed Common Law courts fighting these evils and pursuing convicted officers of church and state?

 

Tune in and find out this Saturday, May 4 at 4 pm EST, 9 pm GMT at www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury.

 

………………………

 

2. Commentary – Be Not Deceived
by Kevin Annett

 

The predictable but ridiculous gestures by the Emperor of Rome, Jorge-Francis, to refashion the image of his Catholic Church into that of a more “humble, just” body makes as much sense as a ravaging strip-mining corporation sponsoring an annual “Eco-Friendly Day”.  A smiling figurehead and a facelift don’t change the nature of the Beast.

 

But the crowd is fickle, and wired into its brain is a desperate need to find virtue in the power of its master. So even otherwise sage observers are caught up nowadays in the “Francis Frenzy” vomiting forth from Rome, and good friends of mine have asked me if I am “encouraged” by the new pope’s statements.

 

Well, no. For if the smiling Francis didn’t exist, he’d have to be concocted, right now. Pope Frank Bergoglio is as legitimate in his beneficence as a smiling Al Capone was as he posed at Chicago charity photo-ops.

 

Papal reforms? Not really. One doesn’t “reform” the oldest and most iron-clad corporation on the planet.

 

Predictably, there’s no talk at the Vatican these days of stopping its laundering of Mafia money, or abolishing the church laws that protect priestly child rapists. They’re still not saying where all those aboriginal kids they slaughtered are buried. Nor are reparations being made to atone for centuries of catholic-sponsored genocide, stolen land and plundered wealth.

 

This new Pope, who funded and buttressed the military junta of Argentina and thinks that women are not complete human beings, is in truth a poor candidate as a reformer, despite his smooth rhetoric. Jorge Bergoglio is a Jesuit, after all: those masters of deception who by their own fourth vow are to pose as all things to all people in order to “infiltrate, dissimulate and destroy all enemies of Rome”.

 

And yet beneath all the necessary spin-doctoring in the church of Rome these days, a fundamental break-up is unfolding in Roman Catholicism that would have happened even without the obvious crimes of Herr Joseph Ratzinger.

 

Like an aging Mafia Don, the papacy has made just too many enemies, done too many scams and ordered too many deaths. But even more to the point, the Vatican Incorporated has lost the capacity to manage its own crises.

 

According to Nicolo Machiavelli, such an incapacity to govern legitimately spells the death knell of any ruler, since retaining the confidence of one’s immediate subordinates is key to keeping power. And so it’s small wonder that Bishops in Ireland and America are already devising plans to loosen their ties with Rome and may even break off entirely into national churches, according to insiders in Dublin, Boston and New York.

 

These local Catholic hierarchs are protecting their assets, quite obviously, as the Vatican Bank is sliding under the waves of financial insolvency, and more of the papal rats are swimming from the floundering vessel. And as for the rest of us: well, any good rebel knows that the time to storm the Bastille is when the King has his hands full and his lieutenants are disunited.

 

Like a tiny match dropped on a properly-soaked building, our recent Common Law Court conviction of the Vatican hierarchy has come just at the right moment. Igniting a flame that is spreading now in more countries, our action directly compelled one pope’s resignation and has encouraged Bishops and even Cardinals abroad to rethink their allegiance to Rome.

 

The following Open Letter is more fuel added to this spreading fire. It was issued today to one of the Cardinals who almost beat Jorge Bergoglio in the papal elections:  Sean O’Malley of Boston, who is part of the “Autonomy” faction in the Vatican Curia and is a member of Bergoglio’s so-called “Reform Commission”.

 

Like all Catholic Cardinals, Sean O’Malley is actively subverting the sovereignty and the laws of the United States of America.

 

………………………

 

3. An Open Letter to a Traitor

 

Dear Cardinal Sean O’Malley,

 

I appreciate your time, considering how preoccupied you are politically these days.

 

Your own Massachusetts state legislature has just passed a new broader statute of limitation law allowing your many child-raping priests to be tried more readily. Following as this law does on the heels of the first-ever conviction and jailing of an American Catholic Bishop, William Lynn, for concealing child trafficking among his priests in Philadelphia, I’m sure you feel the water lapping at your own feet.

 

You and other members of the Catholic hierarchy are now in more than a quandry, and not only because you are actively subverting the sovereignty and the laws of the United States of America.

 

You church officials are now caught firmly between the law of the land and of God, and church law. The latter orders you to conceal child rape in your parishes, and to protect the rapist by not telling the police of this crime. If you don’t participate in such a criminal conspiracy, you face immediate excommunication.

 

And that fact alone means that you wouldn’t be in your position today if you hadn’t aided child rapists.

 

Of course, that papal law – Crimen Solicitationas – has been around since 1929, and none of you seem to have been that bothered by it up to now – that is, until William Lynn’s imprisonment. But now that you, Sean O’Malley, can conceivably go to jail for obeying church law and aiding in the torture and soul-murder of children, it’s a pimp of a different color, as they say in Boston’s south side.

 

So I understand why you’re part of Frank Bergoglio’s “Reform Commission” in Rome, and are trying to tip toe through the present mine field with the right words and gestures. But worse the luck for you, I have to piss on your parade a wee bit, Sean, with some more bad news.

 

By sending money to the Vatican, and obeying its laws, you, Sean O’Malley, are already an undeniable accessory to a crime against humanity, and to what American lawyers call “an international obstruction of justice”: the criminal interference of one government with the laws and internal sovereignty of another.

 

Of course, the Catholic church is an old hand at subverting and overthrowing other governments; but their Bishops have not until now been jailed for doing so. But now, your oath of office and actions are quite simply helping the Vatican subvert the laws and sovereignty of the United States of America. That makes you an indictable traitor and a terrorist, under domestic laws.

 

That fact alone means you can be arrested and put on trial at any time – especially now that a Common Law Court verdict on February 25 found your bosses in Rome guilty of these crimes and sentenced them to prison terms and public banishment. (www.itccs.org)

 

So Sean, listen up: you’re not being asked, but are rather required under the Law of Nations to stop enforcing the church law Crimen Solictationas by immediately identifying and defrocking any clergyman in your Diocese who has harmed or is harming children, or who’s aided those who have.

 

Under Article 25 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, you are also obligated not to fund or subsidize institutions such as the Vatican which has ordered that you collude in this crime.

 

Ultimately, I know your bottom line, and how concerned you are about all the Citizens Arrests, occupations of Catholic church property, and the commercial liens issued against the wealth of your church and its officers. These same actions are going to commence soon in your own Boston Diocese, led by survivors of priestly torture.

 

I know you’re worried about all this, because recently you commented to a subordinate,

 

“I’ll eat shit publicly before I let any of those bastards occupy our Cathedral”

 

Well, I’d hate to be the one who reduced a Cardinal of Rome to the status of a coprophiliac, Sean, but life is hard. These matters aren’t in my hands anymore, as I’m sure you’ve known ever since a tornado and lightning struck the Vatican the day after our first public exorcism of your church in Rome in October, 2009.

 

But you do have a way out, Sean: you, and your fellow Cardinals and others with so much blood and crime on your hands. It’s this simple:

 

You, and your Bishops and priests in the Boston Diocese, must all agree to take a Public Oath of Protection to the community and its children whereby you unconditionally pledge the following, under God:

 

1. To disregard and publicly repudiate the Catholic canon law known as Crimen Solicitationas, and seek for its immediate repeal by the Vatican, along with any similar canon law statutes;

 

2. To actively protect children in your Diocese by immediately and without conditions expelling and defrocking any clergy or other employees who have harmed or are harming children, and

 

3. To refuse to fund or commercially engage with the corporation known as the Vatican or Church of Rome.

 

Taking such steps will undoubtedly cause your own defrocking, Sean, but as the Book says, You cannot serve God and Mammon. Remember?

 

There’s nowhere for you to hide anymore, Sean: not from civil justice, and certainly not from the sight and judgement of God and your victims. But you must act quickly, so that not another child is destroyed by your church’s standing policy of harboring and protecting active child rapists in its ranks.

 

The reclamation actions of our network will begin in the churches of your Boston Diocese, depending on your response to this letter, or lack of it. The choice is yours. We await your reply.

 

Sincerely,

 

Kevin D. Annett, Field Secretary of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

 

Issued 28 April, 2013 to the Office of the Boston Diocese of the Roman Catholic Church

http://itccs.org/

 

Kevin Annett is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize


There couldn’t be a more deserving individual, our prayers are with you Kevin…thank you for your invaluable Service to the greater good and especially Canada’s aboriginal population, they deserved a recounting of history and to have their story of grave injustice and genocide heard before the International Tribunal! With much love…Mahalo!

Posted on May 08, 2013 by itccs

New York City

Reverend Kevin Annett has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a group of American and Canadian academicians, it was learned today. Annett is currently on an extended speaking tour in Holland, France, Italy and other countries.

Reverend Annett has made history since 1996 with his meticulous exposure of church and state sponsored Genocide of indigenous children in Canada’s Indian residential school system. Annett produced the first documented evidence of massive deaths in the schools and helped force official recognition and an apology from the government of Canada in 2008.

Reverend Annett has been honored and adopted by aboriginal nations in Canada over the past fifteen years and has helped immeasureable numbers of residential school survivors at a great personal cost, in recognition of which he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a group of North American scholars.

“Without Kevin Annett there would have been no healing and no justice for any of us survivors of this Genocide. He has put us on the map” stated Ojibway Nation elder Louis Daniels in October of 2004 when he adopted Annett into his tribe and gave him the name Eagle Strong Voice.

The Nobel Committee in Oslo – which may itself name candidates – does not reveal nominees or those who endorse them for a period of 50 years, nor does it offer comment, although contenders are sometimes named or speculated over by the media and other sources.

Rev. Annett presently serves as the Field Secretary for the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State. A complete interview with him will be posted shortly.

http://itccs.org/2013/05/08/kevin-annett-is-nominated-for-the-nobel-peace-prize/

America Keeps Honoring One of Its Worst Mass Murderers: Henry Kissinger


 

Henry Kissinger’s quote recently released [3] by Wikileaks,”the illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer“, likely brought a smile to his legions of elite media, government, corporate and high society admirers. Oh that Henry! That rapier wit! That trademark insouciance! That naughtiness! It is unlikely, however, that the descendants of his more than 6 million victims in Indochina, and Americans of conscience appalled by his murder of non-Americans, will share in the amusement. For his illegal and unconstitutional actions had real-world consequences: the ruined lives of millions of Indochinese innocents in a new form of secret, automated, amoral U.S. Executive warfare which haunts the world until today.

And his conduct raises even more fundamental questions: to what extent can leaders who act secretly ,illegally and unconstitutionally, lying to their citizenry and legislature as a matter of course, legitimately claim to represent their people? How much allegiance do citizens owe such leaders? And what does it say about America’s elites that they have honored a man with so much innocent blood on his hands for the past 40 years?

Mr. Kissinger’s most significant historical act was executing Richard Nixon’s orders to conduct the most massive bombing campaign, largely of civilian targets, in world history. He dropped 3.7 million tons of bombs** between January 1969 and January 1973 – nearly twice the two million dropped on all of Europe and the Pacific in World War II. He secretly and illegally devastated villages throughout areas of Cambodia inhabited by a U.S. Embassy-estimated two million people; quadrupled the bombing of Laos and laid waste to the 700-year old civilization on the Plain of Jars; and struck civilian targets throughout North Vietnam – Haiphong harbor, dikes, cities, Bach Mai Hospital – which even Lyndon Johnson had avoided. His aerial slaughter helped kill, wound or make homeless an officially-estimated six million human beings**, mostly civilians who posed no threat whatsoever to U.S. national security and had committed no offense against it.

There is a word for the aerial mass murder that Henry Kissinger committed  in Indochina, and that word is “evil”. The figure most identified with this word today is Adolph Hitler, and his evil was so unspeakable that the term is by now identified with him. But that is precisely why it is important to understand the new face of evil and moral depravity that Henry Kissinger represents. For evil not only comes in the form of madmen dreaming of 1000 year Reichs. In fact, in our day, it is more likely to be committed by sane, genial and ordinary careerists waging invisible automated war in far-off lands against people whose screams we never hear, whose faces we never see, and whose deaths go unrecorded and unnoticed. It is critical to understand this new face of evil, for it threatens not only countless foreigners but Americans in coming years. And no one has embodied it more than Henry Kissinger.

The planes he dispatched came by day. They came by night. Remorseless. Pitiless. Relentless. Day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year. Most of the people below had no idea where the bombers came from, why their lives had been turned into a living hell. The movie ”War of the Worlds”, in which Americans are incomprehensibly slaughtered by machines is the closest depiction of what the innocent rice-farmers of Indochina experienced.

Hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam were forced to live in holes and caves, like animals. Many tens of thousands were burned alive by the bombs, slowly dying in agony. Others were buried alive, as they gradually suffocated to death when a 500 pound bomb exploded nearby. Most were victims of antipersonnel bombs designed primarily to maim not kill, many of the survivors carrying the metal, jagged or plastic pellets in their bodies for the rest of their lives.

Fathers like 38-year old Thao Vong were suddenly blinded or crippled for life as they lost an arm or leg, made helpless, unable to support their families, becoming  dependent on others just to stay alive. Children were struck, lying out in the open, screaming, villagers unable to come to their aid for fear of being killed themselves. No one was spared – neither sweet, loving grandmothers nor lovely young women, neither laughing, innocent children nor nursing or pregnant mothers, not water buffalo needed to farm not the shrines where people had for centuries honored their ancestors and hoped one day to be honored themselves.

A farmer on the Plain of Jars in northern Laos wrote of being bombed by the U.S. in 1969 that ”every day and every night the planes came to drop bombs on us. We lived in holes to protect our lives. I saw my cousin die in the field of death. My heart was most disturbed and my voice called out loudly as I ran to the houses. Thus, I saw life and death for the people on account of the war of many airplanes in the region of the Plain of Jars. Until there were no houses at all. And the cows and buffalo were dead. Until everything was leveled and you could see only the red, red ground.”

A 30-year old mother  wrote that ”at that time, our lives became like those of animals desperately trying to escape their hunters. Our lives were confided to the Lord Buddha. No matter when, all we did was to pray to the Lord to save our lives.”

A 39 year old rice-farmer wrote of the aftermath of a bombing raid: “The other villagers and I got together to consider this thing. We hadn’t done anything, nor harmed anyone. We had raised our crops, celebrated the festivals and maintained our homes for many years. Why did the planes drop bombs on us, impoverishing us this way?”

Mr. Kissinger exulted to President Nixon over this bombing, telling [4] him that ”it’s wave after wave of planes. You see, they can’t see the B-52 and they dropped a million pounds of bombs … I bet you we will have had more planes over there in one day than Johnson had in a month … each plane can carry about 10 times the load of World War II plane could carry.”

Although Mr. Kissinger claimed he was only bombing enemy troops, guerrilla soldiers were largely undetectable from the air. Investigating the bombing of northern Laos, the U.S. Senate Refugee Subcommittee concluded that ”the United States has undertaken a large-scale air war over Laos to destroy the physical and social infra­structure in Pathet Lao (i.e., guerrilla) areas. Throughout all this there has been a policy of secrecy. The bombing has taken and is taking a heavy toll among civilians.” These words apply to Mr. Kissinger’s bombing throughout Indochina. The villagers of Indochina were not “collateral damage”. They were the target.

Those who praise Mr. Kissinger for the opening to China but ignore his mass murder in Indochina shame human decency itself. By honoring Mr. Kissinger they dishonor themselves. And they are also blind to the careerist “Executive Branch mentality” he embodied, which poses a clear and present a danger to foreigners and Americans alike today. Adolph Hitler dreamed of conquering and Stalin of communizing the world. Mr. Kissinger destroyed millions of lives primarily to further his career by preventing a communist takeover while he held office. And it is this kind of institutional, bureaucratic mentality, combined with new machines of secret war,  which threatens the humanity today far more than the crazed ideologies of the past.

In the end Mr. Kissinger failed, as the communists took over Indochina in the spring of 1975. The Thieu, Lon Nol and Royal Lao government regimes, which Mr. Kissinger propped up with so many tens of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars, evaporated. The genocidal Khmer Rouge took over in Cambodia,  which would not have occurred had Mr. Kissinger supported the neutralist Sihanouk and not illegally invaded Cambodia. But though Mr. Kissinger failed miserably in Indochina, he did in the end succeed in his principal goal. He emerged from the wreckage of Indochina with his reputation intact.

Even critics of Mr. Kissinger tend to use euphemisms about his actions for fear of losing their “credibility.” But facts are facts. The truth is the truth, and euphemisms obscure it. It is a matter of  fact not rhetoric that Mr. Kissinger bears a major responsibility for murdering masses of people in Indochina. He is a mass murderer.

What is most important about his mass murder, however, was not only that his order to Alexander Haig to undertake [5] ”a massive bombing campaign in Cambodia. Anything that flies on anything that moves”  was clear evidence of criminal intent to avoid the laws of war protecting civilians, and that he would have been executed had the Nuremberg Judgment been applied to his blanket bombing of civilian targets.

It was that he conducted a new form of automated, secret and  amoral warfare previously only imagined by George Orwell in 1984 when he described war as fought by machines waged by ”very small numbers of people, mostly highly-trained specialists (waging war) on the vague frontiers whose whereabouts the average man can only guess at.”  When Richard Nixon decided, and Henry Kissinger executed, a plan to withdraw U.S. ground troops but seek to win by escalating war from the air, they brought into being a new age of automated war that inevitably, and cold-bloodedly, wound up killing large numbers of civilians.

Previous war-makers fomented hatred against the “Jewish scum”, “gooks”, or “Huns” they massacred. But neither Mr. Kissinger nor his subordinates had anything against the countless Lao, Cambodian and Vietnamese civilians they slaughtered. They simply did not regard them as human beings. They had no more significance for them than cockroaches or ants. It was not immorality but amorality, the murder of countless “non-people” whose existence as human beings was simply ignored. Though the people of the Plain of Jars wanted nothing from America except to be left alone, even this simple wish was denied them, as they were extinguished like flies out of indifference not malice.

An August, 1945 editorial in the London Observer eerily foreshadowed what Mr. Kissinger represented,  and what such successors as David Petraeus and John Brennan embody today: ”Albert Speer symbolizes a type which is becoming increasingly important in all belligerent countries: the pure technician, the classless, bright young man, without background, with no other original aim than to make his way in the world, and no other means than his technical and managerial ability. It is the lack of psychological and spiritual ballast and the ease with which he handles the terrifying technical and organizational machinery of our age which makes this slight type go extremely far nowadays. This is their age. The Hitlers and Himmlers we may get rid of, but the Speers, whatever happens to this particular special man, will long be with us.”

Although Mr. Kissinger failed so miserably in Indochina, he did indeed display great ability in handling the “organizational machinery” of the U.S. Executive Branch — so much ability in fact that his actions have become the template for most U.S. war-making today. This war-making is:

– Undemocratic: Mr. Kissinger not only failed to obtain permission from Congress to bomb Laos and Cambodia, he did not even inform it he was doing so. The incredible fact is that a handful of U.S. leaders unilaterally dropped 3.7 million tons of bombs on Indochina entirely on their own initiative – as have U.S. officials today assassinated thousands of unarmed suspects throughout the Muslim world.

– Unconstitutional: The very foundation of the Constitution is the principle that leaders may only legitimately rule with the “informed consent” of the people. But Mr. Kissinger not only failed to inform the American people or Congress about his bombing of Indochina. He has lied about it  from the day he took office until today. Between January 1969 and March 1970, as he leveled the Plain of Jars, Mr. Kissinger’s State Department denied it was even bombing Laos.  And when reports from refugees made it impossible to deny the bombing, Mr. Kissinger’s and his representatives continued to lie, denying that they bombed civilian targets. William Sullivan, close Kissinger ally and the former U.S. Ambassador to Laos, testified to Senator Edward Kennedy on April 22, 1971 “the policy of the U.S. is deliberately to avoid hitting inhabited villages.”

– Illegal: By failing to even notify Congress of his massive bombing, Mr. Kissinger broke domestic law. By systematically bombing civilian targets and refusing to observe laws seeking to protect civilians  during wartime, he violated international law. Both conditions are true for U.S. drone and ground assassinations today.

– Secret:  The bombing of Laos and Cambodia, like that in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia today,  was conducted in secret. Even as U.S. officials first denied they were doing any bombing at all, and then that they were only bombing legitimate military targets, they refused to allow journalists to go out on bombing runs. The  information about the bombing of civilian targets was classified and kept out of the hands of Congress, the media, and the American people.

– Amoral:  Like Mr. Kissinger, President Obama lied when he recently described his drone assassination program as “a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists who are trying to go in and harm Americans,  hit American facilities, American bases, and so on “. In fact, U.S. officials have admitted that most of their victims are unarmed suspects  killed in “signature strikes” against people who names are not known. And the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has documented that hundreds of those killed by U.S. drone strikes are civilians. The victims of drone strikes are simply labeled “militants”, denied their humanity as well as their lives.

What is most troubling  to anyone with a conscience about Mr. Kissinger’s new form of warfare is that, from a bureaucratic perspective, it worked. By keeping the human consequences of their  war-making secret from Congress and the American people, the Kissingers, Petraeuses and Brennans have had a free hand to kill, torture, imprison   and maim anyone they wish. They not only need not fear punishment for their illegal acts. Like Mr. Kissinger, who has grown wealthy on the blood of the innocents of Indochina, they can even look forward to being rewarded for them. We are taught as children that crime does not pay. Mr. Kissinger, who has earned tens of millions since the war ended on the blood of innocent Indochinese, is living proof that this is untrue.

The big question for Americans today is the degree to which this “Executive Mentality”  will be directed against American citizens in the future. The prospects are not promising.

The U.S. Executive today has not only obtained permission from Congress to kill or imprison any American citizens they wish without due process. They have done so – murdering not only Anwar al-Awlaki but his 16 year son, also a U.S. citizen, while sitting in a café. The Executive under President Obama has undertaken unprecedented prosecution of  U.S. whistle-blowers and journalists alike for revealing information officials have arbitrarily classified. Never before has the U.S. had an Executive Branch  ”Department of Homeland Security”, which routinely spies on millions of Americans, and is working to paramilitarize police departments around the nation.

On a human level it is possible, even appropriate, to sympathize with Henry Kissinger. German Jew Heinz Alfred Kissinger was  only 9 when Hitler took office, and only escaped at age 16 shortly before Kristallnacht, One can only guess at the multiple traumas and psychological damage he suffered. It is entirely understandable that he would develop a cynical view of the world  and devote himself solely to gaining and holding power  devoid of moral or ethical concerns.

But Mr. Kissinger is more than an individual. He is also a political and historical figure.

Future historians, public intellectuals and journalists  who have nothing to gain by flattering Mr. Kissinger and ignoring his crimes against humanity will likely have a very different view of his legacy than today’s opinion-makers.

They will likely see the U.S. opening to China as inevitable and pay relatively little attention to Mr. Kissinger’s role in it.  As the historian Gareth Porter has documented [6] in detail, they will also see clearly that the terms of the Paris Peace Agreement he signed in 1973 were no different than what he could have obtained in 1969 – thus saving tens of thousands of American, and countless Indochinese,  lives. And his winning the Nobel Peace Prize will be seen less as an honor he deserved than an indelible stain on those who awarded it to him.

No, what Mr. Kissinger will be most remembered for is cold-bloodedly ushering in a new age of undemocratic, unconstitutional, secret, criminal and amoral automated warfare, by a U.S. Executive Branch constrained neither by law nor elemental human decency.

After the war ended, former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara made a good-faith effort to understand what he did in Vietnam, issuing a mea culpa of sorts in his book [7] In Retrospect. By contrast PBS Journalist Steve Talbot reported [8] the following when he interviewed Mr. Kissinger: “I told him I had just interviewed Robert McNamara in Washington. That got his attention. He stopped badgering me, and then he did an extraordinary thing. He began to cry. But no, not real tears. Before my eyes, Henry Kissinger was acting. ‘Boohoo, boohoo,’ Kissinger said, pretending to cry and rub his eyes. ‘He’s still beating his breast, right? Still feeling guilty.’ He spoke in a mocking, singsong voice and patted his heart for emphasis.” As the Khmer Rouge were conducting genocide in Cambodia, Mr. Kissinger told [9] the Thai Foreign Minister on November 26, 1975 that “how many people did (Khmer Rouge Foreign Minister Ieng Sary) kill? Tens of thousands … you should tell the Cambodians  that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in the way. We are prepared to improve relations with them. Tell them the latter part, but don’t tell them what I said before.”

Future historians will not only marvel at the depth of his pathology, but ask a basic question: what does it say about America and its elites that they honor such a man?

They will likely not have much interest in the man himself who was indeed, after all, little more than the man foresaw by the London Observer, a ”classless, bright young man … with no other original aim than to make his way in the world”characterized both by a ”lack of psychological and spiritual ballast” and a skill in handling ”the terrifying technical and organizational machinery of our age.”

Kissinger the man will likely be remembered, if he is remembered at all, as the fellow best described by the novelist Joseph Heller in Good As Gold:

 “It was disgraceful and so discouraging … that this base figure charged with infamies too horrendous to measure and too numerous for listing should be gadding about gaily in chauffeured cars, instead of walking at Spandau with Rudolf Hess … Asked about his role in the Cambodian war, in which an estimated five hundred thousand people died, he’d said: ‘I may have a lack of imagination, but I fail to see the moral issue involved.’ Whereas another State Department official, William C. Sullivan, had testified: ‘The justification for the war is the reelection of the President.’ Not once … had Kissinger raised a voice in protest against the fascistic use of police power to quell public opposition to the war in Southeast Asia.

“In Gold’s conservative opinion, Kissinger would not be recalled in history as a Bismarck, Metternich, or Castlereagh but as an odious shlumpf who made war gladly.”

But what this insignificant man symbolized for future war-making will be of great significance to future historians. For, as the London Observer also correctly predicted Mr. Kissinger did indeed go far – taking America on a dark journey of war-making characterized by mass murder by machine, secrecy, lying, manipulation, betrayal of democracy and the U.S. Constitution, international criminality, overthrowing democratically elected governments and support for some of the world’s most brutal and savage dictators. Yes, as he joked, he was skilled at engaging in ”illegal” and ”unconstitutional” activities. But the rest of humanity, and this nation, will be paying the price for this skill for generations to come.

**  “Dollars and Deaths,” The Congressional Record, May 14, 1975, p. 14262.  

TOP TEN KISSINGER QUOTES

1. Soviet Jews:“The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern.” (link [10])

2. Bombing Cambodia: “[Nixon] wants a massive bombing campaign in Cambodia. He doesn’t want to hear anything about it. It’s an order, to be done. Anything that flies on anything that moves.” (link [11]) (Emphasis added)

3. Bombing Vietnam: ”It’s wave after wave of planes. You see, they can’t see the B-52 and they dropped a million pounds of bombs … I bet you we will have had more planes over there in one day than Johnson had in a month … each plane can carry about 10 times the load of World War II plane could carry.”  (link [4])

4. Khmer Rouge:“How many people did (Khmer Rouge Foreign Minister Ieng Sary) kill? Tens of thousands? You should tell the Cambodians (i.e., Khmer Rouge) that we will be friends with them. They are murderous thugs, but we won’t let that stand in the way. We are prepared to improve relations with them. Tell them the latter part, but don’t tell them what I said before.” (from November 26, 1975 Meeting [9] With Thai Foreign Minister.)

5. Dan Ellsberg: “Because that son-of-a-bitch—First of all, I would expect—I know him well—I am sure he has some more information—I would bet that he has more information that he’s saving for the trial.  Examples of American war crimes that triggered him into it…It’s the way he’d operate….Because he is a despicable bastard.” (Oval Office tape, July 27, 1971)

6. Robert McNamara: “Boohoo, boohoo … He’s still beating his breast, right? Still feeling guilty. ” (Pretending [8] to cry, rubbing his eyes.)

7. Assassination:  “It is an act of insanity and national humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.” (Statement [12] at a National Security Council meeting , 1975)

8. Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” (link [13])

9. Illegality-Unconstitutionality: “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” (from March 10, 1975 Meeting With Turkish Foreign Minister Melih Esenbel in Ankara, Turkey)

10. Himself: “Americans like the cowboy … who rides all alone into the town, the village, with his horse and nothing else … This amazing, romantic character suits me precisely because to be alone has always been part of my style or, if you like, my technique.” (November 1972 Interview with Oriana Fallaci)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPPT: When Will The Other Shoe Drop? [Video]


Added by GM on March 3, 2013

OPPT-IN-FREEDOM-MLK

Here is the text of an email I received recently from Paula Humfrey detailing the OPPT foreclosure, the “Trust” accounts set up for all of us on the planet, and top secret documents we were never supposed to see.

Sam Davis

Hi All,

Let me take you through two items that appeared in my email inbox over the course of the past week. Both of these items, one video and one .pdf file, are publicly available online. Check it out for yourself.

It’s just amazing what hides in plain sight. It’s also amazing to see what happens when we use our mind’s eye.

Here’s what we’ve learned so far:

On behalf of us, the One People, OPPT has foreclosed on all of the global ‘trust’ accounts. These accounts properly belong to all of us in trust, simply because we’re all citizens of this planet, equally. Each global trust account (and these go by many and various names) represents vast sums of money, all of it backed by gold, silver, and treasure.

That’s a pretty chewy statement but let’s go with it, just as a thought experiment.

OPPT proposes that Ten Billion Dollars ($10,000,000,000) USD is held in trust for each individual on this planet. Well then! What kind of evidence exists that I might use to verify for myself that this story isn’t completely nutbar? Let’s return to the above-mentioned pair of items, which turn out to be very helpful in this regard.

The video, titled ‘Joint Release 3-36.3’, was produced at some point after Dec. 24th, 2012 by UN-SWISSINDO TELEVISION NEWS: GLOBAL WORLD, which seems to be the PR vehicle for announcements from the Soekarno Trust. So in this moment of NOW I’m transcribing the first part of an hour-long video announcing disbursements from the Trust. The payments, one after the other, are literally astronomical (see partial transcript below). There seems little question that this money is in fact available and is being sent out to its named recipients.

And now here comes this missive, just in today (Jan. 22) from Drake via Jean Haines, which directly concerns the subject at hand:

“HUGE assets and MONEY from the imperial families are in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Specifically, China, Japan, Indonesia.”

“Financial Intel – From Drake…”

http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/financial-intel-from-drake/

I also offer for your consideration the attached ‘Top Secret’ 2012 World Bank audit of its black-screen off-ledger accounts. Some impressive signatures are attached to the end of the document. As you’re reading through the audit doc, you might want to keep these three things in mind:

1. It’s important to squint hard at the names of the accounts and the identities of the account holders; this info appears in the first several pages of the doc.
2. The ‘infinity’ symbol looks like a sideways numeral 8. That symbol replaces dollar values in each of the accounts because they are in fact infinite (the accounts are grown and partially harvested when mature, in perpetuity).
3. Really: check out those signatures at the end.

Cheers.

• • •

As an added bonus, here’s my partial and slightly challenged transcript of the first 15 mins. of the video, which is all I was able to handle in one go. If someone would like to improve on it, that would be swell:

Joint Release 3-36.3

UN – SWISSINDO TELEVISION NEWS: GLOBAL WORLD

Good day.

I am Director of Joint Communications [unclear]. This is Publication 3-36, authorized release unlimited. ID 452106/66/2012, Trustee, Processee, Dynasty… Swissindo Agreement Joint Release 3-36, Joint Doctrine for Multinational Operations, ID 452106/66/2012.

For keeping information on Transactions and Treaties, International Agreements.

Treaty Event: UN Swissindo Multinational, Special Extra, Thirty Trillion US Dollars, Federal Reserve Bank, to pay to Deposit Control Settlement Investment Deposit, Freedom Forever 111, in official name, ownership [unclear], authority mandate, Personal International Trustee, plus Trustee Dynasty RMSPTD, Beneficial name, Global Development

1. Payment 1: To Committee of Treaty of UN Swissindo Multinational.
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD.
Date: November 20, 2012.

2. Payment 1: U.N. date 24 [unclear] in the House of Representatives HR 1249, Internal Protocol Number 301 of the Great President of the Kingdom of the United Nations Organization
Amount: Five Hundred Million ($500,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.

3. Payment 1: Independent Consultant and Contractor Exhibit AB
Amount: Nine Billion and Seven Hundred Million ($9,700,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012

4. Payment 1: For [unclear], Public Property
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.

5. Payment 1: For UMD UN Swissindo, Treaty Event of Paris
Amount: Ninety-Seven Billion ($97,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.

6. Payment 1: Official Extra to U.N. Members of 193 Nations
Amount: Five Hundred Billion ($500,000,000,000) USD
Total: Forty-Six Trillion and Five Hundred Billion ($46,500,000,000,000) USD
Date: November 20, 2012.

7. Payment 1: U.N. Swissindo Multinational
Date: December 24, 2012
Number 1: N.A.T.O.: One Hundred and Fifty Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($158,990,000,000,000) USD
Number 2: S.A.T.O.[?]: One Hundred and Thirty Trillion and Nine Hundred Ninety Billion ($130,990,000,000,000) USD
Number 3: NON-BLOC: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD

8. Payment 1: Neo Mercusuar Dunia
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012

9. Payment 1: Contract Project
1. Master Key Plan; Date: December 24, 2012
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD
1. Master Plan; Date: December 24, 2012
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion ($138,990,000,000,000) USD

10. Payment 1: Global Immunity, The World [unclear] Date: December 24, 2012
Big Top: One Hundred Twenty Person World [unclear] Most Powerful Families
Amount: Ten Billion in [unclear] Currency
Amount: Two Trillion and Two Hundred Fifteen Billion ($2,215,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012

11. Payment 1: [unclear]; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 1: UN Members of 190 Nations
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and One Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,119,000,000) USD
Number 2: Top Three Hundred Organizations IPO
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD
Total: Four Hundred and Sixteen Trillion and Nine Hundred and Seventy Billion ($416,970,000,000) USD
Number 3: World and Indonesia [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Ninety Billion USD
Total: Three Quadrillion…

[This is really funny! At the 7:30 point in the video, the number is so big that the Communications Director, who now has terrible cotton mouth from reciting non-stop, can't get his tongue around saying it successfully.]

Total: Three Quadrillion and Six Hundred and Thirty Trillion and Seven Hundred and Forty Billion ($3,630,740,000,000,000) USD
3.1. [unclear] Foundation
3.2. [unclear] Foundation
3.3. U.N. Foundation
3.4. [unclear] Republic Indonesia
3.5. USO USA
3.6. MUN [?]
3.7. OMD
3.8. [unclear]
3.9. [unclear] Indonesia
3.10. Billion Big Bang [unclear] A1 1A
3.11. UBS AG
3.12: Bank of America
3.13: Wells Fargo
3.14: Citibank N.A.
3.15. Federal Reserve
3.16. World Bank
3.17. Bank of International Settlements or BIS
3.18. International Monetary Fund
3.19. All Central Banks for 193 and 115 Top World Prime Banks
3.20. International Chamber of Commerce or ICC
3.21 Financial [?] FITFGFI
3.22. Tantara [?] National International TNI [?]
3.23. United Nations Organization
3.24. [unclear] Hospital
3.25. Thirty-Three Provinces
3.26. 29 BUMN
3.27. [unclear] Global Government
Number 4: World Mining or [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 5: World [unclear]
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 6: World Agricultural or Brittania
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 7: Communication or [unclear] Land, Ocean, and Air
Amount: One Hundred Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Total: Seventeen Billion and Three Hundred and Ninety-One Million and Three Hundred and Four Thousand and Three Hundred and Forty-Eight ($17,391,304,348) USD
Total: Three Quadrillion and Eight Hundred and Ninety-One Trillion and Seven Hundred and Twenty Million ($3,891,000,720,000,000) USD; Date: December 24, 2012
Number 10: Global Development Human Obligation of the Big Five Continents and Requirement Employer of the Consultant on site of the Big Five Continents AAAA2, Asia, Africa, Europe, America, Australia
10.1. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Asia
Amount: Twenty-Six Quadrillion and Two Hundred Trillion ($26,200,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
For and on behalf of Continent of Asia, Pilot Project; Date: December 24, 2012
Club 1: Indonesia, 33 Provinces
Amount: One Quadrillion and One Hundred and Sixty-One Trillion ($1,161,000,000,000) USD
Club 2: [unclear]
Six Trillion and Eight Hundred and Sixty-Two Billion ($6,862,000,000,000) USD
Singleton[?] of one or part country, Continent of Africa
Amount: Three Hundred and Thirty Trillion ($330,000,000,000) USD
10.2. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Africa
Amount: Six Quadrillion, Seven Hundred and Twenty Trillion ($6,720,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Africa, the Nation of Africa
10.3. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Europe
Amount: Five Quadrillion and Nine Hundred and Twenty Trillion ($5,920,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
Singletonl[?] of one or part country, Continent of Africa, Bosnia-Herzegovina
Amount: Thirty-Six Trillion ($36,000,000,000) USD
For and on behalf of Continent of Europe, Nation of Africa
10.4. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of America
Amount: Three Quadrillion and Four Hundred Trillion ($3,400,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Continent of Africa,
Nation of Africa
10.5. The Great Kingdom of the Continent of Australia
Amount: One Hundred and Forty-Five Trillion ($145,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012; Pilot Project for and on behalf of Continent of Australia,
Nation of Australia
Number 11: Requirement, Consultant, and Contractor, Swissindo, JO[?], Representing the Big Five Continents
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion (138,919,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012
Number 12: OMB [unclear] USA Indonesia
Amount: One Hundred and Thirty-Eight Trillion and Nine Hundred and Nineteen Billion ($138,919,000,000,000) USD
Date: December 24, 2012

This stuff is pretty amazing, isn’t it?

Sam Davis

Here is a video from Alang Jr., Confirming that everyone knows what OPPT has done is legal.

Published on Dec 18, 2012
Join Release 3-36
Join Doctrine For MULTINASIONAL OPERATIONS
AD452106/66/2012
For Keeps International Transaction And Treaties International Agreement
TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO MULTINASIONAL

http://guardianlv.com/2013/03/jd-oppt-when-will-the-other-shoe-drop/

 

The Criminalization of Poverty…the Illuminati are all Judges, Politicians and Bankers using Unrebutted Statutes Against Us


Adam Yates March 26, 2013

UniversalPeaceNowNo CommentsOne Voice

Lawyers are so expensive that Governments win their Court cases by your poverty (Unlawful).

New Statutes and precedents are set in this way for the benefit of those claiming ownership of you by a design copyrighted berth certificate. You are a vessel of funding to the design owners (Courts) therefore under Jurisdiction or Administration of all three forms of statute legislation, they being the designers…the paper statutes are not designers (which pre supposes a proponent with power of voice) and cannot own anything. Statutes are written words (statutes of any law systems have no power in Court unless consented to).
Baptized (under Ecclesiastical), registered (under Crown/Federal) and owned by NI/SSN (under Copyright)
Courts create Laws by voice. Governments create Legislative Statutes to control Law. You hold Authority in Court as Sovereign.
Lawyers are so expensive that Governments win Court cases by your unrebuttal out of poverty (Unlawful). New Statutes and precedents are set in this way.
Not to have money or ‘ownership’ ‘of ‘property’ is the ‘state of insanity, incompetence, absence’ in Statute Legislation (this is not the same as Law).
Written word is Statute by the Author. Voiced word is Law by Being. Do not condemn yourself by silence, always object or ‘notify’.
Ecclesiastical Law by ‘authority of power of god’ is Slavery Law. AUTHORITY IS TAKEN by CONSENT: NOT GIVEN WITHOUT CONSENT .
Authority over you in Court is offered/requested/required/stipulated/endorsed/billed/summonsed/licensed/notified/noticed/presented/asked ‘for’ by the Judge in the form of:
1 commerce (the vessel hull), 2 religion (to be a slave on ship), or 3 claim to own the physical ship or vessel (your body that holds water) by copyright ownership (berth certificate).
You are nothing but a ‘drawing’. You are a ‘drawing’ in a ‘design’ of a Law Vessel copyrighted by the Vatican. The US Copyright laws enable the US to do business for the Vatican as a partner by enforcing Canon Law with a global agenda under the guise of copyright law. Now look up ‘drawing’ in Ballentines Law Dictionary.
The lie is that their Law Systems, Government and Court are NOT ‘vessel’s (defined as a seaworthy craft). They literally hold no water by definition and therefore have no power/authority: only a voice is deemed Authority in a fair Court (fair: without such religious, business and ownership conflicts of interest).
Government and Court cannot float on water; neither can the Vatican even if Jesus did.
They are ideas we either accept (consent) or reject (rebut).
We are not in a ‘vessel’ or ‘ship’ though metaphorically we are if you want to be as a ‘content’ of an ‘employer’ in a ‘workplace’ registered under religious copyrighted ideas.
Step away from the metaphor…be precise.
You can’t copyright something that cannot float in water least of all an idea. Neither can paper contracts survive water.
Water is their ‘value’. Voice is the proven power of Being a vessel, sovereign, freeman, spiritual person who holds ‘value’ by a voice or ’flag’.
Laws are ‘established’ by ‘trials’ and is taught over years of continual changes to Law over time.
Never get to Court: Corporations go to Court. If you are not yet sovereign and have a summons to Court this is for you.
You are owned as a registered entity/company/thing by another copyrighted entity/company/thing.
The CHARGE you get is giving commission to Court on your Court appearance should the prosecutor think they will win and get money, the Court always get a commission, hire charge, paid by the State or Nation. Conflicts of Interest. The Court is proponent ‘giving offer of commerce’.
Courts are paid by governments whose legislation is there to support the occupancy of the system by ‘sadism’, (see dictionary) as if their Terms & Conditions, so governments are supporting the Court system & vice versa. Conflicts of Interest.
Positive Law: Attention is drawn to apostrophe words where meanings stray into ‘legal fiction’.
Above all you are registered: by birth certificate, as owned by the crown under canon law, that appoints trustees to administer your company name registered by the certificate. The trust is a cestui que vie trust. This declares you incompetent/missing/lost at sea shortly after birth. You then become berthed in citizen’ship’. If unrebutted for 7 years you are owned by the crown or government then enslaved by an NI or SSN registration number . See Cestui Que Vie 1666, just after the Plague and Great Fire of London. This Act was amended about a hundred years later to include the incompetent or insane and the creation of mental health statutes ensued thereof as another ‘instrument’ of ‘offers of commerce’.
A ‘person’ or ‘thing’ that can be ’owned’ may be a Vessel or ’ship’ and all the contents which will include ‘people’ to ‘work’ in the ‘ship’, as designed & registered by the US Copyright ‘holder’ as defined by the ‘US Copyright Law’, the US being under Canon Law. Copyright is an instrument for treason.
The Crown Monarch or Nation are copyrighted.
Vatican, governments, departments, all copyrighted….
The three vessels of Law that ‘govern’ the ‘people’ in ‘benefit’ ‘for’ the ‘hull design’ of the ‘Laws’ are Uniform Commercial Code (Trading: by consent), Canon Law (Slave Law: imprisonment, seizure of goods) & Copyright Law to which you consent all the time you do not ‘claim Sovereignty’.
That law is denied the right to reversal of form in court.
Taxpayers or ‘section’ (denoted by the symbol ‘§’) defined as a ‘region contained within a larger area’ i.e a ‘berth’ within a citizen‘ship’ (crown or state). A statute authored & denoted ‘§’ holds no more water than one without if written by a Sovereign.
IN COURT: Show Respect. Make it known you are competent and you have Authority.
Declare Common Law Jurisdiction as Sovereign Being to the Clerk of Court or Justice of Peace by paper witnessed notice and as many friends as will come.
Respondent & Proponent
Never be the proponent unless invoicing as a response.
“…he who attacks first makes himself look the prick…” three full stops before & after phrases denote an action/response/notice/receipt for the ‘invoice’ to a respondent or ‘offer of commerce’ under UCC Law.
Denotes ‘duress’ as you did not ask for the offer.
Recess & Adjournment
When judge calls to recess he is abandoning the ship of Uniform Commercial Code itself (1st Form of Law a court ‘hears’).
You say, “Let the record show Judge has abandoned ship, I claim authority over the Court, and I move to dismiss the charges: Motion carried”
You have declined the Judges ‘offer’ to fight under Canon Law which ‘holds’ religious ‘conviction’ in the Vessel of Roman Law or Slave Law. (Vatican City).
When Judge calls an Adjournment he is returning to Court under the same Jurisdiction of UCC, 1st Form of Law.
Without objecting to the recess you will be under Canon Law on his return and therefore have consented to Ecclesiastical Slavery Systems where you are now considered a ‘thing’ in the eyes of the now Canon Law Court.
“Are you trying to deny me Justice, Your Honour”, is a useful phrase.
Being Competent
A competent is a property owner (Vatican notably) or one who knows the law (Bankers notably)
Mortgage, license, registration, leasehold, is not owner’ship’ or ‘valid competencies’ (by Copyright Law of vessels and Hull Design).
In court you must ‘prove’ ‘competency’ as ‘sovereign’ by ‘copyright’. In court you must ‘prove’ ‘competency’ as ‘sovereign’ by ‘copyright’ or ’property owner’ of a ‘private individual’ and not ‘holder of a deed’ (berth certificate by baptism).
You must write your own letters, and terms & conditions (your opinions that are immovable by water carried in another vessel i.e. the Judge) legal terms are not important since OPPT and this is all OPPT have done…removed the legal need for lawyers altogether at Courts. It is legal to present your case by simply saying no, having the letter witnessed and sent by recorded delivery to a real name in a department of the bullyboy company.
Silence is ‘incompetency’
In Court we have been subjected to ‘rule of consent or imprisonment’ by Canon Law, Fraud Law, and Copyright infringement simply by contesting our ‘innocence, ignorance, incompetence’ of the ‘Straw Man’.
Terms &Conditions/Statutes/Obligation/Bill/Endorsement/Request/Offer/Receipt/Summons/Doctrine.
As Sovereign you may ‘hold’ Court Authority and ‘claim notice served for terms and conditions of witnessed documents’ i.e. the notice of terms and conditions that this Court is under Common Law as well as UCC Law by authority of your ‘paper witnessed notice’. Common Law is abused in favour of UCC Law, ‘gain’, ‘profit’, ‘money’ all the time. This is a commercial court and not applicable to people, only vessels of design. You were not designed you were created!
‘For’ & ‘Of’.
For is used to mean towards or for your own benefit.
Of means you are giving of free will.
When asked in court if you are Mr. Yourname and you reply yes you ‘claim the debt to crown Canon Law by ignorance, incompetence of Law and Vessels of design and Ecclesiastical Canon Law. Therefore ownership of the legal fiction ‘of’ and ‘for’ the Vessel designed ‘by’ (of fabrication or giving, for) ‘Law’ and then your address ‘of’ and you also reply yes or you understand, you have in fact just consented to the Court to take your house and liberty with prison to confine you to ‘quarters’ as a legal fiction or ‘story’. You are returned to the warehouse; prison, hospital.
When you reply no to ownership of the legal fiction Mr. Yourname, by Common Law right, you are able as Registered Sovereign, to be Administrator for the Straw Man with no personal liability to you in your common name, or body. You then become a Court Official and cannot be removed from Court by the Judge lawfully.
Do not consent to becoming owner, agent, deed holder, surety, tax, levy, tythe, toll, licensee, mortgagee, etc
There is no legal definition for: Claim to ‘Free Thought’
‘of’ (you become respondent/debtor/MR/MRS/MS/Taxpayer/Citizen) or ’for’ (you become proponent/creditor/Sovereign Trust)
The Vatican is the biggest owner of property
Taken using Canon Law
Mind your OFS and FORS if you end up in Court
Salvific Law is the ‘Will of God’. i.e. You owe me for the design of the vessel that saves you, rather than pays (govt.) or protects you (crown/state), a ridiculous ‘claim’ without reference to gender.
Having the intention or power to bring about salvation or redemption: “the doctrine that only a perfect male form can incarnate God fully and be salvific” (Rita N. Brock).
[Late Latin salvificus : Latin salvus, safe; see safe + Latin -ficus, -fic.]
Vatican Indoctrination of Male above Female.
That only men can ‘author’, ‘design’ and ‘own’. Women are not deemed good authors and not invited into authorship of Laws or administration of Church trusts. From authorship comes ‘Authority’.
As women they are the creator of the vessel and men the designer though this is not acknowledged in Law as Law refers to Knowing which has no gender whilst statute refers to things as ‘he’. Designer is perceived as more important than creator or worker or labourer although without either male or female the ‘thing’ or ‘article’ would not exist since physical reality needs a male and female to create the creator in retrospect. It is a conflict of interest to claim ‘ownership’, ‘right’ or ‘decree’ to a single company/person since their life exists of the fact of bi-lateral nature, unrebuttable from outset and known.
In order to keep women out of power they are made as vessels that can be designed and owned by marriage certification. These laws favour men.

All law maybe interpreted as ‘advice’.
Created by Copyright (GOD?)
Ecclisiastically Licensed
Commercially Trading

Legally, lawfully, factually and as a matter of public policy OPPT have released us from having to know all of the above. Life is excellent!

http://www.yellowbrickroadtour.net/probate-and-other-law.html

British Queen urged to relinquish power because of ill health


 

Sun Mar 24, 2013 6:7PM GMT
42
1653

 

134

 

The UK’s Queen Elizabeth II has been advised to resign and relinquish power as she gets older and overburdened with a tough schedule to live with, local media reported.

The advice came from former Labour deputy prime minister Lord Prescott, who suggested that “the Queen should think about abdication because she is overburdened at the age of 86”, British media reported.

The former deputy premier added that ‘the monarch was risking her health and deserves a break’.

The high-ranking British official said that the Queen herself might not be sure about her own health after she was recently hospitalized for a stomach bug issue.

Lord Prescott, a member of the Privy Council which advises the Queen, tried to appear affectionate and friendly towards the queen, noting that “the monarch should break with convention and consider enjoying a long and fulfilling retirement”, according to the reports.

“His concern was that the Queen, who is 87 next month, is overburdening herself,” he said.

Lord Prescott also referred to the queen’s ongoing ill health because of which she has been increasingly cancelling her public duties recently, saying that “she had done a remarkable job over her 60 years on the throne”.

“My friend noted the monarch would be delivering her 61st queen’s speech in May, where she’ll announce her future trips abroad, on top of her many other public duties.

“So he asked me, as a privy councillor, to tell her that he didn’t expect her to see out her royal duties as the Queen.

“She deserves a break and he wouldn’t think less of her if she stepped down”, said Lord Prescott.

This is while that the queen herself had said on her 21st birthday that she regarded ruling Britain as a job for life.

But Lord Prescott described the fears over the ‘heavy load’ she continues to carry as head of state.

“She has given wise counsel to 12 prime ministers, from [Winston] Churchill to [David] Cameron, and has made her mark on the country she loves,” he said. Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

MOL/JR/HE

Note: It’s called damage control, when a CEO’s liabilities threaten corporate profits they are asked to resign and given a big fat golden umbrella to retire under and a pat on the back for a job well done

 

 

Global Reclamation Campaign is Launched as Catholic Bishops begin Breaking Ranks – “Existing authority is replaced now by the People”


Posted on April 02, 2013 by itccs


Brussels:

From the steps of the Vatican to Catholic churches in Vancouver, New York and London, ITCCS groups commenced church occupations and the issuing of liens against Vatican property this week, as part of a Global Reclamation Campaign to enforce a Common Law Court sentence against heads of church and state, including the new Pope, Francis 1 – Jorge Bergoglio, and Queen Elisabeth Windsor.

Bergoglio, Windsor and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper are among those officials who have been lawfully banished from their communities and face standing Citizen Arrest Warrants.

And despite a massive pro-Vatican blitz in the corporate media, Catholic Bishops have begun to publicly break ranks as new divisions emerged in the church hierarchy.

In Albany, New York, Orthodox Catholic Bishop Timotheos has been charged by local police after he disseminated ITCCS statements to a Catholic congregation and called upon Catholics to refuse to fund the Vatican.

And in Dublin, acting head of the Catholic church in Ireland, Archbishop Diarmid Martin, refused to comment on the claim that his office has convened a secret conference of Irish Bishops to issue a “Home Rule” statement loosening their ties with the Vatican.

In London, high wire protestors displayed an “Arrest the Pope and the Queen” banner from an office tower facing Parliament, as other ITCCS activists served arrest warrants on the new Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, for destroying evidence of the mass graves of children at Anglican Indian schools in Canada.

And in Vancouver, ITCCS members and local indigenous leaders publicly reclaimed Holy Rosary Catholic church during Easter services.

“As a survivor of Catholic Genocide, I’m issuing a public lien against this building and claiming it for all native people” declared Cree elder Stee-mas, a survivor of two Christian internment camps. (Stee-mas will be interviewed on the ITCCS online program We the Jury this Saturday April 6 at 4 pm EST at www.blogtalkradio.com/wethejury)

“I invite all our people to take over this church and use it. And I am telling the Vancouver police they have to help us or stand aside because this is our jurisdiction”.

Similar ITCCS Easter actions occurred at churches in a dozen other nations including America, South Africa, Poland, France, Ireland, Italy and Germany.

An update and summary of the Campaign is provided in this Good Friday interview with ITCCS Field Secretary Kevin Annett, who is starting a ten week international speaking tour next week:

Kevin’s trip and the next cases being launched by the Court will be discussed this coming Saturday, April 6 on the upcoming ITCCS international bog radio program, We the Jury, featuring host Kevin Annett.

“We’ve broken the ice and set an example. The walls of church and crown are crumbling before our eyes. Now it`s up to everyone to learn again the habits of liberty, and seize back power from the convicted criminals in charge. For existing authority has now been lawfully replaced by the People.”
- Kevin Annett

Stand by for further updates.

ITCCS Central, Brussels
1-2 April, 2013

 

Margaret Thatcher’s Death and Queen’s Pending Resignation are Connected ~ April 12, 2013 by itccs


Pope Francis is linked to Exocet Missile Acquisition, according to British government source

Brussels and London:

 


The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS)

ITCCS Breaking News Update – Thursday, April 11, 2013

(9 am GMT)

Brussels and London:

Whatever it is that dwells in Rome behind the mask of religion and empire is inexorably being revealed. And its mask slipped further yesterday with more startling revelations involving the new Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio.

A reliable source in the British civil service who has provided accurate internal leaks in the past to our Tribunal has revealed the following to an ITCCS officer in London:

Commencing in September of 1981, the present Pope Francis 1 acted as an agent for the Argentine military Junta to acquire Exocet missiles which were used against the Royal Navy flotilla during the Falklands War the following year.

During September and October of 1981, Pope Francis, as then-priest Jorge Mario Bergoglio, applied through his friend Roberto Calvi, a high official in the Vatican Bank, for the funds that allowed the Argentine Junta to buy “at least twenty” of the Exocet missiles at a cost of over $200 million, according to the British source.

The same source stated to an ITCCS officer in London on April 9, 2013,

“The Junta knew the British would oppose their seizure of the Malvinas so they got their man Father Bergoglio to get them the missiles, since he was friends with Roberto Calvi. Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister in 1982, and both she and Buckingham Palace knew that it was Bergoglio who had lined up the missile funding for (General) Videla. Thatcher in fact approved an MI-6 plan to eliminate the priest, Father Bergoglio, but that fizzled out. But now that same priest has become the Pope, and Thatcher just suddenly died, and the Queen is stepping down under rumored assassination fears, after she had already cancelled her March 6 trip to Rome when it became clear that Bergoglio would become Pope. These are not coincidences.”

After the Exocet missile deal was successfully concluded, the relatively unknown cleric, Fr. Jorge Bergoglio, was rapidly elevated in the Argentine Catholic hierarchy. He became the head of the entire Roman Catholic Church in Argentina in 1998 as part of his reward.

On June 17, 1982 – just two months after the start of the Falklands War – Bergoglio’s Vatican bank associate Roberto Calvi was found dead, hanging under Blackfriar’s Bridge in London.

http://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info/content/sitenewsreadmore/infobox/news/template/default/active_id/746

http://www.nytimes.com/1982/07/28/world/italy-s-mysterious-deepening-bank-scandal.html?pagewanted=all

Two books have confirmed the Vatican Bank and Roberto Calvi’s link to the Argentine Exocet deal: In God’s Name by David Yallop, and The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage by Eric Frattini.

Is the Jesuit Pope Francis linked to the deaths of Roberto Calvi and former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and to an assassination plan against Queen Elizabeth? This evidence and recent events certainly suggest so.

On April 10, 2013, an official inquiry about these facts and questions was sent by our Tribunal to the Papal Office and to the Vatican Secretary of State. Our inquiry has gone unanswered.

Stay tuned for more evidence and updates at www.itccs.org  .

See the evidence of Genocide in Canada and other crimes against the innocent at www.hiddennolonger.com and at the websites of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State at www.itccs.org and www.itccs.tv .

An International, multi-lingual ITCCS site can be found at: http://kevinannettinternational.blogspot.fr/

The complete Common Law Court proceedings of Genocide in Canada are found at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvhfXAd08TE – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada  (Part One) – 1 hr. 46 mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada  (Part Two) – 1 hr. 47 mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ormOIlOi4Vc – Final Court Verdict and Sentencing – 8 mins. 30 secs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IylfBxm3sMg – Authorizations and Endorsements of ITCCS/Kevin Annett by indigenous eyewitnesses – 10 mins.

Messages for Kevin Annett can be left at 250-591-4573 (Canada)

“The great only appear great because we are on our knees. Let us rise!”

- Camille DesMoulins, French revolutionary, 1790

“I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him.”

Chief Louis Daniels – Whispers Wind

Elder, Crane Clan, Anishinabe Nation, Winnipeg, Manitoba

jhaines6.wordpress.com

 

Education vs Conditioning ~ EXCELLENT Unslave Humanity Speech ~ Break (Y)our Conditioning!


Published on Mar 29, 2013

OccupyNWOOccupyNWO

Valedictorian Erica Goldson: http://goo.gl/8zZ2F ~support: http://JohnTaylorGatto.com ~sub: http://youtube.com/women4truth ~Unslave Humanity Tactical Media: http://whynotnews.eu/?p=2143 – This video is [FAIR USE] under © COPYRIGHT LAW it is: 1 noncommercial 2 trans-formative in nature 3 not competitive with the original work 4 not effecting its market negatively FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

* http://AmericaViaErica.blogspot.com
* http://UnschoolBus.com
* http://My-Big-TOE.com

SOON WITH DUTCH & GERMAN SUBTITLES!

~infopowerment truthers network~
-new kind of unity against tyranny-

http://infopowerment.whynotnews.eu
http://facebook.com/infopowerment

 

Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth arrest warrants; USA Bishop breaks with Vatican


Published on Mar 29, 2013

Alfred Lambremont WebreAlfred Lambremont Webre

Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth arrest warrants; USA Bishop breaks with Vatican
READ ARTICLE AT:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolit…