FREE Episode: New Season of Buzzsaw – Forbidden Knowledge for a New Age with Billy Carson ~ Gaia


Watch Now, only on Gaia: http://bit.ly/BZZ4bidden
Series Home Page: http://bit.ly/BuzzsawOnGaia

As the dull roar of mainstream media lulls the masses into mindless complacency, a Buzzsaw cuts through the din of the mainstream narrative to explore hidden truths and reawaken the planet. Join Sean Stone as he takes an unflinching look into the hidden agendas behind world politics, popular culture and news events.

Join Gaia.com for $0.99: http://bit.ly/99centsBuzzsaw

Gaia Inc
Boulder, CO
866-284-8058
http://www.gaia.com

Join our email list for FREE articles: http://bit.ly/gaiaemails

Connect with us on Social:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Gaia
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/yogaongaia
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GaiaVideo
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/YogaOnGaia
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JoinGaia
Instagram: @wearegaia @yogaongaia

#gaia #Buzzsaw #SeanStone #4biddenknowledge #BillyCarson

FREE Episode: Hidden Origins with Michael Tellinger (Season 1, Episode 3) Ancient Sounds and Symbols ~ Gaia


Series Home Page: http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Michael Tellinger describes the importance of sound and symbolism for many cultures throughout the world. Across the ages many civilizations bore many commonalities, such as the prevalence of gold and many similar symbols shared throughout their unique cultures. It is the predominance of sound with sacred practices and architectural designs which this points toward a common origin, or at least to the many links which interweave these civilization across the centuries

http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Sign up for our email list, seekers only please:
http://bit.ly/gaiaemails

Gaia Inc
Boulder, CO
866-284-8058
https://www.gaia.com
Connect with us on Social:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Gaia
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/yogaongaia
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GaiaVideo
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yogaongaia
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JoinGaia
Instagram: @wearegaia @yogaongaia

#gaia #michaeltellinger #hiddenorigins

FREE Episode: Hidden Origins with Michael Tellinger (Season 1, Episode 2) The Power of Gold ~ Gaia TV


Series Home Page: http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Uncover the clues that expose humanity’s true origins as Michael Tellinger reveals secrets hidden within ancient stone circles and artifacts. These secrets could help us once again reclaim our true power and create a new world of abundance and opportunity for all.

Everything we have been told about our history is a lie. The stories that have shaped our society, as we know it, are falsehoods concocted by the victors of our planet’s many wars. However, evidence found in ancient texts and sacred sites reveal that discovering who we are and what we have become is only part of humanity’s hidden origins.

http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Sign up for our email list, seekers only please:
http://bit.ly/gaiaemails

Gaia Inc
Boulder, CO
866-284-8058
https://www.gaia.com
Connect with us on Social:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Gaia
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/yogaongaia
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GaiaVideo
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yogaongaia
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JoinGaia
Instagram: @wearegaia @yogaongaia

#gaia #michaeltellinger #hiddenorigins

Full Episode: Hidden Origins with Michael Tellinger (Season 1, Episode 1) on Gaia


Series Home Page: http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Uncover the clues that expose humanity’s true origins as Michael Tellinger reveals secrets hidden within ancient stone circles and artifacts. These secrets could help us once again reclaim our true power and create a new world of abundance and opportunity for all.

Everything we have been told about our history is a lie. The stories that have shaped our society, as we know it, are falsehoods concocted by the victors of our planet’s many wars. However, evidence found in ancient texts and sacred sites reveal that discovering who we are and what we have become is only part of humanity’s hidden origins.

http://bit.ly/RethinkYourOrigins

Sign up for our email list, seekers only please:
http://bit.ly/gaiaemails

Gaia Inc
Boulder, CO
866-284-8058
https://www.gaia.com
Connect with us on Social:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Gaia
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/yogaongaia
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/GaiaVideo
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yogaongaia
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/JoinGaia
Instagram: @wearegaia @yogaongaia

#gaia #michaeltellinger #hiddenorigins

Sharon Daphna – Energetic War on Humanity and How to Win ~ 5D Event


Note: Fascinating and inspiring presentation! Was really disappointed with Sharon’s feedback on Dane Wigington’s alleged motives and his absolute refusal to support Sharon’s research and the work her group has done to mitigate chemtrail toxins in the state of California. I was recently guided to pull my energy from Dane’s work, it just didn’t feel right anymore – something was amiss,.  Now I understand the underlying reason why that guidance came forth.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5D Nirvana Event – 2016 LAX Hilton
http://www.5DEvent.com
Watch more amazing talks at 5D-TV / 5DStream.com
http://www.5DStream.com

Who Determines a State of War Exists in International Law? by Hawaiian Kingdom


loweringtheflagofthehawaiiankingdomandrepublic

There has been some confusion as to who, in particular, determines whether a state of war exists for international law purposes. Is it a decision made by army commanders, international courts, or the heads of state? To answer this question we first need to understand the term war. By definition, war is a violent contention between two or more countries, called States, which is allowable under international law.

War as it is understood today is different from what it was understood in the nineteenth century when the Hawaiian Kingdom government was unlawfully overthrown by United States armed forces on January 17, 1893. According to Professor Brownlie, “The right of war, as an aspect of sovereignty, which existed in the period before 1914, subject to the doctrine that war was a means of last resort in the enforcement of legal rights, was very rarely asserted either by statesmen or works of authority without some stereotyped plea to a right of self-preservation, and of self-defence, or to necessity or protection of vital interests, or merely alleged injury to rights or national honour and dignity.” (Ian Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States (1963) 41).

In the absence of a system of dispute resolution, such as today’s Permanent Court of Arbitration (est. 1899) or the International Court of Justice (est. 1945), war was seen as a form of judicial procedure, a litigation of sorts between nations that involved lethal punishment. It was a means by which one State could obtain redress for wrongs committed against it. War, however, was considered a course of last resort.

“It was generally thought that a state of war came into existence between two countries if, and only if, one of these countries made it clear that it regarded itself as being in a state of war,” says Judge Greenwood. (Christopher Greenwood, “Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law,” in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (2nd ed., 2008) 45). Representatives of countries in international law are Heads of States, whether they are Presidents, Monarchs or Prime Ministers. Any political determination made by these Heads of States that their countries are in a state of war is conclusive. In the case of the United States it would the President, and in the case of the Hawaiian Kingdom it would be the Monarch.

International law differentiates a “declaration of war” from a “state of war.” According to McNair and Watts, “the absence of a declaration…will not of itself render the ensuing conflict any less a war.” In other words, since a state of war is based upon concrete facts of military action there is no requirement for a formal declaration of war to be made. In 1946, a United States Federal Court had to determine whether a United States naval captain’s life insurance policy, which excluded coverage if death came about as a result of war, covered his death during the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1945. The family of the captain was arguing that the United States was not a war at the time of his death because the Congress did not declare war against Japan until the following day. The Court denied the family’s claim and determined, “that the formal declaration by the Congress on December 8th was not an essential prerequisite to a political determination of the existence of a state of war commencing with the attack on Pearl Harbor.” (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Bennion, 158 F.2d 260 (C.C.A. 10th, 1946), 41 American Journal of International Law (1947), 682).

cannon252520on252520the252520steps252520of252520iolani252520palace25255b325255d_thumb25255b425255d

On the 100th anniversary of the United States unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom government in 1893, the United States Congress enacted a joint resolution offering an apology. Of significance in the resolution was a particular “whereas” clause, which stated “Whereas, in a message to Congress on December 18, 1893, President Grover Cleveland reportedly fully and accurately on the illegal acts of the conspirators, described such acts as an ‘act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress, and acknowledged that by such acts the government of a peaceful and friendly people was overthrown.” (Annexure 2Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, 119 International Law Reports (2001) 612).

At first read, it would appear that the “conspirators” were the subjects that committed the “act of war,” but this is misleading. First, under international law, only a country can commit an “act of war”, whether through its military and/or its diplomats; and, second, under municipal laws, which are the laws applicable to a particular country, conspirators within a country could only commit treason not “acts of war.” These two concepts are reflective in the terms coup de main and coup d’état. The former is a successful invasion by an outside military force, while the former is a successful internal revolt, which was also referred to in the nineteenth century as a revolution. According to the United States Department of Defense, a coup de main is an “offensive operation that capitalizes on surprise and simultaneous execution of supporting operations to achieve success in one swift stroke.” (U.S. Department of Defense, The Dictionary of Military Terms (2009)).

In a petition to President Cleveland on December 27, 1893, from the Hawaiian Patriotic League, its leadership, comprised of Hawaiian statesmen and lawyers, clearly articulated the difference between a “revolution” and a “coup de main,” and, as such, an international crime was committed. The petition read:

“Last January, a political crime was committed, not only against the legitimate Sovereign of the Hawaiian Kingdom, but also against the whole of the Hawaiian nation, a nation who, for the past sixty years, had enjoyed free and happy constitutional self-government. This was done by a coup de main of U.S. Minister Stevens, in collusion with a cabal of conspirators, mainly faithless sons of missionaries and local politicians angered by continuous political defeat, who, as revenge for being a hopeless minority in the country, resolved to ‘rule or ruin’ through foreign help. The facts of this ‘revolution,’ was it is improperly called, are now a matter of history.” (Petition of the Hawaiian Patriotic League to President Cleveland (Dec. 27, 1893), The Executive Documents of the House of Representatives (1895), 1295).

Whether by chance or design, the 1993 Congressional Apology Resolution did not accurately reflect what President Cleveland stated in his message to Congress on December 18, 1893. When Cleveland stated the “military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war,” he was referring to United States armed forces and not to any of the conspirators. Cleveland noted, “that on the 16th day of January, 1893, between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, a detachment of marines from the United States steamer Boston, with two pieces of artillery, landed at Honolulu. The men, upwards of 160 in all, were supplied with double cartridge belts filled with ammunition and with haversacks and canteens, and were accompanied by a hospital corps with stretchers and medical supplies.” Clearly the act of war was committed by the armed forces of the United States. The landing, however, was just the beginning stage of a coup de main with the ultimate goal of seizing control of the Hawaiian government.

As part of the plan, the U.S. diplomat, John Stevens, would prematurely recognize the small group of insurgents on January 17th as if they were a successful revolution thereby giving it de facto status. International law, however, provides the parameters by which a revolution is deemed to have been successful. Foreign States would acknowledge success when an insurgency has secured complete control of all governmental machinery, no opposition by the lawful government, and has the acquiescence of the national population. According to Professor Lauterpacht, “So long as the revolution has not been successful, and so long as the lawful government…remains within national territory and asserts its authority, it is presumed to represent the State as a whole.” (E. Lauterpacht, Recognition in International Law (1947) 93). With full knowledge of what constitutes a successful revolution, Cleveland provided a blistering indictment:

“When our Minister recognized the provisional government the only basis upon which it rested was the fact that the Committee of Safety…declared it to exist. It was neither a government de facto nor de jure. That it was not in such possession of the Government property and agencies as entitled it to recognition is conclusively proved by a note found in the files of the Legation at Honolulu, addressed by the declared head of the provisional government to Minister Stevens, dated January 17, 1893, in which he acknowledges with expressions of appreciation the Minister’s recognition of the provisional government, and states that it is not yet in the possession of the station house (the place where a large number of the Queen’s troops were quartered), though the same had been demanded of the Queen’s officers in charge.”

“Premature recognition is a tortious act against the lawful government,” explains Professor Lauterpacht, which “is a breach of international law.” (Ibid, 95). And according to Stowell, a “foreign state which intervenes in support of [insurgents] commits an act of war against the state to which it belongs, and steps outside the law of nations in time of peace.” (Ellery C. Stowell, Intervention in International Law (1921) 349, n. 75). Furthermore Stapleton, states, “Of all the principles in the code of international law, the most important—the one which the independent existence of all weaker States must depend—is this: no State has a right FORCIBLY to interfere in the internal concerns of another State.” (Augustus Granville Stapleton, Intervention and Non-Intervention (1866) 6).

Cleveland then explained to the Congress the egregious effects these acts of war had upon the Hawaiian government and its apprehension of a “cabal of conspirators” who committed high treason.

135_w_full

“Nevertheless, this wrongful recognition by our Minister placed the Government of the Queen in a position of most perilous perplexity. On the one hand she had possession of the palace, of the barracks, and of the police station, and had at her command at least five hundred fully armed men and several pieces of artillery. Indeed, the whole military force of her kingdom was on her side and at her disposal, while the Committee of Safety, by actual search, had discovered that there were but very few arms in Honolulu that were not in the service of the Government. In this state of things if the Queen could have dealt with the insurgents alone her course would have been plain and the result unmistakable. But the United States had allied itself with her enemies, had recognized them as the true Government of Hawaii, and had put her and her adherents in the position of opposition against lawful authority. She knew that she could not withstand the power of the United States, but she believed that she might safely trust to its justice. Accordingly, some hours after the recognition of the provisional government by the United States Minister, the palace, the barracks, and the police station, with all the military resources of the country, were delivered up by the Queen upon the representation made to her that her cause would thereafter be reviewed at Washington, and while protesting that she surrendered to the superior force of the United States, whose Minister had caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the provisional government, and that she yielded her authority to prevent collision of armed forces and loss of life and only until such time as the United States, upon the facts being presented to it, should undo the action of its representative and reinstate her in the authority she claimed as the constitutional sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.”

According to Professor Wright, “War begins when any state of the world manifests its intention to make war by some overt act, which may take the form of an act of war.” Quincy Wright, “Changes in the Concept of War,” 18 American Journal of International Law (1924) 758). In his review of customary international law in the nineteenth century, Professor Brownlie concluded, “that in so far a ‘state of war’ had any generally accepted meaning it was a situation regarded by one or both parties to a conflict as constituting a ‘state of war.’” (Brownlie, 38).

Cleveland concluded by an “act of war…the Government of a feeble but friendly and confiding people has been overthrown.” More importantly, Cleveland referred to the Hawaiian people as “friendly and confiding,” not “hostile.” This is a classic case of where the United States President admits an unjust war, but a state of war nevertheless. In the absence of a treaty or agreement to end the state of war that has ensued for over a century, international humanitarian law regulates the Hawaiian situation.

These are the very matters that will come before the International Commission of Inquiry: Incidents of War Crimes in the Hawaiian Islands—The Larsen Case.

 

Dynastic Temple Of Isis In Egypt ~ Brien Foerster


Though beautiful in execution, the Isis Temple is not as profound a construction as the much older works in Egypt that had to have been made using lost ancient high technology. Join us March 5 to 19 2018 as we explore more: https://hiddenincatours.com/shop/tour…

Hollow Earth vs Honeycomb Earth and Inner Earth Civilizations – Corey Goode SphereBeing Alliance


Corey Goode in Kona, Hawaii discussing the Inner Earth Civilizations and the Secret Space Program.

www.SphereBeingAlliance.com
www.BlueAvians.com
www.ComicDisclosure.com

Rothschild’s British Concentration Camps: Way Back When, It Was A Means To Usurp/Destroy The Gold/Silver Standard ~ Only Then To Be Replaced By Rothschild’s Keynesian Economics ‘Derivative Fiat Paper’


“They are not buried here; they are planted. And they will for ever be growing in the hearts of the Boer people.”

In 1900, Rothschild’s Britain invaded the Boer Republics, stole the gold mines, turned the Western Transvaal into a “smoking desert” (in their own words), imprisoned 110,000 women and children in concentration camps where 28,000 of them died, then, after the war, they tried and shot 2 Boer officers for “misusing a flag of truce”! You’re wasting your time looking for justice in any post-war trial. They are simply a continuation of the war. [Interview] CARLOS W. PORTER

[Red Cross put Dachau at 18,000, Auschwitz at 53,000 deaths.  Rothschild’s Boer Concentration Camps ~ A report after the war concluded that 27,927 Boers (of whom 24,074 [50% of the Boer child population] were children under 16) had died of starvation, disease and exposure in the concentration camps. In all, about one in four (25%) of the Boer inmates, mostly children, died.]

The Rothschild British Should Have Never Been Here!

British Concentration Camps

Just over a century ago during the Boer War, the British were responsible for about 27,000 deaths of innocent women and children who were rounded up and placed in British concentration camps after burning them out of their own farms and settlements in (now) South Africa.

The Second War of Independence was fought from 1899 to 1902 when England laid her hands on the mineral riches of (Transvaal) under the false pretense of protecting the rights of the foreigners who swarmed to the Transvaal gold fields.

On the battlefield England failed to get the better of the Boers (Dutch-descendants), and then decided to stoop to a full-scale war against the Boer women and children, employing a holocaust to force the burghers to surrender.

Under the command of Kitchener, Milner and Roberts, more than homesteads and farms belonging to Boer people were plundered and burned down. Animals belonging to the Boers were killed in the cruelest ways possible while the women, whose men were on the battlefield, had to watch helplessly. The motive behind this action was the destruction of the farms in order to prevent the fighting burghers from obtaining food, and to demoralize the Boers by leaving their women and children homeless on the open field.

The Second Boer War – Howick Concentration Camp.

However, England misjudged the steel of the Boer people. Despite their desperate circumstances, the women and children managed to survive fairly well in the open and their men continued their fight against the [foreign] invader.

More severe measures had to be taken. The English hoarded the Boer women and children into open cattle trucks or drove them on foot to concentration camps. To the world, England pretended to act very humanely by caring for the fighting Boers’ women and children in “refugee camps”.

The Cape Argus of 21 June 1900 clearly states that the destitution of these women and children was the result of the English’s plundering of farms: “Within 10 miles we (the English) burned not less than six farm homesteads. Between 30 and 40 homesteads were burned and totally destroyed between Bloemfontein and Boshoff. Many others were also burned down. With their houses destroyed, the women and children were left in the bitter South African winter in the open.” The British history text book says nothing about this.

Awfully generous of the English to care for those whose houses they destroyed!

The Boer Fight For Freedom

Breytenbach writes in Danie Theron“The destruction was undertaken in a diabolic way and even Mrs Prinsloo, a 22 year old lady who gave birth to a baby only 24 hours ago in the house of Van Niekerk, was not spared. A group of rude tommies (British soldiers), amongst whom a so-called English doctor, forced their way into her room, and after making a pretence of examining her, they drove her out of the house.

With the aid of her sister, she managed to don a few articles of clothing and left the house. Her mother brought a blanket to protect her against the cold. The soldiers robustly jerked the blanket out of her mother’s hands and after having looted whatever they wanted to, put the house to fire. Afterwards the old man was driven on foot to Kroonstad by mounted kakies (British soldiers), while his wife and daughter (Mrs Prinsloo) were left destitute on the scorched farm.”

England’s claim of caring for the Boer women reminds one of somebody who boasts to have saved the life of someone he himself has pushed into the water. However, there is one vital difference: The holocaust on the Boer women and children began in all earnest once they had been forced into the concentration camps under the “care” of the British!

Despite the English claims that the concentration camps were “voluntary refugee camps” the following questions must be asked:

– From whom did the refugees flee? Certainly not from their own husbands and sons!

– How can the fact that the “voluntary” women and children had to be dragged to the concentration camps by force be explained?

– Why should the “voluntary refugee camps” be enclosed by barbed wire fences and the inmates be overseen by armed wardens? Kimberley camp had a five meter high barbed wire fence and some camps even had two or three fences!

The Creation Of Hitler Part 1 Of 6

Hitler received training at the Tavistock Institute in London.

In this 6 part series Greg Hallett explains the workings of the global family network of The Royals, the Paedeophiles, the Tavistock Brainwashing for war, and the global war of the Rothschilds. Hitler was also a Rothschild.

Greg Hallett and the Spymaster have written four books:
“Hitler Was A British Agent”
“How To Take Over the World: A Right Royal Con”
“Stalin’s British Training, Breeding Concubines, Paedophiles at War”
“Gifting the United Nations to Stalin”.

The Boer War

– Why would one of the camp commanders make the following statement quoted by Emily Hobhouse: “The wardens were under orders not to interfere with the inmates, unless they should try to escape.”? What kind of “voluntary refugee” would want to escape?

Perhaps the words of the Welsh William Redmond are closer to the truth: “The way in which these wretched, unfortunate and poor women and children are treated in South Africa is barbarous, outrageous, scandalous and disgraceful.”

The English claim of decent actions towards the Boer women and children are further contradicted by the location of the concentration camps. The military authorities, who often had to plan and erect camps for their soldiers, would certainly have been well aware of the essential requirements for such camps. Yet the concentration camps were established in the most unsuitable locations possible.

Merebank camp was located in a swamp where there was an abundance of various kinds of insects. Water oozed out of the ground, ensuring that everything was constantly wet and slimy.

  1. Exposed -> Obama’s Brother Malik Obama: Investor For Muslim Brotherhood’s Money!
  2. McCain/Obama’s CIA Responsible For 600 Acts Of Terrorism In Syria: Rothschild Czar Benjamin Netanyahu Prepares To Attack Syria.
  3. Putin’s Purge Of The Rothschild Money Changers From Russia: Another Rothschild Goon Found Dead & Another Flees To U.K.
  4. Homosexual pResident Obama’s Criticism Of Russia Getting More And More Ridiculous!
  5. I Day Before Boston Bomb & Texas Missile Attack: CIA, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr., & Barack Obama Indicted By U.S. Congressional “Constitutional Task Force” For Crimes Against Humanity!

By October 1900 there were already 58,883 people in concentration camps in Transvaal and 45,306 in the Free State.

The amenities in the camps were clearly planned to kill as many of the women and children as possible. They were accommodated in tattered reject tents which offered no protection against the elements.

Emily Hobhouse, the Cornish lady who campaigned for better conditions for the Boer women, wrote: “Throughout the night there was a downpour. Puddles of water were everywhere. They tried to get themselves and their possessions dry on the soaked ground.”

In Springfontein camp, 19 to 20 people where crammed into one tent. There were neither beds nor mattresses and nearly the whole camp population had to sleep on the bare ground, which was damp most of the time.

One person wrote the following plea for aid to the New York Herald: “In the name of small children who have to sleep in open tents without fire, with barely any clothes, I plea for help.”

According to a British journalist, WT Stead, the concentration camps were nothing more than a cruel torture machine. He writes: “Every one of these children who died as a result of the halving of their rations, thereby exerting pressure onto their family still on the battle-field, was purposefully murdered. The system of half-rations stands exposed and stark and un-shameful as a cold-blooded deed of state policy employed with the purpose of ensuring the surrender of people whom we were not able to defeat on the battlefield.”

The detainees received no fruit or vegetables; not even milk for the babies. The meat and flour issued were crawling with maggots. Emily Hobhouse writes: “I have in my possession coffee and sugar which were described as follows by a London analyst: In the case of the first, 66% imitation, and in the case of the second, sweepings from a warehouse.”

In her book, Met die Boere in die Veld (With the Boers in the field), Sara Raal states that “there were poisonous sulphate of copper, grounded glass, fishhooks, and razor blades in the rations.” The evidence given on this fact is so overwhelming that it must be regarded as a historical fact.

The outbreak of disease and epidemics in the camps were further promoted by, inter alia, the lack of sanitary conveniences. Bloemfontein camp had only 13 toilets for more than 3 500 people. Aliwal North camp had one toilet for every 170 people.

Lizzie van Zyl

Emily Hobhouse tells the story of the young Lizzie van Zyl who died in the Bloemfontein concentration camp: “She was a frail, weak little child in desperate need of good care. Yet, because her mother was one of the ‘undesirables’ due to the fact that her father neither surrendered nor betrayed his people, Lizzie was placed on the lowest rations and so perished with hunger that, after a month in the camp, she was transferred to the new small hospital. Here she was treated harshly. The English disposed doctor and his nurses did not understand her language and, as she could not speak English, labelled her an idiot although she was mentally fit and normal. One day she dejectedly started calling: Mother! Mother! I want to go to my mother! One Mrs Botha walked over to her to console her. She was just telling the child that she would soon see her mother again, when she was brusquely interrupted by one of the nurses who told her not to interfere with the child as she was a nuisance.” Shortly afterwards, Lizzie van Zyl died.

In total 27,000 women and children made the highest sacrifice (died) in the British hell camps during the struggle for the freedom of the Boerevolk.

“Their only crime was that they stood between England and the GOLD of Transvaal.”

Diary of a Boer Commando, Deneys Reitz

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/04/05/rothschilds-british-concentration-camps-a-means-to-usurpdestroy-the-gold-standard-only-then-to-be-replaced-by-rothschilds-keynesian-economics-derivative-fiat-paper/

MICHAEL SALLA – GRAND WORLD SPACE HISTORY – SACRED MATRIX


Ancient Antarctica Builder Race Technology , Corporate Reptilian ET Alliance, Nordic Disclosure
Para-Perception TV

The Real Secrets Hidden in Antarctica… Revealed ~ Truthstream Media


Please fund this channel on Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia

There may be good reason for your curiosity if you have ever wondered about what is really going on at the southernmost continent… With so many myths and rumors flying around about the place lately, we decided to do a little research of our own into the claims… which turned into a whole lot of research… and what was going to be a 10-minute video turned into this.

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:
Website: http://TruthstreamMedia.com
FB: http://Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF
Amazon Affiliate Link (help support TSM with every Amazon purchase, no cost to you!): http://amzn.to/2aTARRx
Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*­~*~*~*~*~

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Photographer captures a ‘rare’ weather phenomenon as storm creates a violet flash upwards in Western Australia


© Jeff Miles
These stunning photos show the violet stream shooting out from the top of a cloud.

A photographer couldn’t believe his luck when he captured a rare celestial phenomenon creating a breathtaking vision against the night sky. Photographs taken in Australia depict the colourful violet stream shooting out against the deep blue of a night sky behind, while the raging storm lights up the clouds below.

The phenomenon, called ionospheric lightning, occurs at much higher altitudes than normal lightening or storm clouds. Photographer Jeff Miles captured the rare sight near the small town of Pilbara in Western Australia.

© Jeff Miles
Upper atmospheric lightning, or ionospheric lightning, are terms used by experts to refer to a family of short-lived electrical-breakdown phenomena that occur above the altitudes of normal lightning and storm clouds.

He said: ‘This was a mind blowing experience to see with my eyes, never mind research the photos to find out just how rare they are.

‘Gigantic jets have only been captured on camera a handful of times and this night I was lucky enough to see six jets.’

Photographer Jeff Miles captured the rare sight near the small town of Pilbara in Western Australia.

Antarctica and Imprisoned Fallen Angels from the Book of Enoch ~ ExoNews TV


On March 14, Israeli News Live published a provocative story titled “The Fallen Angels Imprisoned in Antarctica and are still Alive.” The commentator, Steven Ben-Nun, analyzed the apocryphal Book of Enoch, which describes the experiences of Enoch, a pre-deluvian biblical figure, who was taken into the heavens to witness and play a key role in a major celestial conflict. There are intriguing parallels between Ben-Nun’s analysis of the Book of Enoch, and the recent disclosures of secret space program whistleblower Corey Goode concerning Antarctica.

For related article with links and references go to: http://exopolitics.org/antarctica-and…

Secret Space Programs, Aliens, Inner Earth Civilizations & Atlantis – CLE 2017 Corey Goode


 

Corey Goode: Full Presentation at the 2017 Conscious Life Expo in LA. He speaks of his time in the MILAB & SSP Programs as well as interactions with Non-Terrestrial and Inner Earth Beings.

Watch Corey Goode on Cosmic Disclosure, Gaia TV – www.BlueAvians.com

Return of the Guardians
www.ComicDisclosure.com
www.SphereBeingAlliance.com

 

Andrew Bartzis – Classic Callers 2 (Reluctant Elder, Self Ceremony, Ancestor Connections) Galactic Historian


Andrew Bartzis ~ The Spiritual Court of Equity Timeline Paradox Resolution


BREAKING: A “Pedogate Coin” from the US Mint! (Bix Weir)


The US Mint has just released a commemorative coin honoring one of the largest pedophile coverups in US history! I feel sick to my stomach after making this but it has to get out there to END this sick game.

NASA/NWO HAS STARTED RE-WRITING HISTORY.


WERE HERE, HERE IT IS. THE CULT OF SPACE AND SCIENCE HAS STEPPED INTO THE ARENA WITH A KNOCKOUT BLOW. THEY ARE NOW NATURAL FUN EASY TO NAME “NEW” CLOUDS. TEACHING CHILDREN THAT ALL THE SHIT THEY ARE CLOGGING THE SKIES , KILLING THE BEES, KILLING THE TREES WITH ARE SIMPLY NATURAL, MAKING VIDEOS TRYING TO AWAKEN THE SHEEP, JUST GOT EVEN HARDER.
RICHIE FROM BOSTON, RFB NASA, CHEMTRAILS. LIES
http://scool.larc.nasa.gov/pdf/1-Page… NASA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE4-s… EYESPYs CHANNEL

HELP THIS CHANNEL GROW AND REACH MORE PEOPLE.
https://paypal.me/RichieFromBoston
I WILL NEVER COMPROMISE THE CHANNEL BY JOINING A NETWORK AND YOUR HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATED. TY
RFB

Disclaimer: All works by RichieFromBoston are criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and research.
-All footage taken falls under ”fair use” of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998). Therefore, no breach of privacy or copyright has been committed.
-FAIR USE STATEMENT
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism, is being distributed without profit, and is believed to be “fair use” in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

Snakes, Serpents, and the Dragon Mythology ~ Atlantean Gardens


There are numerous myths and legends South and East Asia, involving dragons. These are not quite the same as European dragons, which in folklore is often, if not always, described with wings. Robert Sepehr is an author, producer, and anthropologist. https://www.amazon.com/Robert-Sepehr/…

Gods with Amnesia: Subterranean Worlds of Inner Earth
https://www.createspace.com/6159364
Species with Amnesia: Our Forgotten History
https://www.createspace.com/5528598

%d bloggers like this: