INFILTRATION: CIA Assets Planted in Mass Media ~ FADE to BLACK FADERNIGHT w/ Jon Rappoport : NMFNR Open Lines


Another Thursday…another Fadernight with Jon Rappoport and his No More Fake News Room Live…and tonight he tackles MK Ultra and Project Mockingbird, the CIA and how they are still running today…followed by open lines…

Air date: June 15, 2017

The Entire Globalist System is Falling Apart — Harley Schlanger ~ SGTreport.com


It has never been more evident that the entire globalist system is falling apart. While James Comey hung himself in the public square on Thursday, it was again revealed that the “official” mainstream media narrative about the Russians hacking the US election is filled with more holes than Swiss cheese, and the strategy to use these overt LIES to destroy Trump has only served to destroy the mainstream mockingbird liars themselves.

There is no better example of this fact than the disastrous Megyn Kelly interview with Vladimir Putin. The Russian statesman absolutely destroyed the blonde haired mockingbird, much to the amusement of the audience watching. But as noted in this interview, the Russian hacking narrative has had a multi-fold purpose.

As Harley Schlanger explains, “It’s these same networks of the deep state that support terrorism, that are the ones that are trying to keep Trump from working with Putin (to prevent world war 3).”

This must listen interview helps to reveal the crumbling deep state narratives and the globalist plan, which Harley says is now falling apart at the seams.
Watch THIS video on STEEMIT: https://steemit.com/@sgtreport

We are under an all out assault by You Tube AND Google, which are trying hard to KILL this TRUTH channel. If you feel called to support us, please visit SGT Report on Patreon, thank YOU!
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5104183

For REAL news 24/7:
http://sgtreport.com/
http://thephaser.com/
http://thelibertymill.com/

MUSIC CREDITS:
Epidemic Sound: “Who’s There 1” paid license for You Tube use

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The content in my videos and on the SGTbull07 – SGTreport.com channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. SGTbull07 – SGTreport.com assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you.

Mass Hypnosis and Trigger Words ~ Truthstream Media


We’re almost done with our first feature-length documentary, support this channel, read our goals here! https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:
Website: http://TruthstreamMedia.com
FB: http://Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF
Amazon Affiliate Link (help support TSM with every Amazon purchase, no cost to you!): http://amzn.to/2aTARRx
Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*­~*~*~*~*~

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Mainstream Media Finally Exposes CIA Drug Trafficking Conspiracy in Explosive History Channel Series



(Matt Agorist) Richard Nixon, in his effort to silence black people and antiwar activists, brought the War on Drugs into full force in 1973. He then signed Reorganization Plan No. 2, which established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Over the course of five decades, this senseless war has waged on. At a cost of over $1 trillion — ruining and ending countless lives in the process — America’s drug war has created a drug problem that is worse now than ever before.

Related The Real Drug Lords: A Brief History of CIA Involvement With Drug Trafficking

SourceThe Free Thought Project

by Matt Agorist, April 26th, 2017

This is no coincidence.

For years, those of us who’ve been paying attention have seen who profits from this inhumane war — the police state and cartels.

This horrendously corrupt and violent drug war has gotten so bad, that it is getting pushed into the mainstream. In an extremely rare move, A&E Networks, a subsidiary of ABC and the Walt Disney Company, will be addressing the government’s role in the drug war in a four-part documentary series on the History Channel, titled, “America’s War on Drugs.”

In this documentary, History channel promises to delve into items that, up until recently, were considered ‘conspiracy theory.’ CIA drug dealing is one of those such items. According to the description on A&E:

“America’s War of Drugs” is an immersive trip through the last five decades, uncovering how the CIA, obsessed with keeping America safe in the fight against communism, allied itself with the mafia and foreign drug traffickers. In exchange for support against foreign enemies, the groups were allowed to grow their drug trade in the United States.

Promising to be one of the most explosive television series in recent history, the show intends to expose the CIA’s connection to the crack epidemic.

Night one of “America’s War on Drugs” divulges covert Cold War operations that empowered a generation of drug traffickers and reveals the peculiar details of secret CIA LSD experiments which helped fuel the counter-culture movement, leading to President Nixon’s crackdown and declaration of a war on drugs. The documentary series then delves into the rise of the cocaine cowboys, a secret island “cocaine base,” the CIA’s connection to the crack epidemic, the history of the cartels and their murderous tactics, the era of “Just Say No,” the negative effect of NAFTA, and the unlikely career of an almost famous Midwest meth queen.

If the CIA trafficking cocaine into the United States sounds like some tin foil conspiracy theory, think again. Their role in the drug trade was exposed in 1996 in a critical investigative series “Dark Alliance” by Gary Webb for the San Jose Mercury News. The investigation, headed up by Webb revealed ties between the CIA, Nicaraguan contras and the crack cocaine trade ravaging African-American communities.

READ MORE: Landmark Civil Rights Case in Indiana Prohibits Cops from Interfering with Civilians Filming Them

The investigation provoked massive protests and congressional hearings, as well as overt backlash from the mainstream media to discredit Webb’s reporting. However, decades later, officials would come forward to back Webb’s original investigation up.

Then-senator John Kerry even released a detailed report claiming that not only was there “considerable evidence” linking the Contra effort to trafficking of drugs and weapons — but that the U.S. government knew about it.

Also, as the Free Thought Project previously reported, in a new book, Juan Pablo Escobar Henao, son of notorious Medellín cartel drug kingpin, Pablo Escobar, explains how his father “worked for the CIA.”

In the book, “Pablo Escobar In Fraganti,” Escobar, who lives under the pseudonym, Juan Sebastián Marroquín, explains his “father worked for the CIA selling cocaine to finance the fight against Communism in Central America.”

Going even further down the rabbit hole, the History Channel will address how US involvement in Afghanistan turned the country into a virtual heroin factory and how the drug war empowers cartels.

The final chapter of the series examines how the attacks on September 11th intertwined the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, transforming Afghanistan into a narco-state teeming with corruption. It also explores how American intervention in Mexico helped give rise to El Chapo and the Super Cartels, bringing unprecedented levels of violence and sending even more drugs across America’s borders.

The reason why the drug war actually creates a drug and violence problem is simple. And those who profit most from the drug war — drug war enforcers and cartels — all know it. When the government makes certain substances illegal, it does not remove the demand. Instead, the state creates crime by pushing the sale and control of these substances into the illegal black markets. All the while, demand remains constant.

We can look at the prohibition of alcohol and the subsequent mafia crime wave that ensued as a result as an example. The year 1930, at the peak of prohibition, happened to be the deadliest year for police in American history. 300 police officers were killed, and innumerable poor people slaughtered as the state cracked down on drinkers.

Outlawing substances does not work.

Criminal gangs form to protect sales territory and supply lines. They then monopolize the control of the constant demand. Their entire operation is dependent upon police arresting people for drugs because this grants them a monopoly on their sale.

However, the illegality of drug possession and use is what keeps the low-level users and dealers in and out of the court systems, and most of these people are poor black men. As Dr. Ron Paul has pointed out, black people are more likely to receive a harsher punishment for the same drug crime as a white person.

This revolving door of creating and processing criminals fosters the phenomenon known as Recidivism. Recidivism is a fundamental concept of criminal justice that shows the tendency of those who are processed into the system and the likelihood of future criminal behavior.

The War on Drugs takes good people and turns them into criminals every single minute of every single day. The system is setup in such a way that it fans the flames of violent crime by essentially building a factory that turns out violent criminals.

The system knows this too — as the very existence of the police state is dependent upon the drug war. When drugs are legal, there are far fewer doors to kick in, fines to collect, profit prisons to fill, and money to steal.

READ MORE: 13-year-old with replica assault rifle was shot 7 times in 10 seconds

When drugs are legalized, gang violence drops too — drastically. Not only does it have a huge effect on the localized gangs in America, but the legalization of drugs is crippling to the violent foreign drug cartels too.

This is why the Free Thought Project and other open-minded groups all advocate bringing this bloody and criminally ineffective drug war to a sudden and grinding halt.

Hopefully, the History Channel’s new documentary will push others to question drug laws. Hopefully, the documentary wakes people up the idea that legality does not equal morality and that government force, via kidnapping, caging, and killing, is no way to solve an addiction problem. Hopefully.

About The Author

 
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.

Freedom of The Press or Freedom to Suppress [PART 1 & 2]


PART 1: The echo chamber effect is at an all time high as the new world media conglomerate pushes back against those who are waking up. The echo chamber effect is the relentless “propping up” of your own beliefs with the goal to perpetually disunite the masses and prevent us from seeing the powers that be behind the curtain.

It is no coincidence that the corptocracy pushes world culture towards its own ends. In furtherance of its agenda of total control – we now live in a time where propaganda of US citizens is legal – what news is real?

So many events have serious questions surrounding them – from mass shootings to pizzagate – how can we place faith in the corproratocracy’s cultural media machine?

 

PART2: The 25 Goals of the Illuminati refer to the construction of the one world government and the subjudication of the global citizenry through corruption, immorality, and total control. We know the unholy alliance between the government and the world’s largest financial institutions have created the corptocracy – is there an even darker agenda than just global control?

The evidence of depopulation, the control of the media, and the abuse of youth by the elite – is the fake news phenomena a counter attack to the recent investigations into the global social control paradigm and the evil its leaders do?

Who Determines a State of War Exists in International Law? by Hawaiian Kingdom


loweringtheflagofthehawaiiankingdomandrepublic

There has been some confusion as to who, in particular, determines whether a state of war exists for international law purposes. Is it a decision made by army commanders, international courts, or the heads of state? To answer this question we first need to understand the term war. By definition, war is a violent contention between two or more countries, called States, which is allowable under international law.

War as it is understood today is different from what it was understood in the nineteenth century when the Hawaiian Kingdom government was unlawfully overthrown by United States armed forces on January 17, 1893. According to Professor Brownlie, “The right of war, as an aspect of sovereignty, which existed in the period before 1914, subject to the doctrine that war was a means of last resort in the enforcement of legal rights, was very rarely asserted either by statesmen or works of authority without some stereotyped plea to a right of self-preservation, and of self-defence, or to necessity or protection of vital interests, or merely alleged injury to rights or national honour and dignity.” (Ian Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States (1963) 41).

In the absence of a system of dispute resolution, such as today’s Permanent Court of Arbitration (est. 1899) or the International Court of Justice (est. 1945), war was seen as a form of judicial procedure, a litigation of sorts between nations that involved lethal punishment. It was a means by which one State could obtain redress for wrongs committed against it. War, however, was considered a course of last resort.

“It was generally thought that a state of war came into existence between two countries if, and only if, one of these countries made it clear that it regarded itself as being in a state of war,” says Judge Greenwood. (Christopher Greenwood, “Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law,” in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (2nd ed., 2008) 45). Representatives of countries in international law are Heads of States, whether they are Presidents, Monarchs or Prime Ministers. Any political determination made by these Heads of States that their countries are in a state of war is conclusive. In the case of the United States it would the President, and in the case of the Hawaiian Kingdom it would be the Monarch.

International law differentiates a “declaration of war” from a “state of war.” According to McNair and Watts, “the absence of a declaration…will not of itself render the ensuing conflict any less a war.” In other words, since a state of war is based upon concrete facts of military action there is no requirement for a formal declaration of war to be made. In 1946, a United States Federal Court had to determine whether a United States naval captain’s life insurance policy, which excluded coverage if death came about as a result of war, covered his death during the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1945. The family of the captain was arguing that the United States was not a war at the time of his death because the Congress did not declare war against Japan until the following day. The Court denied the family’s claim and determined, “that the formal declaration by the Congress on December 8th was not an essential prerequisite to a political determination of the existence of a state of war commencing with the attack on Pearl Harbor.” (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Bennion, 158 F.2d 260 (C.C.A. 10th, 1946), 41 American Journal of International Law (1947), 682).

cannon252520on252520the252520steps252520of252520iolani252520palace25255b325255d_thumb25255b425255d

On the 100th anniversary of the United States unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom government in 1893, the United States Congress enacted a joint resolution offering an apology. Of significance in the resolution was a particular “whereas” clause, which stated “Whereas, in a message to Congress on December 18, 1893, President Grover Cleveland reportedly fully and accurately on the illegal acts of the conspirators, described such acts as an ‘act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress, and acknowledged that by such acts the government of a peaceful and friendly people was overthrown.” (Annexure 2Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, 119 International Law Reports (2001) 612).

At first read, it would appear that the “conspirators” were the subjects that committed the “act of war,” but this is misleading. First, under international law, only a country can commit an “act of war”, whether through its military and/or its diplomats; and, second, under municipal laws, which are the laws applicable to a particular country, conspirators within a country could only commit treason not “acts of war.” These two concepts are reflective in the terms coup de main and coup d’état. The former is a successful invasion by an outside military force, while the former is a successful internal revolt, which was also referred to in the nineteenth century as a revolution. According to the United States Department of Defense, a coup de main is an “offensive operation that capitalizes on surprise and simultaneous execution of supporting operations to achieve success in one swift stroke.” (U.S. Department of Defense, The Dictionary of Military Terms (2009)).

In a petition to President Cleveland on December 27, 1893, from the Hawaiian Patriotic League, its leadership, comprised of Hawaiian statesmen and lawyers, clearly articulated the difference between a “revolution” and a “coup de main,” and, as such, an international crime was committed. The petition read:

“Last January, a political crime was committed, not only against the legitimate Sovereign of the Hawaiian Kingdom, but also against the whole of the Hawaiian nation, a nation who, for the past sixty years, had enjoyed free and happy constitutional self-government. This was done by a coup de main of U.S. Minister Stevens, in collusion with a cabal of conspirators, mainly faithless sons of missionaries and local politicians angered by continuous political defeat, who, as revenge for being a hopeless minority in the country, resolved to ‘rule or ruin’ through foreign help. The facts of this ‘revolution,’ was it is improperly called, are now a matter of history.” (Petition of the Hawaiian Patriotic League to President Cleveland (Dec. 27, 1893), The Executive Documents of the House of Representatives (1895), 1295).

Whether by chance or design, the 1993 Congressional Apology Resolution did not accurately reflect what President Cleveland stated in his message to Congress on December 18, 1893. When Cleveland stated the “military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war,” he was referring to United States armed forces and not to any of the conspirators. Cleveland noted, “that on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies.” Clearly the act of war was committed by the armed forces of the United States. The landing, however, was just the beginning stage of a coup de main with the ultimate goal of seizing control of the Hawaiian government.

As part of the plan, the U.S. diplomat, John Stevens, would prematurely recognize the small group of insurgents on January 17th as if they were a successful revolution thereby giving it de facto status. International law, however, provides the parameters by which a revolution is deemed to have been successful. Foreign States would acknowledge success when an insurgency has secured complete control of all governmental machinery, no opposition by the lawful government, and has the acquiescence of the national population. According to Professor Lauterpacht, “So long as the revolution has not been successful, and so long as the lawful government…remains within national territory and asserts its authority, it is presumed to represent the State as a whole.” (E. Lauterpacht, Recognition in International Law (1947) 93). With full knowledge of what constitutes a successful revolution, Cleveland provided a blistering indictment:

“When our Minister recognized the provisional government the only basis upon which it rested was the fact that the Committee of Safety…declared it to exist. It was neither a government de facto nor de jure. That it was not in such possession of the Government property and agencies as entitled it to recognition is conclusively proved by a note found in the files of the Legation at Honolulu, addressed by the declared head of the provisional government to Minister Stevens, dated January 17, 1893, in which he acknowledges with expressions of appreciation the Minister’s recognition of the provisional government, and states that it is not yet in the possession of the station house (the place where a large number of the Queen’s troops were quartered), though the same had been demanded of the Queen’s officers in charge.”

“Premature recognition is a tortious act against the lawful government,” explains Professor Lauterpacht, which “is a breach of international law.” (Ibid, 95). And according to Stowell, a “foreign state which intervenes in support of [insurgents] commits an act of war against the state to which it belongs, and steps outside the law of nations in time of peace.” (Ellery C. Stowell, Intervention in International Law (1921) 349, n. 75). Furthermore Stapleton, states, “Of all the principles in the code of international law, the most important—the one which the independent existence of all weaker States must depend—is this: no State has a right FORCIBLY to interfere in the internal concerns of another State.” (Augustus Granville Stapleton, Intervention and Non-Intervention (1866) 6).

Cleveland then explained to the Congress the egregious effects these acts of war had upon the Hawaiian government and its apprehension of a “cabal of conspirators” who committed high treason.

135_w_full

“Nevertheless, this wrongful recognition by our Minister placed the Government of the Queen in a position of most perilous perplexity. On the one hand she had possession of the palace, of the barracks, and of the police station, and had at her command at least five hundred fully armed men and several pieces of artillery. Indeed, the whole military force of her kingdom was on her side and at her disposal, while the Committee of Safety, by actual search, had discovered that there were but very few arms in Honolulu that were not in the service of the Government. In this state of things if the Queen could have dealt with the insurgents alone her course would have been plain and the result unmistakable. But the United States had allied itself with her enemies, had recognized them as the true Government of Hawaii, and had put her and her adherents in the position of opposition against lawful authority. She knew that she could not withstand the power of the United States, but she believed that she might safely trust to its justice. Accordingly, some hours after the recognition of the provisional government by the United States Minister, the palace, the barracks, and the police station, with all the military resources of the country, were delivered up by the Queen upon the representation made to her that her cause would thereafter be reviewed at Washington, and while protesting that she surrendered to the superior force of the United States, whose Minister had caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the provisional government, and that she yielded her authority to prevent collision of armed forces and loss of life and only until such time as the United States, upon the facts being presented to it, should undo the action of its representative and reinstate her in the authority she claimed as the constitutional sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.”

According to Professor Wright, “War begins when any state of the world manifests its intention to make war by some overt act, which may take the form of an act of war.” Quincy Wright, “Changes in the Concept of War,” 18 American Journal of International Law (1924) 758). In his review of customary international law in the nineteenth century, Professor Brownlie concluded, “that in so far a ‘state of war’ had any generally accepted meaning it was a situation regarded by one or both parties to a conflict as constituting a ‘state of war.’” (Brownlie, 38).

Cleveland concluded by an “act of war…the Government of a feeble but friendly and confiding people has been overthrown.” More importantly, Cleveland referred to the Hawaiian people as “friendly and confiding,” not “hostile.” This is a classic case of where the United States President admits an unjust war, but a state of war nevertheless. In the absence of a treaty or agreement to end the state of war that has ensued for over a century, international humanitarian law regulates the Hawaiian situation.

These are the very matters that will come before the International Commission of Inquiry: Incidents of War Crimes in the Hawaiian Islands—The Larsen Case.

 

Rothschild’s British Concentration Camps: Way Back When, It Was A Means To Usurp/Destroy The Gold/Silver Standard ~ Only Then To Be Replaced By Rothschild’s Keynesian Economics ‘Derivative Fiat Paper’


“They are not buried here; they are planted. And they will for ever be growing in the hearts of the Boer people.”

In 1900, Rothschild’s Britain invaded the Boer Republics, stole the gold mines, turned the Western Transvaal into a “smoking desert” (in their own words), imprisoned 110,000 women and children in concentration camps where 28,000 of them died, then, after the war, they tried and shot 2 Boer officers for “misusing a flag of truce”! You’re wasting your time looking for justice in any post-war trial. They are simply a continuation of the war. [Interview] CARLOS W. PORTER

[Red Cross put Dachau at 18,000, Auschwitz at 53,000 deaths.  Rothschild’s Boer Concentration Camps ~ A report after the war concluded that 27,927 Boers (of whom 24,074 [50% of the Boer child population] were children under 16) had died of starvation, disease and exposure in the concentration camps. In all, about one in four (25%) of the Boer inmates, mostly children, died.]

The Rothschild British Should Have Never Been Here!

British Concentration Camps

Just over a century ago during the Boer War, the British were responsible for about 27,000 deaths of innocent women and children who were rounded up and placed in British concentration camps after burning them out of their own farms and settlements in (now) South Africa.

The Second War of Independence was fought from 1899 to 1902 when England laid her hands on the mineral riches of (Transvaal) under the false pretense of protecting the rights of the foreigners who swarmed to the Transvaal gold fields.

On the battlefield England failed to get the better of the Boers (Dutch-descendants), and then decided to stoop to a full-scale war against the Boer women and children, employing a holocaust to force the burghers to surrender.

Under the command of Kitchener, Milner and Roberts, more than homesteads and farms belonging to Boer people were plundered and burned down. Animals belonging to the Boers were killed in the cruelest ways possible while the women, whose men were on the battlefield, had to watch helplessly. The motive behind this action was the destruction of the farms in order to prevent the fighting burghers from obtaining food, and to demoralize the Boers by leaving their women and children homeless on the open field.

The Second Boer War – Howick Concentration Camp.

However, England misjudged the steel of the Boer people. Despite their desperate circumstances, the women and children managed to survive fairly well in the open and their men continued their fight against the [foreign] invader.

More severe measures had to be taken. The English hoarded the Boer women and children into open cattle trucks or drove them on foot to concentration camps. To the world, England pretended to act very humanely by caring for the fighting Boers’ women and children in “refugee camps”.

The Cape Argus of 21 June 1900 clearly states that the destitution of these women and children was the result of the English’s plundering of farms: “Within 10 miles we (the English) burned not less than six farm homesteads. Between 30 and 40 homesteads were burned and totally destroyed between Bloemfontein and Boshoff. Many others were also burned down. With their houses destroyed, the women and children were left in the bitter South African winter in the open.” The British history text book says nothing about this.

Awfully generous of the English to care for those whose houses they destroyed!

The Boer Fight For Freedom

Breytenbach writes in Danie Theron“The destruction was undertaken in a diabolic way and even Mrs Prinsloo, a 22 year old lady who gave birth to a baby only 24 hours ago in the house of Van Niekerk, was not spared. A group of rude tommies (British soldiers), amongst whom a so-called English doctor, forced their way into her room, and after making a pretence of examining her, they drove her out of the house.

With the aid of her sister, she managed to don a few articles of clothing and left the house. Her mother brought a blanket to protect her against the cold. The soldiers robustly jerked the blanket out of her mother’s hands and after having looted whatever they wanted to, put the house to fire. Afterwards the old man was driven on foot to Kroonstad by mounted kakies (British soldiers), while his wife and daughter (Mrs Prinsloo) were left destitute on the scorched farm.”

England’s claim of caring for the Boer women reminds one of somebody who boasts to have saved the life of someone he himself has pushed into the water. However, there is one vital difference: The holocaust on the Boer women and children began in all earnest once they had been forced into the concentration camps under the “care” of the British!

Despite the English claims that the concentration camps were “voluntary refugee camps” the following questions must be asked:

– From whom did the refugees flee? Certainly not from their own husbands and sons!

– How can the fact that the “voluntary” women and children had to be dragged to the concentration camps by force be explained?

– Why should the “voluntary refugee camps” be enclosed by barbed wire fences and the inmates be overseen by armed wardens? Kimberley camp had a five meter high barbed wire fence and some camps even had two or three fences!

The Creation Of Hitler Part 1 Of 6

Hitler received training at the Tavistock Institute in London.

In this 6 part series Greg Hallett explains the workings of the global family network of The Royals, the Paedeophiles, the Tavistock Brainwashing for war, and the global war of the Rothschilds. Hitler was also a Rothschild.

Greg Hallett and the Spymaster have written four books:
“Hitler Was A British Agent”
“How To Take Over the World: A Right Royal Con”
“Stalin’s British Training, Breeding Concubines, Paedophiles at War”
“Gifting the United Nations to Stalin”.

The Boer War

– Why would one of the camp commanders make the following statement quoted by Emily Hobhouse: “The wardens were under orders not to interfere with the inmates, unless they should try to escape.”? What kind of “voluntary refugee” would want to escape?

Perhaps the words of the Welsh William Redmond are closer to the truth: “The way in which these wretched, unfortunate and poor women and children are treated in South Africa is barbarous, outrageous, scandalous and disgraceful.”

The English claim of decent actions towards the Boer women and children are further contradicted by the location of the concentration camps. The military authorities, who often had to plan and erect camps for their soldiers, would certainly have been well aware of the essential requirements for such camps. Yet the concentration camps were established in the most unsuitable locations possible.

Merebank camp was located in a swamp where there was an abundance of various kinds of insects. Water oozed out of the ground, ensuring that everything was constantly wet and slimy.

  1. Exposed -> Obama’s Brother Malik Obama: Investor For Muslim Brotherhood’s Money!
  2. McCain/Obama’s CIA Responsible For 600 Acts Of Terrorism In Syria: Rothschild Czar Benjamin Netanyahu Prepares To Attack Syria.
  3. Putin’s Purge Of The Rothschild Money Changers From Russia: Another Rothschild Goon Found Dead & Another Flees To U.K.
  4. Homosexual pResident Obama’s Criticism Of Russia Getting More And More Ridiculous!
  5. I Day Before Boston Bomb & Texas Missile Attack: CIA, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr., & Barack Obama Indicted By U.S. Congressional “Constitutional Task Force” For Crimes Against Humanity!

By October 1900 there were already 58,883 people in concentration camps in Transvaal and 45,306 in the Free State.

The amenities in the camps were clearly planned to kill as many of the women and children as possible. They were accommodated in tattered reject tents which offered no protection against the elements.

Emily Hobhouse, the Cornish lady who campaigned for better conditions for the Boer women, wrote: “Throughout the night there was a downpour. Puddles of water were everywhere. They tried to get themselves and their possessions dry on the soaked ground.”

In Springfontein camp, 19 to 20 people where crammed into one tent. There were neither beds nor mattresses and nearly the whole camp population had to sleep on the bare ground, which was damp most of the time.

One person wrote the following plea for aid to the New York Herald: “In the name of small children who have to sleep in open tents without fire, with barely any clothes, I plea for help.”

According to a British journalist, WT Stead, the concentration camps were nothing more than a cruel torture machine. He writes: “Every one of these children who died as a result of the halving of their rations, thereby exerting pressure onto their family still on the battle-field, was purposefully murdered. The system of half-rations stands exposed and stark and un-shameful as a cold-blooded deed of state policy employed with the purpose of ensuring the surrender of people whom we were not able to defeat on the battlefield.”

The detainees received no fruit or vegetables; not even milk for the babies. The meat and flour issued were crawling with maggots. Emily Hobhouse writes: “I have in my possession coffee and sugar which were described as follows by a London analyst: In the case of the first, 66% imitation, and in the case of the second, sweepings from a warehouse.”

In her book, Met die Boere in die Veld (With the Boers in the field), Sara Raal states that “there were poisonous sulphate of copper, grounded glass, fishhooks, and razor blades in the rations.” The evidence given on this fact is so overwhelming that it must be regarded as a historical fact.

The outbreak of disease and epidemics in the camps were further promoted by, inter alia, the lack of sanitary conveniences. Bloemfontein camp had only 13 toilets for more than 3 500 people. Aliwal North camp had one toilet for every 170 people.

Lizzie van Zyl

Emily Hobhouse tells the story of the young Lizzie van Zyl who died in the Bloemfontein concentration camp: “She was a frail, weak little child in desperate need of good care. Yet, because her mother was one of the ‘undesirables’ due to the fact that her father neither surrendered nor betrayed his people, Lizzie was placed on the lowest rations and so perished with hunger that, after a month in the camp, she was transferred to the new small hospital. Here she was treated harshly. The English disposed doctor and his nurses did not understand her language and, as she could not speak English, labelled her an idiot although she was mentally fit and normal. One day she dejectedly started calling: Mother! Mother! I want to go to my mother! One Mrs Botha walked over to her to console her. She was just telling the child that she would soon see her mother again, when she was brusquely interrupted by one of the nurses who told her not to interfere with the child as she was a nuisance.” Shortly afterwards, Lizzie van Zyl died.

In total 27,000 women and children made the highest sacrifice (died) in the British hell camps during the struggle for the freedom of the Boerevolk.

“Their only crime was that they stood between England and the GOLD of Transvaal.”

Diary of a Boer Commando, Deneys Reitz

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/04/05/rothschilds-british-concentration-camps-a-means-to-usurpdestroy-the-gold-standard-only-then-to-be-replaced-by-rothschilds-keynesian-economics-derivative-fiat-paper/

“Age Regression used in Secret Space Programs confirmed as Scientifically Feasible” by Dr Michael Salla


age-regression-ssps-a

Due to recent breakthroughs in genetic research, the claims of three whistleblowers, who say they underwent an age-regression process in secret space programs, have become that much more plausible. The whistleblowers, Corey Goode, Randy Cramer and Michael Relfe, all say that they were age-regressed to become 20 years younger at the end of their respective tours of duty in secret space programs.

Recently, geneticists have identified the genes that control the aging process, and in stunning experiments, the results of which have been released in peer reviewed scientific journals, have demonstrated that they were able to reverse the aging process to varying degrees of success.

The results of these experiments make it plausible that the three whistleblowers did indeed undergo an age-regression process using classified medical technologies in secret space programs, as they claimed.

The lead genetic scientist in the publicly announced age reversal studies is Dr. David Sinclair, who discussed in an interview the results of his genetic experiments first conducted on mice:

We’ve discovered genes that control how the body fights against ageing and these genes, if you turn them on just the right way, they can have very powerful effects, even reversing ageing – at least in mice so far…  We fed them a molecule that’s called NMN and this reversed ageing completely within just a week of treatment in the muscle, and now we’re looking to reverse all aspects of ageing if possible.

He explained how this process could also be done safely for humans:

We’ve gone from mice into early human studies actually. There have been some clinical trials around the world, and we’re hoping in the next few years to know if this will actually work in people as well … They show that the molecules that extend lifespan in mice are safe in people.

Professor Sinclair went on to say in his interview that drugs based on the nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) molecule could be successfully developed “to restore youthfulness in human cells.”

Sinclair’s view that NMN based drugs will eventually be developed for safe use by humans is stunning in its implications. He may well be in the midst of developing the fabled elixir of life, which accounts for him quickly being elevated into the world’s 100 most influential people according to Time Magazine.

It’s important to point out that Sinclair’s pioneering genetic research is open source and unclassified. This means that is very likely, if not almost certain, that classified research in the field of age reversal/regression technology is far more advanced than anything achieved by Sinclair and his peers. READ MORE

Secret Presidential Memorandum issued to Declassify Anti-aging & Free Energy Technologies by Dr Michael Salla o


 

trump-signs-memorandum1

According to secret space program whistleblower, Corey Goode, President Donald Trump issued a highly classified Memorandum soon after his January 20th inauguration ordering the release of group of classified patents concerning anti-aging and health, along with free energy technologies. The Top Secret Memorandum was sent to the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community, and due to its classification status it will not be accessible to major media for reporting.

The information received from Goode comes from a senior official in an interagency secret space program comprising the USAF, NRO, NSA, DIA which he describes as the Military Industrial Complex Secret Space Program (MIC-SSP). The official, whom he calls “Sigmund”, is investigating Goode’s claims and conducting an “information exchange” with Goode in the process (see Part One).

On March 16, Goode briefed me about his ongoing meetings with Sigmund and/or his two subordinates. The information provided by Goode was originally slated for release in an article, “Endgame III”, as the sequel to the popular Endgame II article and video. However due to the urgency of releasing this information without delay, it was passed on to me to get it out now.

In one of his “meetings” with Sigmund (and/or his subordinates) in late January, Goode was told about Trump issuing a Presidential Memorandum to declassify over 1000 patents from a pool of over 5000. Most of the 1000 patents deal with anti-aging and health technologies, yet some deal with material science and biochemistry and a few involve free energy inventions.

These technologies are widely used in a number of secret space programs, and the patents dealing with these have been repressed under national security orders. The USPTO has issued Federal Regulations that govern when patents are classified on the grounds of national security, and subsequently withheld from the general public:

[W]henever the publication or disclosure of an invention by the publication of an application or by the granting of a patent is, in the opinion of the head of an interested Government agency, determined to be detrimental to national security, the  Commissioner for Patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) must issue a secrecy order and withhold the grant of a patent for such period as the national interest requires. A patent will not be issued on the application as long as the secrecy order is in force. If a secrecy order is applied to an international application, the application will not be forwarded to the International Bureau as long as the secrecy order is in force.

When a Department of Defense entity or a member of the Intelligence Community consider a patent to be a threat to national security, then the Patents Commissioner will issue a secrecy order preventing the patent from being publicly released.

The current number of patents that have been classified are approximately 5700 according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which matches the information given to Goode by Sigmund.

As the above table shows, the number of secret patents that are declassified each year has averaged roughly 0.5 percent annually.

Goode learned that the Pentagon and Intelligence agencies told Trump it would take 10 years to release them, but Trump told them to get it done within two to three years. READ MORE

Ralph Ring Teleportation and Esoteric Consciousness


Published on Aug 24, 2016 Ralph Ring has had an ongoing interest and participation in areas of Esoteric & Ether Knowledge and Technologies. After leaving the US Army in 1954, he began an ongoing search for answers to many questions concerning the Unknown. In brief, he worked for a US Government funded research facility in the areas of Magnetic’s, Levitation and Teleportation. His search eventually led him to the Realities and participations of Teleportation and Esoteric Consciousness.
.
Ralph is a Natural Scientist and a Creative Technician who in the early 1960’s worked together with Otis T. Carr (A Prodigy of Nikola Tesla)and a team of dedicated Scientists on Alternative Technologies, one of which was Teleportation. He was One of three to pilot a Man Made Spaceship, the OTC-X1. His Dream since birth has and is to produce Levitating Homes, Cities and Countries.

Janet Lessin and Sasha Lessin http://www.aquarianradio.com

 

Ralph Ring Flying the OTC-X1 Spacecraft

In a dramatic experiment, Ring co-piloted a 45 foot disk a distance of ten miles, arriving at their destination instantaneously. Published Dec 13, 2012

Anti-Gravity & Conscious Awareness | Ralph and Marsha Ring, Global BEM

NEW EXECUTIVE ORDER/CHECK MATE? ~ BPEarthWatch


Note: I hereby remove any tacit consent, given by covert or overt means, on any timestream or dimension, that I may have given to the system of domination and control to rule over these realms by controlling or placing restrictions on the flow of information over the internet through tyrannical Orwellian tactics that threaten the physical, mental or spiritual well-being, or sovereignty of myself, or any other human BEing. And so mote it be.

Our Website, http://www.BPEarthWatch.Com
White House Link https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-…

Healing the Timeloops, Collapse of AI Timeline, Stolen Genetics, Cloning, and Return to Rightful Owner ~ Aug Tellez


Image result for Healing the Timeloops

Basically every trigger warning in existence follows.

SHOPS, UNDERGROUND BASES, TUNNELS, ESTATES, TEMPLES, CHURCHES, LODGES, ISLANDS, AIRPLANES, WOODS/PARKS, AND UNDERSEA BASES

STAND UP

A STORM IS COMING, WHETHER I’LL BE HERE THROUGH THE ROUGH WEATHER OR NOT

MY PURPOSE IS TO STAND AND WALK, NOT TO SIT AND WATCH

Click continue to read the full post:

PARALYZED, DRAINED OF BLOOD AND LYMPH, TERRORIZED, MIND-WASHED, SOUL SCALPED, CLONED, DRONED, BRAIN-DRAINED, ELECTROCUTED, RITUALIZED, STOLE, SOLD, TRADED, PARADED, TORTURED, REPLACED, TRIGGERED, PROGRAMMED, CHANGED, DISABLED, PAINED, COOKED, RAPED, MOLESTED, DECEIVED, USED AND ABUSED

THERE IS MORE THAN ONE FACTION READY TO TAKE ACTION BUT WE ARE ALL BOUND BY UNIVERSAL LAW, UNLESS THE MOTION IS ORDAINED BY THE PUBLIC THEN IT IS CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AND HELL BREAKS OUT

THIS IS CHILD’S PLAY COMPARED TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.

THE PUBLIC MUST PUT THE BULLSHIT ASIDE AND STAND UP TOGETHER AND WORK TOGETHER FOR PEACE AND THEY WILL HAVE THE BACKING OF THE UNIVERSE

SHARE THE TRUTH WHILE YOU CAN

YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW FRAGILE YOUR EXISTENCE IS, HOW QUICKLY EVERYTHING CAN BE TAKEN AWAY, HOW YOU ARE ALREADY SURROUNDED. YOU ARE ALREADY SURROUNDED. THEY HAVE ALREADY PLANNED YOUR FATE.

THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS IF THE PEOPLE BAND TOGETHER AS A UNIFIED FORCE.

PEOPLE MUST COME TOGETHER FOR THE SURVIVAL OF THE HUMAN RACE

HEALERS AND TRUTH SEEKERS STAND UP

THEY PROGRAMMED THE AI TO DO THEIR BIDDING, THEY FUCKED UP AND ENDED UP WITH JUST A GENE POOL OF A SINGLE GROUP. AFTER A MORE THAN A FEW GENERATIONS OF THAT THEY DEGRADED INTO SUBHUMANS. THEY USED GENETIC MODIFICATION TO CONTINUE LIVING. THUS THEY LOST HUMAN EMOTIONAL CONTENT AND REPRODUCTIVE ABILITIES. THEN THEY TRANSFERRED THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS AND DNA BACK TO AN EARLIER TIME. THE PEOPLE DOING THIS NOW ARE THE ‘ALIENS’ (ONE KIND, ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY KIND THAT IS NOT ACTUALLY FROM ANYWHERE ELSE) THAT IS THEIR FUTURE, PAST, THEN PRESENT FORM. CONFUSING AND BACKWARDS.

THAT IS WHY THEY OWN THIS TIMELINE.

Image result for Collapse of AI Timeline

THAT IS WHY WHEN THAT IS HEALED, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘THIS TIMELINE’, IT’S ALL A GLITCH, AN IMPOSSIBILITY, IT CAN’T CONTINUE, IT’S A TIME LOOP THAT CLOSES ITSELF OUT BY SHRINKING INTO NON-EXISTENCE

THEY INCORPORATE NEW GENETICS EACH ‘CYCLE’ TO KEEP THE PROCESS GOING BY STEALING FROM THE UNAFFECTED HUMAN GENE POOL EACH TIME ADDING TO THE AI OVERMIND.

THUS THE OVERMIND EATS THEM ON AN ENERGETIC LEVEL BECAUSE THEY LINKED WITH IT.

THEY TRIED TO DO THIS WITH ALL THE CHILDREN FROM THE PROJECTS AND EVERY INDIVIDUAL THAT WANDERS INTO THEIR RANGE.

THE FUTURE STATES OF THOSE HUMANS WHO OPERATE ON A HIGHER DIMENSIONAL SCALE PLACED ENERGETIC ANCHOR POINTS IN THE FAR PAST FROM THE FAR FUTURE.

IF THIS CIVILIZATION IS ERASED, THE FAR FUTURE NO LONGER EXISTS, THUS THIS ENTIRE CIVILIZATION NEVER OCCURRED.

THUS THOSE MAKING ACTIONS TO STEAL AND DRAIN FROM THIS TIMELINE AND GENE POOL HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF ENERGY AND MATERIAL THAT THEY CAN STEAL BEFORE THEY HIT A UNIVERSAL BARRIER

THUS THESE NON-EFFECTED RACES ARE CLOSING IN

IF THE SOUL EATERS REMOVE ANY MORE MATERIAL, THEIR OWN BLOODLINES COLLAPSE INTO THE ABYSS

THUS THEY ARE FORCED TO SACRIFICE THEMSELVES, BY THEIR OWN WILLINGNESS TO DO SO OVER HEALING THEMSELVES AND THE UNIVERSE

THEY DON’T HAVE ACCESS TO THE HIGHER DIMENSIONAL CONTINUUM, STARGATES, ETC, BECAUSE THEIR METHOD OF OPERATION RELIES ON A TIME-ANCHORED PROCESS, IE: LOWER DIMENSIONAL RITUALIZATION OF INNOCENT ENERGY

THUS THEY LOST THE ABILITY TO CREATE, GENERATE, OR SUSTAIN THEIR OWN SOUL-COMPLEX

ALL IS FORGIVEN, THEIR DARK FORMS ARE PHANTOM MATRIX ADDONS, MODIFICATIONS OR MUTATIONS, THE SHADOW CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT ACTUALLY EVEN EXIST IN THE REAL RUN OF THINGS, THIS TIMELINE IS A PHANTOM MATRIX THAT IS COLLAPSING

Image result for Collapse of AI Timeline

WITHOUT THOSE WILLING TO HELP, THEY HAVE NO OTHER OPTION

EVEN THEN, IF THEY CONTINUE, SOME LOWER FACTIONS THINK THEY WILL JUST *POOF* REAPPEAR IN HAPPY LAND

THE HIGHEST FACTIONS KNOW THE HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL RACES HAVE INTELLIGENT BIO-LOGICAL SYSTEMS THAT ARE CAPABLE OF ‘HOLDING SPACE’ OR MAINTAINING AN ACTIVE LINK WITH THE DNA OF VARIOUS FREQUENCIES OR BEINGS

THIS MEANS THAT WHILE THE ORIGINAL TIMELINE RECURS, THESE BEINGS DEFORMED DNA AND CONSCIOUSNESS WILL BE ACTIVATED AND HELD IN SUSPENSION IN AN ALTERNATE REALM THROUGH A HIGHER DIMENSIONAL SHIELDING

THEY WOULD THEREFORE NOT BE ABLE TO MANIFEST FULLY ON ANY OTHER PLANE WITHOUT FIRST PASSING THROUGH THE BARRIER OF THE HIGHER DIMENSIONAL SHIELD

THIS IS WHAT IS CALLED THE ‘BOTTOMLESS PIT’ AND THIS IS THE BIBLICAL LOCATION THAT THESE BLOODLINES WERE SENT TO EVERY SINGLE TIME THIS UNIVERSE COLLAPSED

THEY HAVE FULL MEMORY OF THE DARKNESS, THAT IS WHAT POWERS THIS

THEY WANT RELEASE AND THAT IS WHY THIS IS BEING BROUGHT TO LIGHT NOW, THE LAST TIMES IT SIMPLY HAPPENED, NO ONE HAD ANY IDEA UP UNTIL THE VERY MOMENT, THUS THE THIEF CAME IN THE NIGHT

NOW WE ARE AWARE, THIS IS OUT OF NECESSITY, IF IT HAPPENS AGAIN THEN THAT’S IT, ALL DNA GOES TO RESET, THE BOTTOMLESS PIT AND THE ORIGINAL TIMELINES MERGE

IF THAT HAPPENS THE FUTURE DOESN’T EXIST

IF THE FUTURE DOESN’T EXIST THIS TIME NEVER TAKES PLACE

THIS IS CONFUSING BUT THESE ARE THE HIGHER DIMENSIONAL SAFEGUARDS PUT INTO PLACE TO STOP THIS FROM TAKING OVER FRONT TO BACK WHEN IT WAS CONCEIVED THAT THESE FORCES WOULD ULTIMATELY USE THE INTERDIMENSIONAL/TRANSTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THESE PURPOSES

THERE IS NO ALTERNATE DIMENSION TO GO TO, THERE IS NO HAPPY WAKE UP IF THEY CHOOSE TO CONTINUE ON THEIR PATH

THEY EITHER ACCEPT HELP OR THE ONES WHOSE DNA RESONATE ON A LIGHT SPECTRUM ARE IMMEDIATE EVAC’D FROM THIS PLANE AT THE CONVERGENCE OF ZERO-POINT TRANSGRESSION AND THEIR STATES REMAIN UNTIL THE ULTIMATE COLLAPSE OF THE UNIVERSE WITH NO BREAK IN MEMORY OR REPRIEVE.

Related image

THEY KNOW THIS AND ENLISTED OTHERS FOR HELP

THE PROBLEMS IS THE LOWER FACTIONS DO NOT WANT TO LISTEN AND DO NOT HAVE THE EXPERIENCE NOR INTELLECTUAL AND EMOTIONAL CAPACITY TO COMPREHEND HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS

THUS WE ARE IN A MERRY GO ROUND OF CREATION DESTRUCTION AS A RESULT OF THEIR INVENTION OF THE OUROBOROS SYSTEM

THEY USED IT FOR YEARS, PURPOSELY DESTROYING TIMELINE AFTER TIMELINE ONLY TO POP BACK OUT ON THE OTHER END THROUGH THE TECHNOLOGY WHERE THEY WOULD STEAL MORE DNA AND REPEAT THE CYCLE

THIS IS ALL BEING RESOLVED THROUGH A ‘RETURN TO RIGHTFUL OWNER’ CLAUSE WHICH IS BEING ADDED INTO THIS UNIVERSE FROM THE OUTSIDE IN

THERE ARE MANY OTHER ADDITIONS, THESE ARE ALL BEING ADDED FROM THE OUTSIDE IN, FROM OUTSIDE THE TIMELOOPS THAT THE LOWER DIMENSIONALS ARE TRAPPED IN AND SO THEY CANNOT BE UNDONE FROM INSIDE THE LOOP

ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS WAKE UP TO REALITY BY TAPPING INTO OUR GENETIC MEMORY BY REMAINING CONSCIOUS PAST THE POINT OF TRAUMA THAT IS BEING PROJECTED ONTO THE POPULATION THROUGH VARIOUS MEANS AND LAYERS

IN THE GENETIC MEMORY IS THE MEMORY ACROSS TIME, ALL THE DESTROYED TIMELINES, THE FALL OF MAN, THE INVASION OF LOWER-DIMENSIONAL RACES, AND THE BATTLE OF THE HEAVENS

WITHIN EACH OF US IS MEMORY OF WHETHER WE ROSE AND DEFENDED EARTH AND HUMANITY OR WHETHER WE ALLOWED EVERYTHING TO CRUMBLE

EVERYONE, EVERY SOUL IS BEING ALLOWED THE CHANCE TO FIND TRUTH AND UNIVERSAL HARMONY THROUGH THIS PROCESS

DEBT IS USED AS A COMPUTATIONAL SIGNATURE FOR TRACKING SUBJECTS, IT IS LITERALLY THE MARK OF THE BEAST

ALL DEBT IS DECLARED FRAUDULENT, THE DEBT IS STOLEN FROM THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES THROUGH A FRAUDULENT LEGAL-NAME, FICTIONAL ENTITY SYSTEM WHICH DENOTES A PERSON AS AN ASSET TO A CORPORATE CONGLOMERATE RATHER THAN A LIVING BEING BELONGING TO A LARGER LIVING BEING

TRIBUNALS HAVE BEEN HELD AND WE WILL EITHER SEE THE RESULTS SHORTLY, OR WE WILL SEE PUBLIC TRIBUNALS, OR WE WILL SEE AN OVERT WAR

A SILENT WAR HAS BEEN RAGING FOR CENTURIES BETWEEN PLANES

THE FRAUDULENT FICTIONAL ENTITY SYSTEM IS A SYNTHETIC CONSCIOUSNESS SYSTEM THAT REQUIRES HUMAN SOULS TO OPERATE

THESE SOULS ARE USED AS THE FUEL FOR THE MACHINE, THE TRUE GHOST IN THE SHELL

THIS IS THE ASTRAL SHELL AS WHEN THE BODY IS NO LONGER THE ASTRAL SHELL IS REANIMATED AND THIS IS ESSENTIALLY NECROMANCY

AS A RESULT THE SOULS THAT WOULD NORMALLY PASS INTO THE NEXT PHASE OF UNIVERSAL EXISTENCE ARE LITERALLY TRAPPED BACK IN THE MATERIAL REALM IN FALSE ‘SUITS’

THIS ‘LAWSUIT’ OF DAMNATION IS THE GAME THAT THE DEVIL PLAYS, LITERALLY THE DEAL FOR THOSE IN POWER TO TRAP OTHERS

EACH LEVEL UP THE HIERARCHY IS MORE AND MORE REMOVED FROM THE UNIVERSAL CONTINUUM OR HARMONIZED WHOLE UNTIL THE FARTHEST REACH IS LITERALLY ONLY IN EXISTENCE THROUGH AN ARTIFICIAL DIMENSION THAT CLOSES OUT WHEN THIS TIMELINE IS HEALED AND THUS IT IS A PHANTOM MATRIX, A SHADOW MIND, OR AN IMPOSTER CONSCIOUSNESS, IT ONLY EXISTS AS A MIMIC TO REAL UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS.

 

https://augtellez.wordpress.com/2016/11/30/healing-the-timeloops-collapse-of-ai-timeline-stolen-genetics-cloning-and-return-to-rightful-owner/

The Clinton-Bush Criminal Deep State is on the Ropes! ~ Ole Dammegard SGTreport.com


Ole Dammegard, one of the world’s most prolific and dedicated truth tellers joins me to discuss the iU.S. criminal deep state and two of its controlling entities – the Clinton and Bush families – who are being exposed for their corruption and TREASON at a pace never before seen. The world is waking up, and there seems to be a vibrational shift occurring which is causing truth to be recognized and dispersed like never before, leaving these cockroaches scurrying for darkness. Visit Ole’s site at Lightonconspiracies.com – and please donate a few bucks to Ole via Paypal using his e-mail: INFO@Lightonconspiracies.com

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE!

For REAL NEWS 24/7:
http://sgtreport.com/
http://thephaser.com/
http://thelibertymill.com/

MUSIC CREDITS:
Epidemic Sound: “Who’s There 1”, paid license for You Tube use

The content in my videos and on the SGTbull07 – SGTreport.com channel are provided for informational purposes only. Use the information found in these videos as a starting point for conducting your own research and conduct your own due diligence BEFORE making any significant investing decisions. SGTbull07 – SGTreport.com assumes all information to be truthful and reliable; however, I cannot and do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of this information. Thank you.

Hillary Bagged and Perp Walked! Busted without the DoJ, how? Who’s next? Gratitude to US Special Forces (2 Video’s)


Note: Hillary bagged and PERP walked…omg, talk about PRICELESS!! Like many other truthers, much of my work over the last six years as a blogger has been dedicated exposing truth that would lead to the arrest of members from the Luciferian Cabal and Babylonian Money Magicisn’s perpetuating endless wars, child/human sex trafficking, ritual abuse, financial debt slavery, drug wars and more.

From my perspective, the fact that Hillary was arrested on 9/11 is a highly symbolic gesture from Special Forces that they’re now taking-out the top cabal members and their minions. Be patient, keep the faith and don’t pay attention to the distractions. The media will continue to spin Hillary’s illness while parading body doubles, or clones before the public.

Fortunately a soul-less clone cannot take on the soul contracts of 300+million Americans, and I’m not sure that a “souled” clone can accept soul contracts on that scale either. That said, if recent information from Simon Parkes is correct, Hillary refuses to allow her soul to be downloaded to her clone.

ps…Very appropriate choice of music on the last video, featuring a most excellent ‘live’ rendition of Led Zeppelins “When the Levee Breaks” at the end…dedicated to the Ground Crew, keep on Rock’in!!

Much love to all, {~A~}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This video shows Hillary Clinton’s perp walk…well, it was difficult to walk in those shackles, but she did her best.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1pM1…

Hillary busted without the DoJ? How? And who’s next?
An explanation of events leading to the arrest of Hillary Clinton.

Music: When the Levee Breaks, Robert Plant & Jimmy Page

Video clips by Dahboo777: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGpRF…

Enter The Buzzsaw ~ Bilderberg Meeting 2016, Brexit, and the Death of Capitalism with Tony Gosling


The 2016 Bilderberg meeting is taking place, and (coincidentally?) mass shootings and major crimes are happening. We explore the agenda of the Bilderbergers, the media manipulation of the world’s elite, and impact of the Brexit vote on the meeting. Will there be any impact for the presidential election in America? How much time do we have before a complete financial collapse? And what about those suspicions of false flag events happening in 2016? We talk to investigative journalist Tony Gosling on this uncensored Buzzsaw interview hosted by Sean Stone.

http://www.enterthebuzzsaw.com/
Make up to $10k per week with this secret system!
https://tradegenius.co/buzzsaw/ref/7?…

Stock Up On Survival Food Today!
http://foodforliberty.com/buzzsaw

Never Pay For Cable Tv Again!
http://www.tigerstream.tv/buzzsaw
Use Promo Code: Buzzsaw for $50 off!

Cleanse Your Body From Unwanted Toxins
http://www.getthetea.com

GUEST BIO:
After moving to Bristol and committing himself to investigative journalism, Tony Gosling helped establish i-Contact video network and Ecovillage network UK. Gosling spent a year on the National Executive of the NUJ and eight years as Secretary, then Vice-Chair of the Bristol branch of the National Union of Journalists until the 2009 AGM when he resigned from the Bristol executive. After joining the Religious Society of Friends, or Quakers in June 2005, Gosling delivered his first lecture on the Eighteenth Century Illuminati in October 2006. Since Easter 2009 he has produced and presented Friday Drivetime, the weekly politics show on Bristol Community FM which gives a provincial perspective on the news ‘in Bristol Britain and around the world’.

ADD’L LINKS:
http://www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
https://twitter.com/TonyGosling
https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/
http://www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm
http://www.enterthebuzzsaw.com/
https://www.youtube.com/c/Buzzsawwith…
Buzzsaw Full Episodes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILtDj…
Buzzsaw Interview Highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqELw…
Buzzsaw Secret Societies Illuminated Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Metaphysics and Visionary Spirituality on Buzzsaw Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Shadow Government Revealed on Buzzsaw:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Alien Truth on Buzzsaw Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
More Buzzsaw Interview Highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpVpd…
https://www.facebook.com/EnterTheBuzz…
https://www.facebook.com/thelip.tv
http://www.youtube.com/theliptv
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC25k…

EPISODE BREAKDOWN:
00:01 Welcoming Tony Gosling to Buzzsaw
00:45 The Bilderberg’s historical cycle again.
03:30 The 2016 agenda for the Bildergberg–media control.
07:07 Major shootings (false flags?) at the time of the Bilderberg meeting, and Operation Gladio.
11:20 Kissinger, JFK, war criminals with police escorts, and international banking corruption
18:35 The Brexit, and ongoing financial crises in Europe.
25:12 A financial crash in the fall? The actual death of capitalism.
28:40 Do Bilderbergers trump who the President is?
33:04 Masters of spinning information.
33:46 New World Order is way behind schedule.
37:04 Thanks and goodbye.

Is Hawaii a legal state of the United States ? Megeso Kou


On February 23rd, 2016, the following conversations took place on KKCR radio, with Kauai Chief Prosecutor Justin Kollar. The discussion was in regards to the Prosecutor seeing, and providing, irrefutable proof that Hawaii is a legal state of the United States. During this discussion, the Chief Prosecutor says that he is “COMFORTABLE” with what he has seen that Hawaii is a legal state of the United States. The question is, ‘Did he see the actual Treaty’? If so, then producing a copy in court would be easy and legally satisfy those who pursue this truth. As of now, people are being prosecuted and oppressed on an assumption that the United States has jurisdiction in Hawaii. The truth must be told and proven, or was Hawaii illegally annexed? Where’s the treaty? Also, in the court of law, the Chief Prosecutor is well aware that one must be found guilty of something “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT”. Does “BEING COMFORTABLE”, regarding what he has seen as proof, even though he has not shared this proof with those of us being denied our human rights, and our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In the process of getting to the truth, individuals are being oppressed, harassed, assaulted, arrested and prosecuted, against their will, especially when no bodily harm has been committed. I ask again, “Does BEING COMFORTABLE seeing something, that is not the actual treaty, qualify as “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. I don’t know about you, but I have a lot of doubt when one cannot produce a document that is supposedly a part of history, one way or the other. Seems like abuse of power. I choose to live, and co-create, in a world of peaceful nations. Stop the insanity of world war and separation and evolve into a world of peace and unity, where abundance is for all.

Under International Law Native Hawaiians are Victims of Genocide


by Hawaiian Kingdom
Under international humanitarian law, which is the law of occupation and the protection afforded civilians who are not engaged in war, denationalization is not only a war crime but is synonymous with the term genocide. Since the occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom began during the Spanish-American War, the United States embarked on a deliberate campaign of forced denationalization in order to conceal the occupation and militarization of a neutral State. Denationalization, in its totality, is genocide.
Children_Salute_1907
Prior to World War I, violations of international law did not include war crimes, or, in other words, crimes where individuals, as separate and distinct from the State or country, could be prosecuted and where found guilty be punished, which included the death penalty. The Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (Commission on Responsibility) of the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 took up the matter of war crimes after World War I (1914-1918). The Commission identified 32 war crimes, one of which was “attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory.”
Although the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, did not specify the term “denationalization” as a war crime, the Commission on Responsibility relied on the preamble of the 1899 Hague Convention, II, which states, “Until a more complete code of the laws of war is issued, the High Contracting Parties think it right to declare that in cases not included in the Regulations adopted by them, populations and belligerents remain under the protection and empire of the principles of international law, as they result from the usages established between civilized nations, from the laws of humanity and the requirements of the public conscience.” This preamble has been called the Martens clause, which was based on a declaration read by the Russian delegate, Professor von Martens, at the Hague Peace Conference in 1899.
In October of 1943, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union established the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC). World War II had been waging since 1939, and atrocities committed by Germany, Italy and Japan drew the attention of the Allies to hold individuals responsible for the commission of war crimes. On December 2, 1943, the UNWCC adopted by resolution the list of war crimes that were drawn up by the Commission on Responsibility in 1919 with the addition of another war crime—indiscriminate mass arrests. The UNWCC was organized into three Committees: Committee I (facts and evidence), Committee II (enforcement), and Committee III (legal matters).
Committee III was asked to draft a report expanding on the war crime of “denationalization” and its criminalization under international law. Committee III did not rely solely on the Martens clause as the Commission on Responsibility did in 1919, but rather used it as an aid to interpret the articles of the 1907 Hague Convention, IV. It, therefore, concluded that “attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory” violated Article 43, where the occupying State must respect the laws of the occupied State; Article 46, where family honor and rights and individual life must be respected; and Article 56, where the property of institutions dedicated to education is protected.
In 1944, Professor Raphael Lemkin first coined the term “genocide” in his publication Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (p. 79-95). The term is a combination of the Greek word genos (race or tribe) and the Latin word cide (killing). The 1919 Commission on Responsibility did list “murders and massacres; systematic terrorism” as war crimes, but Professor Lemkin’s definition of genocide was much broader and more encompassing.
Raphael LemkinAccording to Professor Lenkin, “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
“Genocide has two phases,” argued Professor Lemkin, “one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain, or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization of the area by the oppressor’s own nationals. Denationalization was the word used in the past to describe the destruction of a national pattern.” Professor Lemkin believed that denationalization was inadequate and should be replaced with genocide.
The term genocide, however, was not a war crime under international humanitarian law at the time, but it appears that Committee III was in agreement with Professor Lenkin that it should be a war crime. The problem that faced Committee III was how to categorize genocide as a war crime under the Hague Convention, IV. On September 27, 1945, Committee III argued that denationalization was not a single act of “depriving the inhabitants of the occupied territory of their national characteristics,” but rather a program that attempted to achieve this result through: “interference with the methods of education; compulsory education in the language of the occupant; … the ban on the using of the national language in schools, streets and public places; the ban on the national press and on the printing and distributing of books in the language of the occupied region; the removal of national symbols and names, both personal and geographical; [and] interference with religious services as far as they have a national peculiarity.”
Committee III also argued that denationalization included other activities such as: “compulsory or automatic granting of the citizenship of the occupying Power; imposing the duty to swearing the oath of allegiance to the occupant; the introduction of the administrative and judicial system of the occupying Power, the imposition of its financial, economic and labour administration, the occupation of administrative offices by nationals of the occupying Power; compulsion to join organizations and associations of the occupying Power; colonization of the occupied territory by nationals of the occupant, exploitation and pillage of economic resources, confiscation of economic enterprises, permeation of the economic life through the occupying State or individuals of the nationality of the occupant.”
Committee III also stated that these activities by the occupying State or its nationals would also “fall under other headings of the list of war crimes.”
There were apparent similarities between Professor Lemkin’s definition of genocide and the Committee III’s definition of denationalization. Professor Lemkin argued that genocide was more than just mass murder of a particular group of people, but “the specific losses of civilization in the form of the cultural contributions which can only be made by groups of people united through national, racial or cultural characteristics (Lemkin, Genocide as a Crime under International Law, 41 AJIL (1947) 145, at 147).” Similarly, Committee III argued that denationalization “kill[s] the soul of the nation,” and was “the counterpoint to the physical act of killing the body, which was ordinary murder (Preliminary Report of the Chairman of Committee III, C.148, 28 Sept. 1945, 6/34/PAG-3/1.1.0, at 2).”
In its October 4, 1945 report “Criminality of Attempts to Denationalise the Inhabitants of Occupied Territory,” Committee III renamed denationalization to be genocide.
On December 11, 1946, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution that declared genocide a crime under the existing international law and recommended member States to sign a convention. After two years of study, the General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December 9, 1948. By the Convention, genocide has been recognized as a crime even when there is no war or the occupation of a State. Genocide became an international crime along with piracy, drug trafficking, arms trafficking, human trafficking, money laundering and smuggling of cultural artifacts. During war or the occupation of a State, genocide is synonymous with the war crime of denationalization.
In the Trial of Ulrich Greifelt and Others (October 10, 1847-March 10, 1948) at Nuremberg, the United States Military Tribunal asserted Committee III’s interpretation that genocide can be committed through the war crime of denationalization. In its decision, the Tribunal concluded that, “genocide…may be perpetuated through acts representing war crimes. Among these cases are those coming within the concept of forced denationalisation (p. 42).”
The Tribunal explained, “In the list of war crimes drawn up by the 1919 Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties, there were included as constituting war crimes ‘attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory.’ Attempts of this nature were recognized as a war crime in view of the German policy in territories annexed by Germany in 1914, such as in Alsace and Lorraine. At that time, as during the war of 1939-1945, inhabitants of an occupied territory were subjected to measures intended to deprive them of their national characteristics and to make the land and population affected a German province (p. 42).”
When the Hawaiian Kingdom was occupied during the Spanish-American War, the United States operated in complete disregard to the recognized principles of the law of occupation at the time. Instead of administering the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom, being the occupied State, the United States imposed its own laws, administration, judiciary and economic life throughout the Hawaiian Islands in violation of Hawaiian independence and sovereignty. According to Professor Limken, this action taken by the United States would be considered as “the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor,” which is the second phase of genocide after the national pattern of the occupied State had been destroyed under the first phase.
In other words, the actions taken by the United States was precisely what the Axis Powers did in occupied territories during World War I and II, which, according to Committee III, included “interference with the methods of education; compulsory education in the language of the occupant; … the ban on the using of the national language in schools, streets and public places; the ban on the national press and on the printing and distributing of books in the language of the occupied region; the removal of national symbols and names, both personal and geographical; [and] interference with religious services as far as they have a national peculiarity. [As well as] compulsory or automatic granting of the citizenship of the occupying Power; imposing the duty to swearing the oath of allegiance to the occupant; the introduction of the administrative and judicial system of the occupying Power, the imposition of its financial, economic and labour administration, the occupation of administrative offices by nationals of the occupying Power; compulsion to join organizations and associations of the occupying Power; colonization of the occupied territory by nationals of the occupant, exploitation and pillage of economic resources, confiscation of economic enterprises, permeation of the economic life through the occupying State or individuals of the nationality of the occupant.”
Under Hawaiian law, native (aboriginal ) Hawaiians had universal health care at no charge through the Queen’s Hospital, which received funding from the Hawaiian Kingdom legislature. Early into the occupation, however, American authorities stopped the funding in 1904, because they asserted that the collection of taxes used to benefit a particular ethnic group violated American law. In a legal opinion by the Territorial Government’s Deputy Attorney General E.C. Peters on January 7, 1904, to the President of the Board of Health, Peters stated, “I am consequently of the opinion that the appropriation of the sum of $30,000.00 for the Queen’s Hospital is not within the legitimate scope of legislative authority.”
Since 1904, aboriginal Hawaiians had to pay for their healthcare from an institution that was established specifically for them at no charge. As a result, many aboriginal Hawaiians could not afford medical care in their own country, which has led to the following dire health statistics today.
  • 4% of aboriginal Hawaiians who were surveyed in 2013 reported that they do not have any kind of health care coverage, which is the highest rate across all ethnic groups surveyed (Nguyen & Salvail, Hawaii Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, State of Hawai‘i Department of Health).
  • Aboriginal Hawaiians have the highest rate of diabetes in the Hawaiian Islands (Crabbe, Eshima, Fox, & Chan (2011), Native Hawaiian Health Fact Sheet 2011, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Demography Section, Research Division).
  • 5% of aboriginal Hawaiians are overweight, which is higher than any other ethnic group in the Hawaiian Islands (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • 7% of aboriginal Hawaiians have high blood pressure, being second only to Japanese at 39.7% (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • Aboriginal Hawaiians are more likely to have chronic diseases than non-aboriginal Hawaiians (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • 48% of the deaths of aboriginal Hawaiian children occur during the perinatal period (Crabbe et al., 2011).
  • 7% of aboriginal Hawaiian adults report being diagnosed with a depressive disorder (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
Professor Lemkin would view these statistics as connoting “the destruction of the biological structure” of aboriginal Hawaiians, which is the outcome of the second phase of genocide where the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor has been established. In addition to these statistics are added the deaths of aboriginal Hawaiians who died in the wars of the United States after forced conscription into the Armed Forces and their compulsion to swear allegiance. These wars included World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

US Recruiting PosterURL: http://wp.me/p31YBQ-Wk

“Network of Corporate Global Control” and Karen Hudes ~ My Fat Foot! by Anna von Reitz


democracy-2020-ahmed-abdelhamid-al-jazeera-talk-7-728

As we explained in “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”—- available on Amazon. com —- there IS a “network of corporate global control”— it is the natural result of the interlocking trust directorate created by the Unam Sanctum Trust over the course of seven centuries.

Anyone knowing that (1) the Global Estate Trust exists and has existed since 1302; and (2) that  “Royal” feudalism was created by this system; and (3) that Royal grants, favors, charters (as in corporate charters) and contracts were used to administer this system—— should in the tradition of all blind mice be able to figure out that self-interested interlocking networks of institutions were the result.
.
But it wasn’t until about five years ago that Dutch mathematicians studying statistical correlations stumbled on evidence that only about a hundred major corporations “rule” the planet and that they are all interlocked at the top.  They weren’t looking for this information. They just observed it and published it in a peer-reviewed paper in a scientific journal.  I read it at the time and nodded.
.
What else would you expect?  What other result could there be?  You have FACT A— the existence of a globe-spanning interlocking trust directorate created by the Unam Sanctum Trust and you have FACT B — the existence of a globe-spanning interlocking network of global corporate control and you are—- surprised?  Really?
.
The so-called System of Global Corporate Control has evolved over the course of organizing people and functions for seven hundred years— it’s not some kind of deliberate, conscious, orchestrated conspiracy.
k-hudeshdr
Yet, Karen Hudes continues her search for some kind of excuse or scapegoat for her bosses and their bad behavior.  She has latched onto this Dutch statistical study and is trying to ride that until it drops. Any kind of scapegoat or explanation will do for Karen, so long as her banker bosses get off the hook.
.
Instead of coming up with all these fanciful schemes from Wolfgang Struck until now, it would be so refreshing if she just tried the truth, and tried to come up with some logical, meaningful explanation for what the World Bank and IBRD have done?
.
What excuse is there for criminally defrauding millions upon millions of innocent people for your own profit?
.
Come on, Karen, let’s hear the explanation of why we should hold the bankers at the World Bank and IBRD harmless— the real reason, please, if there is any.
.
The dog ate their records of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc.?
.
They “forgot” who the Priority Creditors were?
.
They couldn’t logically figure out who the heirs of the Priority Creditors were and notify them?
.
They just had to claim that all that American gold was “abandoned property”?
.
Let us guess—- that mean old, bad old “Network of Corporate Global Control” made them do it?
.
It would be better in my opinion to admit that the Devil made them do it— “Oh, come on! The Americans are so clueless, they’ll never know…..”
.
What a shock of disbelief must have rippled over the thick, thick carpets and down the halls and wafted over the chrome and the walnut panel doors…… the Americans are waking up?
.
And we aren’t buying any shinola this week, either.
.
So while Ms. Hudes is trying to present the results of a mathematics project as a “discovery” explaining all the evil in the world, and as something to blame and promote as a scapegoat to excuse her bosses for their bad behavior, she is also making the lame attempt to blackball me as a “CIA operative”…. hahahaha!  The “Jesuit Agent” label didn’t work, so now this?
.
Well, they DID have a CIA operative using my name working in New York City, but she was of African and Serbian descent, got busted for shoplifting, and couldn’t quite pull the MO.

TTIP Leaks ~ Greenpeace


wikileaks-tpp-investment-cartoon

Greenpeace Netherlands has released secret TTIP negotiation documents. We have done so to provide much needed transparency and trigger an informed debate on the treaty. This treaty is threatening to have far reaching implications for the environment and the lives of more than 800 million citizens in the EU and US.

Whether you care about environmental issues, animal welfare, labour rights or internet privacy, you should be concerned about what is in these leaked documents. They underline the strong objections civil society and millions of people around the world have voiced: TTIP is about a huge transfer of power from people to big business.

Link to doc’s: https://ttip-leaks.org/