Star Trek The Next Generation – Moneyless Society


This is an extremely powerful video, as Star Trek tends to reveal expanded concepts of sovereignty and responsibility. 

In this episode, they encounter a cryostatis ship with 3 survivors from late 20th century Earth. One of the newly awakened people decides to use a communication system which he was specifically told not to use, and when confronted with this break of trust, asserts that if it was so important that he not use it, it should have been locked out; as in I can not be expected to be held responsible for my actions ‘I am incompetent’ The Captain responds by saying “in the 24th century and on this ship, we have learned to exercise self control when asked not to touch something.” In other words, being sovereign within thyself, acting with personal responsibility and liability. 

And the statement of the 20th century survivor also reveals how the Elite, our would-be masters, view us at this time. We are Incompetent, hence their position of authority, as they feel they are competent. It is only when we accept our impact on our reality, and acknowledge it fully, that we will begin to be conscious of our responsibility as co-creators, the path of true Sovereignty. This ability to be Response-able or to exercise our will harmoniously in the world is the underlying consciousness which supports a moneyless society. 

- Justin

Source - Lucas 2012 Info’s

Published on Jan 2, 2013
Jean-Luc Picard explaining how society can work without money.

 

Source:
http://lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/star-trek-the-next-generation-moneyless-society-31-march-2014/

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2014/04/star-trek-next-generation-moneyless.html

Iceland Dismantles the Corrupt – Then Arrests Ten Rothschild Bankers


The truth is out: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it


British banknotes – money

‘The central bank can print as much money as it wishes.’ Photograph: Alamy

Back in the 1930s, Henry Ford is supposed to have remarked that it was a good thing that most Americans didn’t know how banking really works, because if they did, “there’d be a revolution before tomorrow morning”.

Last week, something remarkable happened. The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called “Money Creation in the Modern Economy“, co-authored by three economists from the Bank’s Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank’s new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks. Banks then lend that money out at interest – either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable enterprise. True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve, and true, if savings don’t suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.

The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told this is why independent central banks exist in the first place. If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would throw the economy into chaos. Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully regulate the money supply to prevent inflation. This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It’s this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or petroleum, to say “there’s just not enough money” to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt or of public spending “crowding out” the private sector. What the Bank of England admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary: “Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits” … “In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money ‘multiplied up’ into more loans and deposits.”

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it’s backwards. When banks make loans, they create money. This is because money is really just an IOU. The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes. There’s really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it. They will never get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again. So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit. What’s more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity. Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing. In fact, with “quantitative easing” they’ve been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any inflationary effects.

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow. Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the central bank does fund the government after all). So there’s no question of public spending “crowding out” private investment. It’s exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England suddenly admit all this? Well, one reason is because it’s obviously true. The Bank’s job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It’s possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk. Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realized the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become new orthodoxies. If that’s what’s happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/truth-money-iou-bank-of-england-austerity

Shocking ’60 Minutes’ Report Will Shake Wall Street To Its Core!


Monday, March 31, 2014 7:45

(Before It’s News)

The bombshell ’60 Minutes’ report below just released last night will shake Wall Street to its core. Exposing that Wall Street is rigged to the benefit of certain insiders who have made BILLIONS of dollars via computerized trading, this report should bring Wall Street to its knees. 2nd video also below.

This next video is Dahboo7′s take on this latest revelation.

http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2014/03/shocking-60-minutes-report-will-shake-wall-street-to-its-core-2463386.html?ut

The truth is out: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it


British banknotes – money

‘The central bank can print as much money as it wishes.’ Photograph: Alamy

Back in the 1930s, Henry Ford is supposed to have remarked that it was a good thing that most Americans didn’t know how banking really works, because if they did, “there’d be a revolution before tomorrow morning”.

Last week, something remarkable happened. The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called “Money Creation in the Modern Economy“, co-authored by three economists from the Bank’s Monetary Analysis Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are correct. In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank’s new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks. Banks then lend that money out at interest – either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable enterprise. True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve, and true, if savings don’t suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.

The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told this is why independent central banks exist in the first place. If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would throw the economy into chaos. Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully regulate the money supply to prevent inflation. This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It’s this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or petroleum, to say “there’s just not enough money” to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt or of public spending “crowding out” the private sector. What the Bank of England admitted this week is that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary: “Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits” … “In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money ‘multiplied up’ into more loans and deposits.”

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong – it’s backwards. When banks make loans, they create money. This is because money is really just an IOU. The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes. There’s really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it. They will never get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again. So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit. What’s more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity. Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing. In fact, with “quantitative easing” they’ve been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any inflationary effects.

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow. Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the central bank does fund the government after all). So there’s no question of public spending “crowding out” private investment. It’s exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England suddenly admit all this? Well, one reason is because it’s obviously true. The Bank’s job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It’s possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk. Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realized the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become new orthodoxies. If that’s what’s happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/18/truth-money-iou-bank-of-england-austerity

JP Morgan bankruptcy lawyer killed in hit & run


Joseph GiampapaThe banker suicide saga has just reached a new level as a top level JP Morgan attorney has been exterminated in a hit & run incident involving a minivan.

JPM attorney Joseph Giampapa was killed over the weekend when he was struck by a minivan in a hit and run incident. Giampapa was reportedly hit and thrown 150 ft and was pronounced dead at the scene. No charges have been filed.

It gets better: Giampapa was JP Morgan’s top commercial bankruptcy lawyer (SVP).
Somehow we suspect the incident was not inflicted by a soccer mom.

The JP Morgan outside counsel manual, listing Giampapa as their Commercial Bank Bankruptcy SVP:

Commercial Bank Bankruptcy & Workout
Joseph Giampapa, SVP and Associate General Counsel
(614/248-6056)

http://www.jpmorganchase.com/corporate/Home/document/Annex_I_US_BasedGeneralCounselPracticeGroupsandManagers_7012013.pdf

Giampapa’s legal profile:

http://www.martindale.com/Joseph-A-Giampapa/1445173-lawyer.htm

The Columbus Dispatch’s coverage of the incident:

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2014/03/23/cyclist-56-struck-by-minivan-in-piqua.html

Recall that Jim Willie informed SD readers several weeks ago that international bankers are dropping like flies to prevent details on massive FOREX fraud from reaching investigating authorities, and that European banking source “V” stated that the banker hit list includes top level banking executives, and also stated that suicided JP Morgan bankers Ryan Henry Crane & Gabriel Magee knew each other and had uncovered something.

Joseph Giampapa JP Morgan

Perhaps Giampapa had also uncovered too many secrets.

AMTV’s take on the increasing banker deaths:

http://www.hangthebankers.com/jp-morgan-bankruptcy-lawyer-killed-in-hit-run/

Karen Hudes, David Crayford and D ~ From RMN: The Obfuscation of the Collateral Accounts


Note: Here’s a respectable attempt from D at Removing the Shackles, to unravel the massive disinfo hairball surrounding the collateral accounts.

At this point, after reading this you must admit the wizards behind the curtain have done a truly masterful job at the game of deception. They’ve muddied the waters, obfuscating the entire matter to the point where we don’t know who or what to believe any more ~ except for the fact we know these collateral accounts that represent our value really do exist and it appears there are people behind the scenes attempting to release them on behalf of humanity.

Fortunately, as more disinfo agents get revealed there are fewer players on the field, making it easier to determine who’s holding the real deck of cards.

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2014/03/karen-hudes-david-crayford-and-me-from.html

There has been an on going conversation on Rumor Mill News, back and forth between David Crayford and I, for the past two or three days.   As the conversation links have slid so far down the RMN main page, I am posting the on going conversation here for transparency.

It all started with the posting of an article, originally from Philosophyofmetrics HERE, between JC Collins and  Karen Hudes on RMN which can be found HERE

I am not going to get into the details of it, but highly recommend reading it as Collins writing is very insightful and thought provoking at the best of times, and very humorous in this instance.

As Hudes brought up David Crawford in her communications with Collins (god knows why) and David Crawford responded on RMN HERE

I have never been a fan or follower of Crawford, but  in this instance, his comments are excellent and a good portion of the information he gives is WAY closer to accurate than the disinfo that Hudes is spreading.

I will  post the conversations from RMN between Crawford and myself in the order that they were posted.

“And who is David Crayford”? I am the official spokesperson for the ITC / OITC, that is who

Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 25-Mar-2014 08:51:24

In Response To: The Karen Hudes Operation (igots2no)

Dear Dimce,

Ref: to the article as referred below, which needs further input.

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
The Karen Hudes Operation
Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]Date: Monday, 24-Mar-2014 21:48:02

I have just finished reading the article (as referenced above) on RMN http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=303377 and the website https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/UBS+UNCUT.pdf and feel compelled to respond to this because once again, it gives a small part of the story, sufficient to mislead people, but it doesn’t give the whole part of the story which shows a completely different picture.

Allow me to start with the uncut US Dollar Notes. These are NOT the normal US Dollar Notes currently in circulation, referred by many as Federal Reserve Notes. They are in fact the “Reagan Dollars” or otherwise known as the “Asian Dollar”. These were printed in the Philippines and China for a purpose which is a “Common Currency” for the whole of the South East Asia Region (Ten (10) countries to be precise). In fact there were Trillions of these Dollar Notes printed which are all mainly in storage in China, but there are some in the Philippines, as well as within UBS (The European Agent for the Federal Reserve). China have been attempting to do a deal with the Americans on these Notes based upon a 50/50 basis.

This “Common Currency” was supposed to have been initiated in 1998 but it all collapsed because the 10 Asian countries involved rejected it because they did not desire to be controlled by the Federal Reserve. Introduction of this currency was then rescheduled for 2004 but again it collapsed because the 10 countries rejected it.
This is what all the arguments are partially about re: Thaksin Shinawatra (Former P.M. Of Thailand, convicted criminal and fugitive from justice) and his Sister (the current Prime Minister of Thailand). The fact is they are working very closely with the Americans, along with other leaders of some of the Asian countries involved, reference to the introduction of the Asian Dollar.
With reference to the Gold backing for this currency, there are three vitally important issues here which will open people’s eyes and allow them to understand these things better:-

A). Although Marcos executed this agreement with Ronald Reagan, he later pulled out of the agreement and rescinded same, because he had established what the Americans were really trying to do, and it certainly was not for Humanitarian purposes as indicated within the agreement. It was for political purposes combined with a common currency controlled by the Federal Reserve. Total control over the the 10 Asian countries achieved by devious means.
Americans had under-mined Marcos reference to the ABL currency (a Common Currency for the 10 countries of South East Asia which was Gold Backed) which the 10 countries had previously agreed to under International Treaty (Note: I have those Treaties on record).
Now you know some of the reasons why Marcos, in the eyes of America, had to go. Haven’t we all seen similar instances in the more recent years.

B). The second vital point here is that Marcos withdrew the Gold he had previously agreed to reference / allocate to the aforesaid agreement. Therefore this “Reagan Dollar” or other referred to as the “Asian Dollar” is just “Fiat” currency with no real value, and certainly hasn’t got any Gold backing it.

C). The third point is equally important, and probably the most important. That is the January 1995 Treaty agreements executed by the Nations of the World which appointed a Legal Heir to Decadency, a legal Owner, Sole Arbiter, and Controller, of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, otherwise known as the Collateral Accounts, Global Accounts, Global Debt Facility. That person was Dr. Ray C. Dam, the former Gold Signatory to the G7, and just like Marcos, Ray Dam had to go.
These 1995 agreements and the content thereof, superseded all other previous agreements entered into by the Americans with any Holder, Custodian, Signatory, etc of the Collateral Accounts, prior to 1995, and there are many of them, all of which are voided, invalidated, and legally unenforceable.
This being the real situation, then that agreement executed by Marcos and Reagan as shown within the said article / report, is legally void, is now invalid, and legally unenforceable. So in simple terms, it means nothing and holds no legal substance whatsoever.

The real question now is who is trying to mislead the public into believing something which legally no longer is valid and has no meaning whatsoever.

Let me now attend to specific and important issues in reference to the article written by J C Collins within the aforementioned web article:- https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/UBS+UNCUT.pdf

i). I have to agree with J C Collins’s comments, quote “it is my contention that she is the lead figure in a psychological operation meant to distract away from real events and processes happening in the world”.
Karen Hudes has proven nothing yet, other than having a small amount of information which she believes is the whole picture, followed by the constant repetitiveness of her interviews and the deviation to other subjects within her comments.

ii). The statement, quote “The truth that your blog is evading has to do with the source of financing for the Ukrainian revolt and whether it was fomented by nonindigenous forces”.
The real truth of the matter is that the Ukrainian situation was unlawfully financed by the Collateral Accounts through unlawful use of assets of the Collateral Accounts by the Federal Reserve within an illicit “Trading” program. It is all part of their “One World Currency” Doctrine propagated by America and its Allies.

iii). The statement, quote “My original sources, cloaked in illegal secrecy, are impeccable. I challenge you to inform your readers by publishing them:”
If your sources are “Cloaked in illegal secrecy”then why are you condoning such illegal secrecy by a). Stating same, and b). Requesting that J.C. Collins publish them??????

iv). The statement, quote “I simply cited the Green Hilton Agreement so that people would know what John F. Kennedy was doing that caused the Jesuits to murder him. David Crayford is deliberately trying to undermine me by attributing to me positions that I do not hold. This is what is known as a “straw man” argument. I never said that the Green Hilton Agreement was now in force and effect”.
You keep quoting the “Green Hilton Agreement” even after I have advised that it is legally invalid and unenforceable, WHY ????????? Why do you keep quoting “The Green Hilton Agreement” when you now openly state, quote “I never said that the Green Hilton Agreement was now in force and effect”. You must have a belief that it is in legal effect and enforceable, hence why you keep quoting it, so you are in fact contradicting yourself Ms Hudes.

I am trying to undermine you am I, by attributing to you positions that you do not hold. You stated yourself that after your dismissal from the World Bank, you were reinstated, so I only attributed to you your last position as you have publicly stated. In fact Ms Hudes, you have undermined yourself in many ways because you really do not know what you are talking about. It doesn’t need me to undermine you at all, why, because eventually all misinformation agents run out of steam and start repeating themselves or changing the subject. You have totally undermined yourself, but typical, you, like all others, have to shift the blame onto someone else. Don’t blame me for your own misgivings Ms. Hudes.

v). The statement, quote “And who is David Crayford”?
I am the official spokesperson for the ITC / OITC, that is who. The ITC being the Legal Heir, Owner, Sole Arbiter, and Controller of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, otherwise referred to as the Collateral Accounts, the Global Accounts, the Global Debt Facility.

vi). The statement, quote “The legal authority for the issuance of the uncut dollars that John F. Kennedy printed https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/UBS+UNCUT.pdf comes from the Bilateral Agreement, (see paragraph 6, giving the World Bank and IMF legal authority over the Collateral Account.) https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/BILATERAL.pdf
Boy, oh boy, someone really has got their lines crossed here. Quote “that John F. Kennedy printed” What BS. These were authorised under Reagan not Kennedy, even the agreement was signed by Reagan not Kennedy, whereby there were to be the new “Asian Dollar”, otherwise known as the “Reagan Dollar”, the common currency of the 10 South East Asian countries which was rejected by said countries because they did not desire to be controlled by the Federal Reserve. For information purposes there is a period of 18 years and 59 days between the Presidency of JFK and that of R Reagan.
As for the, quote “comes from the Bilateral Agreement, (see paragraph 6, giving the World Bank and IMF legal authority over the Collateral Account.)”.
Ferdinand Marcos withdrew from that agreement when he realised what the Americans were up to, so the agreement is void and has no legal basis nor is it enforceable at any times. This Bilateral Agreement, whether considered legal by one Nation, or otherwise, was superseded by the January 1995 Treaty agreements between the Nations of the World. These agreements were also based upon the 1976 agreements, the 1980 agreements, and of course the 1995 agreements, and now the May 2012 agreements. The World Bank and IMF, DO NOT have Legal Authority over the Collateral Accounts. That is where the World Bank and IMF are committing fraud because they claim something which they have no legal right to claim and there are no legal agreements in force to substantiate their claim.

There is another issue here Ms Hudes, that being that at the time you were Senior Legal Counsel to the World Bank so you must be aware of the illegality of these agreements you refer to. At the same time you must also be aware of many other illegal agreements initiated by the World Bank reference to the Collateral Accounts. You may have also been a signatory to some of the agreements, if not externally, then internally, which makes you complicit in fraud against the Collateral Accounts, Ms Hudes.

vii). The statement, quote “I have been reinstated by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF as the Acting General Counsel of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.”.
Am I wrong in stating that the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development is the former name for the World Bank. Research shows, quote “Established in 1944 as the original institution of the World Bank Group”, and quote “It was established in 1944 with the mission of financing the reconstruction of European nations devastated by World War II. Together, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and its concessional lending arm, the International Development Association, are collectively known as the World Bank as they share the same leadership and staff”. In fact it is the very same organisation Ms Hudes. If I am correct, what game are you playing here Ms Hudes.

ix). The statement, quote “The Board of Governors of the World Bank has authorized the release of the uncut US dollars from Union Bank of Switzerland https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Karen-Hudes+(2).jpg in accordance with the instructions of the authorized signatory, Wolfgang Struck. The banking cartel is illegally refusing to release the uncut US dollars printed by John F. Kennedy. Instead, the banking cartel wants to engineer the collapse of the US dollar.”
Neither the Board of Governors, the World Bank, or Union Bank of Switzerland (Proper name is United Bank of Switzerland based upon when they were taken over by SBC some years ago. They still like to use the words Union Bank because people have short memories and publicly it appears to be the same bank, when in reality it isn’t); hold any authority over the “uncut dollars”.
You will find that because of the various agreements regarding these “Uncut Dollars” and International Treaties, these “Uncut Dollars” were transferred to the Collateral Accounts so that they could not be used by the issuers at any time in the future.

Wolfgang Struck is NOT THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY as is claimed, and that can be proven legally.

Why is the banking cartel refusing to release the “Uncut Dollars” ………. Probably because they know the truth and with many already facing severe financial penalties and possibly later, fraud charges, they are being ultra careful not in involve themselves with persons who are not who they claim to be, Ms. Hudes.

x). The statement, quote “You should follow me on Twitter, @KarenHudes as I will have nothing further to do with Rumor Mill News. David Crayford deliberately removed the thread of links that would have enabled his readers to understand my information”.
Now you are trying to blame me for something I have absolutely no control over, Ms. Hudes. How cheap, foolish, and very low in character you are making yourself look Ms. Hudes.
The issue of whether an article is published or not by RMN is entirely at the discretion of the Administrators of that site, Ms. Hudes, not me.
I have no legal or financial connection to RMN at all, so I have no control over anything they do or say.
Get your facts right Ms. Hudes and stop misinforming people with your gossip.

A lot of whatever you say Ms. Hudes is mere speculation and supposition. Whether you care to believe it or not, I am, not only a lawyer but more of an authority on the subject of the Collateral Accounts than what you will ever believe.

In my opinion, you are a misinformation agent, putting out an awful amount of BS for the people to believe, when in fact they should be rejecting and discarding it. We attempted to inform you of various factors that are all verifiable, but you even refused to accept our envelope that was delivered to you, because you did not want to involve yourself with “Top Secret” matters.

All I can say Ms. Hudes, is in that case, do not get involved with the Collateral Accounts and the fraudulent goings on at the World Bank and the IMF, because this is a “Top Secret” matter and no one will ever get to the truth unless they hold one of the highest International security level classification ratings, which normally is held only by Kings, Queens, Presidents, and Prime Ministers as well as the International Treasury Controller, and NO, Ms. Hudes, we are NOT cabal and do not adhere to the cabal’s policies, or the One World Order.

We are a “SOVEREIGN ENTITY” completely independent from Politics (National or International) or religion, with our own jurisdiction, and one that stands above and beyond all other “Sovereign Nations”.

We don’t want you in the picture stirring up the muddy waters because you, like others, just impede our objectives and prevent us from doing our job ……….. Perhaps that is your purpose Ms. Hudes?????????????

David P. Crayford.

*****************************************

D from RTS has comments for David Crayford

Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 25-Mar-2014 22:21:08

In Response To: “And who is David Crayford”? I am the official spokesperson for the ITC / OITC, that is who (igots2no)

D from RTS writes:

Standing round of applause! While I do not agree with Crawford on many things, his outline in this article is WAY closer to the actual facts than the drivel that Hudes tried to sell to the public. The Reagan dollars ARE in China- there are literally vaults filled with pallets of this currency scam and they are completely useless and have 0 value at all. NOTHING that Reagan did was for the “betterment of man” nor “humanitarian” ….. The Wanta Reagan Mitterand accords/theft is a glaring tribute to that, along with the Marcos debacle.

The ponzi scam “money” that financed the Ukraine’s protests (and syria etc) was not from the Collateral Accounts though- the accounts are locked down and even the two people who were the ONLY two who had access to the accounts, are now locked out. The money that has been used is part of the ridiculous make believe money shuffling and monetary slight of hand tricks which the Fed has been using for the past year to keep up the illusion that all is well in Economicland.

As for the “Green Hilton Agreements” I have a copy of them myself and spent quite a bit of time searching for verification of their validity. I have found none, and have found no one that can provide ANY proof that they were even actually signed, let alone put into play.

Hudes is STILL employed for the World Bank. That alone speaks louder than words- and by the very ommission of well known information that anyone in her position would possess- ie: what is the value, where it comes from, how money is created, the fact that all these governments are actually corporations who are controlled by the banksters…. she is proclaiming openly that she is a disinformationist.

Right now, there is a HUGE web is misinformation and disinformation being spread across the internet and around the world. The idea is to give enough truth to get your attention… then spawn very believable lies to muddy the waters and distract from the actual truth and facts of what is going on. With anyone like Hudes, it’s more important to hear what she does NOT say, than to listen to what she IS saying. Take notice of the topics that she does NOT talk about, pay attention to the things that she tosses off as lies, but then hurries away to talk about something else entirely. This goes for anyone blowing the whistle from an official position.

There is a LOT of truth coming out in the media right now- more than ever before, which is why I started Transpicuous News, to show the glaring transparency that is flooding out. All you need to do is pay attention to what is being said and not said…. it’s all right there in black and white.

As I said, while I don’t agree with Crawford on a lot of things….. great article!!! Thank you!

love D

************************************************************

David Crayford responds to D from RTS

Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 26-Mar-2014 08:44:58

In Response To: D from RTS has comments for David Crayford (igots2no)

David Crayford writes:

I am pleased to see that someone other than the likes of Keenan, Hudes, Drake, Wilcock, Casper, and others, does not agree with many factors that I state. I welcome that as it leads to good open discussion and further understandings regarding a very complex subject.

However, I would like to point out a couple of issues with Reader D’s comments.

If I may just correct you on one issue. It is Crayford not Crawford, or in the case of Keenan who refers to me as Crayfish.

The second issue is, quote “The ponzi scam “money” that financed the Ukraine’s protests (and syria etc) was not from the Collateral Accounts though- the accounts are locked down and even the two people who were the ONLY two who had access to the accounts, are now locked out”.

We are fully aware that the accounts have been locked down. That is an effort to stop all the fraud that has existed for decades. However, and as I certainly would expect, the crooks have found a way around all of this. This is where you have misunderstood what I have previously written.
One way is that the Federal Reserve have been trading Petchilli Bonds, Mexican Bonds, etc for a considerable time, building up a ‘slush Fund’ in conjunction with other crooks mainly the CIA and NSA. When this was realised this trading was blocked, but now they have moved onto the Kennedy Bonds and trading through the various International Banks.
That too is now blocked and being locked down. The aforesaid ‘slush fund’ has yet to be located but it has been split into numerous accounts in various parts of the world under pseudonym names, so it will take time to locate all of it. In the meantime they are using these funds for financing covert operations which does include the Ukrainian situation. I did briefly explain this in my previous article by stating the words ‘by the Federal Reserve within an illicit “Trading” program’.

A second factor is that we are aware that a Signatory of an account, which is not the original signatory but a former NSA/CIA employee who was deliberately and purposely placed into the Signatory position of one of the Trusts, so that access for illicit activities could take place quite easily. That person gave the access and other codes to Prince Bandar (This happened before the ‘Lock down’ of the accounts) who accessed the Federal Reserve ‘Blue Screens’ and immediately removed $32 billion US Dollars. By following the money trail, this money, or a large part of it, was used to finance insurgency in Syria. Prince Bandar, or the Saudi Royal Family, will now have to pay this $32 billion back, whether they like it or not.

That is all I need to say to Reader D, other than Thank You for your comments.

**************************************************************

Reply to David Crayford from D of RTS

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 26-Mar-2014 18:27:16

In Response To: David Crayford responds to D from RTS (igots2no)

(Thanks, D. :)

Reader D. of RemovingTheShackles replies:

=====

Hi David- Sorry about misspelling your name!

As for the Collateral accounts. Actually the money didn’t come from the accounts- because they are locked down…. BUT…. what the lovely money digger thieves did was to mirror the accounts, using them as…. “collateral”, lol! When they discovered in late 2012 that even the signatories could not access the biometric security systems, they created a sort of ETF to Mirror the accounts, and claimed the funds that are locked down as collateral for the money they magically created through the ETF Mirror. Nice eh? I think that you’ll find that the “slush fund” you are looking for is the mirrored ETF that, if I remember correctly, was run through UBS.

Before the security system locked out the two signatories in 2012, they- the thieves- use to access the accounts by quasi kidnapping the two of them, having them open the accounts and then dropping them off back home while they money thieves ran off with the “dough”.

And yes it IS good to have these conversations and to pull all this info out into the publics awareness…. this is how people SEE the incredible fraud that has been going on.

D

******************************************

As a side note, Heather and Bill and I did a lot of research into the ETFs a while ago.  Bill posted this into one of the skype rooms:

[3/26/2014 8:29:37 PM] ��  AK ��: ETF=EXCHANGE TRADED FUND…
[3/26/2014 8:35:43 PM] ��  AK ��: Exchange traded funds are mirror accounts by definition. For example an ETF of the SP500 mirrors the SP500 index. ETFs are created by firms like Goldman Sachs, and they buy the underlying stock and create a mirror in the ETF called a “CREATION UNIT” there is supposed to be a 1-to-1 correspondence in these but its not closely regulated, its just assumed something real backs the ETF.   Heather, D and I were researching these a few months back and we thought perhaps that was how they were now hiding the birth certificate bonds, in ETFs, it severs the accounting trail to the underlying security by laundering it thru the “creation unit”…
[3/26/2014 8:36:25 PM] ��  AK ��: I think its also a way in a pinch to nab the underlying asset while crashing the ETF funds…

I strongly suspect that THIS is how they managed to keep the broken system going for a little while longer- by mirroring funds and using the original’s as collateral.  But now even that isn’t working for them any more because you still have to have investors to buy into the ETFs and be able to convince them that these “investments” are a great way to make a profit.   Unfortunately for the PTW, the investors are no longer playing that game- they have been burned far too many times to just accept something at face value now.    The newest rage is  “SHOW ME  THE MONEY!!”

…. and when no one can show them the money….. well, it’s starting to make all these “investors” just a weeeeee bit leery.  The MSM can talk the talk about “economic recovery” and all this crap to th egeneral public, but the financial circles and groups are smarter than your average bear, and they KNOW the real deal is dead.

Bix Weir: Two Financial-Collapse Updates


Ex Deutche Bank CEO and “Pioneer in Interest  Rate Swaps”…DEAD!

If I were a Bankster and I had been involved in the decades long manipulation and fraud in financial markets I would quickly “retire” and hope to God my past sins would not catch up with me.

Today’s news that a 58 year old NEWLY RETIRED Deutsche Bank CEO is dead is just another Symptom of the destruction going on behind the scenes in the European Derivative Market.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-28/william-broeksmit-former-deutsche-bank-risk-manager-dies-at-58.html

“William Broeksmit, a recently retired executive at Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) who worked at Merrill Lynch in the 1990s with Anshu Jain, now Deutsche Bank’s co-chief executive officer, has died. He was 58.”

“He died on Jan. 26 at his home in London, according to a memo to employees obtained by Bloomberg News. Deutsche Bank spokesman Michael Golden confirmed the contents, which didn’t give a cause. In an interview, a spokesman for the London police said a 58-year-old man was found hanging in a residence on Evelyn Gardens, the street where Broeksmit lived, and that authorities aren’t treating the death as suspicious.”

“Broeksmit “was a pioneer in interest rate swaps” while at Continental Bank in Chicago “and brought his expertise to Merrill Lynch,” Janet Tavakoli, who managed asset swaps under Broeksmit at Merrill in the late 1980s, said today in an interview. “He was brilliant.” Tavakoli is president of Tavakoli Structured Finance Inc. in Chicago.”

END

The CRASH is not “coming…the crash is HAPPENING!

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.

The #2 Man at JP Morgan is OUT…You’re Next on the Chopping Block Blythe!!!

What’s the expression?…The Rats are leaving the ship?! Well there goes a big hairy rat from the heart of the Silver Market Rigging Operation:

A Likely Heir is Leaving JP Morgan 

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/jpmorgan-co-head-of-investment-banking-to-leave/

“The surprise departure of a top JP Morgan Chase executive for a giant private equity firm underscores how financial regulations are forcing a shift in the balance of power on Wall Street”

“Considered a likely heir to Jamie Dimon, the bank’s 58-year-old chief executive, Michael J. Cavanagh announced on Tuesday that he would resign as JPMorgan’s co-head of investment banking…”

(At first I wondered if he may be suicided like the others but then I read this!)

…to take on the role of co-chief operating officer of the Carlyle Group.”

So he goes from the most public of Banking Cabal operators to a more private one! He must have someone big watching out for him.

But the CFO leaving JPM at the “height of the market recovery” speaks volumes about the turmoil going on behind the scenes at the Bankster Headquarters!

“While it is not uncommon for bank executives to leave for other jobs — at least 10 senior executives have left JPMorgan in the last two years — Mr. Cavanagh’s departure was surprising, in part, because of his prominence at JPMorgan and his reputation within the bank as what one executive referred to as a “lifer.”

END

Anybody want to bet that the Wicked Witch herself, Blythe Masters, will be next?! :-)

Stay tuned as the Banking Cabal is taken down for good!

Alphabet Soup: SI, OPPT, RV, PPP, GCR….. without prejudice


March 26, 2013 from D @ RemovingtheShackles.blogspot.com

After last night’s post “What if: The Tattered Ball of Twine”, I put the computer away for the night and had a (relatively) early night.  I awoke this morning to several people sending me the latest Zap and the latest SwissIndo video.

On the topic of the SwissIndo video that was 2 hours long (and I fully and transparently admit that I did NOT listen to the whole thing), at the 1:13 mark, the speaker discusses SwissIndo and OPPT, and once again I feel the need to clarify facts and to point out mis/disinformation.  The speaker that  describes the purported link between the SI and OPPT- from his perspective, and I suspect the perspective of SI leaders- is unfortunately misinformed and seems to misunderstand the OPPT filings, what exactly was the One People’s Public Trust, the basic content of the filings, the true understanding of the “Value” that is returned to the people of the planet, where the “Value” was “deposited”, what the reconciliation of the One People’s Public Trust is and why it was done, and the basic laws behind rebutting a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) filing.

I will give just a brief review of a few of the points above.

The content of the OPPT UCC filings (which can be read in the original pdf format at the top of this page) has been fully and in complete transparency discussed in a multitude of articles, interviews and on many many radio shows over the past year.  I am not going to go over all of the details as the details are available to the public on many sites and recordings.The “VALUE” of the people is Not money.  The Value of the people IS Energy, and IS the basis of the slavery system that has been used as a “financial system” for eons. The Slavery system equated that true VALUE/ENERGY into their financial tool called “money”.

The “One People’s Public Trust”  is NOT a “trust fund”.  At no point was the “Value” of the people ever put into an OPPT trust “fund” or “account”.   The “VALUE” of the people was deposited back TO the people by the OPPT filings and was never held BY the OPPT trustees.

The OPPT UCC filings eliminated all hierarchy, and closed down and foreclosed on the  “slavery system”.  Anyone who is using these filings to work with organizations, corporations or perceived “governments” that were foreclosed BY the filings, is re-animating and resurrecting the former slavery financial system, by recognizing them as still being operational and as being valid.  NO organization, group, corporation, or person has Any control over the disbursement, allocation, or amount of the perceived “value” of any Being – be it in monetary or energetic form- nor any ability to take a Being’s Value or assign a monetary amount to or from any individual person, Unless each person signs over their Value contractually and gives full consent to that organization.

The OPPT was never “bankrupt” and was never a “fund” that could be bankrupted.  The OPPT was reconciled once it had done it’s job and finished what it was set out to do, as are ALL “Trusts” once they have served their purpose.

I hope this clarifies this information once and for all.


Now, onto this weeks “Zap/Poof” report.  I though it very interesting that both Zap and SI were brought to my attention this morning.  ZAPs full report can be read here on Rumor Mill News:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=303269


I am not going to copy the full content of his report here, but will address a few things that he says.

THE PREVIOUS WEEK ON MARCH 11, PAY ORDER 1-11 (THE NUMBER THING AGAIN) WAS ANNOUNCED BY SUCARNO’S SON. BRIEF HISTORY: JOHN F. KENNEDY AND SUCARNO, THE PRESIDENT OF INDONESIA SIGNED THE GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL AGREEMENT WHERE THE GLOBAL MATRIX FUNDS OF THE WORLD WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE GENERAL PLAN.
BOTH PAID WITH THEIR LIVES AS THE CABAL ROLLED OUT THE MACHINERY TO STOP THEM.
SUCARNO’S SON HAD A CEREMONY AND SIGNED A BIG SHEET OF UNCUT USD $2 BILLS, AND SIGNED OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT RELEASE THE MATRIX GOLD BACK TO THE COUNTRIES. HOW THIS GETS DEPLOYED IS AN UNKNOWN, BUT THE GESTURE WAS MADE. 

 I find it rather interesting that Zap is suddenly commenting on SI, especially in relation to my comments above and a few of his comments below:

 

Can we move some funds to another banking institution, i.e. a non-federal credit union leaving some funds in the access bank? Do we need to diversify and spread the funds into different baskets?

THE NATURE OF THE MONEY IS THAT IT IS GOLD BACKED. IT IS USEFUL AND VALUABLE. IT WILL NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHERE YOU KEEP IT. IT WILL BE SAFE NOW UNDER THE NEW SYSTEM AND NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO ROB YOU ANYMORE. THE SMALLEST BANK WILL BE AS SAFE AS THE LARGEST BANK. 


Yes, it will not matter where you keep it BECAUSE all of the Banks- largest to smallest- and credit unions and any other financial/banking corporation or institution are ALL controlled by the BIS and the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel.  I have discussed this thoroughly many times.  It doesn’t matter if your accounts are in Switzerland or Swaziland, America or Armenia. If the BIS, the IMF and all the Central Banks in the world (with the exception of Iran, North Korea and Cuba (although the later is now highly doubtful as they are being wined and dined by the European Union and European Central Bank)) are still being treated as the controllers of the Money, then the former systems of slavery are still in place and still under the control of the same Banker Kingpins. ie: NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

Pay very close attention to the next question and answer Zap gives:

Under Basel III will we be required in the US to give SS# to open our accounts?

I DO NOT KNOW THIS. EVEN IF YOU OPT TO BECOME A NATURAL PERSON, THERE HAS TO BE SOME FORM OF RECOGNITION THAT THE BANKS WILL ACCEPT WHEN THEY CONTRACT WITH YOU TO PROVIDE BANKING SERVICES.

Did I highlight the operative word of that sentence enough?

The one thing that has been said over and over and over, by all the supposed RV “Gurus”, by all these purported insiders with info about the GCR (Global Currency Revaluation) and the perceived “New” financial system is that you will be forced to sign a Non-Disclosure Contract, and that if you exchange your currencies in a bank with ANY group and/or any special rate, and that if you get a prosperity package…. you will HAVE to SIGN a CONTRACT with that bank.

…. hmmmmmm, a contract eh?  Now why does that sound familiar?……

Oh right:  NO organization, group, corporation, or person has Any control over the disbursement, allocation, or amount of the perceived “value” of any Being – be it in monetary or energetic form- nor any ability to take a Being’s Value or assign a monetary amount to or from any individual person, Unless each person signs over their Value contractually and gives full consent to that organization.

How do they plan on getting around the whole issue of using Your ASSETS (ie: YOU) to back their “new” Asset Backed Financial System?  By convincing you to sign over your “value” to them.

RESET HAPPENED ALREADY ON MARCH 17. NOW WE ARE IN THE DEPLOYMENT PHASE OF IT ALL. WHEN US TREASURY FORMALLY ANNOUNCES THE TRN (EXPECTED THIS COMING WEEK) THE FEDERAL RESERVE WILL NOT GO AWAY. IT IS A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK FOR MONEY, AND THE UST WILL ASSIMILATE AND USE THIS SYSTEM FOR SUCH DISTRIBUTION AND SAVE A FEW BUCKS BY NOT RE-INVENTING THE WHEEL. COMMON SENSE AGAIN RIGHT? 

And there you have it everyone- exactly what I have been saying for a year:  The Federal Reserve (ie: the banking mafia) are still around, and still in the “Distribution” business of “money”.  The UST is just another corporation being controlled by the banksters- along with the BIS and IMF which are also under their control.

( BTW: I have had absolutely NO hard confirmation that the “RV” has happened.)

CHINA HAS NOT RUN OUT OF MONEY. THAT IS BROKER CRAP. THE PAYMENTS FOR ALL THINGS CAN BEGIN THIS COMING WEEK WITH THE ADVENT OF THE TRN. 

China is even more bankrupt that the US is.  They are dead broke, just like every other corporation disguised as a government.  They supposedly have bough 80B in gold this year…… but then they also seem to have a gold smuggling problem with it going through Nepal into India!  China is so desperate that they even convinced Mexican Drug lords to smuggle shipments of illegal iron ore (with gold hidden inside) instead of cocaine!!  They bought JPMorgan Chase’s Gold vault, but then suddenly all the gold is supposedly gone…. to….?

As I have said, The entire financial system has completely collapsed- all that you are seeing right now is the chaotic running of a headless chicken.  The reason that they haven’t “pressed the RV button” is because no matter how many times they punch it, nothing happens.  They’ve tried everything and so far nothing is working for them.  Why?  Because there is no “Value” left in the system, and without that “Value”, they having been unable to continue their Money based monopoly game.  

…. unless of course, they can convince you to give them YOUR value.

And that is the entire point of this article: 

DON’T SIGN ANYTHING!!!!!

I was just sent this message on skype and I thought that it sort of tied in nicely with what we’ve just been talking about: 

Hi D
Just found this at the top of John MacHaffie’s blog. Then it quickly disappeared…

Hi John,

Please feel free to post this on the blog if you feel the need to.
First off I’m gonna say this. I don’t mean to put a damper on anything or be the bearer of bad news, but this is just my perspective, based on what I see happening, my research and what resonates with me.

Now. How many times have we all heard over the past year or so that the RV is happening “tomorrow” or “Tuesday” or “it will only happen between Tuesday and Thursday” or “next week” or “it’s all done” funds are being distributed”.

I don’t mean to beat up on any gurus but let’s face it, they’ve all been wrong so far. Especially the ones telling us that the RV is tomorrow,Tuesday or Friday etc.

We even have “Sananda” and “God” himself telling us that the RV is done. Really? Then where the hell is it then? Nobody wants to hear bad news and it’s kinda encouraging for some of us to hear exactly what we want to hear from some entity through a “Channel”. In my humble opinion some of these entities can’t know much more than we do about the RV/GCR because even THEY can’t get it right. If that’s true then why the hell do we listen to them? Because we all want the RV like yesterday.

Now that we got the BS out of the way let’s focus on the real stuff and what we can do.

Reality check: The Dark Cabal are still in power, albeit with reduced venom.

What’s the use of an RV with the Cabal still in power? Think about it. We all want to exchange our Dinar/Dong/ Zimbabwe Dollar etc. Let’s get one thing straight people. An RV/GCR with the Cabal in control of the current global banking system would be suicide for all of us.

We’ve been seriously screwed globally by the cabal and if an RV happened today most of us would go out on a wild spending spree. How many people would go out and buy a new million dollar mansion? Or pay off their mortgage? Or go and buy the Ferrari Enzo? Well, ask yourself. Where is the money going? If you haven’t figured it out yet, it’s going straight back to The Cabal!

Ask yourself, do you really want an RV with The Cabal still in power? Huh?
My point here is this. The Cabal have to be totally removed before a proper RV can happen. Period.

I don’t care what anyone says or whether you believe in God, Source, Prime Creator, Jesus or not but the “RV” is NOT JUST ABOUT THE MONEY FOLKS!
There is a deeply spiritual aspect to this RV” as it’s called.

This is about a BRAND NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMANITY AND THE PLANET!
This is why I believe the RV hasn’t happened and will not happen before certain things take place. Those things are two in number and are connected.

1. The Cabal have to be removed…BY US! How the hell do we do that I hear you ask? Which leads to action number
2. WE DEMAND THEIR REMOVAL. PEACEFULLY.

We are the ones we’ve been waiting for, and until humanity stands up and demand our freedom, their ain’t gonna be no RV.

Sure, we’ll get all the help we need from different groups, whether it be positive Military, Police, Interpol, ET’s or whatever, but they ain’t gonna do jack until we get out there en masse and demand our freedom from the thugs that have taken it from us.

To my knowledge there’s only been two sources of info that have been consistently spot on about what I’ve addressed above, and that’s COBRA of 2012 portal and D of Removing the Shackles.

The more this carries on the more I see that they’re both right.

On May16th,17th 2014 and possibly beyond there is gonna be a major standing up event called Operation American Spring. I strongly believe that this will be the event that will trigger THE EVENT. Please visithttp://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/ for more details.

We need as many people as possible in DC for this event. Even if you can’t get to Washington DC, please do everything you can to spread the word.

First we take back America then the World.

Please spread the word about this event far and wide. This is not meant to be a one or two day event then everybody goes home. The plan is to STAND OUR GROUND until demands are met.

Maybe I’m wrong about the above but it’s what resonates with me. I’ll say this again, and that’s that there is a deeply spiritual aspect to the RV. If it ain’t happening, then maybe God’s trying to tell us something and we ain’t listening.

I want the RV just as bad as anyone else so let’s all do something to make it happen. Let’s make Operation American Spring a massive event to send a clear message to the Dark Cabal that WE’VE HAD ENOUGH OF THEIR BS!

Spread the word far and wide.

God Bless America, God Bless Planet Earth (GAIA)

[9:36:08 PM] XXX: I have no idea who wrote it and why it disappeared, but there is some truth to it.[9:46:30 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: lol- a lot.    I mean, there is lots of missing pieces , but yes, it’s very true

[9:47:39 PM] XXX: I wonder if it is someone trying to incite people to join the march on DC to begin some conflict?

[9:48:39 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: could be.  but then could also be someone just trying to get people off their asses and to take charge of themselves and stop waiting around for someone to save them

[9:49:26 PM] XXX: Which ain’t a bad thing either!! LOL

[9:50:00 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: exactly

 
Please my friends, BE smart.  Play safe.  And remember…..Without Prejudice

Pam and Russ Martens, WallStreetOnParade.com, 3-24-14…”JPMorgan Chase Bets $10.4 Billion on the Early Death of Workers”


jp_morgan_complex_martens_article_140324You know, my own personal interest in viewing articles and/or researching and/or reading stuff about anything to do with finance, and particularly, “Wall Street”, is pretty close to zero. So I usually do not post this type of article.

Thankfully, others are into researching the finance world, and can see many of the various “tricks” that our wonderful big banker “friends” use to “bump up their profits”… at our expense.

Pam Martens sent me this link this morning. As I scanned to the bottom, here is what this publication of Pam’s and her husband Russ’, is about.

WallStreetOnParade.com is a public interest web site operated by Russ and Pam Martens to help the investing public better understand systemic corruption on Wall Street. Ms. Martens is a former Wall Street veteran with a background in journalism. Mr. Martens’ career spanned four decades in printing and publishing management.”

And from this article, here are a couple of highlights (via my own “almost totally non-interested in these things” view).

“Families of young JPMorgan Chase workers who have experienced tragic deaths over the past four months, have been kept in the dark on… the fact that the bank most likely held a life insurance policy on their loved one – payable to itself.

“Banks in the U.S…, are allowed to make multi-billion dollar wagers that their profits from life insurance policies on employees will outstrip the cost of paying premiums and other fees. Early deaths help those wagers pay off.

“Notice the big penalty for banks that don’t comply; they could simply lose the tax benefits.”

By the way, here’s a link to an earlier article from their journal, which I believe I linked to in another of this blog’s posts: “As Bank Deaths Continue to Shock, Documents Reveal JPMorgan Has Been Patenting Death Derivatives“.

Part of my reason for posting this is to direct others to their website, and their research and understanding. Perhaps others will find insight into some things they have been wondering about with these “big bank” institutions.

Well, that’s enough from me. Here’s the article, and read on into the details if you feel so drawn.

—————————————————————————-

Document: JPMorgan Chase Bets $10.4 Billion on the Early Death of Workers”

Families of young JPMorgan Chase workers who have experienced tragic deaths over the past four months, have been kept in the dark on many details, including the fact that the bank most likely held a life insurance policy on their loved one – payable to itself. Banks in the U.S., as well as other corporations, are allowed to make multi-billion dollar wagers that their profits from life insurance policies on employees will outstrip the cost of paying premiums and other fees. Early deaths help those wagers pay off.

According to the December 31, 2013 financial filing known as the Call Report that JPMorgan made with Federal regulators, it has tied up $10.4 billion in illiquid, long term bets on the death of a large segment of its employees.

The program is known among regulators as Bank Owned Life Insurance or BOLI. Federal regulators specifically exempted BOLI in passing the final version of the Volcker Rule in December of last year which disallowed most proprietary trading or betting for the house. Regulators stated in the rule that “Rather, these accounts permit the banking entity to effectively hedge and cover costs of providing benefits to employees through insurance policies related to key employees.” We have italicized the word “key” because regulators know very well from financial filings that the country’s mega banks are not just insuring key employees but a broad-base of their employees.

Just four of the largest U.S. banks, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup hold over $53 billion in investments in BOLI according to 2013 year-end Call Reports. Death benefits from life insurance is purchased at a multiple to the amount of the investments, meaning that $53 billion is easily enough to buy $1 million life insurance policies on 159,000 employees, and potentially a great deal more. Industry experts estimate that the total face amount of life insurance held by all banks in the U.S. on their employees now exceeds half a trillion dollars.

When the General Accountability Office (GAO) looked into the matter for Congress in 2003 and 2004, it found the insidious practice of continuing the life insurance even after the employee had left the company – nullifying any ability to consider him or her a “key” to the business. The GAO wrote: “Unless prohibited by state law, businesses can retain ownership of these policies regardless of whether the employment relationship has ended.” The GAO found that multiple companies held life insurance policies on the same individual.

In 2006, Congress passed the Pension Protection Act which included a section on these policies. Instead of outlawing BOLI and its corporate sibling, Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI), Congress grandfathered all of the millions of previously issued policies while tweaking a few tax and reporting rules.

One bedrock of insurance law dating back to the 19th Century is that a party must have an insurable interest in the life of another person in order to take out an insurance policy. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Warnock v. Davis in 1881 that “in all cases there must be a reasonable ground, founded upon the relations of the parties to each other, either pecuniary or of blood or affinity, to expect some benefit or advantage from the continuance of the life of the assured. Otherwise the contract is a mere wager, by which the party taking the policy is directly interested in the early death of the assured. Such policies have a tendency to create a desire for the event. They are, therefore, independently of any statute on the subject, condemned, as being against public policy.”

While it is highly questionable that rank and file employees are “key” to the success of a business, there is certainly no question that their contribution to the business ends when they terminate their employment. And yet, somehow, banks are allowed to collect death benefits on terminated workers right under the nose of State insurance regulators. The explanation is likely the secrecy which surrounds these policies, limiting knowledge of death payments to just the bank and the insurance company.

One reason banks are enamored with taking out policies on other people’s lives and keeping the practice as hush-hush as possible with the willing consent of regulators is that the gullible U.S. taxpayer who bailed out the banks to the tune of trillions of dollars from 2008 to 2010 and is now subsidizing too-big-to-fail through an implied permanent Federal backstop, is also subsidizing these death wagers. Both the buildup in the cash value of the policy over time and the payment of the death benefit are tax-free income to the bank; the more workers they insure, the more tax-free income they receive to help their bottom line; and the less corporations pay in their share of Federal income taxes, shifting more and more of the burden to the struggling middle class.

Banks have also exploited other tricks with the billions invested in these policies. JPMorgan is the assignee for Patent number 5,806,042 at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, titled “System for Designing and Implementing Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) With a Reinsurance Option.” Noteworthy features of this scheme include the following:

“The purposes of the consent requirements and statutory requirements for insurable interest are to insure that a bank does not take out a death benefit policy on the life of an employee which exceeds the bank’s loss. In general, a bank may take out a death benefit policy in the amount which is a multiple of 8-10 times the annual compensation of that employee…”

“Reinsuring the BOLI plan by a captive insurance subsidiary of the parent bank or holding company allows the bank to augment the cash value gains of the BOLI plan by providing cash revenue sources from fee income associated with investment and trust management. Reinsurance also minimizes the impact to the bank’s profit and loss statement by keeping the assets within the corporate structure of the bank holding company…”

“The administrative support subsystem performs periodic sweeps of social security records to identify death claims for covered employees who have terminated or retired…”

Whether JPMorgan is providing its own reinsurance through an affiliate or just suggesting this patented idea to others is unknown. What is known is that JPMorgan has multiple insurance subsidiaries in both the U.S. and the U.K. When the final Volcker Rule was published, it carried this notation in footnote 1813: “This requirement is not intended to preclude a banking entity from purchasing a life insurance policy from an affiliated insurance company.”

It is doubtful that regulators are fully aware that BOLI assets may actually remain under the control and management of the banks, rather than the insurance companies providing the death benefits.

On March 15 of last year when Senator Carl Levin opened the hearing on the $6.2 billion in losses of depositors’ money in the exotic derivative bets by JPMorgan’s London Whale trading fiasco, he chastised the bank for failing to make loans to worthy businesses. Levin said JPMorgan had “the lowest loan-to-deposit ratio of the big banks, lending just 61 percent of its deposits out in loans.” Apparently, said Levin, “it was too busy betting on derivatives to issue the loans needed to speed economic recovery.”

Ina Drew, the head of the Chief Investment Office (CIO) at JPMorgan responsible in 2012 for overseeing the London Whale trades (who has since left the firm) revealed in her testimony to Levin’s committee that she was also overseeing the “company-owned-life-insurance portfolio…”

Drew testified:

“The CIO engaged in a wide range of asset-liability management activities. As of the first quarter of 2012, the CIO managed the Company’s $350 billion investment securities portfolio (this portfolio exceeded $500 billion during 2008 and 2009), the $17 billion foreign exchange hedging book, the $13 billion employee retirement plan, the $9 billion company-owned-life insurance portfolio, the strategically-important MSR hedging book, and a series of other books including the cash and synthetic credit portfolios.”

Banking used to be a simple business to understand. The bank took in insured deposits and then loaned out the money at a higher rate than it paid on the deposits to people needing loans to buy homes, to start new businesses or expand existing ones. But then came the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which had kept commercial banks separate from Wall Street trading houses since the Great Depression, and the partial repeal of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 which had barred commercial banks from merging with insurance companies.

As a result of those repeals through legislation known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Wall Street’s behemoth banks are more dangerous than at any time since the 1929 crash. The banks are essentially everywhere you don’t want your insured deposits to be. Each mega bank now owns thousands of other businesses in fields like insurance, mergers and acquisitions, stock and bond underwriting, securitizations, commodities trading, structuring of exotic derivative bets, and the latest – making tens of billions of dollars in wagers on the deaths of their own employees.

Because nothing in the banks’ financial filings break out the number of lives the company has insured; how far down in rank the company insures its workers; or the total amount of life insurance it has in force, Wall Street On Parade sent two emails to two of JPMorgan’s top media relations personnel asking those questions. We gave them four days to respond. Despite pointing out that the questions go to the heart of the quality of earnings of JPMorgan Chase, an issue to which shareholders are entitled to transparency under U.S. securities laws, neither individual responded.

Because regulators have become willful enablers to some of the worst practices on Wall Street, the Wall Street worker must now look out for himself. Various state laws prohibit BOLI without the consent of the insured. New York State’s Department of Financial Service says this about BOLI policies on employees residing within New York: “Under some insurance programs, New York State insurance regulations require that employees approve the purchase of life insurance at initiation of coverage and have a notification and terminate right when they leave employment. Procedures that standardize notification and documentation should exist to ensure compliance with these insurance requirements and other applicable laws and regulations. Failure to comply could jeopardize the tax benefits associated with the insurance.”

Notice the big penalty for banks that don’t comply; they could simply lose the tax benefits.

http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2014/03/24/pam-and-russ-martens-wallstreetonparade-com-3-24-14-jpmorgan-chase-bets-10-4-billion-on-the-early-death-of-workers/

 

QEG: NOW OPEN SOURCED


small QEG-HopeGirl-logo

As Promised, here are the open sourced documents for a quantum energy generator. This has been made possible by the people and for the people. It is freely given to the world.

CLICK HERE FOR QEG OPEN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

An average modern household requires 5-10KW of power  to operate.

A conventional generator needs   15KW to produce 10KW of power.

To produce these 15KW of power we rely on gas, diesel, propane, coal or other products that can be metered creating profits for the oil industry.

130 years ago Nikola Tesla invented and patented an energy generator. This is a resonance machine that only needs 1KW of input power to produce 10KW of output power.  His patents are now in the public domain.

The Fix the World Organization has reproduced Teslas design with a few modern twists to generate the same results.   Our Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) provides 10KW of power output for less than 1KW input, which it supplies to itself.

We have freely given this technology to the people of the world.  We’ve open sourced a full set of instructions, user manual, schematics and parts list for any engineer to follow and reproduce the same results.

How the QEG works:
First we use a starting power source, such as an outlet or a crank to power the 1 horsepower motor. This motor spins the rotor in the generator core. The unique oscillator circuitry configuration in the generator core causes resonance to occur. Once the core achieves this resonance it can produce up to 10KW of power, which can then be run through an inverter to power the motor that spins the rotor. You can then unplug the motor from the original power source and the generator will power itself.

Cottage Industry Community Units specifically for the production of QEG’s are NOW developing in communities in 30+ countries.  The People are making their own free energy devices.

The QEG belongs to humanity now. Many will make further improvements and we will all co-develop this practical bridge technology together.

The QEG: For the People and By the People

Fix the World is currently traveling to Taiwan, London and Morocco for the month of April to help communities build QEG’s. Everything we have accomplished has been made possible by the donations of people like you. If you would like to help keep us going, every little bit helps! Please consider giving back and making a donation of any amount to the Fix the World Organization. By Clicking here:

http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/donate-to-hopegirl-ftw/

The Government Is a Hit Man: Uber, Tesla and Airbnb Are in Its Crosshairs


San Francisco taxi drivers show their opposition to Uber which taxi drivers say is operating illegally in San Francisco
San Francisco taxi drivers protest Uber, which taxi drivers say is operating illegally in San Francisco, July 30, 2013. Beck Diefenbach—Reuters

The real losers are not just the next generation of innovators but also customers who lose out on more ways of getting what they need or want.

What the invisible hand of free-market innovation giveth, the dead hand of politically motivated regulation tryeth desperately to take away.

That’s the only way to describe what’s happening to three wildly innovative and popular products: the award-winning electric car Tesla, taxi-replacement service Uber and hotel alternative Airbnb. These companies are not only revolutionizing their industries via cutting-edge technology and customer-empowering distribution, they’re also running afoul of interest groups that are quick to use political muscle to maintain market share and the status quo.

The battle between what historian Burton W. Folsom calls “market entrepreneurs” and “political entrepreneurs” is an old and ugly one, dating back to the earliest days of the American experiment. Market entrepreneurs make their money by offering customers a good or new service at a good or new price. Political entrepreneurs make their money the old-fashioned way: they use the government to rig markets and kneecap real and potential competitors. In his great 1987 book The Myth of the Robber Barons, Folsom discusses how the 19th century steamboat pioneer Robert Fulton quickly went from a market entrepreneur to a political one by securing a 30-year monopoly from the New York legislature for all steamboat traffic in the Empire State.

Especially in today’s sluggish economy, it’s more important than ever that market innovators win out over crony capitalists. Letting markets work to find new ways of delivering goods and services isn’t just better for customers in the short term, it’s the only way to unleash the innovation that ultimately propels long-term economic growth. After all, no country has ever regulated its way out of a recession.

Tesla has done the unthinkable not once but twice: First, it built an electric car that people actually want to buy despite a price tag north of $70,000 for its cheapest models. Second, it has the temerity to sell directly to its wealthy customers rather than subjecting them to the ritualized hell known as auto dealerships. But because auto dealers account for as much as 20% of state sales taxes, their wishes often become legislators’ commands. At the top of their wish list? Don’t let carmakers sell directly to customers. The most glaring example of protectionism just took place in New Jersey, whose legislature added even more burdens to rules that already banned the direct sales of cars to customers. Now Teslas effectively can’t be sold in New Jersey, reports the New York Times, all in the name of ensuring consumer safety and protecting competition. News flash: Anyone who can afford a $70,000 car doesn’t need much protecting. And if you’re ready to believe car dealers when they argue that incredibly complicated rules making it impossible for new companies to enter their market are about protecting competition, I’ve got an expensive undercoating package I want to sell you.

The app-driven car service Uber, which bills itself as “everyone’s car service” and connects drivers and riders in minutes, presents a similar threat to traditional taxi and ride services in the 30-plus U.S. cities in which it operates. Rather than fight for customers by cutting fares, increasing the number of cabs or improving services, taxi commissioners and city councils from San Francisco to New York are instead trying to regulate Uber out of business on the grounds that it provides unfair and unsafe competition.

Never mind that Uber riders get to instantly rate their experience in a way no cab passenger ever does (just as amazingly, drivers get to rate passengers!). At the state level, California has already instituted a bevy of regulations on Uber, Lyft and other new ride-sharing services. These include mandatory criminal-background checks for drivers, licensing via public-utilities commissions, and driver-training programs. Last year, Washington, D.C., officials unsuccessfully tried to squeeze out Uber with regulations on the types of cars that could carry passengers, what sorts of credit-card processing machines could be used and how the company’s app operates.

Airbnb, a website that allows people to rent everything from vacation homes to spare couches for short-term stays, works great for everyone but conventional hoteliers and cities trying to bilk travelers for tourist taxes. Operating in 192 countries and typically showing hundreds of thousands of offerings, Airbnb has faced stiff regulation in towns supposedly famous for their weirdness and openness to lifestyle experimentation, such as Austin, which charges hosts an annual licensing fee and limits the number of participants, and Portland, Ore., which has banned the service in residential neighborhoods. In New York City, rent-control advocates are teaming up with hospitality-industry heavyweights to try and shut down Airbnb and similar services.

If mobsters were pulling these sorts of stunts, we’d recognize the attacks on new ways of doing business for what they are: protection rackets, with state regulators rather than professional hit men creating and enforcing rules to benefit well-connected businessmen. The real losers are not just the next generation of innovators but also customers who lose out on more ways of getting what they need or want.

Folsom’s study of political and market entrepreneurs also suggests that political entrepreneurs are ultimately unsuccessful. Indeed, Fulton claimed in 1817 that his monopoly meant no one could ferry passengers to New York City from neighboring states. A young Cornelius Vanderbilt was hired by a New Jersey businessman to challenge Fulton not in a court of law but on the Hudson River, ferrying passengers from Elizabeth, N.J., and Gotham. Vanderbilt cheekily flew a flag from his ship that read, “New Jersey must be free.” While evading capture, Vanderbilt lowered prices and changed the business climate.

It turns out that New Jersey must be free again — to sell Teslas. And New Yorkers should be free to rent out their rooms if they want to. And Uber to drive you where you want to go. The invisible hand of free markets shouldn’t have to spend so much of its time slapping away the dead hand of political entrepreneurship.

http://time.com/31828/the-government-is-a-hitman-uber-tesla-and-airbnb-are-in-its-crosshairs/

Karen Hudes Exposes Another “Species” Hiding in the Vatican [video]


Okay, I complained that Karen has maintained there are no extraterrestrials, and now she’s exposed the coneheads in a way that some people may find believable. Is this progress?  Maybe it is. Or maybe Karen just killed any credibility she had.  ~ BP

This is so nuts, it’s hard to believe but it’s true that she said this — Former World Bank Sr. Counsel Says That There is An Existence of a Second Species on Earth — Hiding at the Vatican!

This is so nuts, it’s hard to believe but it’s true that she said this. Karen Hudes was being interviewed by Future Money Trends when midway through the interview about conspiracies concerning global economy, she reveals the aliens that have been hiding at the Vatican. WHAAT?? When executive professionals such as Karen begin speaking out about these coming events, we need to start paying closer attention.  
This is so nuts, it’s hard to believe but it’s true that she said this. Karen Hudes was being interviewed by Future Money Trends when midway through the interview about conspiracies concerning global economy, she reveals the aliens that have been hiding at the Vatican. WHAAT?? When executive professionals such as Karen begin speaking out about these coming events, we need to start paying closer attention.

Karen Hudes is a graduate of Yale Law School and she worked in the legal department of the World Bank for more than 20 years.  In fact, when she was fired for blowing the whistle on corruption inside the World Bank, she held the position of Senior Counsel.

Future Money Trends: “Okay Karen, you’re an attorney, you worked for the World Bank for 20 years, what your saying is on the fringe of conspiracy, it sounds crazy so… I mean obviously you have had to come to terms with this. What have you seen that has made you so confident to actually say this stuff publicly?”

For the time-constrained Karen’s alien disclosure begins approx. 23:00 into the video.

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2014/03/21/karen-hudes-exposes-another-species-hiding-in-the-vatican-video/

Autumn Radtke: Bitcoin Exchange CEO Found Dead in Singapore


The American CEO of First Meta, a virtual currency exchange that deals with Bitcoin, was found dead outside her home in Singapore late last month, according to newly released domestic media reports. The apparent suicide of the young up-and-comer, though no direct connections with Bitcoin have been made thus far, casts the troubled cryptocurrency in an even darker light after last week’s Mt. Gox scandal.

Channel NewsAsia said that police were called to Cantonment Close just after 7:00 am on February 26. Autumn Radtke, 28, was allegedly discovered lying motionless on a second-floor parapet – indicating the possibility that she jumped from a higher floor (though it is unclear what floor she lived on). Paramedics pronounced her dead at the scene and preliminary investigations turned up no evidence of foul play. Toxicology results are expected in the coming days.

In light of the estimated $500 million worth of virtual currency lost by Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, some are calling Radtke the “first real victim” of Bitcoin.

“The last few weeks have been dismally littered with two things: The virtual losses of virtual wealth from virtual currency speculation and the very real losses of very real humans with very real senior financial services positions. Sadly, [Radtke’s death] sees the two trends converge,” said ZeroHedge.

Though only 28 years old, Radtke possessed an impressive resume that included work for multiple Fortune 500 companies: including Apple, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, Clear Channel and Universal. She entered the tech industry at the age of 22, working closely with billionaire Richard Branson as a Virgin Charter consultant.

“Before joining First Meta, Radtke was a director of business development at XFire, a company that connected gamers through communication tools,” wrote Tech in Asia. “Prior to that, she was the co-founder of Geodelic, a California-based startup that provided location-based services on smartphones.”

In 2008, Radtke moved to Singapore, where she would become the CEO of First Meta – a virtual currency pioneer known for creating the first virtual credit card, based in the online gaming world known as Second Life.

“We currently offer a service that allows users to trade virtual currency across multiple environments and exchange them for real money,” explains First Meta’s homepage. “For game developers, publishers and sites who issue currency, allowing your virtual currency to be traded provides users the liquidity they want and introduces your currency to new users.”

Though First Meta acts as a virtual currency exchange, Bitcoins make up only a fraction of the firm’s overall business. While the Mt. Gox Bitcoin crash may appear to be a factor in Radtke’s death, the poor performance of that exchange was not necessarily reflected on others.

Bitcoin was being traded for roughly $220 dollars in mid-February on Mt. Gox – down from a peak of $540. But other exchanges were still trading near $600, according to Business Insider.

“Even if [Radtke] did commit suicide, how do we know it had anything to do with Bitcoin’s troubles? We don’t. And for the record, suicide is rarely the result of any single cause,” wrote Slate.

 

http://thediplomat.com/2014/03/autumn-radtke-bitcoin-exchange-ceo-found-dead-in-singapore/

Banker Suicides: The JPMorgan-CIA-NYPD connection. Exposing what lies beneath the bodies of dead bankers and what lies ahead for us


Author
By Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives)

Monday, February 17, 2014

I feel that this is one of the most important investigations I’ve ever done. If my findings are correct, each of us might soon experience a severe, if not crippling blow to our personal finances, the confiscation of any wealth some of us have been able to accumulate over our lifetimes, and the end of the financial world as we once knew it. The evidence to support my findings exists in the trail of dead bodies of financial executives across the globe and a missing Wall Street Journal Reporter who was working at the Dow Jones news room at the time of his disappearance.

If the bodies were dots on a piece of paper, connecting them results in a sinister picture being drawn that involves global criminal activity in the financial world the likes of which is almost without precedent. It should serve as a warning that we are at the precipice of something so big, it will shake the financial world as we know it to its core. It seems to illustrate the complicity of big banks and governments, the intelligence community, and the media.

Although the trail of mysterious and bizarre deaths detailed below begin in late January, 2014, there are others. Not only that, there will be more, according to sources within the financial world. Based on my findings, these are not mere random, tragic cases of suicide, but of the methodical silencing of individuals who had the ability to expose financial fraud at the highest levels, and the complicity of certain governmental agencies and individuals who are engaged in the greatest theft of wealth the world has ever seen.

It is often said that life imitates art. In the case of the dead financial executives, perhaps death imitates theater, or more specifically, the movie The International, which was coincidently released in U.S. theaters exactly five years ago today.

We are told by the media that the untimely deaths of these young men and men in their prime are either suicides or tragic accidents. We are told what to believe by the captured and controlled media, regardless of how unusual or unlikely the circumstances, or how implausible the explanation. Such are the hallmarks of high level criminality and the involvement of a certain U.S. intelligence agency intent on keeping the lid on money laundering on a global scale.

Obviously, it is important that this topic is approached with the utmost respect for the families of those who died, that they be allowed to grieve for the loss of their loved ones in private. However, it is extremely important that the truth about what is happening in the global financial arena is not kept from us, as we will also be victims of a different nature.

The missing and the dead: a timeline

The following is provided as a chronological list of those who have gone missing or been found dead under mysterious circumstances. It is important to note that this list consists of names of the most recent incidents. There are more that extend back through 2012 and beyond.

January 11, 2014

MISSING: David Bird, 55, long-time reporter for the Wall Street Journal working at the Dow Jones news room, went for a walk on Saturday, January 11, 2014, near his New Jersey home and disappeared without a trace. Mr. Bird was a reporter of the oil and commodity markets which happened to be under investigation by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations for price manipulation.

January 26, 2014

DECEASED: Tim Dickenson, a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, was reportedly found dead under undisclosed circumstances.

DECEASED: William Broeksmit, 58, former senior manager for Deutsche Bank, was found hanging in his home from an apparent suicide. It is important to note that Deutsche Bank is under investigation for reportedly hiding $12 billion in losses during the financial crisis and for potentially rigging the foreign exchange markets. The allegations are similar to the claims the institution settled in 2013 over involvement in rigging the Libor interest rates.

January 27, 2014

DECEASED: Karl Slym, 51, Managing director of Tata Motors was found dead on the fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok. Police said he “could” have committed suicide. He was staying on the 22nd floor with his wife, and was attending a board meeting in the Thai capital.

January 28, 2014

DECEASED: Gabriel Magee, 39, a JP Morgan employee, died after reportedly “falling” from the roof of its European headquarters in London in the Canary Wharf area. Magee was vice president at JPMorgan Chase & Co’s (JPM) London headquarters.

Gabriel Magee, a Vice President at JPMorgan in London, plunged to his death from the roof of the 33-story European headquarters of JPMorgan in Canary Wharf. Magee was involved in “Technical architecture oversight for planning, development, and operation of systems for fixed income securities and interest rate derivatives” based on his online Linkedin profile.

It’s important to note that JPMorgan, like Deutsche Bank, is under investigation for its potential involvement in rigging foreign exchange rates. JPMorgan is also reportedly under investigation by the same U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations for its alleged involvement in rigging the physical commodities markets in the U.S. and London.

Regarding the initial reports of his death, journalist Pam Martens of Wall Street on Parade astutely exposed the controlled, scripted details of the media accounts surrounding Magee’s death in an article written on February 9, 2014. Ms. Martens writes:

“According to numerous sources close to the investigation of Gabriel Magee’s death, almost nothing thus far reported about his death has been accurate. This appears to stem from an initial poorly worded press release issued by the Metropolitan Police in London which may have been a result of bad communications between it and JPMorgan or something more deliberate on someone’s part.” [Emphasis added].

Ms. Martens also notes:

No solid evidence exists currently to suggest that the death was a suicide. In fact, there is a strong piece of evidence pointing in the opposite direction. Magee had emailed his girlfriend, Veronica, on the evening of January 27 to say that he was about to leave the office and would see her shortly. [Emphasis added].

Based on information she developed, it appears likely that Magee did not meet his fate on the morning his body was discovered, but hours earlier. Considering the possibility that Magee might now have died in the manner publicized, Ms. Martens offers speculation and notes it as such:

If Magee became aware that incriminating emails, instant messages, or video teleconferences were not turned over in their entirety to Senate investigators or Justice Department prosecutors, that might be reason enough for his untimely death.

Looking at the death of Magee in the context of a larger conspiracy, it is difficult not to suspect foul play and media manipulation.

January 29, 2014

DECEASED: Mike Dueker, 50, who had worked for Russell Investment for five years, was found dead close to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State. Dueker was reported missing on January 29, 2014. Police stated that he “could have” jumped over a fence and fallen 15 meters to his death, and are treating the case as a suicide.

Before joining Russell Investments, Dueker was an assistant vice president and research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis from 1991 to 2008. There he served as an associate editor of the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics and was editor of Monetary Trends, a monthly publication of the St. Louis Federal Reserve.

In November 2013, the New York Times reported that Russell Investments was one of several investment companies that were under subpoena from New York State regulators investigating potential “pay-to-play” schemes involving New York pension funds.

February 3, 2014

DECEASED: Ryan Henry Crane, 37, was the Executive Director in JPMorgan’s Global Equities Group. Of particular relevance is that Crane oversaw all of the trade platforms and had close working ties with the now deceased Gabriel Magee of JPMorgan’s London desk. The ties between Mr. Crane and Mr. Magee are undeniable and outright troublesome. The cause of death has not yet been determined, pending the results of a toxicology report.

February 6, 2014

DECEASED: Richard Talley, 57, was the founder and CEO of American Title, a company he founded in 2001. Talley and his company were under investigation by state insurance regulators at the time of his death. He was found in the garage of his Colorado home by a family member who called authorities. Talley reportedly died from seven or eight “self-inflicted” wounds from a nail gun fired into his torso and head.

The enormity of the lie

One must look back far enough to understand the enormity of the lie and the criminality of bankers and governments alike. We must understand the legal restraints that were severed during the Clinton years and the congress that changed the rules regarding financial institutions. We must understand that the criminal acts were bold and bipartisan, and were designed to consolidate wealth through the destruction of the middle class. All of this is part of a much larger plan to establish a one world economy by “killing” the U.S. dollar and consequently, eradicating the middle class by a cabal of globalists that existed and continue to exist within all sectors of our government. The results will be crippling to not just the United States, but the entire Western world.

What began decades ago is now becoming more transparent under the Obama regime. Perhaps that’s the transparency Obama promised, for we’ve seen little else in terms of transparency with regard to the man known as Barack Hussein Obama. For those not locked into the captured corporate media, we’re starting to see the truth emerging. The truth is that we’ve been living under a giant Ponzi scheme and we, the American citizens, are the suckers. As illustrated by the list of dead bankers above, however, the power elite need a bit more time before the extent of their criminality is revealed. They need a bit more time to transfer the remaining wealth from middle-class America to their private coffers. Timing is everything, and a magic act only works when all props are in place before the illusion is performed. Only when their timing is right will the slumbering Americans realize the extent of the illusion by which they’ve been entranced, at which time they will be forced into submission to accept a financial reset that will ultimately subjugate them to a global economy. I contend that this is the reason for the recent spate of deaths, for those who met their tragic and untimely end had the ability to expose this nefarious agenda by what they knew or discovered, or what they would reveal under subpoena and the damage they could cause to the globalist financial agenda.

It is an insult to the public intellect that the media so readily pushes the official line that the deaths were all suicides given the unusual circumstances surrounding nearly all of those listed. This itself should be ringing alarm bells with anyone of reasonable sensibilities, or at least those who are paying the slightest bit of attention to the larger picture. The media is either complicit or completely inept. While incompetence is evident in many areas, even the most inept journalist or media company cannot possible deny what exists directly in front of them. They can only withhold the truth.

Connecting the dots

To understand what is taking place, I contacted a financial source who has accurately predicted many events that we are now seeing taking place, including the deaths of certain financial people, for an explanation. In fact, he actually predicted that we would see a “clean-up” of individuals who posed a serious threat to certain too-big-to-fail-or-jail banks and “banksters” a full week before the events began to unfold. Truth be told, I initially greeted his prediction with some skepticism, for such things don’t really happen in the real world, or so the obedient and well-managed media tells me.

V, The Guerrilla Economist” as he is known in the alternative media, has provided numerous insider alerts for Steve Quayle‘s website and has appeared as a regular guest on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report. He has an undeniable track record for accuracy, which has earned my respect. However, I thought that he had taken temporary leave of his senses when he twice suggested that there will be some house cleaning done of anyone posing a threat to the agenda of certain banks and the globalist agenda on our broadcasts of November 20, 2013, and again on January 10, 2014. In a separate venue, he described what was about to take place by using the analogy of the movie The International. Several dead bodies and a missing journalist later, that analogy has been proven accurate.

The fact is that we are seeing a clean-up where JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank seems to appear at the epicenter of it all. In January, JPMorgan admitted facilitating the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme by turning its head to his activities. Despite this admission, the U.S. Department of Justice under Eric Holder declined to send anyone to jail under a deferred prosecution agreement. Yet this is only the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

In March, 2013 the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a heavily redacted 307-page report detailing the financial irregularities surrounding the actions of JPMorgan and the deliberate withholding of critical financial information by JPMorgan. Prominent in the mix are the actions of Bruno Iksil, who earned the nickname the “London Whale,” for his “casino bets” of other’s money that caused billions of dollars in losses. Yet, no cooperation was provided by Dimon’s foot soldiers as they failed to testify or otherwise cooperate with Senate investigators.

Remember the damage control and the deliberate downplaying by Jamie Dimon, who maintained that there was nothing to see here with regard to the “London Whale” criminal activities? What was originally described as a loss of perhaps $2 billion ultimately turned into many more times that, yet the actual numbers are still hidden from the public. Such events occurred under the noses of numerous financial executives who had knowledge that went undisclosed.

As we fast forward to today and the current spate of mysterious deaths, we begin to see that many of those who died existed on the periphery of events in the criminal actions of the financial industry. Moreover, it is reasonable to conclude that they possessed knowledge that if disclosed, could have interrupted the magic act taking place for the awestruck audience, captivated by the carefully crafted words of Yellen, her predecessors and the operatives within government who’s duty it is to regulate whatever is left of our current financial system.

That regulation is now a thing of the past. What we have today is a system of facilitation and co-operation between the largest corporations and financial institutions and the U.S. and our intelligence agencies. We now have the “too-big-to-fails” operating with impunity as a result of an incestuous, if not outright unconstitutional relationship where the banks are acting as operational assets for the CIA, the NYPD, and other intelligence and police agencies.

The JPMorgan-CIA-NYPD connection

Perhaps one of the best kept secrets, at least from the majority of the American public, is the integration and overlap between the “too-big-to-fail-and-jail” banks and the most advanced system of surveillance in the U.S. Would it surprise you to learn that the very banks that brought the United States to the brink of financial collapse in 2008, who looted the American public and continue to engage in what most perceive as criminal behavior in the financial venue not only have ties to the CIA, but are actually partnered with the CIA and NYPD surveillance of all of lower Manhattan? That’s right, the big banks such as JPMorgan, Citigroup and others have their own desks and surveillance monitors at a facility known as the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center, located at 55 Broadway, deep in the center of New York’s financial district.

The big banks—the very banks that have been the focus of fraud and corruption investigations have their own system of cameras, more than 2,000 in number, and operate them in tandem with NYPD surveillance cameras at a center that was funded with taxpayer money. Every square inch of lower Manhattan is under surveillance 24/7, not just by NYPD, but by JP Morgan and other members of the so-called “one percent.” Carefully consider the implications of this pact.

JPMorgan Chase and others have had long and quite intimate ties with the CIA. Today, however, the line between the banks that control our financial present and future and police and intelligence agencies no longer exist. This relationship of mutual benefit permits the CIA to use the financial institutions to “handle the money” for their various global initiatives, while it provides the banks a stable of “professional assistants” to handle their “security,” whether such security issues arise in the U.S., London, or elsewhere. Highly trained and skilled CIA operatives now work within the system of interlocked financial institutions that have been at the epicenter of the most egregious crimes involving the theft from our bank accounts and retirement savings.

Please stop and consider this for a moment. The very banks and their top executives who have not only brought the U.S. to the brink of financial collapse and Martial Law, engaged or facilitated in various criminal actions that resulted in fines (but no jail time) for the perpetrators, are working hand-in-hand with the CIA. Not only that, they are working in tandem with the NYPD at their surveillance centers, watching and videotaping every move made by anyone—including potential whistleblowers within their vast purview. By the way, this is no ordinary surveillance or surveillance cameras. You won’t find these cameras on the shelves of your local spy shop. These cameras can focus on the footnotes of a book you might be reading, or the words written on a piece of paper being held by an unwitting person. They employ facial recognition and other advanced visual and data aggregation capabilities, and the extent of their technological abilities is increasing every day.

Additionally, the data is collected and maintained, and files are created of people and groups who are merely going about their daily lives. Equally important, files are created and maintained of problem children and groups, like the Occupy movement and others who lawfully exercise their constitutional rights to protest the actions of the one-percent. Consider this in the context of the Occupy Wall Street protests. where the protesters were not only under police surveillance, but surveillance by the banks and their corporate officers against whom they were protesting. And it was all done with the approval and assistance of the police, in this case the NYPD, and U.S. intelligence agencies.

Now consider the plight of a whistleblower who wants to expose criminality within the ranks of a too-big-to-fail. The institution who is engaged in purported criminality based on the findings of the whistleblower can observe the whistleblower’s every move. Where they go, who they meet and what they are carrying to such a meeting. They can be tracked to a residence, a business, or even to their psychiatrist’s office, place of ill repute, or the residence of some significant other outside of their marriage, all of which would be invaluable for blackmail.

Perhaps the potential whistleblower is clean and free from anything that might dissuade them from revealing what they know, their case could be turned over to the in-house security of former CIA agents for proper disposition. It makes the movie The Firm look like child’s play by comparison.

This is not some fanciful delusion. There is proof of this that exists. The New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) has documented the increasingly extensive surveillance being conducted in lower Manhattan and throughout the city. They have verified that not only are our constitutional rights being violated every minute of every day, but the fruits of surveillance by police and corporate entities are shared between the police, the intelligence agencies and private financial institutions, without restraint on the distribution on such findings.

Are you engaged in a protesting against the criminality of the one-percent? Well, the one-percent are watching you, and they are literally seated right next to the police. Are you a journalist following up on possible “bankster” corruption by meeting a potential whistleblower? You better understand that the bankster target of your investigation is watching you, in real-time, with the complete approval and cooperation of the police. As documented by the NYCLU, you are likely now “on file,” and all data compiled is maintained and accessible not just to law enforcement, but to the very target of your investigation—in real time.

Such surveillance and integration between big banks, law enforcement and spy agencies is not just limited to lower Manhattan or even the United States. It is also most prevalent in London and other cities where international banking is conducted.

Real-time surveillance and the close working relationship between the “one-percenters,” police and the intelligence agencies gives the targets of criminal probes the ability to be pro-active when necessary. It’s all being done under the pretext of national security when it would appear that the real objective is to insulate the banksters from potential problems that exposure of their criminal actions might cause.

Oh, and don’t forget that it is us who are paying for this.

Perhaps we would be well advised to not only consider the capabilities of the surveillance apparatus that exists where the big banks and police are working at adjacent surveillance terminals at 55 Broadway and other locations, but the incestuous working relationship between the banks and the CIA when we read about banker suicides.

Do not expect to see any exclusive report on this in the corporate media, for they, as requested, have dutifully maintained their code of silence by not showing pictures of the brass name plates that identify the bankster terminals situated adjacent to the police terminals during photo shoots of this super-secret surveillance complex a few years ago. As detailed by the tenacious and indefatigable Pam Martens, journalist for Wall Street on Parade in this article, the captured media took a pass on revealing the whole truth about what’s really going on at 55 Broadway.

What has been revealed here is merely the tip of the iceberg. The tentacles of the corporate elite, facilitated and empowered by the CIA, the NYPD top brass, and other agencies have now covertly and effectively succeeded in invading everything you do. The fruits of this operation are being used to advance their global financial agenda and silence the opposition.

Knowing this, is it possible that the dead bodies that are increasing in number are the results of this joint surveillance operation? You will not find any answers in the mainstream media. The big banks have chosen to remain silent, even in the face of subpoenas, and have yet to face any legal consequences for their contempt. It’s not, however, merely contempt of congress or pseudo-investigative bodies. It’s their contempt of humanity, of you and me, and the victims that lie dead, leaving their families broken and wanting for the truth.

Copyright © Douglas J. Hagmann and Canada Free Press

Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com

Older articles by Doug Hagmann

canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61200

8th international banker to die in a month jumps off building in China


February 18, 2014
8th international banker to die in a month jumps off building in China

A man who jumped from the JP Morgan building in Hong Kong this week becomes the 8th banker to die mysteriously this month

By John Vibes

HONG KONG (INTELLIHUB) — All month we have been reporting on the suspicious string of apparent suicides that have hit the financial industry.  Multiple bankers have been found dead in recent weeks, all of them have been ruled suicides despite the fact that little information has been released in some of the cases.

Those who had high profile deaths, like the man who jumped from the top of the JP Morgan HQ building in Europe are highly publicized, but overall, very few details about any of these deaths have been made public.  Now this week, another investment banker has jumped from a different JP Morgan HQ, on a different continent, this time in Hong Kong, China.

The fact that many of these deaths seem to be tied to JP Morgan is arousing further suspicion that there is more to this story than meets the eye.

String of suspicious deaths:

1 – William Broeksmit, 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG, was found dead in his home after an apparent suicide in South Kensington in central London, on January 26th.

2- Karl Slym, 51 year old Tata Motors managing director Karl Slym, was found dead on the fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok on January 27th.

3 – Gabriel Magee, a 39-year-old JP Morgan employee, died after falling from the roof of the JP Morgan European headquarters in London on January 27th.

4 – Mike Dueker, 50-year-old chief economist of a US investment bank was found dead close to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State.

5 – Richard Talley, the 57 year old founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colorado, was found dead earlier this month after apparently shooting himself with a nail gun.

6 -Tim Dickenson, a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, also died last month, however the circumstances surrounding his death are still unknown.

7 – Ryan Henry Crane, a 37 year old executive at JP Morgan died in an alleged suicide just a few weeks ago.  No details have been released about his death aside from this small obituary announcement at the Stamford Daily Voice.

8 - Li Junjie, 33-year-old banker in Hong Kong jumped from the JP Morgan HQ in Hong Kong this week.

Were these bankers killed for knowing too much?  Were they involved in something so unethical that they killed themselves out of shame?  These are the speculations that are rising in the wake of these apparent suicides.

(Photo: Wikimedia Commons)http://intellihub.com/8th-international-banker-die-month-jumps-building-china/

4th Financial Services Executive Found Dead; “From Self-Inflicted Nail-Gun Wounds”


Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/07/2014

The ugly rash of financial services executive suicides appears to have spread once again. Following the jumping deaths of 2 London bankers and a former-Fed economist in the US, The Denver Post reports Richard Talley, founder and CEO of American Title, was found dead in his home from self-inflicted wounds – from a nail-gun. Talley’s company was under investigation from insurance regulators.

Via The Denver Post,

Richard Talley, 57, and the company he founded in 2001 were under investigation by state insurance regulators at the time of his death late Tuesday, an agency spokesman confirmed Thursday.

It was unclear how long the investigation had been ongoing or its primary focus.

A coroner’s spokeswoman Thursday said Talley was found in his garage by a family member who called authorities. They said Talley died from seven or eight self-inflicted wounds from a nail gun fired into his torso and head.

Also unclear is whether Talley’s suicide was related to the investigation by the Colorado Division of Insurance, which regulates title companies.

 

A checkered past?

Before coming to Colorado, Talley was a former regional financial officer at Drexel Burnham Lambert in Chicago, where he met his wife, Cheryl, a vice president at the company. The two married in 1989.

 

Talley had formed a number of companies, some now defunct, according to the Colorado secretary of state’s office. Among them: American Escrow, Clear Title, Clear Creek Financial Holdings, Swift Basin, Sumar, American Real Estate Services, and the American Alliance of Real Estate Professionals.

It would appear, unfortunately, that Mr. Talley was not an entirely honest man

Talley’s 1989 wedding announcement in the Chicago Tribune noted he was “a member of the 1980 U.S. Olympic swimming team.”

A spokeswoman for USA Swimming on Thursday said Talley was not on the team.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-02-07/4th-financial-services-executive-found-dead-self-inflicted-nail-gun-wounds

Ed. Note: Anyone who believes a pencil pusher can even figure out how to operate a nail gun ~ much less have the stamina and courage to overcome the pain from the first self-inflicted nail to the head/torso, to continue shooting 6-7 more nails to said head/torso ~ is out of touch with reality. Men at this level of society have little courage; they rarely possess the will or physical stamina necessary to overcome acute pain and they always hire others to operate nail guns because they don’t have the skills to operate a hammer, or even a screwdriver.

The pencil pusher’s preferred method of suicide is a gun blast to the head or the hangman’s noose. It’s becoming clear these “banker” deaths are not self-inflicted, as to why they’re being “removed” is anyone’s guess.

Create fear and panic could be a clue. Maybe they knew too much and were threatening to blow the whistle, who knows? If the truth is ever revealed, only time will tell….

 

 

Financial world shaken by 4 bankers’ apparent suicides in a week


Published time: February 03, 2014 12:16
Edited time: February 04, 2014 09:00

Mike Dueker (Still from YouTube video/Russell Investments)Mike Dueker (Still from YouTube video/Russell Investments)

The apparent suicide death of the chief economist of a US investment house brings the number of financial workers who have died allegedly by their own hand to four in the last week.

50-year-old Mike Dueker, who had worked for Russell Investment for five years, was found dead close to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State, says AP.

Local police say he could have jumped over a fence and fallen 15 meters to his death, and are treating the case as a suicide.

Dueker was reported missing by friends on January 29, and police had been searching for him.

A Sheriff’s spokesman said investigators learned that he was having problems at work but did not elaborate.

Jennifer Tice, a company spokeswoman declined to comment, however said, that Dueker was in good standing at Russell.

We were deeply saddened to learn today of the death,” Tice said in an e-mail on Friday. “He made a valuable contributions that helped our clients and many of his fellow associates.

Dueker joined Russell Investment in 2008. He wrote for Market Outlook financial services publications, forecasting the business cycle and the target federal funds rate. He is the creator and developer of a business cycle index that forecast economic performance published monthly on the Russell website.

He was previously an assistant vice president and research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and is ranked in the top 5 percent of published economists.

Over the past two decades he wrote dozens of research papers mostly on monetary policy, according to the bank’s website.

His most-cited paper was “Strengthening the case for the yield curve as a predictor of U.S. recessions,” published in 1997 while he was a researcher at the Federal Reserve.

He was a valued colleague of mine during my entire tenure at the St. Louis Fed,” said William Poole, the bank’s ex-president. “Everyone respected his professional skills and good sense.

Dueker held an undergraduate degree in math from the University of Oregon, a master’s degree in economics from Northwestern University and a Ph.D. from the University of Washington.

Streak of bankers’ deaths

Dueker’s apparent suicide was the fourth among financial experts in a week.

A 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG, William Broeksmit, was found dead on January 26 in his home after an apparent suicide in South Kensington in central London.

The next day, January 27, Tata Motors managing director Karl Slym, 51, was found dead on the fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok. Police said he could have committed suicide. Mr. Slym was staying on the 22nd floor with his wife, and was attending a board meeting in the Thai capital.

Another tragic incident occurred on January 28, when a 39-year-old Gabriel Magee, a JP Morgan employee, died after falling from the roof of its European headquarters in London.

 

The offices of JP Morgan in the Canary Wharf district of London (Reuters/Simon Newman)The offices of JP Morgan in the Canary Wharf district of London (Reuters/Simon Newman)

While creating fortunes, City and Wall Street jobs are notorious for extra-long working weeks and huge amounts of stress. In a move to ease the tension some of the world’s biggest lenders like Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Credit Suisse have been telling junior staff to take more time off.

Some European countries like Belgium and the Netherlands have reduced the working week from 40 to 30 hours without damaging their economies, while in Germany an average worker puts in 35 hours a week and is the world’s fourth largest economy.

http://rt.com/business/russell-investments-chief-economist-dead-564/

Ed. Note: Considering the inherent corruption in the banking industry, it’s highly doubtful these men committed “apparent” suicide over a long work….

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,297 other followers

%d bloggers like this: