Swiss Federal Criminal Court Recognizes Switzerland’s Treaty with the Hawaiian Kingdom was Never Cancelled and Implies Hawai‘i was Never Annexed


In a cogent and thoughtful decision the Swiss Federal Criminal Court Objections Chamber recently issued two important and profound statements as to the sovereignty of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Although the Court held that, the filing was untimely and no longer appropriate in a Swiss Federal Criminal Court. The case has now been moved to the Criminal Law section of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in Lausanne. These procedural issues do not diminish the two critical statements the Court made about the status of Hawai‘i.

Download Federal Criminal Court Decision (German) (translation to English)

First, the Court stated that the 1864 Treaty between Switzerland and the Hawaiian Kingdom was never canceled—and is still in effect. Second, the Court identified certain officials and former officials of the State of Hawaii by name as possibly subject to a continuing investigation as to alleged war crimes. Although the Court ruled the filing was untimely, the Court did provide a means by which the plaintiffs could obtain review in the Swiss Supreme Court.

Professor Williamson B.C. Chang, a law professor at the University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, called this statement by the Swiss Court “an extraordinary assessment of the status of Hawaii with enormous ramifications. It confirms my own views that the United States never acquired the Hawaiian Islands, either in 1898 or thereafter.”

Professor Chang also stated, “Indeed, the fact that the statement was made, given that there was no need to make such a statement, renders the statement even more significant. If Hawai‘i had been annexed then all treaties of the Hawaiian Kingdom would have become void.”

The U.S. congressional joint resolution that purportedly annexed Hawai‘i in 1898 during the Spanish-American War stated, “The existing treaties of the Hawaiian Islands with foreign nations shall forthwith cease and determine, being replaced by such treaties as may exist, or as may be hereafter concluded, between the United States and such foreign nations.” Obviously the Swiss Court was not swayed by the language of the joint resolution of Congress, and therefore concluded that the Hawaiian-Swiss Treaty was not cancelled.

To Professor Chang, the statement of the Swiss Court directly contradicts the official position of the United States as currently maintained by the United States Department of State, Office of the Historian, on its official website, “The McKinley Administration also used the [Spanish-American] war as a pretext to annex the independent state of Hawaii… At McKinley’s request, a joint resolution of Congress made Hawaii a U.S. territory on August 12, 1898.”

Second, and equally significant, the Objections Chamber of the Swiss Federal Criminal Court specifically named present and former State of Hawai‘i officials as well others who are defendants and alleged war criminals. Again, the Swiss Criminal Court dismissed on the grounds of untimeliness, nevertheless, the Court held that plaintiffs had a pathway to bring their claims before the Swiss Supreme Court. Thus, the actions of the Defendants will continue to be examined before that Court.

The naming of names is significant because the Court had no need to identify these individuals. Those named are the former Chief Executive Officer of Deustch Bank, Joseph Ackerman, the former Governor of the State of Hawai‘i, Neil Abercrombie, current Lieutenant Governor Shan Tsutsui, former Director of the Department of Taxation, Frederik Pablo, and former deputy Director, Joshua Wisch.

The Swiss criminal action began when the Swiss Attorney General received a war crimes report by Dr. Keanu Sai, as the attorney-in-fact for Mr. Kale Gumapac, a Hawaiian subject, who was a victim of war crimes in December 2014. Dr. Sai also represents another war crimes victim who is a Swiss citizen residing in the Hawaiian Islands, but his name is kept confidential for safety concerns. Prosecutor Andreas Muller from the Attorney General’s Competence Centre for Terrorism and Competence Centre for International Criminal Law initiated a war crimes investigation.

Prosecutor Muller abandoned the investigation on February 3, 2015, and Dr. Sai objected to the Swiss Federal Criminal Court Objections Chamber seeking an order to direct the Prosecutor to complete the investigation and proceed with the prosecution.

The Objections Chamber concluded they were prevented from hearing the objection because of a previous court case that stated if a private courier, such as FedEx, was used to submit documents to a court it would only recognize the date it was received and not the date it was postage marked. There was a 10-day period to object after Dr. Sai received the Prosecutor’s decision and report on March 23, 2015. The deadline to object was April 2, 2015. Although, the objection was sent via FedEx on April 1, 2015, it did not arrive at the Objections Chamber until April 8.

“When I received the Prosecutor’s report I needed to get it translated into the English language in order to draft the objection,” said Dr. Sai. “Once I got the translation, I wrote the objection, which was 12 pages, and then I proceeded to get it translated into German before sending it off. After the translation was completed on April 1, I immediately went to FedEx.” At the request of Dr. Sai, the Clerk of the Federal Criminal Court forwarded the case to the Federal Supreme Court in Lausanne.

In a letter (German) (translation to English) to Dr. Sai from the Criminal Law Section of the Federal Supreme Court dated May 21, 2015, the Clerk of the Court stated the Supreme Court will accept the case if Dr. Sai would “explicitly state by June 5, 2015 that the Federal Supreme Court should accept and treat [his] submission as an objection in criminal matters.” As directed, Dr. Sai drafted a letter dated May 24, 2015 (German) (translation to English), which stated “I hereby explicitly state that the Federal Supreme Court should accept and treat my submission in the above case as an objection in criminal matters pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Supreme Court Act (BGG) of June 17, 2005.” Dr. Sai’s letter arrived in Switzerland by a personal courier and mailed to the Supreme Court through the Swiss postal service on May 28, 2015, which met the deadline of June 5.

Judge Rules Administrative Court System Illegal After 81 Years


martin armstrong

by Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics

Well it has been a long time coming, but all along there have been discussions behind closed doors (never in public) that the Administrative Law Courts established with the New Deal were totally unfounded and unconstitutional. With the anniversary of Magna Carta and the right to a jury trial coming up on June 15 after 800 years, the era of Roosevelt’s big government is quietly unraveling.

A federal judge’s ruling against the Securities and Exchange Commission for using its own Administrative Law judges in an insider trading case is perhaps the beginning of the end of an alternative system of justice that took root in the New Deal. Constitutionally, the socialists tore everything about the idea of a Democracy apart. It was more than taxing one party to the cheers of another in denial of equal protection. It was about creating administrative agencies (1) delegating them to create rules with the force of law as if passed by Congress sanctioned by the people; (2) the creation of administrative courts that defeated the Tripartite government structure usurping all power into the hand of the executive branch, as if this were a dictatorship run by the great hoard of unelected officials.

Not discussed in the coverage of this story is that the Administrative Law Courts are a fiefdom, to put it mildly. They have long been corrupt and traditionally rule in favor of their agencies, making it very costly for anyone to even try to defend themselves. If someone were to attempt this feat, first they have to wear the costs of an Administration proceeding and appeal to an Article III court judge, then they must appeal to the Court of Appeals, and finally plea to the Supreme Court. The cost of such adventures is well into the millions, and good luck on actually getting justice.

Furthermore, Administrative Law Courts cannot sentence you to prison, but they can fine you into bankruptcy. So the lack of a criminal prosecution meant the judges did not have to be lawyers. They could be anyone’s brother-in-law looking for a job where he just rules in favor of the agency not to be bothered with law. Unless the victim has a pile of money, there is no real chance that he or she can afford to defend themselves. This is why the agencies cut deals with the big houses and prosecute the small upstarts who lack the funds to defend themselves.

In a 45-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May in Atlanta issued an injunction halting Administrative Law proceedings against Charles Hill, a businessman who the SEC accused of reaping an illegal $744,000 profit trading in Radian Systems stock. This is typical. The legal fees involved will exceed the amount of money he is alleged to have made, the typical result is to just pay the fine and they go away, it is cheaper.

The judge ruled that the SEC agency violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution by subjecting Hill to proceedings before an Administrative Law judge, who isn’t directly accountable to the president, officials in charge of the SEC, or the courts under Article III. The ruling is 81 years overdue. The entire structure of administrative agencies blackmailing people has been outrageous. Then you take the banks who just entered a plea of CRIMINALLY guilty to manipulating markets. They are now formally FELONS who engaged in violating SEC rules and thus under the SEC rules, they are no longer eligible for a banking license. The banks are “too big to jail” and the SEC has waived their own rules, of course, to exempt the banks. So they can engage in fraud and manipulation, get caught, pay billions in fines, and the SEC exempts them from losing their licenses. This is how corrupt the administrative agencies really are.

Lilburne-Pamphlet

This new decision calling the Administrative Law Courts what they really are is reminiscent of the notorious extrajudicial proceedings of the Star Chamber operated by King James I. The court of Chancery set up outside of the King’s Bench, so there were no trials by jury. It had the same purpose, to circumvent the law. This is where our Fifth Amendment privilege came into being. That came about following the trial of John Lilburne (1615-1657) for handing out a pamphlet the government did not like.

lilburnetrial2

The Miranda v Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) decision of the Supreme Court came only after decades of abuse by American police against citizens, not unlike what we are watching today. The Miranda decision is hated by police, prosecutors, right-wing judges, politicians, and citizens. The decision is based upon the history of the right not to be coerced that began with the famous trial of John Lilburn before the English court of the Star Chamber in 1637 where he stood tall and objected to the King’s torture. Lilburn’s crime was handing out pamphlets against the king. John Lilburne (1615–1657) was a leader in the Leveller Movement of the 1640s and was a prolific pamphleteer who defended religious and individual liberty of the people. He was imprisoned many times for his views and was active in the army of the New Parliament rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. In October 1649, he was arrested and tried for High Treason for printing and circulating books and pamphlets critical of the government but was

http://thedailycoin.org/?p=32633#sthash.bkWUQPaQ.dpuf

Puttin’ on the Writs! National Liberty Alliance Files Mandamus Documents


Home

For those not aware, John Darash and his teams at the ‘National Liberty Alliance’ have been writing and issuing the documentation necessary to free us from the corruption and illegal tyranny of the dark cabal—the imposters posing as our ‘government’.

The “writ mandamus” documents have now been issued, and there are many of them to cover various aspects of the current “illegal” system.

I love this part:

This document is not for interpretation by BAR attorneys; “Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure.” – Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823 ME 15:450. All respondents took an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution and therefore should understand these documents; if not learn or resign your post.

I’ve discussed this before but if you’re not aware, the ORIGINAL 13th Amendment to the US Constitution—before it was slipped out by the corrupt parties—stated that no one of “nobility” or individuals of title were to be part of the government. That referred at that time to those such as “esquire”, which were barristers, solicitors, lawyers, attorneys at law.

We know why that was intended to be part of the Constitution, and why it was removed. Most of the US government we interact with are lawyers, and they are responsible for drafting up documents, bills and laws that only they can understand and are far too large for our representatives to want to read in full, and they use a language that has an entirely different meaning than we lay people were taught.

They have corrupted the system, and we didn’t realize it. But now we know, and the illegalities of government are being addressed.

They pass laws to control us; we are playing by their rules. We’re taking them down legally—and peacefully, and this just may be our saving grace.

The corrupt courts are being served, and now the Common Law Grand Juries are in place to take the criminals to task—thanks to people like John Darash and his teams who have put years of work into this and seem to have pulled a rabbit out of a hat. I don’t know how they did this in the short time they’ve had. They must eat, sleep and breathe this stuff.

It’s incredible what they have accomplished, and I heartily applaud them for their dedication. The People of the Republic of the United States owe them a debt of gratitude. I trust other countries are following suit.

Legal documents have never been interesting for most of us to read (by design), but I think you’ll find these vastly different from what you might expect. They speak our language. Here’s a sample:

                                              LIBERTY RISING

The purpose of this Mandamus is to expose foreign and domestic tyrants posing as Americans that have infiltrated our government at all levels in a concerted effort to overthrow the fifty governments of the united 40 States by seizing their seat of power our Federal City a/k/a Washington DC. Thereby these tyrants have covertly erected a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, political operations and through courts of fiction, contrary to the authority by which they claim, Article I Section 8 clauses 17 and 18, prevent the execution of the Law of the Land resulting in the enslaving of the 45 sovereign People of America;

I find this terribly exciting. We’re puttin’ on the writs!

Here is an excerpt from the writ mandamus for “Subversion”.

On June 6, 2015 We the People filed Writ Mandamus concerning subversion revealing Jade Helm, a Trojan-horse to take America, and exposing foreign and domestic tyrants, posing as Americans, who have infiltrated our government at all levels in a concerted effort to overthrow the fifty governments of the united States. These tyrants have seized their seat of power (our Federal City a/k/a Washington DC) and thereby have covertly erected a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, political operations; through courts of fiction, contrary to the authority by which they claim (Article I Section 8 Clauses 17 and 18), prevent the execution of the Law of the Land resulting in the enslaving of the sovereign People of America;

“Now is the time to pay attention, take a stand and prevent these tyrants from building their dark cities. Become empowered. Read the Writs because we must “educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” Thomas Jefferson; and then join NLA as we take this battle to the courts and our federal city.”

If you can do nothing else, I heartily encourage you to take part in this battle. Take their advice and read the writs. It’s your duty as an American citizen of the Republic, and it’s truly interesting reading. Share them!

Click here to access the mandamus documents. Scroll down the home page until you see the mandamus links, beginning with May 20th. You can then access each PDF separately.

One of our readers is deeply involved in the NLA and shared a link to an upcoming interview segment. Looking forward very much to listening on Saturday.  ~ BP

As You Wish Talk Radio with James Gilliland

Laura says…

James Gilliland interviews my partner and I on his “As You Wish” radio show Saturday night 6/13/15 8pm PST and it is all about what to do and what is being done by National Liberty Alliance. NLA is making huge strides and the fraudulent court system is freaked. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have “The Unified Common Law Grand Jury” mandamus documents on Jade Helm as well. There is one little bit about my Blue Avian experience too. http://bbsradio.com/asyouwishtalkradio

Judge disqualifies all 250 prosecutors in Orange County, CA because of widespread corruption


Jail cell

Between San Diego and Los Angeles is Orange County, California. With more than 3 million residents, it’s larger than 21 states. If Orange County were a separate country, its economy would be the 45th largest in the world. Now known for Disneyland, the county may soon be known for having one of the most corrupt justice systems in the world. The width and depth and duration of the corruption truly boggles the mind. A case thatshould’ve been open and shut has blown the lid off some deep secrets.On October 12, 2011, Orange County experienced the deadliest mass killing in its modern history. Scott Dekraai killed 8 people, including his ex-wife, in a Seal Beach beauty salon. He was arrested wearing full body armor just a few blocks away. Without a doubt, Dekraai was the perpetrator. A dozen surviving witnesses saw him. He admitted to the shooting early on. Yet, nearly four years later, the case against him has all but fallen apart.

It turns out that prosecutors and police officers committed an egregious violation of Dekraai’s rights—so much so that Superior Court Judge Thomas Goethals shocked everyone and removed the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, and all 250 prosecutors, from having anything more to do with the case.

The legal wrangling involved howDekraai came to occupy a jail cell next to a prolific jailhouse informant. Prosecutors and jailers said it was a coincidence, butDekraai’s attorney insisted it was part of a widespread operation to elicit incriminating remarks from defendants who were represented by lawyers,a violation of their rights.Dist. Atty. Tony Rackauckas’ conflict of interest in the Dekraai case “is not imaginary,” the judge wrote. “It apparently stems from his loyalty to his law enforcement partners at the expense of his other constitutional and statutory obligations.”

It turns out that Orange County has a secret system of evidence manufacturing and storage that they have used in countless cases, and the collusion is unraveling dozens of cases and may soon unravel the careers of countless prosecutors and law enforcement officers who’ve maintained it for decades. It’s called TRED.

In recent months, we’ve learned, over the objections of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSD), that the agency created TRED, a computerized records system in which deputies store information about in-custody defendants, including informants. Some of the data is trivial; other pieces contain vital, exculpatory evidence. But for a quarter of a century, OCSD management deemed TRED beyond the reach of any outside authority. In Dekraai, deputies Ben Garcia and Seth Tunstall committed perjury to hide the mere existence of TRED. Those lies didn’t originate from blind loyalty, however. The concealed records show how prosecution teams slyly trampled the constitutional rights of defendants by employing informants—and then keeping clueless judges, juries and defense lawyers.

These violations are beginning to cause cases all over the county to crumble.

Other cases involving informants who were eliciting illegal confessions have emerged, entire cases have collapsed, and more may follow. The story goes way back to the 1980s, as R. Scott Moxley explains at length in the OC Weekly, to a prosecutorial scandal that ended in the execution of one defendant and a lengthy sentence for his alleged co-conspirator. Their convictions were based on the testimony of various jailhouse informants even though they told conflicting stories. That scandal rocked the area then, and this new one shows eerie parallels.

Leonel Vega, a notorious gang member, was convicted of murdering a 17-year-old and was due to get life without possibility of parole. He may now be released in 2019 because of violations of his rights.Similarly, another case—one of the most egregious murders in the history of the county—has been bungled. Jeanette Espeleta, eight months pregnant, was kidnapped and murdered, but the DA’s office there has done the unthinkable.

Similar to Dekraai, government actors took the easily solvable Espeleta murder and unnecessarily cheated. In some ways, the Espeleta case is worse than the lingering aforementioned death-penalty trial that has garnered national attention. During the past 17 years, prosecution teams hid exculpatory evidence, secured tainted testimony, won convictions, and then duped state appellate-court justices into believing they never swerved from their sworn oaths. It’s an alarming situation that’s not based on speculation. While most prosecutors and cops I see in court are honest, some even significantly underpaid for their work, the record alone in the Espeleta mess proves OC’s criminal-justice system needs a cleansing.

So egregious are the violations that the Public Defenders Office filed this 500+ page motion detailing instance after instance of cases where men and women have had their essential rights violated.Speaking to Dahlia Lithwick, of Slate,

Laura Fernandez of Yale Law School, who studies prosecutorial misconduct, says it’s amazing that both the sheriff’s office and the DA’s office worked together to cover up the misconduct: “From my perspective,” she says, “what really sets Orange County apart is the massive cover-up by both law enforcement and prosecutors—a cover-up that appears to have risen to the level of perjury and obstruction of justice. Law enforcement officers and prosecutors in Orange County have gone to such lengths to conceal their wide-ranging misconduct that they have effectively turned the criminal justice system on its head: dismissing charges and reducing sentences in extraordinarily serious cases, utterly failing to investigate unsolved crimes and many murders (by informants—in order to prevent that evidence from ever getting to defense lawyers), while simultaneously pushing forward where it would seem to make no sense (except that it conceals more bad acts by the state), as in the case of an innocent 14-year old boy who was wrongfully detained for two years.”

Now, Al Jazeera has launched a full investigation and has uncovered never-before-heard audio files of conversations between illegal informants.

The U.S. government is prohibited from using informants to gather information on defendants who have retained counsel; doing so violates their right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. But in court filings, Sanders claims the jailhouse informants in Orange County were acting as government agents, taking direction from law enforcement.

Faced with a possible life sentence, Oscar Moriel, a jailhouse informant spoke to Orange County law enforcement about how his memory “might be able to fall back into place” if they could help him out somehow.
Now, prosecutors in Orange County are unethically steering cases away from Judge Thomas Goethals, who kicked them off the case in the Seal Beach murders and has been persistent about their violations in other cases.

For years, Thomas Goethals has weighed the fates of some of Orange County’s most violent criminals. But since the judge began presiding over heated hearings probing the misuse of jailhouse informants, dozens of prosecutors have steered criminal cases away from his courtroom.Since February 2014, the district attorney’s office has asked to disqualify Goethals—a former homicide prosecutor and defense attorney—in 57 cases, according to court records.

In 2011, records show, prosecutors made disqualification requests against Goethals just three times. In 2012, zero times. In 2013, only twice.

The surge of disqualifications began around the time the Superior Court judge agreed to allow wide-ranging hearings that brought prosecutors’ mishandling of informant-related evidence under harsh scrutiny.

In essence, the District Attorney’s Office is abusing a very particular law to protect themselves from the scrutiny of Judge Goethals.

In a tactic informally called “papering a judge,” prosecutors have repeatedly invoked Section 170.6 of the state’s code of civil procedure, which allows lawyers a peremptory challenge to disqualify a judge they deem “prejudiced” against their interests. They do not have to prove prejudice or explain their reasons.

Speaking to R. Scott Moxley of the OC Weekly, Scott Sanders, a public defender, stated,

“Not a single prosecutor or officer has been held accountable for the illegal and unethical conduct that has taken place,” he said. “This shows that there are far too many members of theOCDA andOCSD who either endorse cheating or lack the courage to stand up to their colleagues who cheat.”Rackauckas believes Sanders is overdramatizing the mess. The DA claims errors by his staff and police agencies can be solved by training sessions and increasing his annual budget. Part of that training is apparently nefarious. His deputies have spent the past six months demanding judges seal records so reporters cannot monitor questionable maneuverings.

Now, the Dean of the Law School at UC Irvine in Orange County is calling for a federal probe into the misconduct. If prosecutors and law enforcement officers in Orange County are so willing to lie, cheat, and break the law in the name of justice in the ways that we have discovered, what else have they been willing to do? Whomight’ve been wrongfully convicted? Who else has had their rights trampled – no matter the seriousness of their crimes?How deep will this rabbit hole go and who will fight against the truth coming out to protect their careers?

Originally posted to shaunking on Fri May 29, 2015 at 11:26 AM PDT.

Also republished by California politics, Police Accountability Group, and Daily Kos.

Dr. Richard Cordero-ITNJ: US Federal Judiciary is a rogue & secretive organization, 99.82% complaints against Judges are dismissed


Dr. Richard Cordero-ITNJ: US Federal Judiciary is a rogue & secretive organization, 99.82% complaints against Judges are dismissed

By Alfred Lambremont Webre

NewsInsideOut.com

WATCH ON YOU TUBE

VANCOUVER, BC – In a February 3, 2015 online Symposium with members of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ), Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., who holds a Cambridge doctorate and is an expert on the U.S. Judiciary, revealed that the U.S. Judiciary is in fact a Rogue branch of the U.S. Government, unaccountable to any other agency or branch of government, and has become a force unto itself, a secret society that retaliates against any official, office, agency or government branch that attempts to hold it accountable.

Some of the highlights of Dr. Cordero’s educational Symposium include the official statistics of the federal court that point to judges’ wrongdoing in a Judicial Branch that has gone Rogue:

  1.  “The Federal Judiciary holds all its administrative, adjudicative, policy-making, and disciplinary meetings behind closed doors and no press conferences.
  2.   “A single federal judge can hold unconstitutional what 535 members of Congress and the President have debated, voted, and enacted; such power entails the threat to doom the legislative agenda of any party and politician, including the President, that dare exercise constitutional checks and balances on judges, never mind investigate them.
  3.  “In the 225 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789, only 8 federal judges have been impeached and removed.
  4.  “Chief circuit judges abuse their statutory self-disciplining authority by dismissing 99.82% of complaints against their peers; with other judges they deny up to 100% of appeals to review such dismissals.
  5.  “Up to 9 of every 10 appeals to the circuit courts are disposed of ad-hoc through no-reason summary orders or opinions so “perfunctory” that they are neither published nor precedential, mere fiats of raw judicial power.
  6. . “Justices are unelected yet life-tenured, as are district and circuit judges; the latter appoint bankruptcy judges for renewable 14-year terms with no consent of representatives of the people. These appointees [who received $37.3 billion in fees] decided in CY2010 who kept or received the $373 billion at stake in only personal bankruptcies. The most insidious corruptor is precisely money!
  7.  “About 95% of those bankruptcies are filed by individuals. Lacking the money to hire lawyers, the great majority of them appear pro se and, lacking the knowledge of the law needed to defend themselves, they fall prey to a bankruptcy fraud scheme run by judges and other bankruptcy and legal systems insiders.
  8. “The overwhelming majority of litigants cannot afford to go up on appeal, whereby the unreviewability of their cases affords judges the opportunity for riskless disregard of the law and due process, and arbitrary decision-making.”
  9.  Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor – – Dr. Cordero proposes “a Watergate-like generalized media investigation of wrongdoing in the Judiciary guided by the query, “What did the President and judges know about Then-Judge Sotomayor’s concealment of assets and other judges’ wrongdoing, and when did they know it?” and aimed at demanding that the President release the FBI vetting report on her. The presentation will be an Emile Zola I accuse!-like denunciation to pioneer judicial unaccountability reporting.”
  10.  Secret NSA/FISA Courts – Dr. Cordero states “The evidence of judges’ wrongdoing will introduce the call for ‘reverse surveillance’ over them by We the People, as opposed to the mass surveillance over the People by the NSA with judges’ rubberstamping approval revealed by Edward Snowden. The presentation can give rise to the formation of a multidisciplinary team of students, professors, journalists, and civil rights advocates to conduct reverse surveillance through a Follow the money! and IT Follow the wire! investigation. The team can organize the first of a series of multimedia conferences to report to the national public its findings and expose judges’ pattern of disregard of the law.

 

 

Dr. Cordero is coordinating with interested news media, journalists, activists and organizations in the area of justice to expose judges’ wrongdoing, and advocate judicial reform.

 

Judicial Discipline Reform

http://judicial-discipline-reform.org

Contact Email: Dr. Richard Cordero can be contacted at: riccordero@verizen.net

International Tribunal for Natural Justice

http://www.itnj.org/

 

EXHIBIT

International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ)

Today we would like to introduce you to the new International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ) website

The International Tribunal for Natural Justice has been founded by Humanitad Foundation and the New Earth Trust as an independent judicial body purposed to realising natural justice for natural people.

The inaugural seating of the Tribunal will be at Runnymead, England on June 15th 2015 marking the 800th Anniversary of the signing of the Magna-Carta.

Whilst the ITNJ team includes many leading and well-respected judges, lawyers and investigators, if the ITNJ is to fulfil its greatest potential it requires the support of the people of the world.

Please lend your support by ratifying the ITNJ Treaty

The ITNJ is not another kangaroo court operated by disenfranchised or disenchanted people bearing grudges against ‘the system’. Rather, it is a world-class team made up of conscious lovers of pure-truth and natural justice, each committed to serving all people of the world. The ITNJ also invites your participation through its integrated e-governance platform – offering a forum where your voice, and the voices of others, can be heard on issues of international importance. Register here to participate in the e-governance platform.

With love

The New Earth team

www.NewsInsideOut.com

Alfred Lambremont Webre Contact/News Tips:
news@newsinsideout.com

 

Max Igan – PressTV – Former Guantanamo Guard Reveals Colleagues Murdered 3 Inmates


Max Igan on PressTV World News Jan, 17th, 2015

The International Common Law Court: Genocide in Canada, Online Trial (Video)


For nothing is hidden that will not be revealed, nor anything secret that will not be known and come to light.

– Jesus, Luke 8:17

The evidence of the Prosecution presented at the Common Law Court proceedings regarding Genocide in Canada are found at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvhfXAd08TE – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada (Part One) – 1 hr. 46 mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPKFk_L7y9g – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada (Part Two) – 1 hr. 47 mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ormOIlOi4Vc – Final Court Verdict and Sentencing – 8 mins. 30 secs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IylfBxm3sMg – Authorizations and Endorsements of ITCCS/Kevin Annett by indigenous eyewitnesses – 10 mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CReISnQDbBE – Irene Favel, Eyewitness to the incineration of a newborn baby by a priest at Muscowegan Catholic Indian school, Saskatchewan, 1944

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBUd3UXt6fI – Other key testimonies from our Court case against genocide in Canada

ZeroHedge ~ Putin To Western Elites: Play-Time Is Over **FULL VIDEO** RT: Putin Speech at Valdai – World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules


Via Club Orlov blog,

Most people in the English-speaking parts of the world missed Putin’s speech at the Valdai conference in Sochi a few days ago, and, chances are, those of you who have heard of the speech didn’t get a chance to read it, and missed its importance. Western media did their best to ignore it or to twist its meaning. Regardless of what you think or don’t think of Putin (like the sun and the moon, he does not exist for you to cultivate an opinion) this is probably the most important political speech since Churchill’s “Iron Curtain” speech of March 5, 1946.

In this speech, Putin abruptly changed the rules of the game. Previously, the game of international politics was played as follows: politicians made public pronouncements, for the sake of maintaining a pleasant fiction of national sovereignty, but they were strictly for show and had nothing to do with the substance of international politics; in the meantime, they engaged in secret back-room negotiations, in which the actual deals were hammered out. Previously, Putin tried to play this game, expecting only that Russia be treated as an equal. But these hopes have been dashed, and at this conference he declared the game to be over, explicitly violating Western taboo by speaking directly to the people over the heads of elite clans and political leaders.

The Russian blogger chipstone summarized the most salient points from Putin speech as followS:

1. Russia will no longer play games and engage in back-room negotiations over trifles. But Russia is prepared for serious conversations and agreements, if these are conducive to collective security, are based on fairness and take into account the interests of each side.

2. All systems of global collective security now lie in ruins. There are no longer any international security guarantees at all. And the entity that destroyed them has a name: The United States of America.

3. The builders of the New World Order have failed, having built a sand castle. Whether or not a new world order of any sort is to be built is not just Russia’s decision, but it is a decision that will not be made without Russia.

4. Russia favors a conservative approach to introducing innovations into the social order, but is not opposed to investigating and discussing such innovations, to see if introducing any of them might be justified.

5. Russia has no intention of going fishing in the murky waters created by America’s ever-expanding “empire of chaos,” and has no interest in building a new empire of her own (this is unnecessary; Russia’s challenges lie in developing her already vast territory). Neither is Russia willing to act as a savior of the world, as she had in the past.

6. Russia will not attempt to reformat the world in her own image, but neither will she allow anyone to reformat her in their image. Russia will not close herself off from the world, but anyone who tries to close her off from the world will be sure to reap a whirlwind.

7. Russia does not wish for the chaos to spread, does not want war, and has no intention of starting one. However, today Russia sees the outbreak of global war as almost inevitable, is prepared for it, and is continuing to prepare for it. Russia does not war—nor does she fear it.

8. Russia does not intend to take an active role in thwarting those who are still attempting to construct their New World Order – until their efforts start to impinge on Russia’s key interests. Russia would prefer to stand by and watch them give themselves as many lumps as their poor heads can take. But those who manage to drag Russia into this process, through disregard for her interests, will be taught the true meaning of pain.

9. In her external, and, even more so, internal politics, Russia’s power will rely not on the elites and their back-room dealing, but on the will of the people.

To these nine points I would like to add a tenth:

10. There is still a chance to construct a new world order that will avoid a world war. This new world order must of necessity include the United States—but can only do so on the same terms as everyone else: subject to international law and international agreements; refraining from all unilateral action; in full respect of the sovereignty of other nations.

To sum it all up:

play-time is over. Children, put away your toys. Now is the time for the adults to make decisions. Russia is ready for this; is the world?

*  *  *

Full text of Vladimir Putin’s speech and a question and answer session at the final plenary meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club’s XI session in Sochi on 24 October 2014 can be found here

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-30/putin-western-elites-play-time-over

Putin at Valdai – World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules (FULL VIDEO)

Russian President Vladimir Putin is delivering a speech at the plenary session of Valdai International Discussion Club, a forum involving the world leading experts at foreign and domestic policy.

Vladimir Putin Is The Leader of the “Moral World”, by Paul Craig Roberts . . . Roberts shares Putin’s ‘remarks and says, and I agree: These are the remarks of a humanitarian political leader, the like of which the world has not seen in my lifetime.


putin04

Dear Friends,

Vladimir Putin’s remarks at the 11th meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club are worth more than a link in my latest column. These are the remarks of a humanitarian political leader, the like of which the world has not seen in my lifetime. Compare Putin to the corrupt war criminal in the White House or to his puppets in office in Germany, UK, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, and you will see the difference between a criminal clique and a leader striving for a humane and livable world in which the interests of all peoples are respected.

In a sane Western society, Putin’s statements would have been reproduced in full and discussions organized with remarks from experts such as Stephen F. Cohen. Choruses of approval would have been heard on television and read in the print media. But, of course, nothing like this is possible in a country whose rulers claim that it is the “exceptional” and “indispensable” country with an extra-legal right to hegemony over the world. As far as Washington and its prostitute media, named “presstitutes” by the trends specialist Gerald Celente, are concerned, no country counts except Washington. “You are with us or against us,” which means “you are our vassals or our enemies.” This means that Washington has declared Russia, China, India, Brazil and other parts of South America, Iran, and South Africa to be enemies.

This is a big chunk of the world for a bankrupt country, hated by its vassal populations and many of its own subjects, that has not won a war since it defeated tiny Japan in 1945 by using nuclear weapons, the only use of such terrible weapons in world history.

As an American, try to image any known American politician, or for that matter any professor at Harvard, Princeton, Yale, or Stanford capable of giving an address to an educated discussion group of the quality of Putin’s remarks. Try to find any American politician capable of responding precisely and directly to questions instead of employing evasion.

No one can read Putin’s remarks without concluding that Putin is the leader of the world.

In my opinion, Putin is such a towering figure that Washington has him marked for assassination. The CIA will use one of the Muslim terrorists that the CIA supports inside Russia. Unlike an American president, who dares not move among the people openly, Putin is not kept remote from the people. Putin is at ease with the Russian people and mingles among them. This makes him an easy target for the CIA to use a Chechnya terrorist, a Jihadist suicide bomber, or the traditional “lone nut” to assassinate Putin.

The immoral, wicked, and declining West is incapable of producing leadership of Putin’s quality. Having defamed Putin, assassinating him will cause little comment in the Western media.

Here are Putin’s remarkable remarks:

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club
24 October 2014, Sochi

Vladimir Putin took part in the final plenary meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club’s XI session. The meeting’s theme is The World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules.
This year, 108 experts, historians and political analysts from 25 countries, including 62 foreign participants, took part in the club’s work.

The plenary meeting summed up the club’s work over the previous three days, which concentrated on analysing the factors eroding the current system of institutions and norms of international law.

PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA VLADIMIR PUTIN: Colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, friends, it is a pleasure to welcome you to the XI meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club.

It was mentioned already that the club has new co-organisers this year. They include Russian non-governmental organisations, expert groups and leading universities. The idea was also raised of broadening the discussions to include not just issues related to Russia itself but also global politics and the economy.

n organization and content will bolster the club’s influence as a leading discussion and expert forum. At the same time, I hope the ‘Valdai spirit’ will remain – this free and open atmosphere and chance to express all manner of very different and frank opinions.

Let me say in this respect that I will also not let you down and will speak directly and frankly. Some of what I say might seem a bit too harsh, but if we do not speak directly and honestly about what we really think, then there is little point in even meeting in this way. It would be better in that case just to keep to diplomatic get-togethers, where no one says anything of real sense and, recalling the words of one famous diplomat, you realise that diplomats have tongues so as not to speak the truth.

We get together for other reasons. We get together so as to talk frankly with each other. We need to be direct and blunt today not so as to trade barbs, but so as to attempt to get to the bottom of what is actually happening in the world, try to understand why the world is becoming less safe and more unpredictable, and why the risks are increasing everywhere around us.
Today’s discussion took place under the theme: New Rules or a Game without Rules. I think that this formula accurately describes the historic turning point we have reached today and the choice we all face. There is nothing new of course in the idea that the world is changing very fast. I know this is something you have spoken about at the discussions today. It is certainly hard not to notice the dramatic transformations in global politics and the economy, public life, and in industry, information and social technologies.

Let me ask you right now to forgive me if I end up repeating what some of the discussion’s participants have already said. It’s practically impossible to avoid. You have already held detailed discussions, but I will set out my point of view. It will coincide with other participants’ views on some points and differ on others.

Read more

Breaking News: DRAGON FAMILY NOW OWNS IMF & FEDERAL RESERVE, 18-10-2014


This is one we’ve been waiting for! Yes, the Ambassador confirms that the Family is now the lawful owner of the Federal Reserve that has waged war on humanity for over 100 years. They are responsible for operating the largest and most oppressive criminal operation, an extortion racket and human slave trade, in the history of the world. They totally failed in their mandate to serve humanity; and their mandate has not been renewed. Instead, steps are being taken to transform society, restoring people’s natural rights along with principles of limited government (Republics) outlined in the founding documents of the united States in America. Again, he admonishes us to look in the mirror and to stop aggression, greed and the illusion of self importance.


Planetary Declaration of Independence by Elvira


Add the power of the spoken word. Read out loud, with conviction!

 

By: Elvira

August 22, 2014

It has come to the peoples  attention that our planet  and her people have been manipulated,   raped , robbed,  looted, pillaged and plundered  for many a thousand years by , beings and forces, purposely  in hiding, and until now beyond our comprehension,  of a devious and malicious nature, who have only their own predatory, parasitic, best interest in mind.

These forces have infested all of our history and society mostly by the means of  religion, secret societies, royalty, law, government,  banking,  corporations, military, pharmaceuticals, high society, media, Show businesses, in cohesion with carefully  selected human minions presenting us with a false sense of perceived reality about the nature of ‘life on earth’.

This is no longer acceptable  as the   people of planet earth have the right to choose their own destiny without being parasited upon by creatures of this devious nature. These beings  and malicious forces of a dark and hidden nature  and their minions, have, during millennia perpetrated  horrendous and heinous crimes against individual souls and mankind in general,  and will continue to do so until ,   we, the people of planet earth of the human race , get of our knees of manipulated and forced servitude to the alien/extra dimensional interests these forces and beings represent.

This is the planetary declaration of  independence of the human race, also known as
‘We the people of Planet Earth’, hereafter referred to as ‘We the People’ or We.

We ,the people of planet earth, reclaim our sovereign frequency and minds, deliberately , in a vile manner and on purpose, stolen from us by  deception perception management of above mentioned forces, for selfish purposes.

we, the people of planet earth, will dismantle the demiurge, privately owned, corrupt, corporate controlled system  disguised as, and commonly known as; the vatican; governments; democracies;  un; unesco; tlc; cfa; imf; fed; bis; emf; ecb; etc etc.

all information about the true vibrational nature of the universe, the influence of sacred geometry  on  it and the deceitful and malicious use  and withholding of this knowledge to the people of planet earth, by the demiurge , shall immediately be revealed to the people.

all the wealth and resources of the  people of planet earth, for eons stolen by the demiurge system, know and yet unknown  to the people , commonly referred to as;  ‘cattle‘; ‘ livestock’ ;  ’chattel’ ;  ‘all men with hands and feet’ ; ‘ human capital’;  ‘collateral’; ‘all the land ocean and air and their mineral resources’  and ‘the global collateral accounts’  etc,  etc, are hereby reclaimed and taken in possession by the people of planet earth for the people of planet earth, for each to have an equal share,  so the people may live their life on earth in freedom of fear, despair and poverty, which is their inalienable  birthright.

From this moment on in Zero point energy field and all timelines, all hierarchy  are dissolved and declared unlawful by the people,  as no benevolent forces and beings need to impose and disguise themselves as  ”from an higher order or hierarchy”.  we are all created equal from Source and this includes our animal sisters and brothers.
all (soul) contracts, made or signed, by  representatives of certain human and /or mixed ‘bloodlines’, on behalf of, or claiming rights of,  ‘ownership of the human race and its assets’ , and claiming, ‘hereditary birthrights, to rule, on account of certain dna types’ , are hereby cancelled, declared, nil and void and dissolved in all eternity, also known as zero point energy field and all timelines,  as all contracts were entered into by maliciously  withholding  information, about all the ins and outs of energy harvesting purposes by  fore mentioned hidden forces , to the human souls incarnated.

all  pre-birth soul contracts are declared nil and void as all contracts were entered into  by  secretively, maliciously  and fraudulently , withholding information about energy harvesting purposes connected with ‘incarnating’  and  ‘ life on earth’  under the demiurge archontic system and their representatives, by their representatives, overseeing the incarnation processes or the so called “wheel of karma”, in other dimensions or the astral planes, in an indecent manner. all captured and stolen souls  are to be returned immediately with their complete aspects.

no energy contracting by means of ‘name’; ‘number’; ‘birth certificate’; ‘bio-print’ or any other   foul means, without  full,  and complete disclosure and transparency  in every dimension, consciously remembered and recollected, to those involved shall be.

all hoarded and hidden knowledge about  the true human history, electro magnetism,  it’s role in the history of humankind , the true nature of the vibrational universe and
the law of resonance, shall be revealed and returned to the proper owners being the people of planet earth, so it may benefit each and every living soul on the planet.
all slavery systems, using means of energy harvesting, commonly known as, or disguising as, ‘the financial system’, ’government’, ’military’, ‘media’ , ‘education’,  ‘healthcare’, etc are  no longer allowed from this moment on, in all eternity also known as zero point energy field and all timelines.

the people of planet earth do not consent to war, propaganda, proxy wars, false flags chemtrails, blackops, psyops, vaccinations, gmo ’s, radiation, fluoridation, wi-fi as stealth weapon, dna tampering and all other devious and foul means,  covertly and overtly used  for mind controlling and deceiving the people of planet earth.

exploitation of  animal life shall be disposed of as soon as possible  as all animals  have souls created equal to ours.  animal products or products containing animal aspects , not freely donated by the animal soul in question, shall be  discouraged fiercely to make intrinsically clear to the people that these  ‘products’  place an heavy burden on the collective  human soul and are for a large part responsible  for  the delay to take our rightful place among the stars as the cosmic species we truly are.

a council of  the wise and see-ers  of the several people of planet earth shall be installed , in full transparency and accountability to the people of planet earth to oversee  the process of dismantling the demiurge archontic system.

do no harm, cause no loss shall be our natural Law.

we , the people of planet earth,  demand all alien / extra dimensional  forces,  past,  present and future , of all timelines, connected or having ‘stakes’ in the demiurge, archontic, corrupt system, to disclose themselves and  (either live with us in mutual respect and peace,  or )  leave !

let there be peace ,  love, prosperity, wisdom, joy and laughter on planet earth.

planet earth

http://www.ascensionwithearth.com/2014/09/planetary-declaration-of-independence.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ascensionwithearth%2FVcrr+%28Ascension+with+Mother+Earth+and+Current+State+of+Affairs%29

State of Hawai‘i Judge Says He Received Summons from the International Criminal Court


Dexter_KaiamaDexter Kaiama, an attorney that represents war crime victims, was told by another attorney that Judge Harry Freitas admitted to him and the Prosecutor for Hawai‘i County in a conference call that he received a warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, to appear before the Court. Freitas is a District Court Judge for the Third Circuit in the city of Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i.

Judges-FreitasIn February 2013, Kaiama submitted the following complaint on behalf of his client with the Prosecutor of the ICC alleging Judge Harry P. Freitas committed a war crime by willfully depriving his client of a fair and regular trial prescribed by the Fourth Geneva Convention, and that Federal National Mortgage Association, and attorneys Blue Kaanehe, Charles Prather, and Peter Keegan were complicit in these proceedings and therefore committed a war crime as accessories.

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_02

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_03

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_04

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_05

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_06

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_07

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_08

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_09

On March 4, 2013, the Office of the Prosecutor’s Information and Evidence Unit acknowledged receipt of the complaint and assigned it case no. OTP-CR-63/13.

ICC.Complaint (Redacted)_Page_01

The International Criminal Court’s Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC) issues both arrest warrants and summons at the request of the Prosecutor. It is unlikely that Freitas received a “warrant,” but rather a “summons” to appear before the Court. “Warrants” are orders directed to governments for the arrest and apprehension of war crime suspects to ensure appearance before the Court, while “summons” are sent to war crime suspects themselves so they could voluntarily appear before the Court.

The PTC would issue a summons if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed the alleged crimes, and that the summons is sufficient to ensure appearance before the Court on a specific day and time. Both warrants and summons can be sealed by the Court, which makes them only accessible to persons authorized by the Court. And once it can be ensured that victims and witnesses can be adequately protected, the Prosecutor could apply to the Court to unseal the warrants or summons in an effort to garner international attention and support for the arrests or summons.

ICC_Arrest_Warrants_FAQ_Page_1

ICC_Arrest_Warrants_FAQ_Page_2

ICC_Arrest_Warrants_FAQ_Page_3

It appears that the proceedings and summons are under seal because there is no mention of it on the website of the ICC. In the ICC case The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda, an arrest warrant was under seal for two years. In other cases the warrants or summons were unsealed within a month. Freitas, however, appears to have been confident enough to disclose the matter to both the attorney and the Prosecutor for the County of Hawai‘i in a conference call because he did state to both that he may be traveling to Europe soon.

When Freitas disclosed to two officers of the State of Hawai‘i court that he received a summons from the ICC it should draw international attention because if Hawai‘i was a part of the territory of the United States the ICC would not have issued the summons in the first place. The United States has not agreed to the jurisdiction of the ICC and therefore the Court would have been precluded from sending a summons if Freitas was a judge within the territory of the United States of America. The acting Government acceded to the jurisdiction of the ICC, which provided the basis for the ICC to exercise jurisdiction over the Hawaiian Islands. Hawai‘i is not a part of the United States and has been under an illegal and prolonged occupation since 1898 in direct violation of international law and the law of occupation.

The Hard Truth about the Crime called Canada – and why we need The Republic of Kanata


From ITCCS Canada and the Republican movement:

Margaret Sepass was raped and then beaten to death by an Anglican priest named John Warner on December 5, 1969, at St. Michael’s Indian school in Alert Bay, British Columbia. Margaret was nine years old. Her burial site is unknown and John Warner was never charged.

On January 5, 1938, Albert Gray was beaten to death by Reverend Alfred Caldwell of the United Church of Canada when Albert took a prune from a jar without permission. Albert was eleven years old. His body was buried in secret behind the Ahousat Indian school and Alfred Caldwell was never charged.

On April 3, 1964, Richard Thomas was sodomized and then strangled to death by Catholic priest Terence McNamara at the Kuper Island Indian school. Richard was buried in secret in an orchard south of the school, and Terence McNamara, who is still alive, was never charged.

Elaine Dick, age 6, kicked to death by a nun, 1964;

Daniel Kangetok, age 4, infected with tuberculosis and left to die, 1971;

David Sepass, age 8, pushed down stairs and left to die, 1958;

A newborn Cree baby, burned alive by a priest at the Catholic Muscowegan Indian school, in May of 1944;

Susan Ball, age 5, starved to death in a closet, 1959;

Agnes Bernard, age 6, gang raped to death at the Shubanacadie school, 1958;

Pauline Frank, age 8, died from medical experimentation, Nanaimo Indian Hospital, 1972;

Albert Baptiste, age 9, died from electric shocks from a cattle prod wielded by a catholic priest, Christmas 1951;

Nancy Joe, age 14, died from involuntary drug testing, Nanaimo Indian hospital, 1967;

John Charlie, age 8, died from a blow to the head by a chain wielded by a catholic priest, 1964;

Lorraine white, teenager, gang raped by United Church school staff and left to die, Port Alberni, 1971;

Eighteen Mohawk children, all under the age of sixteen, shot to death by Canadian soldiers outside Brantford, Ontario, summer of 1943;

Johnny Bingo Dawson, eyewitness to some of these crimes, died of injuries from police beating, Vancouver, December 2009;

Ricky Lavallee, witness to Bingo’s murder, died of a blow to the chest, January 2012;

William Combes, eyewitness to the abduction of ten children by Queen Elizabeth from Kamloops Indian school, killed by lethal injection, St. Paul’s hospital, Vancouver, February 2011;

Harriett Nahanee, first witness to a residential school murder to go public, died after mistreatment in a Vancouver jail, February, 2007;

Nora Bernard, the first aboriginal in Canada to sue the catholic church for residential school crimes, murdered December 2007.

And more than 50,000 others, all of them children.

No-one has ever been charged or tried under Canadian law for any these killings. And the criminal government and churches responsible for this mass murder have been legally absolved of any responsibility for them under Canadian law.

Nothing has been healed. Nothing has been reconciled. Justice has been exterminated as completely as these innocent victims.

Stop the criminal conspiracy known as Canada! Join the Republic of Kanata and bring these genocidal institutions down! Simply, for justice.

republicofkanata@gmail.com

http://www.itccs.org / http://www.hiddennolonger.com

 

The Absurd, Bureaucratic Hell That Is the American Police State


By John W. Whitehead
July 28, 2014

“The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid ‘dens of crime’ that Dickens loved to paint. It is not done even in concentration camps and labour camps. In those we see its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern.”—C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters

Whether it’s the working mother arrested for letting her 9-year-old play unsupervised at a playground, the teenager forced to have his genitals photographed by police, the underage burglar sentenced to 23 years for shooting a retired police dog, or the 43-year-old man who died of a heart attack after being put in a chokehold by NYPD officers allegedly over the sale of untaxed cigarettes, the theater of the absurd that passes for life in the American police state grows more tragic and incomprehensible by the day.

Debra Harrell, a 46-year-old South Carolina working mother, was arrested, charged with abandonment and had her child placed in state custody after allowing the 9-year-old to spend unsupervised time at a neighborhood playground while the mom worked a shift at McDonald’s. Mind you, the child asked to play outside, was given a cell phone in case she needed to reach someone, and the park—a stone’s throw from the mom’s place of work—was overrun with kids enjoying its swings, splash pad, and shade.

A Connecticut mother was charged with leaving her 11-year-old daughter in the car unsupervised while she ran inside a store—despite the fact that the child asked to stay in the car and was not overheated or in distress. A few states away, a New Jersey man was arrested and charged with endangering the welfare of his children after leaving them in a car parked in a police station parking lot, windows rolled down, while he ran inside to pay a ticket.

A Virginia teenager was charged with violating the state’s sexting law after exchanging sexually provocative videos with his girlfriend. Instead of insisting that the matter be dealt with as a matter of parental concern, police charged the boy with manufacturing and distributing child pornography and issued a search warrant to “medically induce an erection” in the 17-year-old boy in order to photograph his erect penis and compare it to the images sent in the sexting exchange.  The police had already taken an initial photograph of the boy’s penis against his will, upon his arrest.

In Georgia, a toddler had his face severely burned when a flash bang grenade, launched by a SWAT team during the course of a no-knock warrant, landed in his portable crib, detonating on his pillow. Also in Georgia, a police officer shot and killed a 17-year-old boy who answered the door, reportedly with a Nintendo Wii controller in his hands. The cop claimed the teenager pointed a gun at her, thereby justifying the use of deadly force. Then there was the incident wherein a police officer, responding to a complaint that some children were “chopping off tree limbs” creating “tripping hazards,” pulled a gun on a group of 11-year-old boys who were playing in a wooded area, attempting to build a tree fort.

While the growing phenomenon of cops shooting family pets only adds to the insanity (it is estimated that a family pet is killed by law enforcement every 98 minutes in America), it’s worse for those who dare to shoot a police dog. Ivins Rosier was 16 when he broke into the home of a Florida highway patrol officer and shot (although he didn’t kill) the man’s retired police dog. For his crime, the teenager was sentenced to 23 years in prison, all the while police officers who shoot family pets are rarely reprimanded.

Meanwhile if you’re one of those hoping to live off the grid, independent of city resources, you might want to think again. Florida resident Robin Speronis was threatened with eviction for living without utilities. Speronis was accused of violating the International Property Maintenance Code by relying on rain water instead of the city water system and solar panels instead of the electric grid.

Now we can shrug these incidents off as isolated injustices happening to “other” people. We can rationalize them away by suggesting that these people “must” have done something to warrant such treatment. Or we can acknowledge that this slide into totalitarianism—helped along by overcriminalization, government surveillance, militarized police, neighbors turning in neighbors, privatized prisons, and forced labor camps, to name just a few similarities—is tracking very closely with what we saw happening in Germany in the years leading up to Hitler’s rise to power.

When all is said and done, what these incidents reflect is a society that has become so bureaucratic, so legalistic, so politically correct, so militaristic, so locked down, so self righteous, and so willing to march in lockstep with the corporate-minded police state that any deviations from the norm—especially those that offend the sensibilities of the “government-knows-best” nanny state or challenge the powers that be—become grist for prosecution, persecution and endless tribulations for the poor souls who are caught in the crosshairs.

Then there are the incidents, less colorful perhaps but no less offensive to the sensibilities of any freedom-loving individual, which should arouse outrage among the populace but often slip under the radar of a sleeping nation.

For instance, not only is the NSA spying on and collecting the content of your communications, but it’s also going to extreme lengths to label as “extremists” anyone who attempts to protect their emails from the government’s prying eyes. Adding insult to injury, those same government employees and contractors spying on Americans’ private electronic communications are also ogling their private photos. Recent revelations indicate that NSA employees routinely pass around intercepted nude photos, considered a “fringe benefit” of surveillance positions.

A trove of leaked documents reveals the government’s unmitigated gall in labeling Americans as terrorists for little more than being suspected of committing “any act that is ‘dangerous’ to property and intended to influence government policy through intimidation.” As The Intercept reports: “This combination—a broad definition of what constitutes terrorism and a low threshold for designating someone a terrorist—opens the way to ensnaring innocent people in secret government dragnets.” All the while, the TSA, despite the billions of dollars we spend on the agency annually and the liberties to which its agents subject travelers, has yet to catch a single terrorist.

No less disconcerting are the rash of incidents in which undercover government agents encourage individuals to commit crimes they might not have engaged in otherwise. This “make work” entrapment scheme runs the gamut from terrorism to drugs. In fact, a recent report released by Human Rights Watch reveals that “nearly all of the highest-profile domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 9/11 featured the ‘direct involvement’ of government agents or informants.”

Most outrageous of all are the asset forfeiture laws that empower law enforcement to rake in huge sums of money by confiscating cash, cars, and even homes based on little more than a suspicion of wrongdoing. In this way, Americans who haven’t been charged with a crime, let alone convicted of wrongdoing, are literally being subjected to highway robbery by government agents offering profit-driven, cash-for-freedom deals.

So who or what is to blame for this bureaucratic nightmare delivered by way of the police state? Is it the White House? Is it Congress? Is it the Department of Homeland Security, with its mobster mindset? Is it some shadowy, power-hungry entity operating off a nefarious plan?

Or is it, as Holocaust survivor Hannah Arendt suggests, the sheepish masses who mindlessly march in lockstep with the government’s dictates—expressing no outrage, demanding no reform, and issuing no challenge to the status quo—who are to blame for the prison walls being erected around us? The author of The Origins of Totalitarianism, Arendt warned that “the greatest evil perpetrated is the evil committed by nobodies, that is, by human beings who refuse to be persons.”

This is where democracy falls to ruin, and bureaucracy and tyranny prevail.

As I make clear in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we have only ourselves to blame for this bureaucratic hell that has grown up around us. Too many of us willingly, knowingly and deliberately comprise what Arendt refers to as “cogs in the mass-murder machine.”

These cogs are none other than those of us who have turned a blind eye to the government corruption, or shrugged dismissively at the ongoing injustices, or tuned out the mayhem in favor of entertainment distractions. Just as guilty are those who have traded in their freedoms for a phantom promise of security, not to mention those who feed the machine unquestioningly with their tax dollars and partisan politics.

And then there are those who work for the government, federal, state, local or contractor. These government employees—the soldiers, the cops, the technicians, the social workers, etc.—are neither evil nor sadistic. They’re simply minions being paid to do a job, whether that job is to arrest you, spy on you, investigate you, crash through your door, etc. However, we would do well to remember that those who worked at the concentration camps and ferried the victims to the gas chambers were also just “doing their jobs.”

Then again, if we must blame anyone, blame the faceless, nameless, bureaucratic government machine—which having been erected and set into motion is nearly impossible to shut down—for the relentless erosion of our freedoms through a million laws, statutes, and prohibitions.

If there is any glimmer of hope to be found, it will be at the local level, but we cannot wait for things to get completely out of control. If you wait to act until the SWAT team is crashing through your door, until your name is placed on a terror watch list, until you are reported for such outlawed activities as collecting rainwater or letting your children play outside unsupervised, then it will be too late.

Obedience is the precondition to totalitarianism, and the precondition to obedience is fear. Regimes of the past and present understand this. “The very first essential for success,” Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “is a perpetually constant and regular employment of violence.” Is this not what we are seeing now with the SWAT teams and the security checkpoints and the endless wars?

This much I know: we are not faceless numbers. We are not cogs in the machine. We are not slaves. We are people, and free people at that. As the Founders understood, our freedoms do not flow from the government. They were not given to us, to be taken away at the will of the State; they are inherently ours. In the same way, the government’s appointed purpose is not to threaten or undermine our freedoms, but to safeguard them.

Until we can get back to this way of thinking, until we can remind Americans what it really means to be a free American, and learn to stand our ground in the face of threats to those freedoms, and encourage our fellow citizens to stop being cogs in the machine, we will continue as slaves in thrall to the bureaucratic police state.

https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_absurd_bureaucratic_hell_that_is_the_american_police_state

Note: Sometimes it’s hard to believe things have gone so far astray, on the other hand people are being pushed to the point of breaking, awakening to the truth and demanding change. When cops shoot someones pet we need to flood the police dept with calls demanding accountability and change in policy, it gets their attention because they know we’re watching. Take peaceful, non-violent action against tyranny in all forms, change always takes place at the grassroots level.

The network of global corporate control identified, PDF


Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder and Stefano Battiston

Chair of Systems Design, ETH Zurich, Kreuzplatz 5, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract
The structure of the control network of transnational corporations affects global market com-
petition and financial stability. So far, only small national samples were studied and there was
no appropriate methodology to assess control globally. We present the first investigation of the
architecture of the international ownership network, along with the computation of the control
held by each global player. We find that transnational corporations form a giant bow-tie struc-
ture and that a large portion of control flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions.
This core can be seen as an economic “super-entity” that raises new important issues both for
researchers and policy makers.
Introduction
A common intuition among scholars and in the media sees the global economy as being domi-
nated by a handful of powerful transnational corporations (TNCs). However, this has not been
confirmed or rejected with explicit numbers. A quantitative investigation is not a trivial task
because firms may exert control over other firms via a web of direct and indirect ownership rela-
tions which extends over many countries. Therefore, a complex network analysis [1] is needed in
order to uncover the structure of control and its implications. Recently, economic networks have
attracted growing attention [2], e.g., networks of trade [3], products [4], credit [5, 6], stock prices
[7] and boards of directors [8, 9]. This literature has also analyzed ownership networks [10, 11],
but has neglected the structure of control at a global level. Even the corporate governance litera-
ture has only studied small national business groups [12]. Certainly, it is intuitive that every large
corporation has a pyramid of subsidiaries below and a number of shareholders above. However,
economic theory does not offer models that predict how TNCs globally connect to each other.
Three alternative hypotheses can be formulated. TNCs may remain isolated, cluster in separated
coalitions, or form a giant connected component, possibly with a core-periphery structure. So
far, this issue has remained unaddressed, notwithstanding its important implications for policy
making. Indeed, mutual ownership relations among firms within the same sector can, in some
cases, jeopardize market competition [13, 14].

Kevin Annett: Sheriffs move to arrest convicted church leaders Bergoglio, Pachon and Welby: Vatican-Crown plan counter attack . . . plus . . . The Court Judgement and Arrest Order against Pope Francis and others


“There are rumors that a price has been put on Annett’s head by Ndrangheta”

An Update from The International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels

July 24, 2014 , 3 pm GMT (Common Cause News Service and copyright)

Brussels, Rome and London:

In the wake of the Court’s criminal conviction of Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, Jesuit head Adolfo Pachon and Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby on July 18, Court-authorized Sheriffs armed with Arrest Warrants are seeking to detain the three convicted men today in London and Rome.

Bergoglio, Pachon and Welby were found guilty of child trafficking and murder by a unanimous decision of the five Magistrates of the Court last Friday, and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.

A spokeswoman for the Court said today,

“Our Sheriffs have notified police authorities in England, Italy and at the Vatican about the conviction, and have asked for their assistance in arresting the guilty parties, who have been issued a Court Order to comply with the verdict, and to surrender themselves to the Sheriffs”

In response, sources in Rome and Brussels have informed the Court that the Vatican is launching a counter attack against the verdict which will include blind media stories attacking the Court and Kevin Annett.

“You can expect an escalation in the hysteria and smears against him and the Court, including from so-called alternative media. Now’s the time for another big distraction to fog your verdict” stated a member of Italy’s Radical Party today.

Politicians and church sources in Rome confirm that the Court verdict has the Pope “extremely worried”. Jesuit leader Adolfo Pachon, also convicted by the Court, has already announced that he will resign at the next Jesuit congress.

In London, Archbishop Welby closeted himself with advisers on July 14 to discuss the Court’s case, during the recent London Synod of the Anglican church. Welby has apparently decided not to leave Lambeth Palace, his official residence in London, and has requested police protection.

But the criminal syndicate known as Ndrangheta, which was publicly exposed by Kevin Annett and the Court as a major actor in child trafficking and murder connected to the Catholic church, is apparently planning a more deadly response.

According to a source in a Belgian police department,

“There are rumors that a price has been put on Annett’s head by Ndrangheta. My contacts say it’s being planned with the Holy Alliance” (the Vatican spy and assassination agency).

The Court is planning to release some of the key evidence that convicted the three church officials no later than September 1, 2014, when a Permanent Commission into Child Trafficking and Ritual Sacrifice will be established to dig deeper into the role of Ndrangheta and major banks in drug money laundering, child trafficking and murder.

A European representative of the Common Law Court, Melanie Vritschan, and Field Secretary Kevin Annett will be holding a global media interview soon to elaborate the evidence and respond to these new threats. Stand by for further updates and instructions.

Issued by The Public Information Office of The International Common Law Court of Justice, Brussels

24 July, 2014, 3 pm GMT

Source: http://www.iclcj.com, http://www.itccs.org

The Court Judgement and Arrest Order against Pope Francis and others

Dear Common Law workers,

Attached are the following pdf documents, for your collective use:

1. The Brussels Common Law Court Judgement and Order concerning the guilt of Bergoglio, Pachon and Welby;

2. The Court’s Citizens’ Arrest Warrant against these three;

3. The Court’s Order to Comply to the three;

4.The Common Law Charter, authorizing the formation of a local Common Law chapter;

5. The Stand Down Order issued to all agents of the Crown (Canadian, English and Australian police, politicians, judges, etc.);

6. The Stand Down Order issued to all agents of the Vatican; and,

​7. The original Order declaring the Crown, Vatican and Canadian government/churches to be criminal organizations.​

​Please use these documents to perform Citizens’ Arrests, occupations and common law court actions. Hand the Stand Down Orders to​
​ local police and judges.

Also, the latest youtube broadcasts are attached, concerning the Court’s Verdict and the Republic:

(Verdict)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbewaA-0_5g&feature=youtu.be (Latest Kevin Annett interview and update)

More coming, thanks,
Kevin Annett img-722105823

http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/07/24/kevin-annett-sheriffs-move-to-arrest-convicted-church-leaders-bergoglio-pachon-and-welby-vatican-crown-plan-counter-attack-plus-the-court-judgement-and-arrest-order-against-pope-francis/

Hawaii and the Kanaka Maoli Peoples Battle for Sovereign Nation Status: OHA (Office Of Hawaiian Affairs) Conflict of Interests and Dept of Interior Public Meetings


Note: Things are really heating up amongst the local population between Native Hawaiians and the 120 year illegal occupation the  U.S. government. Here’s some background information on recent public meetings issued by the U.S. Dept of Interior in late June and early July, 2014. More background information on this unfolding story, is posted to the right under the Hawaiian Sovereignty Issues category.  Mahalo…Annette

MANA statement to the press regarding OHA governing entity. July 16, 2014. 

Aloha mai kākou,

Between June 23 and July 8, the US Department of Interior held 15 hearings in Hawai’i seeking input from Kanaka Maoli on a possible a rule change in federal law that would allow for a government to government relationship with Native Hawaiians. Throughout these packed hearings we witnessed an outpouring of love and patriotism as testimony after testimony rejecting the proposed rule change, rejecting federal recognition and re-affirming over and over that the Kingdom of Hawai’i still exists as a subject of international law. And it is through international law that we expect to move forward to restore justice to our people, lands and government. The passion, love and knowledge expressed at these hearings was awe inspiring and have launched a new era of unified dedication to justice amongst our people.

We call on the Department of Interior and the Obama administration to move forward under the principles of democracy, heed the voice of the people of Hawaii and cease any further support for US federal recognition of Native Hawaiians, despite what efforts particular individuals who claim to represent our people may say or pushing to the contrary.

The Department of Interior called for hearings in Hawaiʻi after a number of back door meetings with representatives from OHA and a few other politicians who were in Washington pushing for federal recognition in violation of their own commitment to the Hawaiian people to facilitate a neutral process toward self-governance. OHA tried to be sneaky but unfortunately for them, what they sparked was a unified, democratic Hawaiian voice who gave a resounding no, no, no, to federal recognition.

After weeks of oral and written testimony in nearly unanimous opposition to federal recognition the only moral action for OHA to take is to abandon Act 195, the Kanaʻolowalu roll and the pursuit of a governing entity as a ‘governing entity’ is only relevant to federal or state recognition. But we have learned that OHA is indeed proceeding with the status quo, proving that they do not represent the concerns and hopes of the Hawaiian community. The question then remains, who is OHA working for? Who do they represent? Why have they turned a deaf ear to the many voices of the people? Why have they abandoned their own publicly announced commitment to an open and neutral process, their own commitment to be “hands off”.

OHA might state they are obliged to the 125,000 on the Native Hawaiian roll, also known as Kanaʻiolowalu. We would remind OHA that they are obliged to all beneficiaries, 3/4 of whom chose not to sign up for the roll. We must also emphasize that 3/4 of the so called 125,000 names on the roll did not chose to be on the roll but rather were hijacked by Kanaʻiolowalu from other Native Hawaiian databases. In addition, many have found the names of deceased relatives who passed away before the roll was ever created and who the roll commission will not allow living loved ones to disenroll, this being one of the most egregious and deceptive flaws of the roll.

OHA cannot move forward with the corrupted and offensive native hawaiian roll and cannot move toward a so called governing entity. Doing so without any mandate or consent of the people is unprincipled and undemocratic. And it promotes division and disunity among our people and will only result in calls for escalated resistance, disengagement and direct action.  MANA calls for a process of fair and open dialogue where every voice is heard and all opportunities for education is encouraged and where open, free dialogue and debate is required. We have full faith in our community to truly speak for themselves in a clear, educated and unified voice. OHA disregard for such demonstrates their own fear of the wishes and concerns of an educated lahui.

In closing, we want to acknowledge and thank everyone in the community who came out to speak at the Department of Interior hearings, no matter what side of the issue you took. under international law. Today we stand here as MANA, movement for aloha no ka aina. Our message to the lahui is to remain steadfast! Heed the call of the Queen and onipaa! We call on the lāhui to organize your families, your neighborhoods and your mokus. To hold your own public dialogues and educational forums. Continue to have full faith in yourselves, and in your communities and in the lāhui.  We will continue to speak for ourselves in a clear, educated and unified voice. We know who we are. We are kanaka maoli, we are Hawaiian nationals. We are not Americans! The US has no legal authority over our nation and we will continue to challenge them to prove otherwise.

But we challenge OHA to have the same faith in our community.

We challenge OHA to put resources toward education that will bring to light the full range of options for the restoration of our government and assets that are available to us under international law. Stop campaigning and start educating!

And we challenge OHA to a public debate with other members of the community over our pathway forward.

E ola ka aina, e ola Papahanaumoku, e ola Mauna Kea, e ola Moananuiakea, e ola na kupuna, e ola ka lahui Hawaii, e ola ke aupuni Hawaii. E ola! Aloha Aina.

Red Ribbons for our Country

Picture Aloha ʻĀina Kākou, 

We’re encouraging everyone who supports Hawaiian Independence, and who feels that Queen Liliuʻokalani and the tens of thousands of our kūpuna who protested against annexation to the US is grounds to contest their presence in our islands to wear a Red Ribbon

The red ribbon represents Queen Lili’uokalani’s letter of protest against annexation and the cession of her lands and country:

“I, Lili’uokalani of Hawaii, by the Will of God, named heir-apparent on the tenth day of April A.D. 1877, and by the Grace of God, Queen of the Hawaiian Islands on the 17th day of January, A.D. 1893, do hereby protest against the ratification of a certain treaty which so I am informed has been signed at Washington by Messrs. Hatch Thurston and Kinney, purporting to cede those Islands to the territory and dominion of the United States. I declare such treaty to be an act of wrong toward the native and part native people of Hawaii, an invasion of the rights of the ruling chiefs, in violation of international rights both towards my people and towards friendly nations with whom they have made treaties, the perpetuation of the fraud whereby the constitutional government was overthrown and finally an act of gross injustice to me.”

We carry on the kuleana to see justice for our people, for our country and for our Queen. Make a red ribbon yourself or look for MANA organizers at the DOI meetings with Red Ribbons to give away to whoever wants one. 

If you make one yourself, fold the ribbon so that it takes the shape of an upside down V. Don’t loop it or it will look too much like other campaign ribbons. Lets make our ribbons distinct. Use a small safety pin to attach it on the left side above the heart to represent our deep seated love for our land, country and queen.


Basic Talking Points for Department of Interior Hearings

Basic Talking Points for the Department of Interior:

by MANA, Movement for Aloha No ka Aina

The Department of the Interior should not assist the Native Hawaiian community in reorganizing our government or  facilitate the reestablishment of a government to government relationship.

The Department of Interior should also not involve itself or support the current State of Hawaii-driven efforts to establish a governing entity.

We base our position upon the the following Principles of Nation Building:

1) We believe that nation building cannot be initiated, controlled or monitored by the occupying state or state representatives at the national or local level.

2) We believe that any nation building efforts must start with us, the lahui kanaka (larger Hawaiian community), from the bottom up, not top down.

3) We believe that terms of reconciliation must be set by those who have been injured, not by the offending party.

4) We believe that clauses and conditions granting the United States sovereign immunity and indemnification upholds ultimate power with the US and prohibits true reconciliation.

We reject and condemn any offers or models that do not uphold these principles. 

The current State of Hawai’i and Department of Interior involvement in nation building do not uphold these principles.

Furthermore…

We believe the Hawaiian people can and will produce a peaceful and just resolution of the political and legal problems created by the US if we are not prevented from growing on our own pace and according to its own ideals.

We do not want just a “governing body” or “entity.” We want the restoration of our independent government and we deserve nothing less than that.

We have earned, through our patience and non-violent persistence, the trust of many of those who inhabit these islands along side us that we will not disenfranchise others nor deprive others of their rights.

We insist on claiming our rights as a sovereign people and on the US and state policy makers keeping their hands off our efforts.

Lastly, the question over the United States’ legal authority or jurisdiction over our nation remains unresolved: namely, does the Hawaiian Kingdom, as a sovereign independent State, continue to exist as a subject of international law? Resolving this question is a fundamental first step in reconciliation as called for in US Public Law 103-150, the Apology Resolution of 1993.

Testimony to DOI Advanced Notice of Rule Making

June 22, 2014

To: Representatives of the US Dept of the Interior and Dept of Justice
From: MANA (Movement for Aloha no ke ʻĀina)
Re: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making

Aloha, 

We welcome the representatives of the US Department of Interior and the US Department of Justice to Honolulu and thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of Kanaka Maoli seeking the restoration of our independent government. Our testimony in response to questions (i) and (ii) is that the Department of the Interior should not facilitate the reestablishment of a government to government relationship with the Native Hawaiian community, and should not assist the Native Hawaiian community in reorganizing its government. Nor do we support the DOIs involvement or support in the current State of Hawaii-driven efforts to establish a governing entity, which is a process designed entirely without the input of the community and which has been vigorously criticized and opposed at a number of recent community forums.

We believe that the Departments of Interior and Justice have a critical responsibility to protect the assets and resources of Kānaka Maoli and that this responsibility derives in part from Senate Bill 103-150, the Apology Resolution of 1993. This apology committed the United States to an undetermined process of reconciliation. However, the creation of a government to government relationship with any entity but a restored, independent, Hawaiian government would not be reconciliation but an additional US aggression upon our nation.

Already, the U.S. has perpetrated numerous crimes against our people including: a)  a determinative role in the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani’s lawfully constituted government and in its replacement by a  non-elected republican government composed of a coterie of U.S.-born  subjects of the Queen; b) the rapid and rapacious appropriation of our lands, waters and other resources; c) the attempted erasure of our history, language and culture; and d) the strangling of our diplomatic relationships with other nations in the world. These actions all constitute violations of our collective right of self-determination and also of our human rights.

The United States has in fact violated the sovereignty of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the Kānaka Maoli collective right to self-determination by refusing to allow the restoration of the government it helped unseat in 1893.  Inasmuch as US never conquered our Kingdom which resisted takeover using diplomatic, not military means, nor executed a valid treaty of cession/annexation with us, either one of which was required at the time for an annexation to be valid under international law, the US has no legal authority over our nation.

In fact the attacks on the Hawaiian organizations like OHA and DHHL have principally come from right-wing American organizations who have, in American courts, asserted that the very existence of assets, resources and Hawaiian agencies which manage and protect them violate the rights of all other Americans who do not have access to those assets because of their race.  This threat to our people and our national lands would not exist if Hawaiʻi’s independence was restored.  So the US, by removing our government and by refusing to allow its restoration creates and maintains the political and legal threats to the few assets that still benefit Kanaka.

What the US ought to do between now and the restoration of our full independence is to officially recognize an interim trust relationship with Kānaka Maoli inasmuch as it holds our lands and resources depriving us of their benefits. Indeed, the United Nations imposed this international trust relationship on the U.S. when, after W.W. II, it placed Hawai’i on the list of non-self governing territories which, it later declared, must be decolonized.  As we are not now able to exercise our sovereignty in our own country, the US must also assure in this transitional period that the Hawaiian people do not lose the rights and prerogatives, however inadequate, that have been garnered by Hawaiians since the American takeover: OHA revenues; Hawaiian Homelands; special health and education funds; gathering and access rights, to name a few.

The US government should simply acknowledge that the Hawaiian people have agencies in place that advocate for Kanaka and manage their resources and that neither the courts nor Congress should diminish their mandates.  In other words, the US should inflict no more harm as the Hawaiian nation continues to unify and strengthen itself.  We call on the Department of the Interior to consult with other federal agencies, experts in international law and its own constitutional experts to determine rules and procedures that would allow federal protections of Kanaka Maoli assets without establishing a government to government relationship.

An increasing number of people believe that restoration of our independent government is not only viable and reasonable but inevitable. This makes the political climate and future in Hawaiʻi very different, and somewhat more precarious than in 1959 when Congress declared Hawaiʻi a state, in 1993 when tens of thousands of Hawaiians were seeking limited self-government, or even in 1999 when representatives from Interior and Justice came to Hawaiʻi seeking to begin a process of reconciliation. There has been considerable nation building since then, and a dramatic change in the interpretation of the history of our loss. The Department of the Interior and the State of Hawaiʻi should not attempt to influence or interfere with the nation building that has been ongoing among Kānaka for the past thirty years. The good will and aloha shown by Hawaiian patriots will quickly sour if either the US or the State of Hawaiʻi uses tactics to divide and alienate our people from one another.

We believe the Hawaiian sovereignty movement can and will produce a peaceful and just resolution of the political and legal problems created by the US if it is not prevented from growing at its own pace and according to its own ideals. We do not want just any governing body. We want the restoration of our independent government and we deserve nothing less than that. Through our patience and non-violent persistence, we have earned the trust of those who inhabit these islands along side us that we will not disenfranchise others nor deprive others of their rights. We do insist, however, on claiming our rights as a sovereign people and on the U.S. and state policy makers keeping their hands off our efforts.

Mahalo,
MANA
Movement for Aloha No Ka ʻĀina

Ikaika Hussey, Camille Kalama, Noelani Goodyear Kaʻōpua, Terri Kekoʻolani, ʻIlima Long, Andre Perez, and Jonathan Osorio

MANA position on OHA nation building submitted as testimony at 5/29/14 Board of Trustees meeting

May 29, 2014

MANA continues to oppose the settler-state process initiated by Act 195 for a number of reasons that we feel are in alignment with the values of Aloha ‘Åina. We will not allow our self-determination to be administered by the United States. Our principles are expressed in the following document along with some of the fundamental problems with the current OHA-led nation-building process.

Act 195

  • State of Hawaiʻi legislation – with no lāhui consultation

  • Forced OHA to fund Kanaʻiolowalu

  • Act 195 gave the governor the power to appoint a five-member Native Hawaiian Roll Commission to build the foundation for self-determination. Key leaders in self-determination and nation building efforts should be appointed by the Hawaiian people, not the Hawaiʻi State Governor

Kanaʻiolowalu

  • Kanaʻiolowalu owes its existence to Act 195.

  • According to Act 195, the function of the roll is to create “a reorganized Native Hawaiian governing entity.”  The terms “reorganized governing entity” and “reorganization” have a specific history, or genealogy, within US law going back to the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act, which allowed for limited self-governance under US plenary power (supreme authority). 
  • The sole kuleana of the Native Hawaiian roll commission is to prepare and maintain a roll of “qualified Native Hawaiians” and to certify that the individuals on the roll are of Native Hawaiian ancestry
  • Numerous commissioners stepped outside the scope of their appointment duties and lobbied in Washington DC while they were serving as commissioners without the knowledge of the Hawaiian community.

  • According to Act 195, “the members of the qualified Native Hawaiian roll, and their descendants, shall be acknowledged by the State of Hawaiʻi as the indigenous, aboriginal, maoli population of Hawaiʻi.” A native roll will give authority to the state to establish who is Native Hawaiian and limit it exclusively to those who signed up for the roll. The threat of exclusion from the state responsibilities to Native Hawaiians is a coercive tactic to get Native Hawaiians to sign up with the roll.


Native Rolls

  • Rolls are directly related to Indian law and tribal recognition through the Daws Act which was initiated to quantify tribal members for limited land allotments and monies.
  • Rolls are used to distribute limited resources by the federal government to the tribal members. The smaller the roll, the larger the share of federal monies roll members receive. This fostered competition almost always results in competition within tribes over who should count as a member and who should not.

  • Blood quantum has been a mechanism by which to determine how little or many native people will count as a member of the tribe.

Act 77

  • Due to lack of response from Hawaiian community to sign up for the roll, Act 77 is created to allow Kanʻiolowalu to hijack the names of nearly 100,000 Hawaiians from other databases: Kau Inoa, OHA’s Hawaiian Registry and Operation ‘Ohana programs.

  • There are more names on the roll through Kau Inoa than those who signed up directly for Kanaʻiolowalu.

  • The majority of people on the roll are on without their free, prior and informed consent.

Hoʻoulu Lāhui

  • Nation building plan designed by OHA Ad Hoc Committee with no lāhui representation or consultation.

  • Despite committing to neutrality, within less than a week of their announcement, OHA trustees and Kanaʻiolowalu commissioners and other Hawaiian politicians were in DC lobbying the Department of Interior to find an alternate way to recognize Native Hawaiians as a tribe.

  • As a result of OHA and Kanaʻiolowalu’s lobbying, the Department of Interior, who governs American Indian Tribes and their lands, is preparing a visit to Hawaiʻi for consultations. This further indicates the work being done behind closed doors to push through federal recognition.


Inherent Sovereignty

  • Inherent sovereignty is directly related to indian law and operates within the U.S. framework.

  • Inherent sovereignty means the authority to govern is not granted by another government, but by the consent of the people who are governed. Indian tribal governments have inherent sovereignty.

  • Seeking inherent sovereignty comes with pre-determined outcomes.


Self-Determination

  • Self-determination is a core principle in international law that accords all nations and peoples the right to freely-determine their political status. It specifically includes independence.

  • Self-determination cannot be initiated, controlled or monitored by the occupying state.

  • All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights article 15 states that everyone has the right to a nationality and that no one should be arbitrarily deprived of a nationality or denied the right to change nationality.

Position and Recommendations

  • OHA should not utilize the Kanaʻiolowalu roll and instead use a voter registration process
  • Disassociate the process of organizing our people from State and Federal government
  • Ensure that proper education and outreach is provided equally across the pae ‘āina to ensure informed decision making.
  • Include lāhui representation on all planning committees and at all stages of self-determination efforts followed by consultation and approval.
  • Support ground level people’s organizing efforts toward independence
  • Continue to urge the US Department of State for a clear and thorough response to the four questions put forward in Dr.Kamanaʻopono Crabbe’s letter to Secretary of State John Kerry.
  • Provide equal funding and work into pursuing all pathways to independence, including UN decolonization and de-occupation through international courts.
Link to more information on the Kanaka Maoli’s battle for international sovereign status and independence from U.S. occupation: http://www.manainfo.com/

Law & Getting Back Our Sovereignty, Part 3 with Andrew Bartzis, Rebecca Cope, Jennifer Pippin and Christina Winsey


Streamed live on Jul 18, 2014

If you want to understand more about the corruption of our financial system and how to protect yourself come hear Andrew Bartzis, and Rebecca Cope, along with guests Jennifer Pippin and Christina Winsey telling their own stories interacting with the corruption of the courts and banks. Get other vital information you will want to know. To be forewarned is forearmed!
Google Hangout at 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific

Adventures into Sovereignty on BBS radio will join the show tonight at 11pm Eastern / 8 pm Pacific. http://www.bbsradio.com/adventuresint…

FREE RESOURCES

1. http://ww1.budhibbs.com/ Expert in consumer credit
2. http://www.whpgs.org/f.htm (great resource)
3. http://elangdell.cali.org/ (great resource – make use of it!)
4. http://freedom-school.com/ (a lot of good info, but be careful – all of it is not applicable in everyday litigation)
5. http://law.onecle.com/
6. http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc
7. http://sedm.org/ (a lot of good info, but be careful – all of it is not applicable in everyday litigation)
8. http://famguardian.org/ (a lot of good info, but be careful – all of it is not applicable in everyday litigation)
9. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home….
10. http://www.nclc.org/
11. http://www.operationrest.org/
12. http://paularush.com/
13. http://livinglies.wordpress.com/
14. http://4closurefraud.org/
15. http://www.ruleoflawradio.com/
16. http://sites.google.com/site/judicial…
17. http://law.wustl.edu/sba/firstyearout…
18. http://law.wustl.edu/sba/firstyearout…
19. http://www.msfraud.org/LAW/Lounge/Wel…
20. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_VCn… (Dan Benham)
21. http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2013…
22. http://mattweidnerlaw.com/wp-content/…
23. http://www.onelbriefs.com/
24. http://www.JulioMartinezClark.com
25. http://www.naca.net National Association of Consumer Advocates
26. Finding & Citing Case Law: on Google Scholar: http://www.Google.com then click on the 9 dot icon (looks like this:
. . .
. . .
. . .
and keep clicking “more” until you get to Google Scholar

27. http://www.i-uv.com
28. http://www.absolute-data-exchange.com
29. http://www.AmericanKabuki.com
30. Fraudclosure Fighters on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/21999…
31. http://www.bbsradio.com/adventuresint…
32. Christina Winsey — TheICanDoctor@gmail.com Guest speaker on http://www.bbsradio.com/adventuresint… July 18, 2014

Not Free But Important and Affordable

Two absolute musts: Not free but vital for foundational learning basics of the law when it comes to law suits and how to handle them (Jurisdictionary); and foreclosure law (Robert Janes)

1. Jurisdictionary Basic Course in the Law: http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=WC0020
2. Robert Janes (expert, retired attorney): http://www.fightingtheforeclosuremach… MUST have the book Fighting the Foreclosure Machine.

Important — extremely helpful Experts, Networks:
1. Fighter and Advocate of the Movement – Case analyst, strategy witness for the homeowner: Anthony Martinez at Who Stole Your Loan radio and
a. http://www.DiscoveryTactics.com
b. http://www.amaexperts.com
2. http://www.WhatLiesInYourDebt.com – videos, webinars, weekly Q & A calls, resources, explanations, sample documents, Black’s law dictionary and more.
3. http://afnetwork.org/ – The Anti-Foreclosure Network: weekly Q & A calls, mock trials and hearings, tons of resources on the website for members. Skype group.
4. http://privateaudio.homestead.com/Ind…
5. http://www.HISAdvocates.org Q&A calls, resources on the website for members.
6. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/… http://privateaudio.homestead.com/The…
7. http://www.NewEarthNation.org

Common Law Grand Jury’s ~ Hagan Smith


Florida February 19, 2014 WOCA Radio Interview with Hagan Smith on the Common Law Grand Jury

New Earth Nation Radio ~ Law & Getting Back Our Sovereignty ~ Andrew Bartzis, Rod Class, Rebecca Cope & Jennifer Birmingham


This is a unique show where we take back sovereignty by exploring the corruption prevalent in many of our ‘courts of law.’ This show builds upon the last week’s New Earth Nation show, Independence Day Law & Sovereignty Kick Off (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwEcs…).

Here you can find the New Earth Treaty: http://www.newearthnation.org/new-ear…

Hosted by Andrew Bartzis & Rebecca Cope with very special guests Rod Class and Jennifer Williams.

How CONTEMPT OF COURT is a violation of their laws, and talk about possible ways to handle it to let the Courts know that we, the people, will no longer tolerate the fraud.
Rod and Jennifer will each share their discoveries including what’s happening with the DC Case, and the War Powers Act behind all the “criminal” charges, the Interview at Lake Norman, and Jennifer’s Birmingham Jail experience for Contempt of Court: how she stayed centered and came out of there without ever giving Jurisdiction or her signature.

Talkshoe AIB Radio / for email support: mentor2@gmail.com to be included on the Big List

To contact Rebecca Cope: rebecca@humanitad.org

%d bloggers like this: