CRITICAL INFO: Entire CRISIS INDUSTRY Arose After Legalization of Psych-Ops in 2012 NDAA


 

Note: IMPORTANT HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE: PLEASE READ LINKS BELOW the video, PLEASE SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN
This week the media began demonizing anyone who used critical thinking skills by asking questions about the alleged students, mainly the crisis actors at the Florida shooting. Emotional hysteria is literally blinding people to the fact these shootings are part of massive gov’t psychological operation called the CRISIS INDUSTRY.
 
Until I saw Debi’s EYE OPENING report below, I had no idea exactly how extensive and well planned these events are. Right down to websites that offer staging services and crisis actors, even actors dressed jihadist to fake a beheading.
 
I realize there a lot of newly awakened people who haven’t been down the research rabbit hole long enough to understand all the details behind ‘The Anatomy of a False Flag’. These events are staged to play on our emotions, blinding our critical thinking skills.
 
I NO LONGER PLAY PARTISAN POLITIC’S. Am not Democrat, Republican or Indenpendent and have removed my energy and consent from ‘the system of domination and control’ called party politics.
 
My perspective is VERY similar to Debi’s. As an Independent Journalist her eyes opened wide after covering Bernie Sanders on the campaign trail, where she saw the corruption on both sides of the aisle and has washed her hands of politics. We’re both simply trying to share the truth and are asking people to put their emotions aside and exercise CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS.
 
Now, those of us asking people to use critical thinking are being demonized because we care enough about the truth AND human lives to point out the anomaly’s and discrepency’s from the media.
 
PLEASE READ THE LINKS BELOW…then please listen to this extremely important message with an open heart and open mind. Here Debi does an outstanding job researching the crisis industry, providing evidence with further follow-up links below and in explaining the importance behind all of us getting on the same page and putting our political differences aside before the bars come down around us. Much love and mahalo….Annette
 
LINKS LINKS and MORE VIDEO LINKS: Be sure to scroll all the way through!
 
Police use blanks – scare/training “I thought it was a drill because they told us you will have police officers whoa re going to be firing blanks like scare us, get us like, you know, trained for this. So no one took it seriously until I heard like screaming, the worst screaming you will ever hear. It was awful like major heart stop beating and… http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/18…
 
‘I assumed it was a code red drill, they told us earlier in the day in the day we were going to be having a code red drill, I assumed it was blanks: (THINK about that, they were setting up a simulated event, how did the kid waltz in with police on site staging an event): http://home.suddenlink.net/front_cont…
 
Multiple students all report (in MAINSTREAM MEDIA interviews NOT Alex Jones) that they were told a drill was going to be conducted. One girl said she was told they would hear screams, another stated that they were going to use blanks. Got that. Students are reporting a SIMULATED event of this type was PLANNED and they were they were going to do things to make it seem real (screams, blank). https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co…
 
Part 1 & 2: (Girl talking about multiple shooters, army guys piling injured under mats): https://twitter.com/saneprogressive/s…
 
 
Girl who said that she was walking down the hall next to Nicholas Cruz and he didn’t have a gun: https://twitter.com/KHOUSportsMatt/st…
 
Video banned multiple times from Youtube on graphic/violent content reposted, it won’t last: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxla2…
 
Great video on history of False Flags by Truth Stream for people who are willing to start to look objectively: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co…
 
Legalization of propaganda in 2012 NDAA which rolled back law to stop the use of psychological operations and propaganda US uses in other countries on its own citizens: http://www.newschief.com/news/2018021…
 
Naomi Wolf (former Gore/Clinton Consultant): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuB6w…
 
Crisis Industry has sprung up in wake of this legislation: Crowds on Demand: https://crowdsondemand.com/?gclid=EAI…
 
Wikipedia page w many links to articles on MSM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowds_…
 
Founder is a political operative who worked on Jerry Brown’s California campaign: https://crowdsondemand.com/who-we-are/ Crisis Cast &
 
Affiliates (NGOS, Security Agencies, Governments around the world): http://crisiscast.com/ http://www.magnumservices.com/experie…
 
 
ADS affiliate of crisis cast: https://www.adsgroup.org.uk/events-li…
 
Photo of type of targeted branding they provide: https://twitter.com/saneprogressive/w…
 
It was recently revealed that the world’s largest security firm G4S, who had employed the man named in the Orlando pulse nightclub shooting, Omar Mateen – is a client of the mass casualty staging company called CrisisCast. (this is Vanessa Beely’s site) http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/06/18…
 
This one is especially creepy. The Crisis Cloud. Ugh: http://www.crisis-solutions.com/simul…
 
Pattern of ads from these companies occurring in locations before large scale tragedies: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0… https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/10…
 
Police seeking power to detain preemptively based on social media postings and allowing teachers to carry concealed weapons: http://www.newschief.com/news/2018021…
 
Video of police seeking power to preemptively detain on social media posts on MSNBC: (they ALREADY can detain if you threaten someone online): Go to 20:59: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdnKp…
 
Advertisements

How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations


 

 

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.

Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on fourclassifiedGCHQdocuments presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”

By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the latest GCHQ document we’re publishing today:

Other tactics aimed at individuals are listed here, under the revealing title “discredit a target”:

Then there are the tactics used to destroy companies the agency targets:

GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms: “using online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,” including “information ops (influence or disruption).”

Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services. In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or, more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest activity for political ends.

The title page of one of these documents reflects the agency’s own awareness that it is “pushing the boundaries” by using “cyber offensive” techniques against people who have nothing to do with terrorism or national security threats, and indeed, centrally involves law enforcement agents who investigate ordinary crimes:

No matter your views on Anonymous, “hacktivists” or garden-variety criminals, it is not difficult to see how dangerous it is to have secret government agencies being able to target any individuals they want – who have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crimes – with these sorts of online, deception-based tactics of reputation destruction and disruption. There is a strong argument to make, as Jay Leiderman demonstrated in the Guardian in the context of the Paypal 14 hacktivist persecution, that the “denial of service” tactics used by hacktivists result in (at most) trivial damage (far less than the cyber-warfare tactics favored by the US and UK) and are far more akin to the type of political protest protected by the First Amendment.

The broader point is that, far beyond hacktivists, these surveillance agencies have vested themselves with the power to deliberately ruin people’s reputations and disrupt their online political activity even though they’ve been charged with no crimes, and even though their actions have no conceivable connection to terrorism or even national security threats. As Anonymous expert Gabriella Coleman of McGill University told me, “targeting Anonymous and hacktivists amounts to targeting citizens for expressing their political beliefs, resulting in the stifling of legitimate dissent.” Pointing to this study she published, Professor Coleman vehemently contested the assertion that “there is anything terrorist/violent in their actions.”

Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation. Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other activist groups.

Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government. Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the President who appointed them).

But these GCHQ documents are the first to prove that a major western government is using some of the most controversial techniques to disseminate deception online and harm the reputations of targets. Under the tactics they use, the state is deliberately spreading lies on the internet about whichever individuals it targets, including the use of what GCHQ itself calls “false flag operations” and emails to people’s families and friends. Who would possibly trust a government to exercise these powers at all, let alone do so in secret, with virtually no oversight, and outside of any cognizable legal framework?

Then there is the use of psychology and other social sciences to not only understand, but shape and control, how online activism and discourse unfolds. Today’s newly published document touts the work of GCHQ’s “Human Science Operations Cell,” devoted to “online human intelligence” and “strategic influence and disruption”:

Under the title “Online Covert Action”, the document details a variety of means to engage in “influence and info ops” as well as “disruption and computer net attack,” while dissecting how human beings can be manipulated using “leaders,” “trust,” “obedience” and “compliance”:

The documents lay out theories of how humans interact with one another, particularly online, and then attempt to identify ways to influence the outcomes – or “game” it:

We submitted numerous questions to GCHQ, including: (1) Does GCHQ in fact engage in “false flag operations” where material is posted to the Internet and falsely attributed to someone else?; (2) Does GCHQ engage in efforts to influence or manipulate political discourse online?; and (3) Does GCHQ’s mandate include targeting common criminals (such as boiler room operators), or only foreign threats?

As usual, they ignored those questions and opted instead to send their vague and nonresponsive boilerplate: “It is a longstanding policy that we do not comment on intelligence matters. Furthermore, all of GCHQ’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework which ensures that our activities are authorised, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the Secretary of State, the Interception and Intelligence Services Commissioners and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee. All our operational processes rigorously support this position.”

These agencies’ refusal to “comment on intelligence matters” – meaning: talk at all about anything and everything they do – is precisely why whistleblowing is so urgent, the journalism that supports it so clearly in the public interest, and the increasingly unhinged attacks by these agencies so easy to understand. Claims that government agencies are infiltrating online communities and engaging in “false flag operations” to discredit targets are often dismissed as conspiracy theories, but these documents leave no doubt they are doing precisely that.

Whatever else is true, no government should be able to engage in these tactics: what justification is there for having government agencies target people – who have been charged with no crime – for reputation-destruction, infiltrate online political communities, and develop techniques for manipulating online discourse? But to allow those actions with no public knowledge or accountability is particularly unjustifiable.

Documents referenced in this article:

Source URL: https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

Mass Hypnosis and Trigger Words ~ Truthstream Media


We’re almost done with our first feature-length documentary, support this channel, read our goals here! https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:
Website: http://TruthstreamMedia.com
FB: http://Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF
Amazon Affiliate Link (help support TSM with every Amazon purchase, no cost to you!): http://amzn.to/2aTARRx
Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*­~*~*~*~*~

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

This 1967 CIA Memo Is Still Used to Discredit Conspiracy Theorists Today ~ Truthstream Media


Become our Patreon, read our goals here: https://www.patreon.com/truthstreammedia

Document source: http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.ht…

Truthstream Can Be Found Here:
Website: http://TruthstreamMedia.com
FB: http://Facebook.com/TruthstreamMedia
Twitter: @TruthstreamNews
DONATE: http://bit.ly/2aTBeeF
Amazon Affiliate Link (help support TSM with every Amazon purchase, no cost to you!): http://amzn.to/2aTARRx
Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/bbxcWX
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*­~*~*~*~*~

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

MSNBC Anchor: “Our Job” Is To “Control Exactly What People Think” ~ ZeroHedge


Tyler Durden's picture

 

During a lively discussion centered on fears that President Trump is “trying to undermine the media,” MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski let slip the awesome unspoken truth that the media’s “job” is to “actually control exactly what people think.”


SCARBOROUGH: “Exactly. That is exactly what I hear. What Yamiche said is what I hear from all the Trump supporters that I talk to who were Trump voters and are still Trump supporters. They go, ‘Yeah you guys are going crazy. He’s doing — what are you so surprised about? He is doing exactly what he said he is going to do.'”

BRZEZINSKI: “Well, I think that the dangerous, you know, edges here are that he is trying to undermine the media and trying to make up his own facts. And it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think. And that, that is our job.”

As grabien points out, the comment failed to raise any eyebrows from her co-panelists. Instead, her co-host, Joe Scarborough, said that Trump’s media antagonism puts him on par with Mussolini and Lenin…

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-22/msnbc-anchor-admits-our-job-control-exactly-what-people-think

%d bloggers like this: