Psyops Circus: Orlando / Brexit Updates ~ Corbett Report


SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=18986

The summer of psyops is in full swing as Brexit assassination drama threatens to tilt the referendum and the FBI absolutely WILL NOT release the Mateen 911 ISIS propaganda call…until they do. Join The Corbett Report open source investigations on these topics to stay up to date on all the latest developments.

Max Igan ~ A Brief History of Government False Flag Terrorism


http://thecrowhouse.com
Support The Crowhouse: https://www.patreon.com/maxigan?ty=h

Universal Law/sovereign law trumps all others.

1. No man or woman, in or out of government shall initiate force, threat of force or fraud against my life and property and, any and all contracts Im a party to not giving full disclosure to me whether signed by me or not are void at my discretion.

2. I may use force in self-defense against anyone that violates Law 1.

3. There shall be no exceptions to Law 1 and 2.

When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader. – Plato

“I have lived on the lip of insanity, wanting to know reasons, knocking on a door. It opens. I’ve been knocking from the inside.” – Rumi

Sean Stone ~ Globalist technology is lightyears ahead


Actor and Filmmaker Sean Stone exposes how of what is known by the public. Sean also talks about his new film, Paranormal Activity Security Squad.
paranormalactivitysecuritysquad.com

Ole Dammegard: CocaCola, Nike, Starbucks featured in NWO product placement signage at 2015 Paris, 2016 Brussels false flags. “Explosion” at 2016 Brussels airport false flag was produced by movie-like special effects built into fake airline ticket counter & ceiling


Ole Dammegard: CocaCola, Nike, Starbucks featured in NWO product placement signage at 2015 Paris, 2016 Brussels false flags

Eye witness details how “Explosion” at 2016 Brussels airport false flag was produced by movie-like special effects built into fake airline ticket counter & ceiling

NewsInsideOut.com

By Alfred Lambremont Webre

WATCH INTERVIEW ON EXOPOLITICSTV

VANCOUVER, BC – Ole Dammegard returns to NewsInsideOut.com to continue his deconstruction of false flag operations by an apparent traveling company of “crisis actors” affiliated with the U.S. defense sector and interacting with personnel from MI6, Gladio, Mossad, etc.

Each false flag is elaborately scripted and laid out in a metropolitan setting [in this case Paris and Brussels], and accompanied by a drill within the preceding 24 hours during which media photos are created for release when the “drill” goes live.

CocaCola, Nike, Starbucks: Product placement Signage

Ole Dammegard deconstructs the development of product placement signage of CocaCola, Nike & Starbucks signage advertisements embedded in the photos of false flags intentionally sent out to the media. These corporations, according to Ole Dammegard, are benefitting from unconscious consumer advertising in this new form of synthetic corporate terror.

“Explosion” at 2016 Brussels airport false flag was movie-like Special effect

In his NewsInsideOut.com interview, Ole Dammegard describes an eye witness he interviewed detailing how a major “Explosion” at the 3.22.2016 Brussels airport false flag was produced by movie-like special effects built into fake airline ticket counter & ceiling as though it were a movie scene being filmed at the airport under certain clandestine conditions.

References

Light on Conspiracies

www.lightonconspiracies.com

 

Recommended reading

Ole Dammegard: Pres. Hollande, G-20, Climate Summit part of Paris Friday 13th classic False Flag

By Alfred Lambremont Webre

https://newsinsideout.com/2015/11/2416/

Ole Dammegard exposes 2011 Norway false flag as 2-5 police shooters kill 69-86 youths. Bilderberger-CIA-Mossad-MI5 ops group commits false flags in USA; UK; Spain; Norway; Sweden; Denmark; Canada; France and others
By Alfred Lambremont Webre
https://newsinsideout.com/2015/08/ole-dammegard-exposes-2011-norway-false-flag-as-2-5-police-shooters-kill-69-86-youths-bilderberger-cia-mossad-mi5-ops-group-commits-false-flags-in-usa-uk-spain-norway-sweden-denmark-canada-fra/

Ole Dammegard: NWO crisis actor group stages false flags at Ottawa, Paris, Copenhagen. Italy next?

https://newsinsideout.com/2015/02/ole-dammegard-usisraelbilderberger-crisis-actor-group-stages-false-flags-ottawa-paris-copenhagen-italy-next/

Ole Dammegard: 2014 Bilderberger venue vulnerable to false flag blamed on Truth movement

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2014/05/ole-dammegard-2014-bilderberger-venue-vulnerable-to-false-flag-blamed-on-truth-movement.html

Ole Dammegard: Satanic Pentagram part of 9/11-type false flag at 2014 Bilderberger foiled by Truth movement media

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2014/06/ole-dammegard-satanic-pentagram-part-of-911-type-false-flag-at-2014-bilderberger-foiled-by-truth-movement-media.html

VIDEO-Ole Dammegard: Ebola “news” is psyops. CDC is a CIA proprietary corp. Bilderbergers operationalized JFK assassination, 9/11 & EbolaGate

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/10/ole-dammegard-ebola-news-is-psyops-cdc-is-a-cia-proprietary-corp-bilderbergers-approved-jfk-kill-911-ebolagate.html

 

www.NewsInsideOut.com    

Alfred Lambremont Webre Contact/News Tips:

news@newsinsideout.com

Feet to the Fire: Richard Alan Miller 05-15-16 Open Talk


Dr. Richard Alan Miller -Physicist

Dr. Richard Alan Miller is a pioneer in the annals of metaphysical and paranormal exploration. Miller began working in the “X-Files” world of Navy Intel (Seal Corp. and then MRU) in the late 60s. His public collaborations and research continue.

As an original black ops team-member, Miller’s research in the field of paranormal began as a graduate physicist working 11 years with Navy Intel (Anesthesiology). During this period numerous foundational papers, including “A Holographic Concept of Reality” and “Embryonic Holography” were written.

His past and current writings and presentations reveal a depth of knowledge and practical experience in three major fields; Alternative Agriculture, New Age Physics, and Metaphysics.

Miller now writes for Nexus magazine and is a preferred guest on internet radio. He is re-emerging at a critical time in humanities evolution where metaphysics and practical survival converge.

We WERE going to record two,one hour segments on two topics… but true to form, we ended up making one two hour interview on many things…😉

http://richardalanmiller.com/

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…

Kissinger Awarded by Obama on Way to Meet Trump – #NewWorldNextWeek corbettreport


Welcome to New World Next Week — the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. In this week’s episode:

Story #1: UK Spy Agency GCHQ Joins Twitter With Predictably Bad Results
http://bit.ly/1NzhmA1
Flashback: Peeling The Onion (Jul 2012)
http://bit.ly/1WDwC2b
Flashback: Nullify NSA Gaining Ground (Jan 2014)
http://bit.ly/1Toydoh
NWNW Flashback: #MyNYPD Hashtag Attracts Photos of Police Violence, Abuse (Apr 2014)
http://bit.ly/25bEwUR

Story #2: Obama Just Gave Warmonger Henry Kissinger the Distinguished Public Service Award
http://bit.ly/1Tgq2NZ
Obama Gives Kissinger Distinguished ‘Public Service’ Award
http://bit.ly/1NpJTrE
Cartoon: Kissinger Gets Lifetime Achievement Award From DoD
http://onforb.es/1ss8W44
Donald Trump Will Meet War Criminal Henry Kissinger Tomorrow
http://bit.ly/1VacYsH
Trump and Kissinger Hold Foreign Policy Huddle in New York
http://nbcnews.to/1quBfgi
Trump Meets With Henry Kissinger
http://bit.ly/1XB1fEe
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Calls Henry Kissinger a Friend, Praises His Commitment to Democracy (Sep 2014)
http://bit.ly/1OLAlYc
Flashback: When Kissinger Met Xi – ‘Entire World’ a Topic for China, US (Mar 2015)
http://bit.ly/22gECFx
Flashback: Putin Meets ‘Old Friend’ Kissinger Visiting Russia (Feb 2016)
http://bit.ly/1U0joW5

Story #3: Cascade Locks, Oregon Considers Alternate Actions After Nestle Plant Voted Down
http://bit.ly/1TgpZSm
#MorningMonarchy: Nestle Gains Control of Maine Town’s Water for the Next Half Century
http://bit.ly/1TIidLd
Flashback: New App Lets You Boycott Koch Brothers, Monsanto And More By Scanning Your Shopping Cart (May 2013)
http://onforb.es/18PvQY4
Flashback: Claire Bernish Reports on the Nestle Water Scandal (Aug 2015)
http://bit.ly/1NzhteW

#NewWorldNextWeek Headlines: CIA Watchdog “Accidentally Destroyed” Copy of “Torture Report”
http://bit.ly/1OLAGKA
“Secret” Harvard Meeting on Synthesizing Human Genome Triggers Debate
http://bit.ly/1XmyOtm
TSA Cashing In on $765K Worth of Forgotten Loose Change at Local Airports
http://bit.ly/1NzhuPP
Central Banks Selling Off US Debt At a Pace Not Seen Since 1978
http://bit.ly/1U0jmh4
EMS Workers Have to Prove They Provided 9/11 Help
http://bit.ly/1ToyF63
Senate Passes Bill Exposing Saudi Arabia to 9/11 Legal Claims
http://bit.ly/1XB1peO

Visit http://NewWorldNextWeek.com to get previous episodes in various formats to download and share. Submit articles and links by using #NewWorldNextWeek. And as always, stay up-to-date by subscribing to the New World Next Week RSS feed or iTunes feed. Thank you.

Previous Episode: Public Reaches Breaking Point With TSA
http://bit.ly/1U0pvMQ

Catherine Austin Fitts-Painful Process Coming for America Not Going to Be Pretty Catherine Austin Fitts-Painful Process Coming for America Not Going to Be Pretty ~ Greg Hunter Greg Hunter


It’s official. Total fraud is propping up every corner of the global economy. Former Bush Administration (41) Assistant Secretary of Housing, Catherine Austin Fitts says, “Here’s the problem with this situation, and it’s mind boggling. When you have an economy on a managed basis, and get this far away from a market economy, the problem is the primary trend in the dollar, bonds, stocks, and gold is . . . totally in question and can go either way. A lot of it is because you have a politically managed system and not a market economy. The more you politically manage it, the lower the productivity goes. So, it is really a house of cards. The money managers are looking at this, and they are very nervous and for good reason. A politically managed system is not as robust and healthy as one managed by market economics. . . . You have a failure of the political system to face and manage and deal with what is going on. . . . We have managed this system by being more and more and more secret. George H. W. Bush said the other day that the American people can’t handle the truth. I think they can handle the truth, and one of the reasons I am encouraged by Trump is he is going to start bringing more of it out. That’s what we need. It’s the only way we can get out of this. We are being killed by a politically managed system that is being driven by more and more privilege and more and more secrecy. We’ve got to go to transparency, and it’s going to be a very painful process for the American people. It’s not going to be pretty. The game of musical chairs is upon us. It’s not coming, it’s here.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with investment banker Catherine Austin Fitts, creator of The Solari Report.

All links can be found at USAWatchdog.com: http://usawatchdog.com/trump-is-free-…

Under International Law Native Hawaiians are Victims of Genocide


by Hawaiian Kingdom
Under international humanitarian law, which is the law of occupation and the protection afforded civilians who are not engaged in war, denationalization is not only a war crime but is synonymous with the term genocide. Since the occupation of the Hawaiian Kingdom began during the Spanish-American War, the United States embarked on a deliberate campaign of forced denationalization in order to conceal the occupation and militarization of a neutral State. Denationalization, in its totality, is genocide.
Children_Salute_1907
Prior to World War I, violations of international law did not include war crimes, or, in other words, crimes where individuals, as separate and distinct from the State or country, could be prosecuted and where found guilty be punished, which included the death penalty. The Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (Commission on Responsibility) of the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 took up the matter of war crimes after World War I (1914-1918). The Commission identified 32 war crimes, one of which was “attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory.”
Although the 1907 Hague Convention, IV, did not specify the term “denationalization” as a war crime, the Commission on Responsibility relied on the preamble of the 1899 Hague Convention, II, which states, “Until a more complete code of the laws of war is issued, the High Contracting Parties think it right to declare that in cases not included in the Regulations adopted by them, populations and belligerents remain under the protection and empire of the principles of international law, as they result from the usages established between civilized nations, from the laws of humanity and the requirements of the public conscience.” This preamble has been called the Martens clause, which was based on a declaration read by the Russian delegate, Professor von Martens, at the Hague Peace Conference in 1899.
In October of 1943, the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union established the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC). World War II had been waging since 1939, and atrocities committed by Germany, Italy and Japan drew the attention of the Allies to hold individuals responsible for the commission of war crimes. On December 2, 1943, the UNWCC adopted by resolution the list of war crimes that were drawn up by the Commission on Responsibility in 1919 with the addition of another war crime—indiscriminate mass arrests. The UNWCC was organized into three Committees: Committee I (facts and evidence), Committee II (enforcement), and Committee III (legal matters).
Committee III was asked to draft a report expanding on the war crime of “denationalization” and its criminalization under international law. Committee III did not rely solely on the Martens clause as the Commission on Responsibility did in 1919, but rather used it as an aid to interpret the articles of the 1907 Hague Convention, IV. It, therefore, concluded that “attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory” violated Article 43, where the occupying State must respect the laws of the occupied State; Article 46, where family honor and rights and individual life must be respected; and Article 56, where the property of institutions dedicated to education is protected.
In 1944, Professor Raphael Lemkin first coined the term “genocide” in his publication Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (p. 79-95). The term is a combination of the Greek word genos (race or tribe) and the Latin word cide (killing). The 1919 Commission on Responsibility did list “murders and massacres; systematic terrorism” as war crimes, but Professor Lemkin’s definition of genocide was much broader and more encompassing.
Raphael LemkinAccording to Professor Lenkin, “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
“Genocide has two phases,” argued Professor Lemkin, “one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain, or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization of the area by the oppressor’s own nationals. Denationalization was the word used in the past to describe the destruction of a national pattern.” Professor Lemkin believed that denationalization was inadequate and should be replaced with genocide.
The term genocide, however, was not a war crime under international humanitarian law at the time, but it appears that Committee III was in agreement with Professor Lenkin that it should be a war crime. The problem that faced Committee III was how to categorize genocide as a war crime under the Hague Convention, IV. On September 27, 1945, Committee III argued that denationalization was not a single act of “depriving the inhabitants of the occupied territory of their national characteristics,” but rather a program that attempted to achieve this result through: “interference with the methods of education; compulsory education in the language of the occupant; … the ban on the using of the national language in schools, streets and public places; the ban on the national press and on the printing and distributing of books in the language of the occupied region; the removal of national symbols and names, both personal and geographical; [and] interference with religious services as far as they have a national peculiarity.”
Committee III also argued that denationalization included other activities such as: “compulsory or automatic granting of the citizenship of the occupying Power; imposing the duty to swearing the oath of allegiance to the occupant; the introduction of the administrative and judicial system of the occupying Power, the imposition of its financial, economic and labour administration, the occupation of administrative offices by nationals of the occupying Power; compulsion to join organizations and associations of the occupying Power; colonization of the occupied territory by nationals of the occupant, exploitation and pillage of economic resources, confiscation of economic enterprises, permeation of the economic life through the occupying State or individuals of the nationality of the occupant.”
Committee III also stated that these activities by the occupying State or its nationals would also “fall under other headings of the list of war crimes.”
There were apparent similarities between Professor Lemkin’s definition of genocide and the Committee III’s definition of denationalization. Professor Lemkin argued that genocide was more than just mass murder of a particular group of people, but “the specific losses of civilization in the form of the cultural contributions which can only be made by groups of people united through national, racial or cultural characteristics (Lemkin, Genocide as a Crime under International Law, 41 AJIL (1947) 145, at 147).” Similarly, Committee III argued that denationalization “kill[s] the soul of the nation,” and was “the counterpoint to the physical act of killing the body, which was ordinary murder (Preliminary Report of the Chairman of Committee III, C.148, 28 Sept. 1945, 6/34/PAG-3/1.1.0, at 2).”
In its October 4, 1945 report “Criminality of Attempts to Denationalise the Inhabitants of Occupied Territory,” Committee III renamed denationalization to be genocide.
On December 11, 1946, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution that declared genocide a crime under the existing international law and recommended member States to sign a convention. After two years of study, the General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December 9, 1948. By the Convention, genocide has been recognized as a crime even when there is no war or the occupation of a State. Genocide became an international crime along with piracy, drug trafficking, arms trafficking, human trafficking, money laundering and smuggling of cultural artifacts. During war or the occupation of a State, genocide is synonymous with the war crime of denationalization.
In the Trial of Ulrich Greifelt and Others (October 10, 1847-March 10, 1948) at Nuremberg, the United States Military Tribunal asserted Committee III’s interpretation that genocide can be committed through the war crime of denationalization. In its decision, the Tribunal concluded that, “genocide…may be perpetuated through acts representing war crimes. Among these cases are those coming within the concept of forced denationalisation (p. 42).”
The Tribunal explained, “In the list of war crimes drawn up by the 1919 Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties, there were included as constituting war crimes ‘attempts to denationalize the inhabitants of occupied territory.’ Attempts of this nature were recognized as a war crime in view of the German policy in territories annexed by Germany in 1914, such as in Alsace and Lorraine. At that time, as during the war of 1939-1945, inhabitants of an occupied territory were subjected to measures intended to deprive them of their national characteristics and to make the land and population affected a German province (p. 42).”
When the Hawaiian Kingdom was occupied during the Spanish-American War, the United States operated in complete disregard to the recognized principles of the law of occupation at the time. Instead of administering the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom, being the occupied State, the United States imposed its own laws, administration, judiciary and economic life throughout the Hawaiian Islands in violation of Hawaiian independence and sovereignty. According to Professor Limken, this action taken by the United States would be considered as “the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor,” which is the second phase of genocide after the national pattern of the occupied State had been destroyed under the first phase.
In other words, the actions taken by the United States was precisely what the Axis Powers did in occupied territories during World War I and II, which, according to Committee III, included “interference with the methods of education; compulsory education in the language of the occupant; … the ban on the using of the national language in schools, streets and public places; the ban on the national press and on the printing and distributing of books in the language of the occupied region; the removal of national symbols and names, both personal and geographical; [and] interference with religious services as far as they have a national peculiarity. [As well as] compulsory or automatic granting of the citizenship of the occupying Power; imposing the duty to swearing the oath of allegiance to the occupant; the introduction of the administrative and judicial system of the occupying Power, the imposition of its financial, economic and labour administration, the occupation of administrative offices by nationals of the occupying Power; compulsion to join organizations and associations of the occupying Power; colonization of the occupied territory by nationals of the occupant, exploitation and pillage of economic resources, confiscation of economic enterprises, permeation of the economic life through the occupying State or individuals of the nationality of the occupant.”
Under Hawaiian law, native (aboriginal ) Hawaiians had universal health care at no charge through the Queen’s Hospital, which received funding from the Hawaiian Kingdom legislature. Early into the occupation, however, American authorities stopped the funding in 1904, because they asserted that the collection of taxes used to benefit a particular ethnic group violated American law. In a legal opinion by the Territorial Government’s Deputy Attorney General E.C. Peters on January 7, 1904, to the President of the Board of Health, Peters stated, “I am consequently of the opinion that the appropriation of the sum of $30,000.00 for the Queen’s Hospital is not within the legitimate scope of legislative authority.”
Since 1904, aboriginal Hawaiians had to pay for their healthcare from an institution that was established specifically for them at no charge. As a result, many aboriginal Hawaiians could not afford medical care in their own country, which has led to the following dire health statistics today.
  • 4% of aboriginal Hawaiians who were surveyed in 2013 reported that they do not have any kind of health care coverage, which is the highest rate across all ethnic groups surveyed (Nguyen & Salvail, Hawaii Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, State of Hawai‘i Department of Health).
  • Aboriginal Hawaiians have the highest rate of diabetes in the Hawaiian Islands (Crabbe, Eshima, Fox, & Chan (2011), Native Hawaiian Health Fact Sheet 2011, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Demography Section, Research Division).
  • 5% of aboriginal Hawaiians are overweight, which is higher than any other ethnic group in the Hawaiian Islands (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • 7% of aboriginal Hawaiians have high blood pressure, being second only to Japanese at 39.7% (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • Aboriginal Hawaiians are more likely to have chronic diseases than non-aboriginal Hawaiians (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
  • 48% of the deaths of aboriginal Hawaiian children occur during the perinatal period (Crabbe et al., 2011).
  • 7% of aboriginal Hawaiian adults report being diagnosed with a depressive disorder (Nguyen & Salvail, 2013).
Professor Lemkin would view these statistics as connoting “the destruction of the biological structure” of aboriginal Hawaiians, which is the outcome of the second phase of genocide where the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor has been established. In addition to these statistics are added the deaths of aboriginal Hawaiians who died in the wars of the United States after forced conscription into the Armed Forces and their compulsion to swear allegiance. These wars included World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

US Recruiting PosterURL: http://wp.me/p31YBQ-Wk

Silent Coup Beginning to Overtake America Now-Larry Nichols


By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com 

larry-nichols-300x155

Former Clinton insider Larry Nichols has worked with, and now against, the Clintons. Nichols has some of the top political and financial connections on the planet.  Nichols hopes the public is finally realizing the enormous power struggle going on.  Nichols explains, “There is no two-party system in the United States of America.  Let’s get that straight.  There is no two-party system, there is one.  Part of it is a red team and part of it is a blue team.   You think you have a choice, but as you know you only have a choice between the two they give you to vote for, but here comes Trump.  Trump doesn’t need their money . . . he will bust up the system, and he will not only bust up the system for the Republican Party, but he will bust up the system (for both parties).  So, there are many establishment Republicans that have said they would rather vote for Hillary than Trump. . . . They must maintain status quo of the system for these power elite people to stay where they want to be.”

Nichols goes on to say, “We are at the beginning of a velvet or silent coup. It’s been going on for years.  There’s been a slow subtle takeover of our form of government, starting years and years ago, but it is coming to an end.  That’s why there is this power play now.  It’s more aggressive than you have seen before.  If we don’t stop Hillary, it’s over.  Is Trump the answer to all of our problems?  I don’t know.  Here’s what I do know about Donald Trump.  Donald Trump is not in the system.  How do I know that?  As hard as they are working to keep him out is a pretty good recommendation for me.  He’s not one of them.  He might be a good president.  When you mention Hillary or the establishment, there is no ‘might.’  With them, we would get what we have been getting but only worse.  There is not a ‘might’ there.”

Nichols says the good news might come in the general election in November. Nichols explains, “The American voters’ vote counts in the general election.  Remember that.  The play in the system has always been to trick it in the primaries and get both people that are the same but different colors.  The general election has always been set up where people do get to vote, and they will get to pick the lessor of two evils.  This time, it’s different.  This time, the American voters can make a difference if Trump can stay in and actually get the nomination.”

On the teetering financial system, Nichols says, “One of the five major banks has way too much of that $72 billion Puerto Rican debt. It might not sink them, but it may cause a problem.  If one of the major banks took a hit like that. . . . The FDIC just said it does not have enough liquidity if two major banks went into default.  If one of the major banks falls or if one major bank was getting ready to take a nose dive, people would run on all the banks wouldn’t they?  If everybody tried to cash their money out of the banks at one time, they would get about 6 cents on the dollar.  You think you got a $100,000 protected in the bank—you don’t.”

Nichols, who is currently undergoing treatments for lung cancer, also says, “I believe President Obama doesn’t really want to leave. Now, how could he stay?  It only takes a crisis.  If a national crisis is declared . . . FEMA comes in.  Most people don’t even know about the FEMA provisional plan.  In case a meteor hits America and we go into a national crisis, FEMA has already got a plan in place ready to go where they will set up a provisional government.  So, if the banks were to start collapsing, guess what Obama would do?

He’d go to Congress and get them to vote and boom, in comes the provisional FEMA government, which makes the president . . . king.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with former Clinton insider Larry Nichols.

(There is much, much more in the extensive video interview.)

After the Interview:

You can follow Larry on his Facebook page. He also has a radio show he uploads on YouTube.  It’s called Larry Nichols Live. If you want to donate to help Larry Nichols with his lung cancer treatments, you can do so on PayPal. The address to use to donate is NicholsLive@aol.com.

(Programming note: There will be no Weekly News Wrap-Up (WNW) this week. The Larry Nichols interview is taking the place of the WNW and the “Early Sunday Release.”  The next post will be on Tuesday night (5/10/16) after midnight.)

Our Technology Decades Ahead of What’s Known (Part 2) | Rense Radio Interview with William Tompkins and Maj. George Filer & Frank Chille – March 23, 2016



admin 03 May 2016


 

Transcripts Part 1

Transcripts Part 2

 

Jeff Rense: Okay. It’s Wednesday, middle of the week and we’re going to do something very exciting tonight – really provocative. William Tompkins is back tonight. He, of course, is the man who started out as a very young American patriot, joined the Navy and is obviously gifted, to the extent that they pulled him way up to the top in terms of including him in very secretive affairs, very advanced technological affairs over time. He went on to work, after the Navy, with one of the highest-rated and most brilliant defense contractors, Thompson Ramo Wooldridge (TRW).

And there’s a lot to talk about. We’ve had William Tompkins on the program several times before. We’ve talked about the space fleet we have. We’ve talked about where we have gone in our solar system and, perhaps, elsewhere. I don’t have the answers. All I have are questions. And I listen to what Bill says….

Source:

Sphere Being Alliance

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2016/05/Our-Technology-Decades-Ahead-of-Whats-Known-Part-2-Rense-Radio-Interview-with-William-Tompkins-and-Maj-George-Filer-Frank-Chille-March-23-2016.html

“Network of Corporate Global Control” and Karen Hudes ~ My Fat Foot! by Anna von Reitz


democracy-2020-ahmed-abdelhamid-al-jazeera-talk-7-728

As we explained in “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”—- available on Amazon. com —- there IS a “network of corporate global control”— it is the natural result of the interlocking trust directorate created by the Unam Sanctum Trust over the course of seven centuries.

Anyone knowing that (1) the Global Estate Trust exists and has existed since 1302; and (2) that  “Royal” feudalism was created by this system; and (3) that Royal grants, favors, charters (as in corporate charters) and contracts were used to administer this system—— should in the tradition of all blind mice be able to figure out that self-interested interlocking networks of institutions were the result.
.
But it wasn’t until about five years ago that Dutch mathematicians studying statistical correlations stumbled on evidence that only about a hundred major corporations “rule” the planet and that they are all interlocked at the top.  They weren’t looking for this information. They just observed it and published it in a peer-reviewed paper in a scientific journal.  I read it at the time and nodded.
.
What else would you expect?  What other result could there be?  You have FACT A— the existence of a globe-spanning interlocking trust directorate created by the Unam Sanctum Trust and you have FACT B — the existence of a globe-spanning interlocking network of global corporate control and you are—- surprised?  Really?
.
The so-called System of Global Corporate Control has evolved over the course of organizing people and functions for seven hundred years— it’s not some kind of deliberate, conscious, orchestrated conspiracy.
k-hudeshdr
Yet, Karen Hudes continues her search for some kind of excuse or scapegoat for her bosses and their bad behavior.  She has latched onto this Dutch statistical study and is trying to ride that until it drops. Any kind of scapegoat or explanation will do for Karen, so long as her banker bosses get off the hook.
.
Instead of coming up with all these fanciful schemes from Wolfgang Struck until now, it would be so refreshing if she just tried the truth, and tried to come up with some logical, meaningful explanation for what the World Bank and IBRD have done?
.
What excuse is there for criminally defrauding millions upon millions of innocent people for your own profit?
.
Come on, Karen, let’s hear the explanation of why we should hold the bankers at the World Bank and IBRD harmless— the real reason, please, if there is any.
.
The dog ate their records of the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc.?
.
They “forgot” who the Priority Creditors were?
.
They couldn’t logically figure out who the heirs of the Priority Creditors were and notify them?
.
They just had to claim that all that American gold was “abandoned property”?
.
Let us guess—- that mean old, bad old “Network of Corporate Global Control” made them do it?
.
It would be better in my opinion to admit that the Devil made them do it— “Oh, come on! The Americans are so clueless, they’ll never know…..”
.
What a shock of disbelief must have rippled over the thick, thick carpets and down the halls and wafted over the chrome and the walnut panel doors…… the Americans are waking up?
.
And we aren’t buying any shinola this week, either.
.
So while Ms. Hudes is trying to present the results of a mathematics project as a “discovery” explaining all the evil in the world, and as something to blame and promote as a scapegoat to excuse her bosses for their bad behavior, she is also making the lame attempt to blackball me as a “CIA operative”…. hahahaha!  The “Jesuit Agent” label didn’t work, so now this?
.
Well, they DID have a CIA operative using my name working in New York City, but she was of African and Serbian descent, got busted for shoplifting, and couldn’t quite pull the MO.

TTIP Leaks ~ Greenpeace


wikileaks-tpp-investment-cartoon

Greenpeace Netherlands has released secret TTIP negotiation documents. We have done so to provide much needed transparency and trigger an informed debate on the treaty. This treaty is threatening to have far reaching implications for the environment and the lives of more than 800 million citizens in the EU and US.

Whether you care about environmental issues, animal welfare, labour rights or internet privacy, you should be concerned about what is in these leaked documents. They underline the strong objections civil society and millions of people around the world have voiced: TTIP is about a huge transfer of power from people to big business.

Link to doc’s: https://ttip-leaks.org/

 

 

The UN and the Oiligarchs Are Teaming Up to Take Over the Oceans corbettreport


Note: No, no, no!! I remove any implied consent to more plundering of our oceans and natural resources by any corporation or corporation pretending to be government!!

Does humanity get to roll back all these global agenda’s to plunder the environment and our free will thru bills like Agenda 2030 and the TPP, after disclosure takes place? Which I assume, will also be after “The Shift”….if so, it can happen fast enough.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=18491

Spiro Skouras joins us today to discuss his recent expose on the UN’s Agenda 2030 global goals, its oiligarch and billionaire backers, and the attempt to take over the world’s oceans. From “no go zones” and hydrocarbon rights to the shady characters and groups that are funding this resource grab, you won’t want to miss this informative interview.

Manufacturing consent in science: the diabolical twist ~ by Jon Rappoport




Manufacturing consent in science: the diabolical twist

by Jon Rappoport

April 19, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

In the famous 1988 Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman book, Manufacturing Consent, the authors explore how media distort the news and employ propaganda, in order to bring about consent/consensus in the population.

This is nothing less than the creation of reality.

I want to extend that concept here, particularly as it applies to science.

From so many directions, official science is shaping our future—that’s why it’s vital to understand the manipulations involved.

It’s one thing to say media collaborate to sell a false picture of reality, a picture which is then bought by the masses. It’s quite another thing to say media collaborate to pretend there is already a consensus of the best professional minds on a given scientific subject—when there isn’t.

I’ll start with a theoretical example. Let’s say three researchers at a university examine data based on US moon missions, and they conclude that a small set of new conclusions are true. I’ll call this set X.

The researchers publish an article in a journal, and a healthy debate ensues in professional circles. Is X correct? Are there flaws in the research?

However, a powerful public agency decides that X is dangerous. X could lead to inquiries about contractors, investigations into cost overruns, missing money, and, worst of all, flawed engineering of space-capsules.

Therefore, this powerful agency goes on an all-out propaganda campaign, tapping its press sources, culminating in a new study that concludes X is entirely false.

The press basically trumpets: “Experts agree X is false. X was the result of shoddy research. The original researchers made numerous amateur mistakes.”

Notice that, in this case, the press isn’t simply distorting the news. It’s announcing that a superior consensus already exists among the best scientific minds.

It’s lying about a consensus that doesn’t exist among scientists who, up until that moment, were having a healthy debate.

The press is presenting the false consensus as if it were real and widespread, when it isn’t.

And at this point, all relevant scientists get the message: keep quiet, don’t debate for another moment; otherwise grant monies will vanish, demotions will occur, peers will lay on heavy criticism, excommunication from The Club will follow.

So these scientists do keep quiet—and then a consensus among them comes into being overnight, by implied threat and coercion.

This is basically what happened in the arena of energy-production via cold fusion. Wikipedia adequately summarizes the surface of the situation: “The most famous cold fusion claims were made by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann in 1989. After a brief period of interest by the wider scientific community, their reports were called into question by nuclear physicists.”

Not just called into question; defamed, derided, mocked, slammed over the head with a sledgehammer.

A superior consensus was invented, despite the fact that many scientists were intensely interested in the Pons/Fleishmann findings. They tried, in vain, to point out that the failed efforts to reproduce those findings resulted because researchers were altering Pons and Fleishman’s methods.

No dice. Cold fusion was labeled a giant error and even a fraud. The official door was closed.

In my research leading up to the publication of my first book, AIDS INC., in 1988, I reviewed the period of the early 1980s, when many researchers were coming at the question of the cause of AIDS from different angles. But then, suddenly, in the spring of 1984, the US government officially announced, at a televised press conference, that a virus called HTLV-III (HIV) was the cause.

The science was shoddy, to put it mildly. It was bad science and no science. But no matter. Overnight, all the monies that had gone into discovering what caused AIDS were diverted into the question: How does HIV cause AIDS? Any scientist who failed to see the handwriting on the wall was shoved out into the cold.

The press closed ranks. The consensus (though it was manufactured in the blink of an eye) was trumpeted around the world.

The big news headline wasn’t just false and distorted. It was false-and-distorted about a consensus that, until a few seconds ago, didn’t exist—and only existed now because researchers went silent and accepted dogma and folded up.

For years (and even now), the basic news about climate change/global warming is: there is a consensus. The science is settled. The scientists agree that the science is settled. The scientists agree that the scientists who agree are correct. This, despite the fact that you can still find impressive lists of scientists who don’t agree at all. But they are shut out of the news.

The same construction of consensus applies to the safety of vaccines.

The same construction of consensus applies to the “overwhelming success of the practice of modern medicine.”

Predatory corporations who spray poisonous pesticides all over the world and cause birth defects need special protection and cover? Invent, overnight, and broadcast, a consensus that a basically harmless virus is the cause of those tragic defects.

I can assure you there are many scientists who don’t, for a second, believe the Zika virus is the agent of destruction. But they are keeping their mouths shut now and rolling with the tide.

However, that tide is turning. In many arenas of science, journalists and researchers with no allegiance to official bodies have emerged.

A different species of handwriting is being inscribed on the wall.

What can the mainstream press do about it?

They can only deploy the crass tactics I’ve mentioned here.

A massive and stunning re-education is taking place among the population. No school is running it. No agency is sponsoring it. It’s happening from the ground up.

It turns out that living as a cipher and a unit in the sticky web of fabricated consensus isn’t nearly as attractive as it once was.

More and more, major media are using the consensus strategy to invent the news—and people are rejecting it.

Without realizing it, the press is committing professional suicide. An article that was once headlined, “Three dead horses found in a field,” has become, “Scientists agree that the three dead horses were a coincidence.” And people are laughing the press out of court.


power outside the matrix


The ongoing scandal surrounding the film, Vaxxed (trailer), is a good example. The press assures the population that pointing out a connection between a vaccine and autism is absurd, because scientific experts agree there is no such connection.

But the film features a long-time researcher at the Centers for Disease Control, who confesses that he and colleagues falsified a 2004 study in order to exonerate one such vaccine.

The film’s subject is false consensus.

And the press can do no better than repeat, over and over: the consensus is real and valid.

The CDC researcher, William Thompson, is essentially shouting, “I was part of the consensus. Don’t you get it? I was a card-carrying member of the club that invents fake consensus. And now I’m telling you that. Don’t fall for this notion that the best minds agree. The best minds conspire to concoct agreement out of thin air.”

The media are collapsing into their own swamp.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Zen Gardner:Day of Sacrifice by Fire – Humanity vs Insanity w/ Ian Crane


by Zen Gardner Apr 19, 2016

2 150
  • If the date of April 19th isn’t already indelibly imprinted upon your mind … it will be after hearing this discussion between Ian R Crane & the inimitable Zen Gardner!

A Tale Of Two Fundraisers – Clinton Vs Sanders


Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Screen Shot 2016-04-18 at 10.56.31 AM

 

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.

 

– Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities

By now, most of you will have heard about political oligarch Hillary Clinton’s pair of “obscene” California fundraisers hosted by George Clooney this past weekend. For those of you who aren’t up to speed, here’s a quick recap from Variety:

Clinton is attending a $33,400-per-person event hosted by the Clooneys in San Francisco on Friday evening. It is being held at the home of venture capitalist Shervin Pishevar, and a group of Sanders supporters have said that they plan to demonstrate outside the event. According to Politico, that is the sum that those who want to sit at the head table at the event are being asked to raise — or contribute $353,400. The money is being raised for the Hillary Victory Fund, which includes contributions to the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and state party committees.

 

On Saturday night, Clinton will attend another event hosted by the Clooneys at their Studio City home, with tickets priced at $33,400 per person. The L.A. event is co-hosted by Jeffrey and Marilyn Katzenberg, Steven Spielberg and Kate Capshaw and Haim and Cheryl Saban. The campaign also has been holding a contest in which participants can win tickets to attend.

Haim Saban, that name rings a bell doesn’t it? Recall the following civil liberties lesson from the post, “You Want to Be Free and Dead?” – Billionaire Hillary Clinton Donor Says to Sacrifice Civil Liberties for “Safety”:

What are people in Hollywood saying about the Paris terror attacks?

 

Many members of the Hollywood community are very liberal and they value their civil liberties more than they value life. I disagree with that. You want to be free and dead? I’d rather be not free and alive. 

This is the sort of attitude toward freedom you see from the typical billionaire bankrolling Hillary.

Interestingly enough, Clooney’s Los Angeles millionaire neighbor, Howard Gold, decided to host a simultaneous fundraiser for Bernie.

The cost of admission: 27 bucks.

Sanders supporters in Los Angeles are planning to hold a $27-per-person “99% Party” at the nearby home of Howard Gold of the 99 Cents Only store family, according to a copy of the invite. “Humping Hillary’s visit at millionaire George Clooney’s. Next door, his millionaire neighbor simultaneously presents,” the invite reads.

The Hill adds…

George Clooney’s next door neighbor held his own fundraiser — to benefit Bernie Sanders — during the actor’s posh Hollywood soiree Saturday night with Hillary Clinton.

 

Howard Gold, whose family founded the 99 Cents Only store chain, called his bash the “99% Party,” with tickets selling for $27 per person.

 

The invite also notes that “no-one (will be) turned away for a lack of funds.”

So I take it no static noise cannons then?

Gold’s event turned into a pool party, pro-Sanders event and Clinton protest. As Clinton’s motorcade arrived on the street headed to the Clooneys,’ protesters showered her car with $1 bills.

Here’s a video of the protest. Pretty genius:

Finally, while we’re on the topic of Hillary’s monetary shadiness, let’s turn to some excerpts from yesterday’s Forbes article, Why Did Congo Offer Clinton $650,000 For Two Pics And A Speech?

Congo, one of the poorest nations on Earth, offered former President Bill Clinton a speaking fee of $650,000–a sum equal to annual per-capita income of 2,813 Congolese. Indeed, the International Monetary Fund ranks the Democratic Republic of the Congo dead last in its global income rankings. What did it expect in return for its investment?

 

In the proposed 2012 contract, the organizers expected a speech and at least one photograph each with the leaders of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Congo, which appeared to be splitting the princely honorarium. (Since there are two nations known as Congo, in this article, unless otherwise specified, I am referring to the Democratic Republic of the Congo whenever I write “Congo” alone.) That doesn’t seem like much of a return, two snaps and a chat. So the question is: What else did Congo want for its money?

 

While Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, America’s top official dealing with foreign leaders, former President Bill Clinton travelled the world giving speeches to world leaders and overseas interests–earning at least $48 million while his wife was America’s top diplomat. Why weren’t the payments to one Clinton not considered a bribe to the other Clinton?

 

Apparently Foggy Bottom nixed Clinton’s plans to travel to Congo as well as his request to give a paid speech in North Korea. In any event, he didn’t go. But the offer itself is the issue.

 

What could Congo President Joseph Kabila want?…

 

Consider the case of Lundin Mining. Lukas Lundin, a Swedish investor who founded the company, donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation between 2007 and 2013. (The foundation only reports ranges, not exact amounts, for some of its donors.) Lundin Group pledged another $100 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to a 2007 Clinton Foundation press release. Lundin Mining has substantial operations in the Congo. A partner of Lundin in its Congo operations, Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold, gave the Clinton Foundation as much as $500,000, according documents released by the foundation that present its contributions in the $250,000-$500,000 range. What did the mining giants get in return?

 

The State department, under Clinton’s leadership, entered into talks with the Congo in 2010 over its dispute with Lundin and Freeport-McMoran in what The Financial Times characterizes as “in support of Freeport.” Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer tells a similar tale. The result speaks for itself. Congo gave up its efforts to seize some of the world’s most lucrative copper mines from Lundin and his partners in exchange for increasing its share of the profits by less than 3%.

 

So what did Kabila expect in return for his proffered gift to the Clinton Foundation? Clearly, he had seen other businessmen in his country (like Lundin)  prosper after their generosity with the Clinton Foundation. Perhaps it is a coincidence that one event followed the other? Either way, Kabila knew that a donation might be a good way to hedge his bets. After all, he knew about the allegations, during the Clinton presidency, that Clinton had traded overnight stays in the Lincoln bedroom for campaign cash. Is the Clinton Foundation simply the same idea on a larger scale? One can see why Kabila, accustomed to the ways of a corrupt continent, might think so.

The only question is, who doesn’t Hillary Clinton owe favors to? I’ll give you a hint: The American people.

Vote wisely, New York.

For related articles, see:

Hillary Clinton Accused of Using “Static Noise Machine” at Colorado Fundraiser

The Real Reason Hillary Clinton Refuses to Release Her Wall Street Transcripts

Who’s the Real Progressive? A Side by Side Comparison of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton’s Lifetime Donors

Inspiration for Wall Street’s “Gordon Gekko” Proclaims – Only Sanders Can Stop the Banksters

Hillary Clinton’s Net Favorability Rating Among Democrats is Cut in Half and Hits New Low

The Truth About Hillary Clinton and Verizon

You ready?

Screen Shot 2016-04-18 at 11.39.21 AM

Enter The Buzzsaw ~ Hollywood Illuminati, Sex Magick & Satanic Super Bowl Ritual with Mark Dice


Illuminati infiltration of Hollywood and professional sports has created satanic celebrations at the Oscar Awards and Super Bowl, and we unmask them with Mark Dice. From Eyes Wide Shut, to Lady Gaga, and the Super Bowl halftime show celebrations of the Satanic–we try to separate the fad of illuminati imagery from the substantial effects of a mass designed mind-control. How the CIA collude with movies to brainwash people, the music industry pressure to sexualize and bend musicians to their agenda, and the voices that are actually using the medium to critique the conspiracy are revealed in this uncensored Buzzsaw hosted by Sean Stone.

GUEST BIO:
Mark Dice is the author of several popular books on secret societies and conspiracies, including The Illuminati: Facts & Fiction, Inside the Illuminati,The Bilderberg Group: Facts & Fiction, Big Brother: The Orwellian Nightmare Come True, and his newest book, The Bohemian Grove: Facts & Fiction, which are available in paperback on Amazon.com, or e-book on Kindle, iBooks, Nook or Google Play. While much of Mark’s work confirms the existence and continued operation of the Illuminati today, he is also dedicated to debunking conspiracy theories and hoaxes and separating the facts from the fiction; hence the “Facts & Fiction” subtitle for several of his books. He has a bachelor’s degree in communication from California State University.

ADD’L LINKS:
http://www.markdice.com/
https://twitter.com/MarkDice
https://www.youtube.com/user/MarkDice
https://www.facebook.com/MarkDice
http://thelip.tv/
http://thelip.tv/show/buzzsaw/
https://www.youtube.com/c/Buzzsawwith…
Buzzsaw Full Episodes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeR5W…
Buzzsaw Interview Highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6zwG…
Buzzsaw Secret Societies Illuminated Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Metaphysics and Visionary Spirituality on Buzzsaw Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Shadow Government Revealed on Buzzsaw:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
Alien Truth on Buzzsaw Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
More Buzzsaw Interview Highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpVpd…
https://www.facebook.com/EnterTheBuzz…
https://www.facebook.com/thelip.tv
http://www.youtube.com/theliptv
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC25k…

EPISODE BREAKDOWN:
00:01 Welcoming Mark Dice to Buzzsaw.
01:00 Awakening to the illuminati in entertainment–concerted effort or a fad?
03:50 The CIA and Hollywood.
08:09 The Masonic Oscar ceremony and ritual evolution of the Super Bowl.
11:32 Monarch project infiltrating musicians and actors-Kesha
16:16 The owl decoded.
18:59 Lady Gaga’s resurrection of R. Kelly.
21:20 Professional sports and the game of mind control.
25:32 Consumerism run amok and technocratic disassociation.
28:05 Filmmaking against the illuminati, plausible deniability and subliminal truth.
34:06 Celebrity sacrifices, vs the serious targeting of Michael Hastings.
42:15 Eyes Wide Shut, sex magick, and the Hellfire club.
47:05 Thanks and goodbye.

Delusional Judge orders company to label all-natural milk ‘IMITATION,’ and has thousands of gallons flushed down the drain


 

Friday, April 15, 2016 by: Amy Goodrich

Dairy products

(NaturalNews) For three generations, the Ocheesee Creamery, a tiny family-owned dairy farm located in Grand Ridge, Florida, has skimmed milk the old-fashioned way to produce the most natural cream, ice cream, whole milk and butter. For years, they have been selling the byproduct, skim milk, in its most natural form at the local farmers’ markets and health food stores.

While Mary Lou Wesselhoeft has always had the desire to provide her customers with the most natural products, she’s now being forced to dump about 400 gallons of skim milk each day, because a judge in Florida has ruled that they can’t call it skim milk because there are no synthetic vitamins added.

The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs has now forced her to call the all-natural pasteurized skim milk they produce “imitation milk,” or infuse it with synthetic vitamin A, which would make it anything but all-natural.

“I just want to tell the truth,” said Mary Lou Wesselhoeft of Ocheesee Creamery. “Our skim milk was pure skim milk, and nobody was ever confused when we called it skim milk. I refuse to lie to my customers, so I have stopped selling skim milk until I am allowed to tell the truth again.”

The controversy of our food labeling system

How can it be possible that a perfectly natural product is forced to be labeled as imitation?

The dictionary definition of skim milk is simply milk with the cream removed. Even Chief Judge Robert Hinkle couldn’t deny that.

“You know something’s been removed in order to make it skim milk,” Judge Hinkle said.

“It’s hard to call this imitation milk. It came right out of the cow,” Hinkle said. “Anyone who reads imitation skim milk would think it didn’t come out of a cow.”

However, he could not rule in favor of the creamery, because this would go against the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as well as the state laws upon which the food labeling system is based. Judge Hinkle added that most of the skim milk sold in stores has added vitamins to comply with state laws.

The Department of Agriculture notes that under state and federal law, skim milk can’t be sold as skim milk unless vitamins in the milk fat are replaced so that it has the same nutritional value as whole milk.

“Consumers have the expectation they’ll get a certain amount of nutrition,” Davis said. “(Ocheesee’s milk) is not skim milk and that disclaimer of imitation accurately portrays that. It’s either they make their product skim milk or they sell it as imitation.”

Wasting a perfect all-natural product

Mary Lou and Paul Wesselhoeft have refused to add synthetic vitamin A to their skim milk, nor will they call their natural product imitation milk.

The Wesselhoefts and their attorneys note that the state is violating their First Amendment rights by forcing them to label something they say it is not. The creamery’s attorney, Justin Pearson of the Institute for Justice, will not accept the decision, and plans to appeal the case to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Her entire business is based on selling pure, all-natural items and that’s exactly why her customers purchase dairy items from her. So the idea of being forced to label one of these all-natural dairy items as imitation is absurd,” he said. “It would be disastrous to her business.”

While this may take months, the creamery will continue to sell other natural dairy products, such as whole milk, cheese and butter. However, they will have to disappoint at least some of their customers, since Florida has made it impossible for them to sell skim milk. They will also be forced to keep wasting thousands of gallons of all natural skim milk, thanks to absurd state rules.

Sources for this article include

OffTheGridNews.com

NPR.org

NaturalNews.com

HotAir.com

Yahoo.com

Science.NaturalNews.com

‘Our Corrupt, Fascist Government EXPOSED’ Jason Burack ~ SGTreport.com


Jason Burack from the Wall Street For Main Street You Tube channel joins me to dissect the death of the Republic of the United States – and the end of the rule of law. And we dissect the Panama Papers which are aimed at Putin, Assad and the Prime Minister of Iceland – all of whom are enemies of the West and the banks which control it.
Thanks for tuning in.

Jason’s You Tube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/user/WallStFo…

Watch: BILLIONS IN CHANGE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY7f1…

Watch :The Veneer of Justice in a Kingdom of Crime:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHgbR

For REAL News & Information 24/7:
http://sgtreport.com/
http://thelibertymill.com/

6 Colorado Teenagers File Appeal in Fracking and Climate Lawsuit ~ Our Children’s Trust


From  Our Children’s Trust

Six youth plaintiffs on Monday appealed Denver District Court Judge Eric Elliff’s adverse decision to their fracking and climate change lawsuit. In his decision, Judge Elliff affirmed the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s order to deny the fracking petition brought by the young plaintiffs, determining that the commission is required to “strike a balance between the regulation of oil and gas operations and protecting public health, the environment and wildlife resources.”

cofrack750

Contrary to the plain language of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Act, the court said that is appropriate for the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to “balance” oil and gas development with the need to protect public health, the environment and wildlife. In reaching this conclusion, the court ignored plaintiffs’ arguments that such an interpretation of Colorado’s Oil and Gas Conservation Act would allow for the continued infringement of their constitutional rights, including “the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; and of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness,” rights that oil and gas development are harming. The court also ignored the plethora of evidence before it detailing the serious harms that oil and gas development is causing to Coloradans public’s health and to the environment.

“Our health and safety are on the line,” said Xiuhtezcatl Roske-Martinez, 15-year-old plaintiff and youth director of Earth Guardians.

“For the future of all Coloradans, it was imperative for us to file this appeal. It’s a preposterous idea that the commission need to strike a balance between regulation of oil and gas operations and protecting the health of Coloradans. The commission’s priority should be the health and safety of us, the people. Right now, our government is putting their profits above our futures and that needs to stop.”

The case was brought by six inspiring youth who are all members of the Boulder-based organization Earth Guardians. The youths’ case against the commission arose out of a petition for rulemaking that asked the commission to stop issuing permits that allow oil and gas drilling until it is proven that drilling can be conducted without adversely impacting human health and safety and without harming the environment and wildlife. The commission denied the petition, finding that it did not have the authority to issue the requested rule and that “other commission priorities … must take precedence.” The plaintiffs challenged this decision, arguing that the commission must place human health and safety above the interests of the oil and gas industry in Colorado.

“Without question, this decision places public health at a level that is only as important as corporate dollars,” said Julia Olson, a native Coloradan and executive director and chief legal counsel at Our Children’s Trust.

“The health, safety and welfare of all Coloradans are now subordinate to the interests of fossil fuel industry’s development of oil and gas resources. While no one suggests that public health, safety and welfare should be the sole factors, they should certainly be the primary factors in everything the state does, including natural resource development. This court went so far as to say that there is no legislative intent to make public health the primary factor in defendants’ decisions to issue oil and gas permits.”

The six youth plaintiffs and their attorneys are hopeful that the district court’s decision will be reversed by the Colorado Court of Appeals.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

How Much Money Has Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Taken From the Fossil Fuel Industry?

Mark Ruffalo: TPP Would Fuel Climate Chaos and Empower Corporate Polluters

http://ecowatch.com/2016/04/05/appeal-fracking-lawsuit/