New Year’s in Cologne: Sexual crime and the radicalizing of European society ~ Sott.net Focus story


By now we’ve all heard what happened in Cologne, Germany, on New Year’s Eve. A group of 1000 refugees allegedly caused mayhem in the city’s main square, drinking heavily, launching firecrackers into the crowd, robbing people, and sexually assaulting over 100 women. According to Cologne police, over 200 cases of sexual assault have been registered. A climate of fear is the result, along with a backlash against authorities, from local police to Germany’s leadership. It’s “sexual terrorism” at its worst, proof that Germany’s experiment in multiculturalism, and their open-arms policy to refugees from the Middle East and North Africa, have been utter failures. The coverage and reactions are unequivocal. But is this narrative justified? Hardly. We don’t even have a clear idea of exactly what happened in Cologne that night. The fact that all media outlets are in agreement – in a country where the media is controlled by the CIAindicates the ‘operational’ and contrived nature of the coverage, and perhaps even the event itself.

So far, available video from the scene shows a large crowd of young people (mostly men) on the square, some obviously drinking, and several of them launching firecrackers into the sky and some into the crowd. Basically, a large group, or several smaller groups, of teens and twenty-somethings acting like teens and twenty-somethings do in most of the Western world: irresponsibly and “just having a bit of fun”. What the videos don’t show, but what certainly also occurred, was a series of sexual assaults on women in the area by an unknown number of these young men. Victims report being forced through groups of young men – of Middle Eastern or North African appearance – where they were repeatedly groped at, some robbed, and at least one or two reportedly raped.

Police have identified 32 suspects, 18 or 19 of whom are recent asylum seekers. Another report says the breakdown of suspects is as follows: nine Algerians, eight Moroccans, five Iranians, four Syrians, three Germans, one Iraqi, one Serb, and one American.

It’s hard to get an idea of the actual number of people involved just by looking at suspects: some are probably innocent, and some could very likely remain unidentified. But from the reports I have read and watched, it sounds like the men involved in these attacks were part of a much smaller group, perhaps 30-40 men, as one of the victims described. (If any of our readers have reports saying otherwise, please let us know in the comments.) This makes sense. The mainstream reporting doesn’t.

Think about it. Reading the mainstream reporting, we would be forgiven for thinking that all 1000 men in the square participated in the assaults, because that’s what the MSM is saying. But how was this determined? How are we to imagine every single male in this crowd collectively assaulting 100-200 women? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think any of the women reported this. Much more plausible is that a smaller number of perverts (say, 2 or 3 dozen) each assaulted multiple women in the manner the witnesses describe.

Regardless of the number of perps, the assaults seem to have involved some degree of advance planning, especially given that similar attacks occurred in Finland, Sweden, Switzerland and Austria, which have led the German Justice Minister to suspect the multiple assaults were coordinated. At the very least, it appears that social media was used to plan the gathering in the city square, but there’s no indication that the call was put out to rob and sexually assault women. If that happened, it happened using a different means, perhaps among a smaller, more select group.

Since the attacks, rival groups have demonstrated for and against refugees. “Unknown assailants” have carried out attacks on random refugees. Merkel’s party has proposed tougher laws on asylum seekers, with some politicians calling for deportations.

The refugee crisis in context

Before I comment on the social and media response to these assaults, let me get a few things out of the way. First, the refugee crisis wouldn’t exist if the EU hadn’t bowed down before the will of the U.S., and if NATO under the direction of the U.S. (and Israel) hadn’t made it its goal to destroy country after country in the Middle East and North Africa. Gadaffi warned EU leaders this would happen before his country was destroyed and he was lynched, and he was right. None of this would have happened if the U.S., with Europe’s spineless compliance, had not destroyed the Middle East.

Second, European nations had little choice but to accept the refugees once Turkey opened the floodgates and the media put on the public pressure. Morally and practically, they couldn’t just close their borders and refuse to let anyone in. What do you do with millions of people? For critics of Germany’s ‘open-door’ policy, what would a compassionate, common-sense response on Europe’s part to the refugee crisis have looked like in the first place? And even if there were a decent and effective way of turning that many people away, it would not stop criminal or terrorist elements from getting in, if they had a will to do so. It seems to me that European nations were placed in a near-impossible situation. Deliberately.

Third, we simply do not know the demographics of this refugee population. We don’t know where they’re from (many from other countries have used forged Syrian papers because they feel they will be treated better). Most are fleeing war zones, but many are also economic refugees (i.e. those whose lives were not in any great danger but who see Europe as providing better economic opportunities). A very small number are probably “jihadis”.

Fourth, like any human population, there will undoubtedly be a criminal element. If 1 out of every 100 people is a clinical psychopath (a conservative estimate), that means over 10,000 psychopaths entered Germany last year. And that’s not counting your garden-variety criminals. Add to that the Wahhabist nutjob jihadis who were sent into Europe deliberately. But remember also that, with the 1% ratio, there are as many as 800,000 German psychopaths in Germany.

Now, most people probably cannot keep all those points in their mind at any given moment. Stupid people come to stupid conclusions; even otherwise smart people do, especially when they are being emotionally manipulated. So the existence of even a relatively tiny number of social rejects, jihadists or prima donnas is enough to lead European nutjobs to assume all refugees are rapists, terrorists or greedy freeloaders. (Shout-out to Donald Trump!) And that’s exactly how the nutjob demographic of European society is reacting to the new refugee menace: with fascism and racism. All according to plan. Andrew Korybko summed it up:

The Wars on Iraq, Libya, and Syria created an acute humanitarian crisis where millions of people were forced from their homes and into external or internal refugee status. Working hand-in-glove with Erdogan’s Turkey, the US tempted millions of Syrians to flee their country and settle in the lands of their northern neighbor, only to later be strategically ‘released’ and pushed out to Europe via intelligence agency-linked drug and human-trafficking networks and routes.

As expected, the EU and the Balkan transit states were wholly overwhelmed by the unprecedented human flows that had strategically been directed against them, which, it must be reminded, was the entire objective that the US had been wanting to achieve. The domestic political and identity cleavages that this physical onslaught exacerbated soon developed into chasms of polarizing positions and physical activism, culminating in a predetermined and unstable mix of social ingredients that has heightened the Color Revolution threat in all of the Northern and Western European countries (with a similar risk being experienced in the Balkans, particularly Serbia and the Republic of Macedonia).

On command and with minimal guidance, these competing domestic factors (the pro-“refugee” camp, the anti-“refugee” camp, and the “refugees” themselves) can be manipulated into an all-out Hobbesian conflict amongst themselves and/or against the government, presenting a latent asymmetrical threat that’s sure to keep any wavering political leaders (i.e. those that are entertaining pragmatic relations with Russia and China) firmly under the US’ socio-political blackmail influence.

Since the beginning, the refugee crisis has been manipulated in order to bring about exactly this response. By hijacking the decent, if naive, people’s sense of compassion – only to have it thrown back in their faces in the form of manufactured terrorism – the powers that be are not only showing what they think of decent humans; they are using people’s compassion in order to turn European society racist, and ultimately, fascist. This has been the U.S.’s plan, and it’s working remarkably well. European society is being divided as part of the process of it being conquered by the inhuman ideology of psychopaths in positions of power.

But who will be the victors? Some (including the usually astute Korybko) seem to think the real danger lies with the refugees, that they will have a Sharia-izing effect on European societies, creating nests of terror within, which can then be exploited in faux ‘color revolutions’ that will leave Europe shouting “Allahu Akbar!” I really doubt it. Some crazy jihadis may wish it, but they’re being used by ‘higher powers’, and for a different agenda. There will be another Holocaust before ‘Sharia Law’ takes over Europe.

More likely: the color revolution will be truly homegrown. The best way to turn a country fascist is to manipulate its people into begging for it. The Wahhabist minority are just the excuse that will lead to neo-Nazi rallies and, ultimately, some form of concentration camps, initially to quarantine refugees, then Europe-born Muslims, then all dissenters. Until then, a weak Europe – distracted by internal polarization and conflict – is a compliant Europe.

Sexual terrorism, sex crime or contrived crises?

Getting back to the event(s) in question, the response has been typical: stoking the fires of race conflict. Peter Schwarz writes for World Socialist Web Site:

At any rate, given the absence of factual substantiation of what remain, at this point, no more than allegations, the ferocity of the press response can be explained only in political terms. The political parties and the media have launched a campaign that for many decades would have been considered impossible in Germany.

Some 70 years after the collapse of the Third Reich, the media is making use of the same disgusting types of racial stereotyping, with open appeals to paranoid sexual obsessions, in which the Nazis specialized. Once again, a shameless German media is evoking images of pure Nordic women being preyed upon by dark-skinned untermenschen (sub-humans).

On Saturday, the magazine Focus published on its cover an image of a nude woman covered by black handprints. The weekend edition of the Süddeutsche Zeitung carried an image of a white woman’s body with a black hand grasping her genitals. The newspaper also disseminated the image on Facebook.

This is essentially what those responsible for the refugee crisis want. For example, watch these interviews with Cologne locals.

Humans can’t really help it; our minds are designed to function based on fairly automatic pattern recognition and stereotypes. And if we’re unaware of that and don’t take it into account when actively reasoning, it’s natural to just let it happen unconsciously. The result is predictable: since some Middle Eastern or North African-looking individuals sexually assaulted a large number of women, chances are that the next Middle Eastern or North African-looking individual you see may be a sex offender. It’s nonsense, but largely unavoidable. Just look at the older woman in the video. She seems like a decent lady, but after these attacks she can’t help but wonder if the next Arab-looking man she sees will be a rapist. Not only will most if not all refugees get categorized into this ‘type’; so will non-refugees, like the two black men in the video.

The knock-on result, of course, is that non-whites in Europe will be further marginalized and discriminated against, leading to a higher probability that more of them will engage in ‘anti-social’ behavior. Continue this process for long enough, and an initially false characterization of non-whites as ‘undesirable’ has been made a reality.

Our inner type-casters are hard to escape. Take something Korybko wrote in the article linked to above:

Only individuals that had arrived in the country motivated by greedy or ideological pursuits could ever fathom to commit such a crime, let alone to plot it with around 1,000 conniving cohorts.

First of all, there’s no evidence yet that all 1,000 ‘cohorts’ ‘connived’ together. And the premise is laughable. Rape culture is deeply rooted in Germany, not an imported phenomenon:

Germany’s rape culture is deeply rooted in our collective psyche. Sexual assaults and even rape happen every year at big events like Oktoberfest. “The way to the toilet alone is like running the gauntlet: within 50 feet, you can be sure to tally three hugs from drunken strangers, two pats on the ass, someone looking up your dirndl and some beer purposely splashed right down your cleavage,” wrote Karoline Beisel and Beate Wild in 2011, in the Süddeutsche Zeitung. An average of 10 reported rapes take place each year at Oktoberfest. The estimated number of unreported cases is 200.

A 2004 study on the living conditions, security and health of women in Germany, showed that 13 percent of German women have experienced a form of criminal sexualised violence. The scandal is that only 8 percent of these women filed a complaint with the police. If you include multiple complaints, then the figure decreases to 5 percent. That means that an incredible 95 percent of women in Germany who experience sexual violence don’t report it to the police.

Nobody’s denying that people with immigrant backgrounds or of the Muslim faith are also guilty of committing sex crimes. But to act as if their cultural background has “programmed” them to do so, while making all sorts of excuses and downplaying the crimes of white Germans, will always be racist rabble-rousing.

The clearest thing to come out of the debate around what happened in Cologne as of yet is that Germany has a sexism issue and a racism issue. Both are deep-rooted and were not “imported”.

We’ll have to wait and see what the investigation uncovers. So far, two of those arrested were Moroccans (subsequently released). Just like the Paris attacks, where initial media reports painted the perpetrators as Syrian refugees (though all named suspects turned out to be European citizens), a similar thing is possible in this case. At this point, we don’t know. The perps could have been German-born unemployed youths from various backgrounds who were paid to act in certain ways and say certain things. See the account of this refugee from Cologne:

If his account is true, it looks like a small group initiated aiming firecrackers at the crowd. It wouldn’t be outside the realm of possibility to suggest that this gathering was infiltrated, or even organized in order to be infiltrated and co-opted, so that the actions of a small group would be used to demonize the whole group, further entrenching racist sentiments, and drumming up support for the far-right parties and the neo-Nazi element of German society.

The police response was also questionable. German police know perfectly well how to beat seven shades of excrement out of protesters, rioters, and squatters – they do it routinely. Yet in this case they reportedly sat back, watched it all happen, and did nothing. Nor did they call on reserves to handle what they saw was a dangerous situation. Reports say it was a “political decision”. Yes. The police do what they’re told – or not told – to do. If normal procedures are not followed – riot control – then someone high up the chain of command made that happen.

There are already reports of German police initially covering up the mayhem (and similar accusations coming out of Sweden). One German police officer allegedly told Bild that “law enforcement cannot efficiently tackle crime among refugees without being accused of excessive violence or racism, while many dangerous incidents are played down or kept secret to maintain desirable statistics”:

However, when a refugee needs to be controlled, the police cannot arrest him even for a while, the officer said, citing “superior orders” prescribing not to use coercive actions. “Our domestic rule is – better to let him run away.”

Now contrast that policy with the response to the recent anti-Muslim PEGIDA protest, for example. Just yesterday, some 250 German-looking hooligans caused mayhem, vandalizing foreign-owned shops, shouting racist slogans, and terrorizing the non-white population. More than 200 of them, members of LEGIDA, the Leipzig arm of PEGIDA, were arrested by police. Water canons were primed and ready for the demonstration. Nothing of the sort was brought out on New Year’s Eve.

What could the reason be for this ‘stand-down’? If police forces and politicians are really covering up the fact that refugees are implicated in these crimes in order to prevent people from forming negative opinions of refugees as a whole, they’re not doing a very good job. Either they’re that dumb, or there’s something else going on. If you deliberately avoid arresting criminals, there’s probably a reason. Perhaps those criminals are being paid by someone with the power and influence to make sure they’re not arrested. Or perhaps they are not arrested because having them free to repeat their crimes, and further destabilize Germany, is what certain people want. The far-right parties sure are benefiting from the chaos.

Think about it; how stupid do you have to be to not realize that allowing a small segment of society to engage in anti-social behavior because you don’t want people to form a negative opinion of that segment is going to achieve precisely the opposite result as the rest of society becomes aware of the anti-social behavior of the small segment and the fact that they are allowed to get away with it?

Germany and its leadership are facing a real dilemma. Europe as a whole is in the same position. Its leaders can continue to just roll with the punches, in which case the far-right will only continue gaining popularity. Or they can go the full Gestapo and surveil the entire immigrant population, and/or put them in camps against their will, in which case it will have done the far-right’s job for it. Whether from the Left or Right, such a scenario is a pathocrat’s fantasy.

At this point, there’s not a lot that can be done. Europe basically has a choice between one type of fascism and… another type of fascism. And one way or another, they’ll get it. There’s not much they could have done, except to refuse to be US vassals in the first place. Perhaps the best thing European leaders can do now is to just use some common sense. The refugees will not stop coming. (A German minister is saying only 10% of the refugee ‘wave’ has reached Europe. That’s 10 million more in the coming years.) If there are criminals, treat them as criminals. Investigate, make arrests. Try to make sure people have some basic psychological knowledge. Just as the existence of some criminal Germans does not mean all Germans are criminals, the existence of some criminal refugees does not mean all refugees are criminals, or should be treated as criminals.

The vast majority of refugees are not fanatic jihadis. Even in their home countries (e.g., Libya and Syria), only a tiny minority are nutjobs, just as it is in any country, including Germany, which has its own breed of fanatic nutjobs. As dangerous as the latter are, they are in all likelihood a small minority. However, the mob mind being what it is, events and reports such as this only succeed in painting all Muslims with the same brush. And that’s the point. Muslims are the new Jews.

Europeans should see what is going on for what it is: a deliberate attempt to undermine the real needs and aspirations of hundreds of thousands of decent refugees by associating them with the pathological, criminal minority. And a deliberate attempt to neuter European sovereignty and political effectiveness by creating and exploiting ‘sectarianism’ and internal conflict. Unless Europeans get their act together and learn to actually think, the innocent will suffer the most, because most are innocent.

Comment:

Avatar

Harrison Koehli (Profile)

Harrison Koehli hails from Edmonton, Alberta. A graduate of studies in music performance, Harrison is also an editor for Red Pill Press and has been interviewed on several North American radio shows in recognition of his contributions to advancing the study of ponerology. In addition to music and books, Harrison enjoys tobacco and bacon (often at the same time) and dislikes cell phones, vegetables, and fascists.

http://www.sott.net/article/310260-New-Years-in-Cologne-Sexual-crime-and-the-radicalizing-of-European-society

Oregon native tribe uneasy with armed standoff over land rights ~ Reuters


Note: More background on the Native American land rights involved and what appears to be another distraction-diversion psyop from “the system of domination and control”, here: http://wp.me/p17PKt-9gE

When armed men first took over a U.S. government wildlife refuge in Oregon this weekend, the leader of the area’s Native American tribal council could relate to their land-right dispute – but disagreed with their gun-toting approach.

“I just think they’re a bunch of glory hounds,” Charlotte Rodrique, chairwoman of the federally recognized Burns Paiute Tribe, said in an interview at the tribal reservation’s meeting house on Tuesday. “Look at us, look at what we’re doing.’ I don’t give much credence to their cause.”

The Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the small town of Burns have been thrust into the spotlight by the takeover, which began on Saturday and marked the latest protest over federal management of millions of acres (hectares) of land in the West.

The armed group’s standoff with the U.S. government over ranchers’ land rights has bewildered the tribe’s leaders. Although the Paiute have their own disputes over land and water with U.S. government agencies, they prefer a less adversarial approach.

The reservation is not far from the wildlife refuge, and the tribe has been living in the arid western Oregon mountains since long before Europeans arrived in North America.

“There was never an agreement that we were giving up this land,” Rodrique said. “We were dragged out of here.”

The tribe’s approach has typically been less provocative than the protesters who brought guns to further their anti-government cause.

“I’m, like, hold on a minute, if you want to get technical about it … the land belongs to the Paiute here,” said Selena Sam, a member of the tribe’s council who works as a waitress at a local diner.

At an emotional news conference in Burns on Wednesday, tribal leaders denounced the occupiers’ claims of wanting to help local residents, and said the protesters’ ignorance of the region’s real history was offensive.

“We don’t got no jobs here. But we don’t need them to back us up,” said the tribal council’s sergeant at arms, Jarvis Kennedy.

“They just need to get the hell out of here, I’m sorry. Because we didn’t ask them here. We don’t want them here … This community is hard-working,” Kennedy said to loud applause.

FOCUS ON LAND RIGHTS

The tribe held a council meeting on Tuesday to discuss the sudden national attention land rights are once again getting...read more

Source:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oregon-militia-tribe-idUSKBN0UK1FS20160106

No copyright infringement is ever intended.

FAIR USE STATEMENT:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material. Fair use: Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. We believe that because we are a news/education/research website, that our use of such copyrighted material falls under “fair use”.

If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe that content residing on or accessible through our website infringes a copyright and falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use”, please send a notice of infringement by contacting us at: {ascendingstarseed at gmail dot com} We will respond and take necessary action immediately. If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation we will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question.

We believe in the free-flow of information, and this site may feature content that is not created by us, including articles, videos, and images. All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright to the respective owners/authors. http://www.ascendingstarseed.wordpress.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.

Paul Craig Roberts “No Recovery Whatsoever” ~ Greg Hunter


Former Assistant Treasury Secretary Dr. Paul Craig Roberts says, “There has been no recovery whatsoever. . . . If you look at the economy realistically, and that means you don’t use their phony numbers, there has been no recovery whatsoever and, in fact, it continues to worsen. We see that the “Labor Force Participation Rate” continues to sink. . . . When you consider the full measure of unemployment . . . we still have an unemployment rate of 23% after 7 years of an alleged recovery? I think this is the first so-called recovery where the labor force fell. Normally, when you have a recovery, people re-enter the labor force and the participation rate rises.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.

All links can be found on USAWatchdog.com: http://usawatchdog.com/paul-craig-rob…

http://usawatchdog.com/donations/

Children herded like cattle into Maryland courthouse for forced vaccinations as armed police and attack dogs stand guard ~ Natural News


Monday, November 19, 2007
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) Following the State of Maryland’s threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Price George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.

The State of Maryland has now turned to Gestapo tactics to force its medical will upon the People, stripping parents of any right to decide how they wish to protect their own children from infectious disease. Health authorities there have already announced their intent to essentially kidnap parents and throw them in jail, removing them from their children for up to thirty days if they continue to refuse to have their children vaccinated. This will all be conducted at gunpoint, with armed personnel and attack dogs at the ready, making sure nobody steps out of line, and suppressing any attempt at public dissent against the Orwellian vaccination policies.

The entire campaign against these parents is blatantly illegal. There is no law in Maryland requiring the vaccination of children, thus parents who refuse to do so may not be legally charged with violating any law. Instead, Maryland health and school authorities are using Gestapo-like tactics, threatening to charge the parents with child truancy violations, criminalizing them for daring to protect their children from the dangerous chemicals found in vaccines (including thimerosal, a chemical additive containing a neurotoxic form of mercury).

The desperation of organized medicine is becoming increasingly apparent

As more and more parents are becoming informed about the dangers of vaccinations and their link to autism, state health authorities are increasingly turning to “Gunpoint Medicine” to force the People to submit to the poisons of conventional medicine. Parents who attempt to save their children from deadly chemotherapy chemicals are being arrested and having their children kidnapped by Child Protective Services (see http://www.NaturalNews.com/Abraham_Cherrix.ht… ), and oncologists who used to be armed only with radiation machines and chemotherapy injectors and now arming themselves with U.S. Marshals and other local law enforcement authorities who are using loaded firearms to enforce “the will of the State” against parents who resist.

Even the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced its strong opposition to the Maryland “Gunpoint Medicine” vaccination campaign. In a press release published Nov. 16, the AAPS states:

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons today condemned the “vaccine roundup” executed in Prince George’s county Maryland this week, and promised to do everything it can to support parents who refuse to immunize their children.

“This power play obliterates informed consent and parental rights,” said Kathryn Serkes, director of policy for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), one of the few national physician groups that refuse corporate funding from pharmaceutical companies.

In a scenario reminiscent of cattle round-ups, the state’s attorney has issued summons to more than 1600 parents of children who have not provided certificates of immunization for their children. But instead of toting a cattle prod, this state’s attorney chooses to wield a syringe to keep the “herd” in line.

Read the rest of the press release at: http://www.aapsonline.org/press/nr-11-16-07….

Gunpoint Medicine: Why drug pushers must now rely on Gestapo tactics

Conventional (pharmaceutical) medicine is the only system of medicine in the world that is so unpopular with informed consumers that it must be administered at the barrel of a gun. There is no other system of medicine anywhere in the world that resorts to such tactics to recruit patients.

At the Nov. 17th event in Maryland, activists Jim Moody and Kelly Ann Davis from SafeMinds (www.SafeMinds.org) were able to get in front of TV news cameras and voice their opposition to the coerced vaccination policy. Yet, amazingly, most parents just lined up like cattle ready to be branded, not bothering to question the sanity or legality of the very system in which they were now agreeing to participate.

A health freedom blog called Center for the Common Interest (www.CommonInterest.info) also covered the event, and it reports that a local activist named Donovan Hubbard videotaped the event and plans to make the video available online. (NaturalNews would like to contact Donovan and / or publicize his video. If you know of a way we can contact him, please call us at (520) 232-9300 to let us know…)

What’s next for Gunpoint Medicine?

As the truth continues to emerge about the extreme dangers of vaccinations and pharmaceuticals, Big Pharma is becoming increasingly desperate to coerce the public into relying on its products. It is now working closely with state authorities (including Governors of several states) to mandate the use of vaccinations on young children. This results in the criminalization of parents who refuse to subject their children to these dangerous chemicals.

In effect, Big Pharma is hoping to turn natural health followers into criminals.

The FDA has already criminalized nutritional supplement companies who dare to tell the truth about the health benefits of their supplements. (Read the true history of armed FDA raids on vitamin companies here: http://www.NaturalNews.com/021791.html )

Next, parents who refuse to subject their children to the chemical pharmaceuticals proposed by Big Pharma will be criminalized, rounded up and incarcerated for “refusing to comply with public health policy.” This is all being done by the State in the name of “protecting the children” from their own natural health parents. (Insane, isn’t it, to think that protecting your child from toxic chemicals is now a criminal act in the United States?)

The end game of all this is to apply Gunpoint Medicine tactics to everyone: Adults and senior citizens included. Anyone suffering from high cholesterol, for example, who does not submit to Big Pharma’s statin drugs could be arrested, strapped to a table and medicated against their will. People with cancer could be arrested for choosing to treat that cancer with safe and effective botanical medicines instead of patented, high-profit Big Pharma drugs. If you think the prisons are full enough right now from all the arrests for marijuana possession and other victimless crimes, just wait until the State starts arresting all the natural health moms and dads across the country who refuse to participate in the utterly insane and extremely harmful system of medicine that now dominates U.S. health care today.

The State is very clear about medicine: If you want to remain a free citizen, you must submit to the synthetic drugs made by the very same corporations that now control government health regulators. Any person who resists such “treatments” will be branded a threat to public health — a designation just beneath “terrorist” in the eyes of many government bureaucrats. As such, they believe there is no limit to the level of force they may use to coerce such people into submitting to Big Pharma’s chemicals. Today, it’s armed guards with attack dogs. Tomorrow, it might be water boarding or other torture methods. Think that’s impossible? Think again: Just five years ago, nobody in their right mind would have thought that parents who did not want to get their children vaccinated would end up in prison, their children kidnapped by state authorities and forced to subject themselves to dangerous chemical injections at gunpoint. Yet that is precisely what is happening right now in the state of Maryland. It happened on Saturday, in fact.

Where is the outrage?

What’s most interesting about this issue of using the threat of imprisonment to force vaccinations upon children is not necessarily who is speaking out against it, but who has chosen to remain silent.

The American Medical Association, for example, has said nothing in opposition to the policy. Neither has the Food and Drug Administration. Where is the outrage from the Maryland Hospital Association? None of these organizations seem to have a problem with Gunpoint Medicine. The idea of rounding up parents and coercing their children into receiving injections of toxic chemicals does not seem to bother these organizations. And why should it? All of these organizations are closely tied to Big Pharma. They’re all in favor of vaccinations for all, it seems, and I have no doubt that some individuals in these organizations (especially the AMA) are strongly in favor of the Gunpoint Medicine coerced vaccination policy being played out in Maryland right now.

Organized medicine believes the People are too stupid to be allowed to make their own health decisions. Bureaucrats and physicians should be the ones making these decisions, we’re told, and any person who disagrees with such decisions should be labeled a criminal, arrested and prosecuted. This is no exaggeration. It is, in fact, a shockingly accurate description of Maryland’s current vaccination policy.

It wasn’t too long ago that Americans would have stood up and rallied against this kind of medical tyranny. The major news networks would have denounced Maryland’s vaccination policy with strong language and harsh accusations. People would have been marching in the streets, demanding their health freedom. But today, it’s a different America. The People are drugged up on pharmaceuticals and dosed on fluoride. They’re too intoxicated to think straight, and they’re frightened into submission by a fear-based government that invokes domestic tyranny at every opportunity to control and manipulate the People into doing whatever it wants.

The “free” America we all once knew is long gone, and it has been replaced with The United States of Corporate America, where police tactics are now used to enforce hazardous public health policies, and the people who run the State no longer think there’s anything wrong with rounding up the population at gunpoint and performing large-scale medical experiments on their children. That’s what modern vaccines are, after all: A grand medical experiment whose effects will only become known after a generation of mass poisoning has come and gone.

Max Igan ~ A Storm is Coming


Max Igan – Surviving the Matrix – Episode 246 – AVR – Dec 05, 2015
http://thecrowhouse.com
http://fullcircleproject.net

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets


by / Tuesday, 27 October 2015

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets

by Jeffrey Phillips, published on We are Change, on Jul 21, 2015

Supreme-Court-Justices-2-600x368.jpg

 

U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”

Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –

Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”

Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”

Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”

Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”

Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.

Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”

Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;

Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”

-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”

-International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”

-City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232 “Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled” – Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20 ”

The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”

Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;

Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”

Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163 “the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all.” –

Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”

Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 “Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 “RIGHT — A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”

City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. “A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639. “The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.”

Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.”

Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972). “If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void.” –

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority.” Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O’Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887. “The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.”

(Paul v. Virginia). “[T]he right to travel freely from State to State … is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” (U.S. Supreme Court,

Shapiro v. Thompson). EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. …’Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.’

Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.

Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41 Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14. “The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187. “a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel “Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”

Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. “Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.”

Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is not a “statute.” A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.

Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages.

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29. …automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v. Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354.

Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen.

Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. 677, 197 Mass. 241, 246;

Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158. “A soldier’s personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’

U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235” 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. “[I]t is a jury question whether … an automobile … is a motor vehicle[.]”

United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983). Other right to use an automobile cases: –

EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160 –

TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 – WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 – CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44 – THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 – U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) –

GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) – CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 –

SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) – CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence. Some citations may be paraphrased.

http://i-uv.com/u-s-supreme-court-says-no-license-necessary-to-drive-automobile-on-public-highwaysstreets/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IUv+%28I+UV%29

Rob Kall: Time to think BIG, kill off entire industries that destroy life


http://exopermaculture.com/2015/10/30/rob-kall-time-to-think-big-kill-off-entire-industries-that-destroy-life/

This is the kind of big, bold thinking that is required if we are to have any chance at transforming our so-called civilization that has decimated bodies, minds, souls, and that of our Mother Earth. Not piece-meal thinking, merely trimming away at edges leaving the destructive core intact; rather, let us first imagine, discuss, decide, and then put into practice, the elimination or transformation of entire industries. 

October 29, 2015

by Rob Kall

opednews

Put killing of industries AND jobs on the table

imgresIndustries are killed, with jobs lost, for different reasons, usually to kill union and middle class jobs. I say it is time to intentionally kill or drastically shrink some big, major industries that hurt the democracy and freedom or damage the environment and, literally, the future of life on earth.

In recent years, the legislators and presidents who have embraced transnational trade deals have chosen to kill industries that employee American workers in manufacturing industries like steel, clothing, furniture, shoes– often, unionized workers.. Those industries had long been protected by tariffs. This article is not about trade deals, which I believe are terrible for 99% of Americans. This article is about deciding to kill industries.

Some of the most egregious abuses of democracy are perpetrated by industries that literally deserve to be killed. These industries are usually old technology or energy companies, or privatized versions of what used to be or should be government owned and operated. They flood congress with lobbyists and flood politics with money. They flood the ecosystem with toxic pollution and threaten the planet.

It’s time that the killing of industries be put on the table. Companies with interests in maintaining the industries that should be killed raise cries of accusation about threats to their industries. I say, lay it out in the open. We don’t want your industry to exist. We want to make it go the way of buggy whips, corsets and plow horse harnesses. Get out of the business you are in. Transition to something else. It’s time for your industry to die.

My picks include health insurers, private prisons, charter schools, privatized military services, coal mining, the oil business, nuclear energy, and monoculture factory farming for starters. And let’s make Libertarians and teapartiers happy and shrink two huge parts of government — the out of control military and the drug war. Finally, we need to start a major war aimed at killing BIG.

When trade deals are proposed, the proponents have, historically, lied, saying that they would help workers, while, in truth, they were designed to kill industries, jobs and unions.

Why not start talking about intentionally killing industries that are not ecologically sustainable, that are predatory, extractive operations inserting added, unnecessary costs for vital services.

The first step is to stop corporate welfare subsidies to the industries. That should be easiest to get bi-partisan support for.

Coal and oil are unsustainable energy sources. Coal is incredibly dirty and should be the first to go. We should be intentionally aiming to put the industries out of business. Shell just reported that it lost billions of dollars in the last quarter. Good. Start by immediately ending all subsidies/corporate welfare for old energy companies. But don’t end the subsidies– re-direct them towards building a native US sustainable energy industry that includes wind, waves, solar, hydrogen… Use some of the money that was used for corporate welfare to re-train coal miners and workers in the oil industry. Encourage new sustainable energy ventures to build operations where old energy workers have lost jobs due to intentional killing of their industry.

The nuclear energy industry has a history of irresponsible operations and it is unbelievably subsidized. End the subsidies and start shutting these operations down, as other nations are doing.

Monoculture farming and factory farming of animals produce unhealthy degraded nutrition food while generating massive levels of greenhouse gases. Many nations have made the use of GMOs illegal. In Russia it’s a crime to grow GMOs. Locally grown food, with crop diversity, is much healthier and does not require the addition of oil to move the food around. Factory farmed meat produces drug and hormone filled products that increase risks of illness– diabetes, heart disease, cancer, infections. And these operations reduce jobs. End subsidies and tax breaks. Give tax breaks to small farming operations. Consider this an investment in health care rather than food marketing

Drastically destroy private health insurance — including the bogus non-profits. Create a single payer health care system like every other first world nation has. The USA’s privatized health care system– the most expensive and inefficient in the world, proves that it is a lie that private industry is more efficient and competitive. Kill the private insurance industry. The money saved will provide health care to millions of uninsured Americans and will produce more jobs than those lost with the destruction of private health insurance. I expect that there will small, boutique health insurers for the wealthy. They should be regulated so they don’t sabotage the single payer system.

Private Prisons and the drug war go hand in hand. We need to kill the drug war– a government operation that is totally out of control at the federal and local levels. Local police depend on drug war money to fund their operations. Legalize marijuana. Decriminalize use of all drugs and treat the use as an illness. Make them available at drug stores. Create jobs in the rehabilitation business. Already, there is a bi-partisan effort to fix the justice system and end mandatory sentencing. Aim to reduce the prison population by 60-80%. Shut down all the private prisons. They’re, in a sense, getting corporate welfare. We now have technologies that allow wireless tracking of convicted felons. Use that technology instead of prison walls. Nowadays, millions of people work at home. Allow convicted felons to work at home, instead of putting them in prison. Create a conservation corps to employ the out of work guards, with the task of rebuilding and renewing our infrastructure.

Fund MORE Police. That’s right. invest in training police to connect, bottom-up, with their communities, so they are trusted and respected, and so they respect the members of their communities. Just as the military is investing more and more in soft power– building schools and bridges, develop ways for police to get to know and connect with the people– bring back cops walking the beat. Destroy the cop culture in which police protect criminal, law breaking, even murderous cops. They don’t deserve to be police. Put them in jail. With a new generation of police being hired, make it clear that the old police ways are dead, deadly and no longer tolerable.

Kill the Big Military, big security/intelligence. Don’t get rid of them, but re-invent them as smaller, more accountable and more controlled. This is the most bloated, most unaccountable part of government. The first step is to, from the bottom up, rebuild the military so it is far more transparent and accountable– one hundred percent accountable. It is insane and criminal that over a trillion dollars in funds are not accounted for. While the military has historically been very top-down, the new military should be more distributed, more bottom-up, especially in the massive and burgeoning parts of the military that are not involved in direct combat. Look at holacracy as a management model that builds smarter, more agile operations with employees who are more empowered. We need soldiers who leave the military without having been indoctrinated into being authoritarianism enablers.

Also, as Ron Paul advocated, drastically reduce —  we maintain. Replace foreign military bases with increased investments in soft-power/smart power diplomacy. Take young people who would have enlisted in the army and train them to operate as envoys and workers for the Department of State.

Eliminate archaic technologies that don’t reflect the realities of asymmetric warfare that is waged in today’s world. Massive naval fleets, battalions of tanks? These are as out of date as the cavalry.

Intelligence and security agencies are out of control unaccountable and well on the way to endangering freedom and democracy. They have proven they are not worthy of our trust by spying on members of congress. If they can do that they can hold every member of congress in thrall. The urge to know everything is a form of hoarding. The intelligence system must be re-built and re-scaled with new leadership who are vetted to respect laws and privacy. Of course, that starts from the top down. We need to replace the commander in chief with someone who understands the dangers of putting obsessive compulsive hoarders who don’t respect laws and who lie to congress in charge of any agency.

Charter Schools — another unaccountable development that is parasitizing funding of education, a business model that hedge funds are rapaciously salivating over. We need to invest more in education, but no to privatization– another way the one percent are ruining America.

A bit further down the road, Killing Big— I’ve written a series of articles along these lines, in my article series, Small is Better than Big; small acts, world, economics, lifestyles, solutions, activism. As a longer term goal, we need to aim to get rid of, kill, eliminate, legislate out of existence, make it immoral, disgusting to be too big– which applies to corporations and people, as in billionaires.

We can start by putting a moratorium on mergers that make giant companies humungous. The goal is to end the existence of too-big to fail companies. These are dangerous in so many ways and they tend to avoid paying taxes or even respecting laws. These companies are no longer American. They are transnational, predatory, psychopathic entities, as the book and movie The Corporation well documented, with no national loyalty. The goal is to make small business stronger, to develop a science of small and to end the existence of too-big-to-fail companies. Can you imagine a world where taxes and regulations make it profoundly disadvantageous to exist as a big company, where regulations and taxes favor small businesses staying small? That’s a bottom-up way to prevent excesses of top-down power. My article, Time To Declare War on BIG; America Needs Giant Killers , gets into this in more detail.

FBI Pleads “Stop Filming Police! It’s Making Them Look Bad!” ~ Corbett Report


SHOW NOTES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=16768

For the first time in decades, violent crime is back on the rise in major urban centers across America. What’s the problem? Fed-induced recession driving people into desperate poverty? Media-hyped race baiting inciting social discord? The militarization of police and tightening of the police state noose? No, it’s smartphone cameras that are the culprit according to FBI director James Comey. James Corbett breaks down the propaganda and reminds you why the police are so scared of cameras.

KERRY CASSIDY – YOUTUBE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TAKES US DOWN


Note: Signs the PTW are desperate to maintain control are getting obvious just about everywhere we look….I DO NOT CONSENT TO MEDIA CENSORSHIP BY ANY ENTITY, ON ANY LEVEL.

And so it is! Annette

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Our sister channel PCTV Network has been taken down without warning by Youtube today! Join me to hear what happened. Simultaneously my http://projectcamelotportal.com site has also been taken down… All this the morning after we were about to go live with our Indiegogo campaign: GO HERE TO FUND OUR TV NETWORK!! http://projectcamelottvnetwork.com/do…

Government Implements Illegal “Gag Order” On National Weather Service And NOAA Employees


Ed. Note: Last year I did volunteer work for NOAA’s Monk Seal Watch program on Kauai. In April 2014, one of the head biologists for the program, told me she loves Ahi (tuna) but no longer eats it because the radiation levels are so high. Children and adults all over the world are eating tuna out of cans that’s radioactive when NOAA and EPA officials know damn well people are being permanently harmed by radiation contamination from tuna – contaminated tuna was reported as early as 2012. Me thinks at some point in the future officials with NOAA should be charged with treason AND held accountable for war crimes against citizens of the USA, and the world. This goes straight to the heart of the depopulation agenda, and is about as bad as it gets.

Blessings, {~A~}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

956

The power structure is beginning to panic as the public wakes up to the criminal climate engineering insanity. The growing police state is completely out of control and becoming unimaginably blatant with their actions. In recent weeks Washington has placed “gag orders” on the following agency employees, “The National Weather Service”, the “National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration”, and the “US Department of Commerce”. This is a massive red flag that should trigger alarm bells everywhere.

Bill Hopkins, the executive president for the National Weather Service employees organization (NWSEO) said this:

“As a taxpayer, I find it highly disturbing that a government agency continues to push gag orders to hide how they operate. This is the work of the American government, owned by the American public, and should be open to the American public.”

Jeff Ruch, the executive director “PEER” (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility) said this about the “gag orders”.

“The National Weather Service is about the last place where national security-style secrecy rules need to be enforced,” Ruch noted that the broad scope of the gag orders put much of what goes on inside the agency under wraps.  “Everyone is free to talk about the weather except for the people working inside the National Weather Service. Go figure.”

Some time ago I personally spoke to an NOAA scientist that said “we all know it is going on (climate engineering) but we are afraid to speak out, we have no first amendment protection”. The new “gag order” is a further muzzling of the NWS and NOAA. It is likely there are many in the National Weather Service and NOAA that have had enough of lying about what is really going on in our skies.

916

Massive atmospheric aerosol spraying assaults are constant around the globe. Almost all meteorologists have so far denied the all too obvious ongoing climate engineering operations.

Other weather agencies and personnel have also been actively engaged in public deception. What did BBC “meteorologist” Ian Fergusson say about the picture below?

 “When rain, ice crystals or snow falls but evaporates before reaching the ground, it’s a (natural) phenomenon called ‘virga’ or ‘fallstreak’.”

775

The so called “experts” are naming jet aircraft sprayed aerosol clouds as if they are produced by nature. 

A report from PEER contains the following statement:

This summer, the National Weather Service began requiring a signed confidentiality agreement (Exhibit I) from NWSEO participants along with all participants on the OWA teams. These agreements purport to bind NWSEO representatives from communicating with its members, members of Congress or any other person regarding agency plans and how they are determined. These agreements also do not contain terms allowing reports of actual or impending law or rule violations, gross mismanagement, waste or abuse.

The PEER report continued with this:

The National Weather Service, NOAA and Commerce are presently implementing and enforcing nondisclosure agreements which violate the law.

We are officially living in an Orwellian police state where any who dare to try and tell the truth are dealt with severely. Forcing the employees of “national” weather and climate agencies to sign “confidentiality agreements is extremely alarming (with unimaginable potential consequences), but not surprising given what we know about the cataclysms being caused by the rapidly growing climate engineering elephant in the room. Some may mistake the “gag order” to be only about union issues, this is not the case as quotes above (taken from the PEER reports) make clear. The decimation and mortality that has already been inflicted on our biosphere and all life from global geoengineering is so immense it could never be calculated. The weather warfare insanity is finally becoming all but impossible to hide, the recent “gag orders” are a sign of true desperation on the part of the power structure. Now more than ever we must all keep up our pace in the battle to expose and halt climate engineering.
DW

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/government-implements-illegal-gag-order-on-national-weather-service-and-noaa/

Foster Gamble: Dragon Family And BRICS To Usher In New Currency


Dragon Family And BRICS To Usher In New Currency

by Gregg Prescott, M.S.
Editor, In5D.com

A new video has surfaced which tells of how the Dragon family, (an alliance of spiritual elders from China, Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, and Viet Nam), along with the alliance of numerous countries are not only prepared to start using a gold backed currency but will also provide “debt relief, humanitarian projects, and transformative innovations and inventions”.

The video was released by Foster Gamble and has many intriguing points.

According to Gamble, the BRICS countries are all in alignment of ending the Federal Reserve’s stranglehold of global currency and domination, while the Dragon Family are ” willing to provide the gold to back the dollar and keep America in the game”.  The only “catch” is that the U.S. banking cartel needs to end their scam of fiat currency (creating money out of thin air) while bankrupting other countries, and move to an honest, gold-backed currency.

The video description states:

Is a family of Asian elders about to spell the end of the Banking Cabal through a worldwide monetary reset? Or is the global economy about to be consolidated even further?

One way or another, the value of your money is about to change…

While this all sounds very promising, one must question everything, including the motives behind it. I’ll address some of these questions at the end of the article.

The following is a transcription to the video:

The question that we’re being asked most by our network, even more than Ebola, Ukraine, and Isis (which we will be addressing in the future) is “What’s really going on with the economy?” “Are we really in a recovery? Are we on the verge of some even greater catastrophe? Or, is it perhaps something else entirely?” With the current launch of our new ThriveTogether subscription option, we decided to share the following as a sample of the type of in process thinking that we’ll now be sharing with our subscribers. So, I’ll start in and then hand it off to Kimberly.

Regarding the global economy… What we’re actually seeing is unprecedented developments leading toward a possible complete global economic transformation. We see, very probably, a new, more humble, more peaceful role for the United States, a new role for the dollar, and, possibly, new roles for you and me. Here are some facts about a few recent developments that can provide critical background:

First, the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have launched what they call the New Development Bank with a $100 billion gold backing and another $100 billion in reserve. The Chinese, who hold $1.3 trillion of US debt of U.S. debt, second only to the Federal Reserve itself, have begun selling rather than buying U.S. Bonds. So has Russia. So, America is running out of lenders to borrow from. For the first time in 70 years, the Chinese and Russians have created over 40 deals, including oil purchases totaling close to $1 trillion, and they’re doing this in their own currencies and gold, no longer agreeing to U.S. dollar supremacy. For anyone who doesn’t know, in 1944 (the end of World War II) the Bretton Woods Conference was held where the IMF and the World Bank were created and then soon after, the dollar was declared the only international exchange currency — basically, a global economic system primarily under U.S. control. These new deals and others like them around the world are a very significant move. The Chinese have also launched the Shanghai gold exchange to try to bring integrity to international gold pricing after recent revelations of market-rigging by the West. The BRICS countries have also created a new rating agency, the UCRG (Universal Credit Rating Group) that will compete with the cabal’s services (Fitch, Moody’s, the S & P) whose corrupt bestowing of AAA ratings upon junk investments was exposed in the 2008 crash. The BRICS alliance is also working (understandably) on an alternate Internet to avoid the predations of the NSA. The BRICS countries have been patiently check-mating the corrupt cabal that has been destroying the global economy and the environment and now this BRICS group is creating (as far as we can tell) a more transparent, honest, inclusive, and sustainable alternative.

I want to tell you a real story that might sound like a fiction thriller, but which I’m saying publicly now because I believe the evidence is strong enough now to support its validity. In addition to these BRICS developments, there is an alliance of spiritual elders (often referred to as the “Dragon Families”). They represent China, Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, and Viet Nam, at least and they are stewards of the largest off-the-book gold troves in the world. It represents most of the wealth on the planet and is sometimes called “Yamashita’s Gold”. This is fully documented in a 2005 book called “The Gold Warriors”, which we highly recommend that you read. Gold has been the most trusted medium of exchange and storehouse of wealth throughout history and we’re being told that these families want to use the vast resource, collected over centuries, to support debt relief, humanitarian projects, and transformative innovations and inventions. They apparently would be willing to provide the gold to back the dollar and keep America in the game, but the Western banking cabal needs to end their scam of creating money out of nothing and bankrupting other countries and then move to an honest, asset-backed system. We’ve also been made aware that there are many individuals in the armed services and in the intelligence agencies who are horrified at the deceptive and destructive agenda of the Washington Consensus and the military industrial complex. And they are not only unwilling to support more U.S. imperialist agendas, but are working hard and at great risk to correct the situation. In addition to The Oathkeepers and Veterans Against War, there’s a committed group who call themselves the White Hats who apparently have been brokering a pending, peaceful resolution — a deal between the Asian Elders and the Banking Cabal — and there are a lot of reports that these new negotiations are now reaching completion, though success is obviously not guaranteed.

You might be asking yourself, as I did, “Why would the banking cabal go along with all this?” To answer that, let’s look back at some relevant history because the relationship between the Elders and the cabal goes back centuries, but a hint of this dynamic is revealed by a few little-known occurrences. First, the Central Banking, debt-based money scam goes back several centuries to the founding of the Bank of England and the spread through Europe of the Rothschild family. U.S. President Andrew Jackson fought off assassination attempts for trying to prevent fiat money central banking in the U.S. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated shortly after he tried to get rid of fiat money. Fast forward to 1913, the Federal Reserve and the IRS are created in the same year and one century later, the purchasing power of the dollar has collapsed by more than 97%. In 1933, President Roosevelt confiscated the gold of all Americans to help repay secret debts to European central bankers. We’re being told that the Bretton Woods system itself was backed by borrowing from the Chinese against these vast gold holdings and repayment of these loans is greatly overdue. In 1963, President Kennedy issued Executive Order 11110 to issue dollars outside the Federal Reserve system and at the same time, he agreed to a deal with President Sukarno of Indonesia to use Asian gold troves to help stabilize the U.S. economy and to develop Asia and Africa. Shortly thereafter, as you know, he was assassinated. 1971 — President Nixon took away the gold backing of the dollar and now allowed money to be printed without anything real backing it and now the U.S. debt is almost $18 trillion. After the 2008 financial collapse in the first (for a long time) partial audit of the Fed it was discovered that they covertly gave away at least $16 trillion to domestic and foreign banks. For comparison, the entire US Gross Domestic Product last year was $16.2 trillion. Currently, the too-big-to-fail banks globally are carrying over $700 trillion in derivatives debt and the Federal Reserve has been printing tens of billions of dollars a month in fake money, putting the burden of repayment on us and on generations to come and calling it by the lovely name of “Quantitiative Easing”. This is exactly the kind of thing that the Elders don’t want to happen all over the world.

China is buying huge amounts of gold in addition to the troves I mentioned earlier. The U.S. is usually indebted to China and Japan and with nuclear weapons and millions of soldiers, China can’t be pushed around like so many other countries that the U.S. has bullied. Countries around the world are beginning to reject the use of the U.S. dollars, backed by nothing but the promise of a broke, heavily indebted imperialist country. And, interestingly enough, repayments of hundreds of tons of gold that China had moved to the US for safekeeping is 15 years overdue and the first shipment of gold back to China was due on September 12, 2001. Yes, the day after 9/11, when the offices that were handling the pay arrangements in the Twin Towers and the Pentagon were destroyed. Bottom line: audits of Fort Knox and the New York Fed (our gold depositories in the U.S.) aren’t allowed. When Germany demanded their loan gold back recently, the U.S. refused. America apparently does not have enough gold to join the world in backing their currency. The Elders are offering a way out of this doomsday reality.

Based on these facts and on our educated speculation, let’s look now at possible scenarios. In a worst case (let’s call this one Plan B), the U.S. and the banking cabal resist the offer of the Elders to provide gold to back U.S. currency and they reject joining the rest of the world’s new asset-backed system and the associated humanitarian relief. America would be isolated, the war hawks try to stay imperialistic, they try to create false-flag events leading to World War III, and they continue to try to impose their police state to their last dying breath. The big banks and the U.S. government are broke, so this would mean the collapse of the dollar and complete social breakdown in the U.S. Not a pretty sight.

Or, more likely in my opinion, but certainly not guaranteed, Plan A. The Western cabal reluctantly agrees and goes along with the release of ample, historic funds for honest asset-backed money, currency resets, debt relief, and historic humanitarian projects. The dollar may still devalue and most likely there would be major transitional challenges, but in the long run, a much more stable economy without fake money and the Global Domination Agenda is cast out to the trash heap of history at last. In the U.S., there would be a switch from Federal Reserve Notes (debt notes) to asset-backed TRNs (Treasury Reserve Notes), which we’re being told are already being printed, and prosperity based on real money begins to be restored. Of course, in this scenario, we need to be alert to be a truly free and empowering world of equal rights for everyone and not just wind up under the thumb of some new world regime in some sort of global, royal hierarchy or communist tyranny. The Elders must be held carefully to their spoken covenant to use these vast gold troves to reboot the world for humanitarian benefit. Also, soon the fractional reserve banking system will need to disappear along with fiat money because they are both illegitimate partners in crime. I’m told by some who have visited with them that the Elders are truly profound beings, enlightened enough to know that most of this gold is not truly theirs — that in fact, much of it represents the plunder of centuries of war and that they’re just stewarding its careful return to the people of the world. I’m told that their core commitment, as opposed to controlling greed, is to the spiritual legacy of their families, their people, and to the peoples of the world and I hope that it’s true. This is not the People’s Republic of China. This is a separate entity.

What’s really going to happen? That depends on what the cabal does and what the Elders do and, in the long run, what people like you and I do. With all that’s going on that is so insidious, why would I think that this Plan A is more likely? Because there are very well informed insiders working on this with whom we’re in contact. These are not just some rumors on the Internet for us. These same people forewarned us about the coming of the BRICS bank, the revelations of the Libor interest rate and gold price-fixing scandals, the new TRNs and much more. The timing of this type of unfolding event is understandably uncertain, but confirmations of key intel just keep showing up. The BRICS alliance is a hugely significant move and the Asian gold troves, which the CIA has been trying to locate and steal for decades, are real. I know it can seem strange to open to the possibility of such vast and beneficial global transformation, but there is a lot of evidence that the world is re-organizing around the fundamental pattern of restoring the wholeness of natural systems. We’ve been studying these emerging global and economic changes intensely for the last three years and now it finally seems like the time to bring this conversation out into the light because so many of the verifiable predictions are now actually happening.

When we were making THRIVE, I used to think if a genie gave me three personal wishes, what would I wish for? The first one was that the film would be safely finished. We used encrypted communications and stayed under the radar, we went global in a day in 10 languages, and obviously THRIVE came out safely. My second wish was that there would still be an open Internet to spread THRIVE’s message worldwide. That too happened, especially with the help of anonymous computer whizzes and activists everywhere. My third wish, which seemed really outrageous at the time, was that there would be a force in the world powerful enough to checkmate and transcend the Global Domination Agenda of the Western banking cabal that we laid out in our film. I am amazed and encouraged that this too seems to be coming true.

Kimberly: I think one of the reasons that Foster and I are so optimistic is because of the exposure we get. THRIVE is out in so many languages now that we are exposed to people and movements from every continent. As a result, I feel like what happens is we’re able to see a pattern and the pattern that emerges is informed by specific incidences, but it’s a vantage that allows us to see that a new paradigm really is emerging. We see signs of that all the time.

Since THRIVE came out, we have been contacted by over 400 different inventors of breakthrough technologies in power and water purification and decontamination and agricultural efficiency and healing technologies. It’s not because these are easy things to be developing at this stage of the game. It’s because they know that as this old system crumbles, we are not going to be starting from scratch on solutions. These things, once fully empowered, are going to be able to get out all around the world and we’re really going to be able to hit the road running on this. It’s true of so many things that we see.

So what are some other signs that inform the pattern that creates the hopefulness for us, but also informs our solutions strategies? In just a few years, more than 55 countries have either banned or seriously restricted GMOs. That’s almost entirely from grass roots activists organizing. Many attempts to suppress the Internet by the government and corporations have been successfully averted. (People are staying awake on that one.) There are more than a dozen countries that have pro-actively released their UFO-related files. People have organized to effectively resist the mandatory tracking RFID chips and national ID cards. Over a million people around the world have officially said “No” to smart meters and have informed the utility companies that they’re not going for it. The whole toxic aerial spraying and climate geo-engineering is really coming into people’s attention and they’re organizing to figure out what’s really going on and get the truth about that and organizing to stop it. The non-pharmaceutically-controlled cancer cures are becoming much more available to people. For sure, the medical cannabis, but also others. There’s one I’ve been working with recently called GcMAF. (You can check it out at www.gcmaf.eu. I’m super-excited about that one.) Big banks have been fined now for market-rigging and fraud and sure, the amount they have been fined is insufficient and the individuals haven’t been held accountable, but nonetheless, I think it’s significant because it takes this whole fraud and market-rigging out of conspiracy theory and into official acknowledgment and I think there’s going to be a lot more of that coming down the pike.

The other thing that I know warms my optimism is that the whole consciousness and activist movements are really coming together and sharing the wisdom and the experience of each. Another thing I love is that young people, in particular, are getting their news from different sources and are not getting bogged down by the mainstream distraction. I think that is related to something that I see with people all over, which is that I think we are increasingly questioning the accuracy of the image that we’ve been led to believe about ourselves. We’re really finding each other and those who recognize and believe in and are helping to manifest something different.

A lot of people can feel it, especially those who are engaged in helping to make things happen, and it’s the reason I’m so excited for ThriveTogether because our network is so intelligent. Each country is at a different stage in this evolutionary process so we can really learn from each other and we’ll be informed by the topics that you want us to address and your experience and insights and as well, we’ll be engaged in those that we’ve been studying and are engaged in right now and opening up our real-time research process with you. In addition to the topics that you suggest, we will also be covering more of everything that Foster’s talked about today and the whole changing role of the United States in global affairs. Also, we’ll have people on who disagree, who have different worldviews and perspectives, but we’ll have a forum where we can speak respectfully and intelligently with one another on topics like climate change so that we can really figure out what is going on so that we can be prepared for whatever that is. We are going to be talking about the fact that the United States is actually a corporation and what are the ramifications of that. We’ll be talking about new science and free energy and the other innovations that we’re connected to. We’ll get people in who are really informed about the whole UFO disclosure around the world and what’s going on with that and, also, the whole history and justification for authoritarian rule. How did the government and the cabal get the power that they have and how does the liberty perspective inform our understanding of that. And, also, our solutions. I’m really excited to unpack that one together. It’s the root of all of this that I think we really need to look at and I’m excited to.

The idea is that we’re going to get real-time interaction with you so that together we can develop a roadmap for transformation and really get specific, implementable stages of action and the principles behind them so that we can actually, together, get from where we are to where we need and want to be.

Foster: In addition to this type of sharing, we’re excited and eager for our real-time interactive calls with you and also to be addressing your questions and hearing your insights. Below this video, we’ll put a link to another clip that describes our new ThriveTogether initiative. So, we invite you to join with us in the conversation, connect the dots on current events, and co-create with us the transition to true freedom and prosperity.

To find out more, visit the Thrive website.

Question everything!

I asked one of my sources whether this content of this video was true and he told me it wasn’t.

That being said, I’m sure we all sincerely hope this is true but the first thing that comes to mind is how the “Dragon” family is one of the factions behind this. Dragon = Draconian = Alpha Draconians. What is their agenda?

Secondly, debt forgiveness would have to be included in this proposition because the U.S. dollar is based on the lie of fractional reserve, which creates money out of thin air. Would the Dragon family’s money cover individual OR country debt forgiveness? Or both?

As long as there is money, we’re still economic slaves to a broken system, but like I mentioned in a recent article entitled, ” Karen Hudes: Dollar To Crash And Be Replaced With New, Interest Free, Gold-Backed Currency“, this would also be a step in the right direction until we transition out of money, entirely. This can be done right now through ideas such as Ubuntu and the Venus Project.

One must also ask if this is a distraction for something much larger going on behind the curtain?

Lastly, one must ask if this has anything to do regarding the establishment of a “one world currency” via the “New World Order”?

We’ve been financial slaves to a broken system since the inception of money and the banksters are literally laughing “all the way to the bank”.

As an eternal optimist, “I hope it happens” but similar to long-winded plans of NESARA that keep people believing without any real hope, I won’t hold my breath on it.

One thing that we can be sure of is that we’re not being told the whole truth by our world leaders and by those in any position of power, including the banking cartel and the main stream media.

All we can do is to hope for the best because the current system is broken and unsustainable.

Click here for more articles by Gregg Prescott!

http://in5d.com/foster-gamble-dragon-family-and-brics-to-usher-in-new-currency/

Sign Petition Against the Unlawful Detainment of Santos Bonacci


The first of many petitions I’m sure!
Support human rights by speaking out against the unlawful detainment of Santos Bonacci
Sign this petition to support Brother Santo Bonacci aka MrAstrotheology who has been unlawfully arrested and locked away!
I am a close friend of Santo https://www.youtube.com/user/BasilGen… and someone sent me this petition so I posted it
Over the next couple days all of Santo’s law friends will be arriving to protect him and launch petitions of their own, this is just the beginning.

https://www.change.org/p/jack-dempsey-minister-of-police-fire-and-emergency-services-mark-hrycek-support-human-rights-by-speaking-out-against-the-unlawful-detainment-of-santos-bonacci?recruiter=356430108&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink


Norway’s police haven’t killed a single person in nearly 10 years


shutterstock_246237466-800x430

http://wearechange.org/norways-police-havent-killed-a-single-person-in-nearly-10-years/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wrc+%28We+Are+Change%29

(RAWSTORY) Police in Norway hardly ever use their guns, a new report released by the Scandinavian country’s government shows. In fact, it’s been almost 10 years since law enforcement shot and killed someone, in 2006.

Perhaps the most telling instance was when terrorist Anders Breivik opened fire in 2011 and killed 77 people in Utoya and Oslo. Authorities fired back at him, all right, but only a single time. In 2014, officers drew their guns 42 times, but they fired just two shots while on duty. No one was hurt in either of those instances.

Considering that police officers in the United States have killed more than 600 people this year alone, the report certainly is eye-opening. Of course, law enforcement officials in the United States face greater threats of violence while on duty.

Guns are not central to police activity in Norway, which is one reason why the law enforcement shooting rates are so low. As in Britain, police in Norway typically patrol while unarmed and only bear arms in extenuating situations.

In the past, experts have said that reevaluating U.S. law enforcement tactics–specifically having less of an emphasis on force and making face-to-face interactions more common–could help cut the shooting rates there, at least in the short term. A more complicated issue is the relative lack of trust in police officers in the U.S.

Sociologist Guðmundur Oddsson, speaking to Tech Insider, said Norwegians’ higher sense of trust in law enforcement was perhaps one of the reasons for the country’s low gun violence rates. “Trust is an extremely powerful mechanism of informal social control. In smaller, more ethnically homogeneous countries like Norway, building that trust is easy. People feel a sense of togetherness for many reasons, including the fact that most people look similar and hold similar beliefs,” he said.

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/norways-police-havent-killed-a-single-person-in-nearly-10-years/

BUZZSAW: 2015 Bilderberg Conference Review: Collapse and False Flags with Daniel Estulin ~ TheLipTV


Nice find Keri! Reblogged from https://followingworldchange.wordpress.com

The 2015 Bilderberg conference is discussed with Daniel Estulin, who explores how the group is facing declining influence and hedging their bets against a global economic collapse. The tools of false flags and unrest that are being employed by the world’s elite, as well as the upcoming documentary on the Bilderbergs, and the possible catastrophic outcomes of the Iran Nuclear deal are explored. Learn about the Tavistock house, the growing power of the BRIC alliance, and if deindustrialization and population control are on the agenda of the elite in this Buzzsaw interview, hosted by Sean Stone.

GUEST BIO:
Daniel Estulin is an award winning investigative journalist and bestselling author of The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, published in 59 countries and translated into 34 languages. He was featured on Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory television show. He is currently the host of RT TV show, DESDE LA SOMBRA, and has a new documentary on the Bilderberg Group.

The New WINDOWS 10 Could Send You To Jail! – No More PRIVACY WINDOWS 10 is SPYING on WHAT YOU DO


windows 10 logo
A new published article released on BGR but it’s saying that the new Microsoft Windows 10 will be fantastic and a great improvement over windows 8 which sounds like amazing news right? Well maybe so, but there is one thing also mentioned and that WINDOWS 10 will SPY on EVERYTHING that you do on your computer and on the internet!  you can read the full story here at BGR. They also have a solution to supposedly OPT out so make note of that!

But here’s the thing about this when doing further research.. someone said on a thread on GLP (you can follow the discussion for to see  replies by posters) the following.

“Microsoft says they’re reading and accessing all the content in your computer, mail, movies, data, audio,excel files,pictures,porn,pirated items,torrents,illegal speech, etc. and if they find something illegal,you will be acwindows 10 desktopcused as a criminal to FBI and local Police”

“We will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of your emails, other private communications or files in private folders), when we have a good faith belief that doing so is necessary to.”

So there you have it.. more to come soon as we follow this story, please do you own research on this story and until then and please SHARE THIS STORY to make others aware that Microsoft will be doing this and maybe others will speak out against this if everyone can spread the word. Your PRIVACY is YOUR PRIVACY and should NEVER be invaded!

As of today Windows 10 was installed on 67 Million PCs!!!

http://www.intergalacticvault.com/shocking-the-new-windows-10-could-send-you-to-jail-no-more-privacy/

Israelis Arrested in JPMorgan Hack Case – #NewWorldNextWeek ~ Corbett Report


Welcome to New World Next Week — the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news.

This week:

Story #1: Arrests in Florida, Israel Tied to JPMorgan Hack
http://ur1.ca/nb8dd
Digital Misfits Link JPMorgan Hack to Pump-and-Dump Fraud
http://ur1.ca/nb8de
A Brief History of Israeli Spying in the US
http://ur1.ca/nbeww

Story #2: Her Very Lowness Shown Giving Nazi Salute in Leaked 1933 Home Movie
http://ur1.ca/nb8dg
Queen ‘Nazi salute’: British Film Institute Works with Buckingham Palace to Find Source of Leak
http://ur1.ca/nb8dh
UK Lord John Sewell Caught in Cocaine Party with Prostitutes
http://ur1.ca/nb8dn

Story #3: #GoodNewsNextWeek – Hay for Cheese? Barter Booms in Cash-Squeezed Rural Greece
http://ur1.ca/nb8dp
#MigrantCrisis Meets #GreekCrisis as Refugees Set Up Camp in Athens
http://ur1.ca/nb8dr

#NewWorldNextWeek Updates: Hospitals the #3 Killer in the United States
http://ur1.ca/nb8ds
Satanic Temple Unveils #Baphomet Statue in Detroit
http://ur1.ca/nb8du
Australia’s 60 Minutes Special on ‘Westminster Paedophile Network’
http://ur1.ca/nb8dy
#JadeHelm Psyop?: General Wesley Clark, the Mad Bomber of Belgrade, Wants to Intern Disloyal Westerners
http://ur1.ca/nb8e0
#IranDeal Will Be ‘Competing in Europe Head-On With Russia’
http://ur1.ca/nb8e3
Russia Vetoes MH17 Tribunal Draft at UN Security Council
http://ur1.ca/nb8e4

Visit http://NewWorldNextWeek.com to get previous episodes in various formats to download, burn and share. And as always, stay up-to-date by subscribing to the #NewWorldNextWeek RSS feed or iTunes feed. Thank you.

Previous Episode: Pentagon Moving to Weaponize Space
http://ur1.ca/nb8e8

The Social Terrorism of the Mainstream Media ~ Max Igan


Surviving the Matrix – Season 5 – Episode 04
To download, please visit: http://thecrowhouse.com/radio.html
or to stream directly, please visit: http://thecrowhouse.com/dl/MaxIgan_Th…

“When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader” – Plato

Drivers, Beware: The Costly, Deadly Dangers Of Traffic Stops In The American Police State ~ ZeroHedge


 

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

“The Fourth Amendment was designed to stand between us and arbitrary governmental authority. For all practical purposes, that shield has been shattered, leaving our liberty and personal integrity subject to the whim of every cop on the beat, trooper on the highway and jail official. The framers would be appalled.”—Herman Schwartz, The Nation

Trying to predict the outcome of any encounter with the police is a bit like playing Russian roulette: most of the time you will emerge relatively unscathed, although decidedly poorer and less secure about your rights, but there’s always the chance that an encounter will turn deadly.

The odds weren’t in Walter L. Scott’s favor. Reportedly pulled over for a broken taillight, Scott—unarmed—ran away from the police officer, who pursued and shot him from behind, first with a Taser, then with a gun. Scott was struck five times, “three times in the back, once in the upper buttocks and once in the ear — with at least one bullet entering his heart.”

Samuel Dubose, also unarmed, was pulled over for a missing front license plate. He was reportedly shot in the head after a brief struggle in which his car began rolling forward.

Levar Jones was stopped for a seatbelt offense, just as he was getting out of his car to enter a convenience store. Directed to show his license, Jones leaned into his car to get his wallet, only to be shot four times by the “fearful” officer. Jones was also unarmed.

Bobby Canipe was pulled over for having an expired registration. When the 70-year-old reached into the back of his truck for his walking cane, the officer fired several shots at him, hitting him once in the abdomen.

Dontrell Stevens was stopped “for not bicycling properly.” The officer pursuing him “thought the way Stephens rode his bike was suspicious. He thought the way Stephens got off his bike was suspicious.” Four seconds later, sheriff’s deputy Adams Lin shot Stephens four times as he pulled out a black object from his waistband. The object was his cell phone. Stephens was unarmed.

If there is any lesson to be learned from these “routine” traffic stops, it is that drivers should beware.

At a time when police can do no wrong—at least in the eyes of the courts, police unions and politicians dependent on their votes—and a “fear” for officer safety is used to justify all manner of police misconduct, “we the people” are at a severe disadvantage.

According to the Justice Department, the most common reason for a citizen to come into contact with the police is being a driver in a traffic stop. On average, one in 10 Americans gets pulled over by police. Black drivers are 31 percent more likely to be pulled over than white drivers, or about 23 percent more likely than Hispanic drivers. As the Washington Post concludes, “‘Driving while black’ is, indeed, a measurable phenomenon.”

As Sandra Bland learned the hard way, the reason for a traffic stop no longer matters. Bland, who was pulled over for allegedly failing to use her turn signal, was arrested after refusing to comply with the police officer’s order to extinguish her cigarette and exit her vehicle. The encounter escalated, with the officer threatening to “light” Bland up with his taser. Three days later, Bland was found dead in her jail cell.

You’re doing all of this for a failure to signal?” Bland asked as she got out of her car, after having been yelled at and threatened repeatedly. Had she only known, drivers have been pulled over for far less. Indeed, police officers have been given free range to pull anyone over for a variety of reasons.

This approach to traffic stops (what I would call “blank check policing,” in which the police get to call all of the shots) has resulted in drivers being stopped for windows that are too heavily tinted, for driving too fast, driving too slow, failing to maintain speed, following too closely, improper lane changes, distracted driving, screeching a car’s tires, and leaving a parked car door open for too long.

Motorists can also be stopped by police for driving near a bar or on a road that has large amounts of drunk driving, driving a certain make of car (Mercedes, Grand Prix and Hummers are among the most ticketed vehicles), having anything dangling from the rearview mirror (air fresheners, handicap parking permits, troll transponders or rosaries), and displaying pro-police bumper stickers.

Incredibly, a federal appeals court actually ruled unanimously in 2014 that acne scars and driving with a stiff upright posture are reasonable grounds for being pulled over. More recently, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that driving a vehicle that has a couple air fresheners, rosaries and pro-police bumper stickers at 2 MPH over the speed limit is suspicious, meriting a traffic stop.

Unfortunately for drivers, not only have traffic stops become potentially deadly encounters, they have also turned into a profitable form of highway robbery for the police departments involved.

As The Washington Post reports, traffic stops for minor infractions such as speeding or equipment violations are increasingly used as a pretext for officers to seize cash from drivers.” Relying on federal and state asset forfeiture laws, police set up “stings” on public roads that enable them to stop drivers for a variety of so-called “suspicious” behavior, search their vehicles and seize anything of value that could be suspected of being connected to criminal activity. Since 2001, police have seized $2.5 billion from people who were not charged with a crime and without a warrant being issued.

“In case after case,” notes The Washington Post, “highway interdictors appeared to follow a similar script. Police set up what amounted to rolling checkpoints on busy highways and pulled over motorists for minor violations, such as following too closely or improper signaling. They quickly issued warnings or tickets. They studied drivers for signs of nervousness, including pulsing carotid arteries, clenched jaws and perspiration. They also looked for supposed ‘indicators’ of criminal activity, which can include such things as trash on the floor of a vehicle, abundant energy drinks or air fresheners hanging from rearview mirrors.”

If you’re starting to feel somewhat overwhelmed, intimidated and fearful for your life and your property, you should be. Never before have “we the people” been so seemingly defenseless in the face of police misconduct, lacking advocates in the courts and in the legislatures.

So how do you survive a police encounter with your life and wallet intact?

The courts have already given police the green light to pull anyone over for a variety of reasons. In an 8-1 ruling in Heien v. North Carolina, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that police officers can pull someone over based on a “reasonable” but mistaken belief about the law.

Of course, what’s reasonable to agents of the police state may be completely unreasonable to the populace. Nevertheless, the moment those lights start flashing and that siren goes off, we’re all in the same boat: we must pull over.

However, it’s what happens after you’ve been pulled over that’s critical. Survival is the key.

Technically, you have the right to remain silent (beyond the basic requirement to identify yourself and show your registration). You have the right to refuse to have your vehicle searched. You have the right to film your interaction with police. You have the right to ask to leave. You also have the right to resist an unlawful order such as a police officer directing you to extinguish your cigarette, put away your phone or stop recording them.

However, as Bland learned the hard way, there is a price for asserting one’s rights. “Faced with an authority figure unwilling to de-escalate the situation, Bland refused to be bullied or intimidated,” writes Boston Globe contributor Renee Graham. “She understood her rights, but for African-Americans in encounters with police, the appalling price for asserting even the most basic rights can be their lives.”

So if you don’t want to get probed, poked, pinched, tasered, tackled, searched, seized, stripped, manhandled, arrested, shot, or killed, don’t say, do or even suggest anything that even hints of noncompliance when it comes to interactions with police.

One police officer advised that if you feel as if you’re being treated unfairly, comply anyhow and contest it in court later. Similarly, black parents, advising their kids on how to deal with police, tell them to just obey the officer’s orders. “The goal,” as one parent pointed out, “is to stay alive.”

It seems that “comply or die” has become the new maxim for the American police state.

Then again, not even compliance is a guarantee of safety anymore. “Police are specialists in violence,” warns Kristian Williams, who has written extensively on the phenomenon of police militarization and brutality. “They are armed, trained, and authorized to use force. With varying degrees of subtlety, this colors their every action. Like the possibility of arrest, the threat of violence is implicit in every police encounter. Violence, as well as the law, is what they represent.”

In other words, in the American police state, “we the people” are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”

As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this mindset that any challenge to police authority is a threat that needs to be “neutralized” is a dangerous one that is part of a greater nationwide trend that sets the police beyond the reach of the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, when police officers are allowed to operate under the assumption that their word is law and that there is no room for any form of disagreement or even question, that serves to chill the First Amendment’s assurances of free speech, free assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Frankly, it doesn’t matter whether it’s a casual “show your ID” request on a boardwalk, a stop-and-frisk search on a city street, or a traffic stop for speeding or just to check your insurance. If you feel like you can’t walk away from a police encounter of your own volition—and more often than not you can’t, especially when you’re being confronted by someone armed to the hilt with all manner of militarized weaponry and gear—then for all intents and purposes, you’re under arrest from the moment a cop stops you.

Sad, isn’t it, how quickly we have gone from a nation of laws—where the least among us had just as much right to be treated with dignity and respect as the next person (in principle, at least)—to a nation of law enforcers (revenue collectors with weapons) who treat us all like suspects and criminals?

Clearly, the language of freedom is no longer the common tongue spoken by the citizenry and their government. With the government having shifted into a language of force, “we the people” have been reduced to suspects in a surveillance state, criminals in a police state, and enemy combatants in a military empire.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-28/drivers-beware-costly-deadly-dangers-traffic-stops-american-police-state

3-Year-Old London Child Deemed “Extremist”; Placed In Government Reeducation Program


Note: Tyler Durden: “The United Kingdom has gone batshit crazy.”

Couldn’t have said it better myself! Stunning degree of psychopathy on behalf of British officials, absolutely unbelievable. Of course, over here in the U.S. we drug kids into subordination and indoctrination, where toddlers are prescribed prozac to control a variety of “mental disorders”.

What’s the difference between locking a kid up behind bars, or making them prisoners in their own minds?

Blessings, {~A~}

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The United Kingdom has gone batshit crazy. There’s simply no other way to put it. I warned about Britain’s “war on toddler terrorists” earlier this year in the post: The War on Toddler Terrorists – Britain Wants to Force Nursery School Teachers to Identify “Extremist” Children. Here’s an excerpt:

Nursery school staff and registered childminders must report toddlers at risk of becoming terrorists, under counter-terrorism measures proposed by the Government.

The directive is contained in a 39-page consultation document issued by the Home Office in a bid to bolster its Prevent anti-terrorism plan.

The document accompanies the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill, currently before parliament. It identifies nurseries and early years childcare providers, along with schools and universities, as having a duty “to prevent people being drawn into terrorism”.

Never fear good citizens of Great Britain. While your government actively does everything in its power to protect criminal financial oligarchs and powerful pedophiles, her majesty draws the line at toddler thought crime. We learn from the Independent:

A three-year-old child from London is one of hundreds of young people in the capital who have been tipped as potential future radicals and extremists.

As reported by the Evening Standard, 1,069 people have been put in the government’s anti-extremism ‘Channel’ process, the de-radicalization program at the heart of the Government’s ‘Prevent’ strategy.

The three-year-old in the program is from the borough of Tower Hamlets, and was a member of a family group that had been showing suspect behavior.

Since September 2014, 400 under 18s, including teenagers and children, have been referred to the scheme.

The fact that this story broke on the same day that chairman of the UK’s Lords Privileges and Conduct Committee, Lord John Sewel, was caught on video snorting cocaine off the breast of a prostitute with a £5 note, is simply priceless. You just can’t make this stuff up.

From the BBC:

Lord Sewel is facing a police inquiry after quitting as House of Lords deputy speaker over a video allegedly showing him taking drugs with prostitutes.

The footage showed him snorting powder from a woman’s breasts with a £5 note.

In the footage, Lord Sewel, who is married, also discusses the Lords’ allowances system.

As chairman of committees, the crossbench peer also chaired the privileges and conduct committee, and was responsible for enforcing standards in the Lords.

Lord Sewel served as a minister in the Scotland office under Tony Blair’s Labour government.

Tony Blair, why am I not surprised:

Screen Shot 2015-07-27 at 11.48.13 AM

He has been a member of the Lords since 1996, and is a former senior vice principal of the University of Aberdeen.

Here’s a clip, in the event you’re interested:

 

The UK government is so far gone that it insists on protecting the public from toddlers, rather than protecting toddlers from powerful sexual predators. In case you need a reminder:

In Great Britain, Powerful Pedophiles are Seemingly Everywhere and Totally Above the Law

In Great Britain, Protecting Pedophile Politicians is a Matter of “National Security”

Former BBC Host “Sir” Jimmy Savile Exposed as Major Player in Massive Pedophile Ring

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-28/3-year-old-london-child-deemed-extremist-placed-government-reeducation-program

New definition of extremist: ‘Anybody who challenges the established order’


Note: American’s better wake-up to the smell of tyranny, the same thing is happening in the U.S., only more covertly.

Demonstrators from Occupy London protest. © Luke MacGregor
There is a worrying and dangerous tendency in the UK to label as extremists anybody who poses a challenge and who wants to protest against the unfair economic system that exists in the UK, journalist and broadcaster Neil Clark told RT.

City of London police have been attacked for pigeonholing an anti-capitalist group, alongside Al-Qaeda and IRA. An anti-terror presentation for nursery and school staff featured a picture of the Occupy London campaign alongside images from the 7/7 London bombings in 2005 and an IRA attack in 1996. The anti-inequality group was also categorized as an example of domestic extremism.

RT: As we’ve heard London police have placed movements like the Occupy London movement alongside international terrorist groups. What are your thoughts on calling movements like these extremist?

Neil Clark: I think this all fits in with what’s been happening here in Britain because the government has got this new so-called ‘counter extremism initiative.’ They want to bring in a bill and… their definition of ‘extremism’ is deliberately designed to bring in people who challenge the established order. Of course it’s not just simply about terrorists; it’s about anybody who criticizes the capitalist system, anybody who poses any kind of challenge, and anybody who wants to protest against the existing very unfair economic system that we’ve got in Britain. This is worrying, this is dangerous.

I think we’ve got the biggest threat to our civil liberties in Britain at the moment under this government of David Cameron that we’ve had for many, many years – over 100 years certainly. I remember Cameron a few weeks ago made a very sinister speech when he said that for too long we’ve been a passively tolerant society [and] we’ve got to change that. And he said that in the past people who were not causing trouble would be left alone, and we’ve got to change that – I think it’s very sinister, really, because he is trying to clamp down on legitimate dissent.

RT: Why do you think the intention of the authorities was here?

NC: It’s very clear that what the intention of the authorities is to try to group together anyone who challenges the established order, and to group them all together as terrorists and extremists. So anybody who has any kind of dissenting views that wants to change our economic and political system will be equated with and put together with the most appalling terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda. This is all deliberate, it is all what it’s meant to do is meant to frighten people into conforming. And who wants to be equated with Al-Qaeda, let’s face it? But what they are doing, the authorities, are trying to use this anti-extremism agenda to really try to clamp down on legitimate dissent, legitimate protest, because the aim is, as I said, quite clearly is to group all these people together: ‘Occupy London,’ Al-Qaeda, terrorists, they all are the same, they all are extremists people, animal rights people…

RT: Does labeling of this kind have any impact on individuals and groups that disagree with government policies?

NC: I think lawful campaign groups will be absolutely incensed by this because we are in a very, very dangerous position here in Britain – our civil liberties are threatened in a way they have not been threatened for hundreds of years, probably. David Cameron in that very sinister speech said that he thinks that we’ve been passively tolerant society for too long…

One of the repercussions of that is that the legitimate groups who don’t like the way that country is run, who don’t like our very oligarchal ‘bankocracy’ system of government, who, for example want direct democracy, environmental campaigners, animal rights campaigners- all these people are not happy with the way things are. They were quite rightly being sensed that they are being bracketed with groups like Al-Qaeda. I think there is going to be a huge backlash to this, and that is the question of everybody who is dissenter drawing together now and saying: “Look, we’re not going to put up with this. We’ve got legitimate rights, we’ve got our concerns about the way the country is going, and we’re not going to allow ourselves to be branded extremists simply because we disagree with Mr. David Cameron.”

© Peter Nicholls

RT: Why are the authorities wary of protest movements? After all, they have a legitimate right to their opinion…

NC: Yes, I think that the City of London police has been accused in the past of not doing enough against the criminals in the City, the corrupt ‘banksters’, the financial crooks if you like of the City of London, and instead focus the attention on the petty crimes. You’re more likely to be arrested in the City of London for pick-pocketing than you are for doing a bank fraud worth millions of pounds. So I think that for the City of London police this is very regrettable. And they can’t just say they didn’t know what they were doing. The Occupy movement was very popular, the people made a legitimate statement against the kind of hardcore capitalist system that operates now in Britain. I think it’s a shame on the City of London police for doing this because their job is to be catching criminals and focusing on big criminals, not on trying to smear and put together legitimate protest groups with the most awful terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda.

RT: Can civil disobedience ever be linked to terrorism?

NC: They are doing that. I think the word ‘extremist’ is a very subjective term. The way that the British politics has gone over the last 30 years is that for anybody who holds the sort of what used to be a mainstream in the 1960-70’s in Britain, and I do: mixed economy, a fairer society, anti-war positions. Anybody who holds these views now is at risk of being labeled an extremist. We’ve gone so far to the neo-liberal right in this country; the neo-conservative takeover of power, the neo-conservative and neo-liberals that they brand anybody who doesn’t agree with their agenda as extremists.

The irony is that the biggest extremists are the British government at the moment. They are the ones who have been backing terrorists in Syria who they call rebels; they are the ones who have enabled and facilitated the rise of ISIS with their Middle East policies – these are the real extremists. They are the people who are pursuing extremist economic policies, extremist foreign policies, and they have the audacity to label people who want a more democratic Britain, to get back to the kind of fairer society that we had in the 1960’s and 1970’s in this country. They have the nerve to label these people as extremists, so it’s quite Orwellian. It is beyond George Orwell where you’ve got the moderates- other people who are being labeled as extremists. And the real extremists are the people in power at the moment in Britain.

‘The real terrorists are not those in tents’

Matthew Varnham, Occupy London’s legal advisor, suggests the UK government is labeling the movement as anti-social behavior just because it doesn’t fulfill their criteria of what they would like to see as protest.

RT: As we’ve heard City of London police have placed the movement you represent alongside international terrorist groups. What are your thoughts on being called an extremist?

Matthew Varnham: The fact is that being labeled an extremist is nothing new. In 2011, we were labeled ‘domestic extremists’ through the City of London’s terrorism and extremism update. London’s mayor, Boris Johnson, also referred to the protest as a ‘boil’ that needs to be removed. So it’s nothing new but it does disturb me that the City of London and the police would see a peaceful protest and a movement as something akin to terrorism. I find it particularly sickening that the movement was pictured next to 7/7 [London tube and bus bombings] and I would call on the commissioner, for example, to explain why those two images were next to each other.

RT: It’s been revealed that the mayor spent nearly £2 million pounds on policing a similar movement – Occupy Democracy. Was there any need to spend so much on policing dozens of protestors?

MV: That particular protest was held outside parliament in the run-up to the General Election and it was the most recent iteration of the Occupy movement. The policing of that protest was absolute and people were prevented from protesting on the square. That decision to close the square itself is actually open to a legal challenge currently being taken to the courts. What it does show is that a government – be it in the City of London, Square Mile or elsewhere – who is adamant that the rights of people who object to them are not going to be hurt. The real terrorists are not those in tents but are certainly the corporate and financial world… climate change, the melting ice caps… and high tuition fees. These are some of the things that Occupy was right about in 2011; its other things like that that they are raising now and the real terrorism are those who are introducing policies that prevent those view from being expressed.

RT: Does labeling of this kind have any impact on individuals and groups that disagree with government policies?

MV: The government is… looking at the issue of protesting the wrong way. It’s labeling it as anti-social behavior just by fact; it doesn’t fulfill their criteria of what they would like to see as protest. Protest isn’t going to fit in a particular box, it’s going to be messy and loud; it’s going to have an element of disruption. And the government increasingly can’t handle that.

*The following is a partial transcript of a press release sent out by Occupy London on July 21, 2015: Charges against 12 Occupy Democracy protesters were dropped [July 20] in the first two trials relating to the peaceful pro-democracy group’s occupation of Parliament Square in October 2014. Charges included refusing to comply with a direction to leave and for being in possession of a prohibited article, namely tarpaulin. A further trial relating to charges of aggravated trespass was dropped previously.

http://www.rt.com/op-edge/310290-occupy-london-extremism-uk/

%d bloggers like this: